• 서비스연구
• /
• 제11권4호
• /
• pp.43-55
• /
• 2021

본 연구는 OECD 회원국들을 대상으로 의료서비스의 운영효율성과 품질효율성을 비교 분석하였다. 이를 위하여 2017~2019년의 OECD 보건통계(Health Statistics) 자료를 이용하였다. 분석 방법으로는 산출지향형(output-oriented) 규모수익가변(VRS: Variable Returns to Scale) 모형을 적용하여 초효율성(super efficiency)을 측정하였다. 분석결과, 운영효율성의 상위 그룹에는 스위스, 한국, 이탈리아, 노르웨이, 오스트리아, 네덜란드, 중위 그룹에는 캐나다, 그리스, 덴마크, 멕시코, 미국, 영국, 체코, 프랑스, 핀란드, 헝가리, 호주, 하위 그룹에는 벨기에, 독일, 스페인이 포함되었다. 품질효율성의 상위 그룹에는 노르웨이, 스위스, 스페인, 중위 그룹에는 그리스, 덴마크, 멕시코, 미국, 영국, 캐나다, 프랑스, 핀란드, 헝가리, 호주, 하위 그룹에는 네덜란드, 독일, 벨기에, 오스트리아, 이탈리아, 체코, 한국이 해당되었다. 2018년을 기준으로 OECD 회원국별로 효율성을 비교 분석한 결과, 운영효율성이 가장 효율적인 한국은 품질효율성이 비효율적이었다. 한국(0.998)은 그리스(0.422), 스위스(0.207), 스페인(0.371)을 벤치마킹하여 기대수명을 0.2(0.2%), 주관적 건강 인지를 44.2(138.1%)씩 개선하여 품질효율성을 향상시켜야 한다. 이는 국내에서 기대수명이나 유병률 같은 객관적 지표로 건강상태를 측정하고 있지만, 의학적 진단 여부와 별개로 국민들이 본인의 건강에 관하여 주관적으로 평가하는 것을 관리할 필요가 있음을 의미한다. 본 연구는 운영효율성에 초점을 맞춘 대부분의 선행연구들과 다르게 운영효율성과 품질효율성을 함께 측정했다는 점에서 학술적인 시사점을 지닌다. 또한 OECD 회원국별 의료서비스 산업의 효율성을 비교 분석함으로써, 국내 의료서비스 산업의 국제적인 경쟁력 수준을 확인하고 효율성 개선 방안을 제시했다는 점에서 실무적인 시사점을 지닌다.

• International Journal of Quality Innovation
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.1-9
• /
• 2008

This paper proposes a scheme to estimate the technical efficiency at child care centers for the less-than-three-year-old infants by Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and to manage the quality of care service through implementing flexible and efficient government subsidy system. The result of technical efficiency estimation shows that there exists the heterogeneity in technical efficiency a substantial opportunity for improvement in technical efficiency across child care centers. This result implies that government may bring up the competition by giving subsidy differentially based on efficiency and use the money which has been used inefficiently other purposes. Both can improve the quality of child care service.

• International Journal of Quality Innovation
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.1-9
• /
• 2001

As all the other managerial activities, total quality management (TQM) has also inputs into and outputs from the process. Therefore, the principal managerial efficiency criteria of maximum outputs with minimum inputs should be applied to TQM. In this paper, the methodology for the performance evaluation of TQM by Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) was proposed. DEA is used to measure the efficiency of TQM for each firm with the input and output data obtained by questionnaire. It is found that there are not significant differences between the firms with and without IS09000 certification and between the large and small-sized firms with respect to the TQM efficiency.

• International Journal of Quality Innovation
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.25-36
• /
• 2009

The purpose of this study is to analyze the efficiency of the service quality activity itself by using the DEA Model, in contrast to previous quality evaluation methods, as an attempt to evaluate the service quality activities of the distribution industry. Furthermore, by complementing the shortfalls of the weighted value of the DEA Model, it recommends a DEA/PS Model that is appropriate in the evaluation of service quality activities. Based on this model, the study proposes the SQAE Model, an evaluation tool to complement the traditional measuring method. According to the results of the analysis of 18 sample distribution businesses, there was a discrepancy by business in the results of the Traditional Scoring System and the Evaluation Measuring System. Therefore, it is most desirable to not only be active in service quality activities but also increase efficiency at the same time.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제32권2호
• /
• pp.77-92
• /
• 2004

