• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.51-69
• /
• 2008

The financial industry in which arbitration is most frequently resorted to so as to resolve disputes is the sector related to the securities industry. Most securities related disputes are raised from broker-dealer controversies which is not new in the Republic of Korea. The disputes between securities brokers and customers are very frequently settled by arbitration in the United States. But the arbitration in the securities area may deprive investors from securities regulation's protection. Introducing the United States' Federal Supreme Courts cases, the author explores the logic of how the pre-dispute arbitration agreement compatible with Securities regulations. However, the author insist the South Korea should more careful in accepting pre-dispute arbitration contract in securities area. Mostly because of the lack of more specific way to secure substantive fairness in securities arbitration. Also the author worries about the possibility of prevailing pre-dispute arbitration agreement in all of the securities investment contract without any other choices, or securities laws' protection. But the author also suggests to introduce public securities arbitration system of the States, and also insists the way to secure substantive fairness, or the application of securities regulations in securities arbitrations. Which may be the pre-requirements for the pre-dispute arbitration agreement in securities investment contract.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2010년도 춘계 학술논문 발표대회 1부
• /
• pp.185-189
• /
• 2010

As recent construction project has specialization and high-level of the engineering, Although, It has always uncertainty of agreement and contract enforcement, factors of difficult to predict etc. in each phase. In this process, Various interest groups involved are continuously generated dispute of interest each others. So this paper analyzed the dispute cases in construction projects from the Supreme Court and Korean Commercial Arbitration Board in Korea, and then identified the dispute types and causes that occur during all of the construction project phases with their influence analysis. At the result, It will be contributed to the basic data for pre-dispute prevention in the construction projects.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제24권1호
• /
• pp.111-132
• /
• 2014

Recently, there have been discussions about the necessity of consumer arbitration such as ADR. The debate has progressed, because this area of arbitration has expanded into the press and medical fields. However, there is not an act for regulating consumer arbitration in South Korea. Thus, this issue has been deliberated at UNCITRAL Working Group III. The core issue of this deliberation is the validity of consumer arbitration. Especially if a pre-dispute arbitration agreement is contracted online, it progresses by using standardized terms; therefore it is possible that the Standardized Terms Regulating Act judges the relevant terms. This thesis consists of the following: First, concepts and categories of arbitration agreements. These include arbitration agreement, pre-dispute arbitration agreement, and arbitration agreement through standardized terms. Second, the validity of the above agreements will be discussed. There are three positions concerning their validity: affirmative as de lege ferenda, negative, and restrictively negative. Similar discussions concerning German law and cases would be helpful to specify and compare the issue. When a consumer arbitration agreement is contracted through standardized terms, it is necessary that the required formality of the agreement has been satisfied, before the effect of the agreement may be regulated by the German Civil Code.

• 한국건설관리학회논문집
• /
• 제10권6호
• /
• pp.48-57
• /
• 2009

최근 건설공사는 대형화, 복잡화됨에 따라 도면과 시방서만으로는 모든 정보를 표현하는 것이 어려우며, 불확정적인 요소를 계약서에 명문화 하는 것의 한계성으로 인해 분쟁이 발생하게 된다. 또한 우리나라 건설공사는 상호평등 원칙보다는 발주자 위주의 계약관행이 존재하고 있어서 비합리적인 조항을 계약관련 서류에 포함시키는 등의 일이 발생하고 있다. 이렇듯 겉으로 표현하지 못한 잠재적인 분쟁의 요인들이 존재하게 된다. 이에 본 연구에서는 조달청의 민원상담사례를 분석하여 사전분쟁 단계에서의 잠재적인 분쟁요인을 도출하고, 영향도 분석을 실시하였다. 분석된 결과는 차후 건설공사 추진과정에서 분쟁예방을 위한 체크리스트로 활용이 가능할 것으로 사료된다.

• 한국건설관리학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건설관리학회 2008년도 정기학술발표대회 논문집
• /
• pp.505-508
• /
• 2008

건설공사는 점점 대형화되고 복합화됨에 따라 도면과 시방서만으로는 모든 정보를 표현하는 것이 어려우며, 불확정적인 요소를 계약서에 명문화하는 것의 한계성으로 인해 분쟁이 지속적으로 발생하고 있다. 또한 우리나라의 건설공사는 상호평등의 원칙보다는 발주자 위주의 계약관행이 존재하고 있어서 비합리적인 조항을 계약관련 서류에 포함시키는 등의 일이 발생하고 있다. 계약상의 불이행이나 불만이 발생하더라도 약자의 위치에 있는 시공자는 계약체결 경향과 건설업체의 후속공사 수주목적을 위해 자체적 클레임회피경향이 지배적이다. 이렇듯 겉으로 표출되지 못하는 분쟁의 요인들이 존재하는 것이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 겉으로 표출되지 못했던 사전분쟁단계에서의 요인들을 조달청의 민원상담사례를 분석하여 사전분쟁요인들을 도출하고, 계층분석적 의사결정방법(AHP)을 활용하여 도출된 요인들간 중요도 분석을 실시하였다. 이상의 분석된 결과는 차후 건설공사에서 분쟁예방을 위한 체크리스트로 활용이 가능할 것으로 사료된다.

