• 한국수소및신에너지학회논문집
• /
• 제33권3호
• /
• pp.232-239
• /
• 2022

This study performed qualitative and quantitative risk assessment of equipment for evaluating the protocol of hydrogen refueling stations and suggested measures to improve safety. Hazard and operability study was performed for qualitative risk assessment, and Hy-KoRAM was used for quantitative risk assessment. Through a qualitative risk assessment, additional ventilation devices were installed, simultaneous venting of the storage container was prohibited, and the number of repeated refilling of the evaluation equipment was identified to manage the number of fillings of the container. Through quantitative risk assessment, the area around the device was set as a restricted area when evaluating the station, and measures were suggested to reduce the frequency of accidents.

• Architectural research
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.41-52
• /
• 2010

The aim of this paper is to evaluate the methodological strategies for the architectural design field of study mainly focused on qualitative and quantitative research designs. Firstly, this paper addresses the characteristics of the six approaches including their methodological aspects in general. Each strategy is assessed by the different approaches to give full insights in it. Secondly, it distinguishes the differences among six research approaches especially derived from qualitative and quantitative research designs. The differences are discussed in terms of the strengths and weaknesses of each strategy. Finally, this paper attempts to discuss about possible applications for introducing approaches to the research topic with which the exemplified research topic, a design evaluation system, deals. To investigate the applicability of the design methods employed, the following topic has been stated; how to develop a design evaluation system and what to be considered for unfolding the thrown topic in terms of strategic approaches in the field of architectural design researches reviewed through the study.

• 대한안전경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한안전경영과학회 2008년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.47-51
• /
• 2008

Recently, the development of technology has been rapidly proceeding with information technology in various fields. Due to their abstract properties, proper evaluation of intangible assets is very difficult compared to evaluation of tangible assets. Intangible assets are knowledge, technology, and design etc. In general there are two approaches to evaluate the intangible assets such as qualitative and quantitative approach. The qualitative approach contains scoring approach, profile approach, checklist approach, and quantitative approach. Quantitative approach contains cost approach, market approach, income approach, and real-option approach. As an initial step for evaluation of safe work environments, this study compares and analyzes evaluation methods of intangible assets.

• 산업공학
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.169-179
• /
• 2004

In supply chain management, supplier capacity is very important to meet the customer demand quickly. This paper studies a supplier evaluation structure and then suggests a methodology using fuzzy theory for selecting an effective supplier. Several quantitative and qualitative evaluation factors should be analyzed in the evaluation structure. The qualitative factors includes not only product and service qualities but financial condition. The methodology deals with both the quantitative and qualitative factors together through fuzzy inference. A case study is also presented to show how to choose the best one among potential suppliers.

• 스마트미디어저널
• /
• 제8권3호
• /
• pp.70-79
• /
• 2019

사용자 기대에 부응하는 UX 디자인 구현 여부가 스마트 가전의 차별화를 결정짓는 중요 변수가 되었다. 본 연구는 스마트 가전의 모바일 애플리케이션 개발과정에서 UX 디자인 평가 문제를 다루었다. 최근 수요가 급증하고 있는 <스마트 레인지 후드>의 모바일 애플리케이션에 대한 UX 디자인 평가 내용을 실험연구 대상으로 설정하였다. 연구목적은 스마트 가전 애플리케이션의 UX 디자인 사용자 평가 방법의 의의를 탐색하고 더불어 정량적 정성적 평가 방법의 혼용이 UX 디자인 개발 과정에 어떻게 도움이 되는지를 제안하는 것이다. 주요 발견점은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 사용자 평가를 통해 UX 디자인 개선 방향이 구체화될 수 있음을 발견하였다. UX 디자인 개발 과정에서 사용자 평가가 실질적으로 도움이 됨을 확인하였다. 둘째, UX 디자인 평가에서 '정량적 방법'과 '정성적 방법'의 혼용이 상호 보완적으로 효과가 있음을 발견하였다. 연구 시사점은 다음과 같다. UX 디자인 평가 과정에서 정량평가와 정성평가의 역할을 구분하여 접근하면 효율적이다. 예컨대, '허니콤 모델' 등의 정량평가를 통해 <사용자 경험 촉진/저해 발생 속성>을 '탐색적'으로 파악하고, '사용자 심층 인터뷰' 등의 정성평가를 통해 <사용자 경험촉진/저해 발생 속성 가운데 구체적인 서비스 기능 문제 요소>를 '측정'하고 '검증'하는 것이 가능하다.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제21권5호
• /
• pp.32-39
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a behaviorally anchored rating scale for peer evaluation in group projects based on social interdependence theory. A mixed method involving a qualitative and quantitative approach was used in this study. In the qualitative study, both the individual and group interviews were conducted to college students regarding their cooperative learning experiences. Data from this qualitative research was analyzed based on 5 elements of cooperative learning and 'critical incidents' were extracted from students' own voices that would serve as specific rating criteria in the scale. Once the 'critical incidents' have been incorporated into the scale, validation from 3 independent experts was conducted. In the quantitative study, correlations with relevant variables were analyzed to examine the criteria-referenced validity. Findings suggest that the behaviorally anchored rating scale for peer evaluation in group projects can be used in various team-based learning contexts.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제22권52호
• /
• pp.311-322
• /
• 1999

