DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Risk Assessment for Performance Evaluation System of Hydrogen Refueling Station

수소충전소 성능평가 장비 안전성 평가 연구

  • KANG, SEUNGKYU (Institute of Gas Safety R&D, Korea Gas Safety Corporation) ;
  • LEE, DONGHOON (Energy Safety Empirical Research Center, Korea Gas Safety Corporation)
  • 강승규 (국가스안전공사 가스안전연구원) ;
  • 이동훈 (한국가스안전공사 에너지안전실증연구센터)
  • Received : 2022.05.03
  • Accepted : 2022.06.15
  • Published : 2022.06.30

Abstract

This study performed qualitative and quantitative risk assessment of equipment for evaluating the protocol of hydrogen refueling stations and suggested measures to improve safety. Hazard and operability study was performed for qualitative risk assessment, and Hy-KoRAM was used for quantitative risk assessment. Through a qualitative risk assessment, additional ventilation devices were installed, simultaneous venting of the storage container was prohibited, and the number of repeated refilling of the evaluation equipment was identified to manage the number of fillings of the container. Through quantitative risk assessment, the area around the device was set as a restricted area when evaluating the station, and measures were suggested to reduce the frequency of accidents.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 산업통상자원부(MOTIE)와 한국에너지기술평가원(KETEP)의 지원을 받아 수행한 "수소충전소 성능 및 안전평가 기술 개발" 연구과제입니다(No.20192910100170).

References

  1. SAE J2601, "Fueling protocols for light duty gaseous hydrogen surface vehicles", SAE International, 2020. Retrieved from https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j2601_202005/.
  2. H. Kim and S. Kang, "Analysis of damage range and impact of on-site hydrogen fueling station using quantitative risk assessment program (HyKoRAM)", Trans Korean Hydrogen New Energy Soc, Vol. 31, No. 5, 2020, pp. 459-466, doi: https://doi.org/10.7316/KHNES.2020.31.5.459.
  3. J. L. Lachance, W. G. Houf, L. Pluer, and B. Middleton, "Analyses to support development of riskinformed separation distances for hydrogen codes and standards", SANDIA REPORT, SAND20090874, 2009, doi: https://doi.org/10.2172/983689.
  4. K. M. Groth, J. L. Lachance, and A. P. Harris, "Early-stage quantitative risk assessment to support development of codes and standard requirements for indoor fueling of hydrogen vehicles", SAND201210150, 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.2172/1057251.
  5. IEC60079101, "Classification of arear - explosive gas atmospheres", International Electrotechnical Commission, 2020. Retrieved from https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/63327.
  6. KGS GC101, "Classification code for explosive hazardous area on gas facility", Korea Gas Safey Corporation, 2018. Retrieved from https://cyber.kgs.or.kr/kgscode.codeSearch.view.ex.do?onEngYn=F&pubFldCd=&pubMid=&pubCd=GC101_180712&stDayY=2008&stDayM=01&etDayY=2020&etDayM=12.
  7. Korea Gas Safey Corporation, "City gas high-pressure pipe safety evaluation guidelines", 2019.