It is difficult but very necessary to measure the productivity of container terminals as logistics service provider. It is meaningful to find the appropriate inputs and outputs of the logistics service delivery systems and to measure the relationship between these inputs and outputs. This study proposes a model of evaluating the efficiency of container terminals. The evaluation consists of three phases. First, DEA(Data Envelopment Analysis) phase, determines the efficiency score and weights of DMUs(Decision Making Unit). This phase performs through four steps : selection of DMU, selection of DEA model, determination of input and output factors, calculation of efficiency score and weights for each DMU. Secondly, CEM (Cross Evaluation Model) phase, is to calculate the cross-efficiency scores of DMUs. This phase performs through three steps: selection of CEM, determination of cross-efficiency score for each DMU and development of cross-efficiency matrix. Finally, average cross-efficiency analysis phase is to compute the average cross-efficiency score. The proposed model discriminates among DMUs and ranks DMUs, whether they are efficient or inefficient.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제47권1호
• /
• pp.163-186
• /
• 2019

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to present a methodology for assessing the efficiency of supply chain quality management considering characteristics of defense industries to provide academic and policy implications for strengthening quality competitiveness of military supplies. Methods: Using the defense industry's empirical data, conduct an efficiency evaluation by utilizing a multi-stage DEA/Entropy Model for defense industries subject to the quality level survey of military goods manufacturers in 2017. Results: The results of this study are as follows; the first step of the multi-stage DEA model, Quality Management Performance Efficiency Analysis, shows that the CCR model and the BCC model are more efficient than the parent company. the second stage of the multi-stage DEA model showed that the CCR model was slightly more efficient than the parent company and the BCC model was more efficient than the parent.the overall efficiency value of the multistage DEA model, calculated by multipointing the efficiency value of the first stage by the second stage, was more efficient than the parent. Conclusion: The results of this study show that the efficiency of supply chian quality management performance and profitability in the defense industry can be analyzed for the first time using the multistage DEA/Entropy model to identify specific inefficiencies and support objective decision making.

• 동력기계공학회지
• /
• 제21권6호
• /
• pp.46-55
• /
• 2017

Due to the arise of natural disasters caused by global warming, consumers have more interest in the fuel efficiency of their vehicles, and fuel efficiency became an important factor in comparing vehicles. In this market situation, methods to measure fuel efficiency has become one of the main interests of vehicle related organizations and laboratories, and the current method to measure fuel efficiency is to follow the notification established by the ministry of trade, industry and energy, ministry of environment, and the ministry of land, infrastructure and transport. In this study, we analyze the influence of vehicle fuel efficiency according to test temperature and cooling fan condition which have the possibility to cause difference in fuel efficiency. The analysis results of the influence of the fuel efficiency according to the test temperature, the difference of the fuel efficiency of the test temperature ($21{\sim}29^{\circ}C$) within the allowable range of the notification showed a maximum difference of 2.9%. Therefore, it is necessary to consider the introduction of a test method that permits only the temperature change based on the reference point as the allowable range even in the test within the allowable range. The analysis of the influence of the fuel efficiency according to the cooling method showed no significant effect, and it seems reasonable to maintain the test method of the current notification.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제41권2호
• /
• pp.197-208
• /
• 2013

Purpose: This study proposed a systematic approach to measure eco-efficiency of products based on the concept of quality function deployment(QFD). QFD method has been used to convert customer's subjective requirements to design specifications. A extension of QFD to environmental issues is known as quality environmental function deployment(QEFD). QEFD includes environmental requirements into customer's demand for quality, and incorporates them to design specifications of a product. Methods: In this study, we compared eco-efficiency of old and new models through application of QEFD. Results: The result revealed that the new model's eco-efficiency improved 24% better than the old model. Also, we found that user's Factor X of the new model has been improved to 1.178, which is about 18% better than that of the old model. Conclusion: This study implied that we can systematically use QEFD to determine eco-efficiency of two comparable products in any industries.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제35권3호
• /
• pp.21-36
• /
• 2007

This article is to analyze the service efficiency of public sector using Data Envelopment Analysis(DEA). We tried to measure the public service quality and overall satisfaction by using several DEA models, degree of combination and top2box which is a little bit different methodology from traditional ones. We used CCR, Super-efficiency and Slack based measure(SBM) model in DEA to measure public service efficiency of the 16 public institutions(7 City Halls and 9 Provincial offices). Since the traditional method based on the measurement model(CCR, BCC) has the fundamental problems without taking account of the existence of slacks inputs and outputs in several efficient units, we suggest to measure the exact amount of efficiency and inefficiency of the public sector and rank analysis many efficient units exactly through the slacks-based measure model(SBM)

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제38권3호
• /
• pp.393-407
• /
• 2010

The purpose of this study is to analysis relative efficiency and efficiency in process of time. Thus we use panel data of 34 local public medical centers between 2003 and 2005 to use DEA and Malmquist analysis. The result of our this study is as flow; first, The results of static efficiency of 34 local public medical centers show 10 CCR model and 23 BCC model which is difference of efficiency by economic of scale. Second, a cause of increased efficiency is not only change of technology but also change of efficiency to management system index show between 2003 and 2005 by Malmquist analysis and contracting-out is higher than direct management between 2004 and 2005. That means efficiency of local public medical centers is their own effort and innovation not government subsidies.