• Title/Summary/Keyword: qualitative assessment

검색결과 759건 처리시간 0.022초

정보통신 공공 R&D 기술성 평가 (Technological Assesment on Public R&D Activities)

  • 여인갑
    • 한국산업정보학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 한국산업정보학회 2002년도 추계공동학술대회
    • /
    • pp.433-439
    • /
    • 2002
  • In this paper, we implemented technology assessment on the public R&D activities in IT field in order to select the promising technologies, so called "star technology," making for national industry development. Technology assessment frame in this study included qualitative factors. IT technologies are classified five sector - network, wireless/broadcasting, SW/application/computer/terminal equipment, semiconductor/component. Expert opinion interviews on each field are carried out. Assessment factors consist of technology usefulness and technology competitiveness. In the final analysis, 23 technology items selected as a promising technologies and the results can be used public R&D planning and If industry policy.

  • PDF

성과중심교육에서 학생평가 (Assessment in Outcome-Based Education)

  • 임선주
    • 의학교육논단
    • /
    • 제15권1호
    • /
    • pp.25-30
    • /
    • 2013
  • Assessment plays a vital role in outcome-based education (OBE). This article describes the characteristics of assessment and appropriate assessment instruments for measuring learning outcomes in OBE. Assessment in OBE needs to be formative, continuous, and frequent. Miller's pyramid is useful for selecting the appropriate assessment instruments to reflect a specific outcome; different methods can be applied to evaluate one outcome. Outcomes and competency mean that student must 'do'; therefore, performance tests are emphasized. Qualitative methods as well as quantitative methods are used to evaluate the outcomes of areas such as professionalism or ethics. An absolute criterion-based standard is usually applied to decide whether students pass or fail, but the decision should be based on gathering value judgments and reaching consensus. Active participation of faculty members and students in assessment is crucial.

Priority survey between indicators and analytic hierarchy process analysis for green chemistry technology assessment

  • Kim, Sungjune;Hong, Seokpyo;Ahn, Kilsoo;Gong, Sungyong
    • Environmental Analysis Health and Toxicology
    • /
    • 제30권sup호
    • /
    • pp.3.1-3.11
    • /
    • 2015
  • Objectives This study presents the indicators and proxy variables for the quantitative assessment of green chemistry technologies and evaluates the relative importance of each assessment element by consulting experts from the fields of ecology, chemistry, safety, and public health. Methods The results collected were subjected to an analytic hierarchy process to obtain the weights of the indicators and the proxy variables. Results These weights may prove useful in avoiding having to resort to qualitative means in absence of weights between indicators when integrating the results of quantitative assessment by indicator. Conclusions This study points to the limitations of current quantitative assessment techniques for green chemistry technologies and seeks to present the future direction for quantitative assessment of green chemistry technologies.

고정식 수소충전소에서의 Dispenser Module 내 구역별 위험성 평가 (Risk Assessment of Stationary Hydrogen Refueling Station by Section in Dispenser Module)

  • 임상진;김민기;김수;이윤호
    • 해양환경안전학회지
    • /
    • 제29권1호
    • /
    • pp.76-85
    • /
    • 2023
  • 신재생에너지로서 수소에 대한 수요가 증가하고 있으나 기존의 화석 연료와 달리 수소는 연료 공급을 위한 전용 충전소가 필요하며, 이러한 인프라 확보를 위해서 수소충전소의 위험성 평가가 선행되어야 한다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 정성적 위험성평가와 정량적 위험성 평가로 구분하여 수소충전소에 대한 위험성평가를 수행하였다. 정성적 평가는 Hazard and Operability Analysis(HAZOP) 기법을 사용하여 Dispenser Module을 두 개의 Node로 평가하였으며, Criticality Estimation Matrix에 따라 Filter의 막힘으로 인한 사고와 고압 사고의 위험도가 High Level로 평가되었다. 정량적 위험성 평가는 Hydrogen Korea Risk Assessment Module(Hy-KoRAM)을 사용하여 화재의 형상과 피해영향범위를 나타냈고, 개인적 위험도와 사회적 위험도에 대한 평가를 수행하였다. 개인적 위험도는 수소충전소로부터 약 100m 떨어진 공공시설 부근까지 추가적인 안전조치가 고려되는 As Low As Reasonably Practicable(ALARP) 구간의 위험도를 보였고, 사회적 위험도 역시 약 10명의 사망자가 발생할 사고빈도가 1E-04/year로 도출되며 ALARP 구간 내에 나타났다. 정성적·정량적 위험성 평가 결과, 공정 단계의 추가적인 안전 조치와 수소충전소 부근의 제한구역 설정을 통하여 안전성 향상 방안을 제시하였다.

Indicators and Qualitative Assessment of Lung Cancer Management by Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) of Korea in 2015

  • Yeo, Chang Dong;Lee, Myoung Kyu;Lee, Seung Hyeun;Kim, Eun Young;Lee, Ik Jae;Park, Heae Surng;Chang, Yoon Soo
    • Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases
    • /
    • 제81권1호
    • /
    • pp.19-28
    • /
    • 2018
  • Cancer is the leading cause of death in the Republic of Korea and cancer death accounts for 27.8% of the total deaths, which is not only a social issue but also a concern for the public. Among the cancer death rates, lung cancer mortality account for 34 deaths per 100,000 populations, making it the number one cancer death rate. In a preliminary report on cancer death in 2012, the lung cancer mortality ratio showed the regional variation indicating that there were differences in the qualitative level and the structure among the medical care benefit agency and in the assessment of the treatment process. Therefore, the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) had begun evaluation of the assessment of lung cancer treatment since 2014 to improve the quality of lung cancer care through evaluation and feeds back the results of lung cancer care process. In this report, authors described the current Indicators for the lung cancer adequacy assessment proposed by HIRA and results of the evaluation reported in 2017.