• 한국게임학회 논문지
• /
• 제13권3호
• /
• pp.121-130
• /
• 2013

본고에서는 콘텐츠분쟁조정위원회에서 조정한 사건들을 중심으로 분쟁현황과 그 이슈를 살펴보았다. 그 결과, 미취학 아동들의 모바일 게임 피해 문제, 통신사와 국내 일반기업과 연계된 게임분쟁문제, 게임사의 책임성과 통신사의 주도적인 피해 방지 시스템 구축의 필요성 문제, 업체의 피해 구제 인식의 필요성 문제 등을 되짚어 볼 수 있었다. 또한 본 연구를 통해, 분쟁조정 제도는 분쟁 당사자들의 갈등을 합리적으로 조율하도록 매개 역할을 크게 수행하고 있다는 사실과 모바일 오픈마켓의 자율적인 신뢰성 확립이 절대적으로 필요하다는 사실을 확인할 수 있었다.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제29권1호
• /
• pp.3-29
• /
• 2019

A franchise business is a business in which the owners, or "franchisors," sell the rights to their business logo, name, and model to third party retail outlets, owned by independent, third party operators, called "franchisees." There are a number of features in franchising or terms in franchise agreements that may lead to disputes between franchisors and franchisees. These disputes may arise because of underlying risks in the franchise relationship, franchise agreement, or conduct of the parties. In this case, ADR is an effective way to resolve disputes in a quicker and often less costly way than having to go to court. If an agreement cannot be reached through mediation, then arbitration becomes the next step to resolving the differences. Whereas mediation is non-binding and focused on facilitating the parties to find a resolution that is acceptable to both, arbitration is binding and may result in a decision that is not acceptable to one of the parties. These situations can be resolved through experienced arbitration as arbitration allows franchisees to settle matters promptly and outside of the public eye. In addition, franchise dispute arbitration is usually less costly than going to traditional court. Considering all of these, reaching an agreement will also have typical clauses that address the issue of dispute resolution. It is again a more efficient process than going through the legal process and courts and is often less costly. By going through arbitration, the parties agree to give up their rights to pursue the dispute in the courts. However, there is a problem that the arbitration prior to the agreement and under the terms would be contrary to the restriction of jurisdiction under the "ACT ON THE REGULATION OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS" in Korea.

• Archives of Plastic Surgery
• /
• 제36권3호
• /
• pp.262-268
• /
• 2009

Purpose: Recently medical dispute about plastic surgery is increasing rapidly as result of growing surgery itself due to high interest in appearance and advertisement of plastic surgery. So we want to find a way to prevent similar medical accident by making better solution of plastic surgery through case analysis of medical dispute. Method: 161 cases about plastic surgery asked for aid at Korea Consumer Agency and 41 cases judged at the court was surveyed and gender, location and kind of hospital, goal and kind of operation, making operation agreement or not, kind of damage, result of process, result of lawsuit was studied from 2004.1.1. to 2006.12.31. Result: Medical doctor have to explain about symptoms of disease, method of treatment, possibility of complication, prognosis to patients before therapy so they can make decision if they take operation by doctor or not. On this survey, among the patients who underwent re - operation or had complication, 88.1%(96 from 109 cases) of them didn't get enough explanation about possibility of complication before surgery They brought lawsuit insisting they would not undergo operation if they got enough explanation about possibility of complication and result of operation before surgery. Conclusion: It is advisable that doctor must observe the duty of explanation before surgery and respect the right to decide of patient, make operation agreement and put down concrete progress note and store the pre and post operative photo to avoid medical accident. It is also needed to have guideline of therapy, Code of ethics, organization which deals with medical dispute, reconsideration of law to control that.

• 교육녹색환경연구
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.1-9
• /
• 2017

Defect dispute in apartment building has become a debating social issue. The system of defect lawsuit and the conciliation process are applicable to solve defect problems in South Korea. Among various defects, painting work defect is a critical issue because it requires large area works and entails a lot of cost. Accordingly, disputes on work procedure and cost calculation are argued oftenly between residents and housing providers. This study reviewed detailed main issues of painting work and propose relevant systems and standards. In this analysis, the main issues are categorized into pre-works, main work, and others. The most recent cases are compared and analyzed for each issue. After the analysis, following conclusions are obtained, (1) In defect lawsuit system, even though surface treatment work in pre-work step is part of main work, it has been separated and regarded as a separate work. (2) Although the main painting work are not significantly different from two systems, it is still necessary to achieve a consensus to close the gap in the methodology of painting area calculation and determining whole painting or partial painting. (3) In addition, unlike the profit rate of general construction works, that of painting work remained the maximum rate and additional charge rate for works carried out in higher place are different among cases. Therefore, it is determined that establishing consistent standards is urgent.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제26권3호
• /
• pp.51-66
• /
• 2016

This paper considers how various types of patent disputes can be more efficiently resolved through arbitration, rather than litigation. For this analysis, it takes three types of patent disputes as a control sample - contractual disputes, infringement disputes and FRAND disputes - and assess how these disputes can be better resolved through arbitration in terms of several criteria, namely, the suitability of the decision-makers, the number of forums in which disputes have to separately decided and enforced, procedural flexibility and confidentiality. The paper takes into consideration that certain types of patent disputes, such as infringement disputes and FRAND disputes are unlikely to be subject to pre-existing arbitration agreements. In these types of disputes, parties may make the decision between arbitration and litigation based on strategic and tactical concerns, rather than legal ones. The paper concludes that, given this limitation, it is not possible to categorically state whether arbitration is more suitable than litigation for resolving patent disputes. The most sensible course to follow in adopting arbitration for patent disputes is for legal advisors to be familiar with the intricate benefits and pitfalls of arbitration in patent disputes, and to actively consider referring a dispute to arbitration over litigation after a dispute has arisen.