Major problems involved in an electrical utility expansion planning within a time horizon are how to efficiently deal with objectives considering multiple factors and uncertainty. But justification factors in study these days have considered only quantitative factors except qualitative factors. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to develop a new model for economic evaluation of nuclear power plants through the scoring model with the quantitative and qualitative factors under uncertainty. The quantitative factors use a levelized generation cost method considering time value of money. Especially, the environmental, risk, and safety factors in this paper have been also explained for the rational economic justification of the qualitative factors under uncertainty. This paper not only proposes a new approach method using the scoring model in evaluating economy of the nuclear power plant in the long term, but also provides the more efficient decision making criterion for nuclear power plants under uncertainty.

• Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology
• /
• 제45권4호
• /
• pp.369-381
• /
• 2017

The objective of this study was to compare the wood anatomical characteristics of local tree species in Moluccas, Indonesia i.e., Moluccan ironwood (Intsia bijuga), linggua (Pterocarpus indicus), red meranti (Shorea parvifolia), and gofasa (Vitex cofassus). Qualitative evaluation was conducted by observing the anatomical structure in cross, radial, and tangential sections of each sample. For the quantitative evaluation, the dimensions of vessels, rays, and fibers were measured. Qualitative evaluation showed that crystals were observed in Moluccan ironwood, linggua, and gofasa, while resin canals were only observed in red meranti. Tyloses were frequently observed in gofasa but infrequently observed in linggua and red meranti. Quantitative evaluation showed that Moluccan ironwood with the higher density had thicker fiber wall, higher quantity of ray number, and wider rays than the other species. Red meranti had higher values of ray height and fiber length than the other three species. The results also revealed that linggua showed the highest values of relative crystallinity and crystallite width. Red meranti and gofasa showed similar values of relative crystallinity and crystallite width, while Moluccan ironwood showed the lowest values. The basic qualitative and quantitative anatomical characteristics discussed could provide useful information for further utilizations of such wood species.

• 한국비블리아학회지
• /
• 제34권1호
• /
• pp.189-207
• /
• 2023

본 연구는 2022년 전국 도서관 운영평가 중 공공도서관에 집중하여, 최근 변화 양상을 분석하고 향후 방향성을 논의하고자 하였다. 본 연구에서는 공공도서관 평가의 정성·정량평가 비율 변화 및 변화 전·후 평가 결과의 특성을 분석하였다. 우선 각 정성평가 및 정량평가의 비율 변화에 따른 과거와 현재의 평가 결과 비교 분석을 수행한 후, 도서관의 규모에 따른 그룹화에 대해 실효성을 논하고자 하였다. 더 나아가서는 각 평가점수에 대한 계산 방식의 변화 및 총점과의 상관계수 분석을 통한 새로운 정량평가 변수의 발견을 시도하였다. 이러한 과정을 통해 표준화 및 개별화를 적용한 변수의 계산 방식, 다양한 영역에 대한 비중의 균형화, 도서관들의 자발적인 평가 참여를 고무할 방안을 제안하였다.

• 한국경영과학회지
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.53-73
• /
• 2002

The launch of a new business is crucial to the future growth and profitability of a company. A new business project typically requires a large amount of resources while it has a high possibility of failure. The evaluation of new business opportunities is therefore quite a critical decision-making to companies. This evaluation includes screening of a large number of criteria at a time which often makes desision-making very complicated. Management should evaluate the business alternatives in a sound and consistent manner that is hard to achieve because the new business evaluation is a typical semi/unstructured decision-making problem. The difficulty in such an evaluation will increase if it is required for management to consider both quantitative and qualitative criteria simultaneously. Under these circumstances, this study has proposed a decision-making framework that utilizes analytical hierarchy process(AHP). This study has identified a set of criteria essential to the new business evaluation and suggested a systematic framework for it. Both qualitative and quantitative evaluations are incorporated into the single framework in this study.