국내 물리치료분야에 대한 질적 평가와 근거 수준 및 권고 등급 모형 개발 방안 (Qualitative Assessment and Development of Level of Evidence and Strength of Recommendation Models in the Field of Physical Therapy in Korea)

  • 조성현;이정우
    • 대한통합의학회지
    • /
    • 제11권2호
    • /
    • pp.231-242
    • /
    • 2023
  • Purpose : This study aimed to identify ways to improve the quality of physical therapy research and ultimately review the current situation to improve evidence-based decision-making in physical therapy. Methods : For better evidence-based decision-making in physical therapy, researchers should review the quality assessment of articles in more detail and report their findings for valid and appropriate level of evidence and strength of recommendations. The level of evidence affects how well the findings are derived from well-designed literature. The evaluation of the evidence focuses primarily on the study design and the degree of bias that may compromise the validity of the findings. The final recommendation is based on a combination of the study design and literature quality. To uncover gems of information in each paper, a risk of bias assessment should be performed after the literature has been initially selected. Results : Researchers should consider the complexity of the intervention, appropriate grouping, and calculation of effect sizes for the intervention. Researchers conducting systematic reviews should provide a detailed description of the quality assessment performed and present a detailed analysis of their interpretation of the results. The results of systematic reviews and meta-analyses should be interpreted with caution and include a risk of bias assessment. Guidelines for the level of evidence and strength of recommendations should be developed and utilized more broadly to improve reporting practices in physical therapy. Conclusion : Researchers should be knowledgeable about the strengths and limitations of each study design and methodology. In the future, researchers will also need to improve their ability to critically evaluate their findings, given the potential for their results to influence clinical practice.

총괄평가 방법론을 활용한 한반도 군사력 균형분석 - 남·북한 해군력(수상함)을 중심으로 - (Analysis of Military Capability Balance on the Korean Peninsula Using the Net Assessment Methodology With a Focus on South and North Korean Naval Forces (Surface Combatants))

  • 한정경
    • 해양안보
    • /
    • 제7권1호
    • /
    • pp.61-96
    • /
    • 2023
  • 남북한의 불안정한 군사적 갈등과 충돌이 계속되고 있는 지금 우리에게는 북한의 군사력을 파악하고 비교 평가하며, 부족한 부분에 대해 군사력 증강을 통해 대비해나가는 과정이 반드시 필요하다. 하지만 한반도의 군사균형(또는 군사비교)분석을 위해서는 단순한 콩알세기 식의 전투력에 대한 양적비교 뿐만 아니라 전투력의 질적비교, 그리고 군사작전 수행능력, 국가의 전쟁수행능력과 같은 넓은 범위까지도 포함할 수 있는 보다 넓은 시각에서의 군사력 평가가 이루어져야 한다. 이에 본 연구는 총괄평가(Net Assessment) 방법을 활용하여 남북한 재래식 군사력 가운데서도 수상함 중심의 해군력을 유형적 군사력(병력·장비)의 양적/질적 비교와 무형의 변수(해양/해군전략, 지리 등) 의 비교를 통해 상대적 전투력을 종합 비교하고, 전략적 비대칭 요소를 식별 및 분석하고자 한다.

  • PDF

어린이집 강점평가지표 개발 및 타당화 (Development and Validation of the Strengths Assessment Indicators for Daycare Centers)

  • 홍성희;황해익
    • 한국보육지원학회지
    • /
    • 제14권6호
    • /
    • pp.143-170
    • /
    • 2018
  • Objective: The purpose of this study was to develop assessment indicators and to verify the validity and reliability of the developed assessment indicators. Methods: A Delphi survey, focus group interviews, and content verification were conducted in order for experts to develop an evaluation index of the strengths of the day care center. A main survey was conducted on 438 daycare center principals and teachers to test their item quality, validity and reliability. Results: The final assessment indicators consisted of three areas, seven assessment criteria, 19 evaluation factors, 41 assessment items and a five-point rubric rating scale. As for the common strengths indicators, there were three assessment areas, five assessment criteria, 12 assessment elements and 22 assessment items. In regard to the selective strengths indicators, there were 3 assessment areas, 5 assessment criteria, 12 assessment elements and 16 assessment items. Conclusion/Implications: The efforts to confirm the strengths of daycare centers are expected to facilitate the identity building of the daycare center itself and for its organizational members to make a contribution to the qualitative improvement of childcare.

패키지형 수소충전소의 고장형태별 영향 분석 (A Study on the Hazard Factor of Packaged Hydrogen Station by Failure Mode & Effects Analysis)

  • 서두현;이광원;김태훈
    • 한국수소및신에너지학회논문집
    • /
    • 제31권1호
    • /
    • pp.65-72
    • /
    • 2020
  • In this study, the purpose is to identify the risks of the facilities of packaged hydrogen stations. As a risk identification method, failure mode & effect analysis (FMEA), a qualitative risk assessment, was used to analyze failure mode and effects of component of each facility. The analysis criteria were used to derive the risk priority number (RPN) using the 5-point method according to severity, incidence, and detectability. The study analyzed a total of 141 components of 23 types that can be identified on the design of the packaged hydrogen filling station. As a result, 683 types of failures and their causes and effects were identified. and the RPN was number of a total of 1,485. Of these, 10 failure types with a RPN value of 40 or more were deemed necessary. In addition, a list of failure types with a severity score of 5 was identified and analyzed.