• 수산해양교육연구
• /
• 제19권3호
• /
• pp.355-365
• /
• 2007

This study examined the essential elements of urban fishing ports in the region of Busan in terms of the hydrography, geomorphology, and urban functions of each fishing port and then estimated their development potential. The results were as follows: (1) The ports in the eastern and central parts of the Busan region, used mostly for fishing, were open or quasi-open type ports with ${\Omega}>0.8$, while those of the western part tended to show the reverse. (2) Of the 51 fishing ports, 37.3% were located on land inside the coastline, and structures such as breakwaters had been constructed on both sides of the entrance. Of the total, 47.1% were small fishing ports with water depths of 0~1 m. (3) In the Busan region, 39.2% were urban fishing ports, including Daebyeon and Dadaepo, and 60.8% were non-urban fishing ports.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제42권2호
• /
• pp.107-116
• /
• 2018

Planning strategies to achieve higher competitiveness of ports are becoming increasingly important in business environment. Therefore, strategic competitive position and efficiency analysis needs to be performed to increase ports' effectiveness and competitiveness. This matches with one of targets of new concept e-Navigation to increase the agility and efficiency of ports. The purpose of this study was to apply Boston Consulting Group matrix to analyze competitive positioning of major ports in Korea and China in term of several main cargo types and then use a combination of Data Envelopment Analysis and Principal Component Analysis model to calculate efficiencies. Results show that, at the moment, Chinese ports are still on the top with high position and efficiency score for the representative-Shanghai port. However, result also points out that except container type, Korean ports have chance to compete in other cargo types. Moreover, Gwangyang port is regarded as efficient. It has better position time. It is believed that Gwangyang port together with Busan port can compete with Chinese port in the near future.

• 한국항만학회지
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.1-8
• /
• 1998

If a system has a large boundary and complexity, forecast's accuracy will be very low when consider the system's substance as black box. Thus, it is necessary that analysis by structure model. To examine competition in Northeast Asia Ports, it has assumed that the form of structure model, For which the System Dynamics method is adapted in this paper. Northeast Asia Ports Model includes five ports - Pusan, Kobe, Yokohama, Kaoshiung, Keelung, - which are adjacent to each other by geographically and has a competition relation. The Northeast Asia Ports Model has several sub-systems which consists of each unit port models. And, each unit port model found by quantitive, qualititive factors and their feedback loops. All effects which components of one port have influence to components of the rest ports must be surveyed in order to construct Northeast Asia Ports Model, but it may be impossible currently. In this paper Northeast Asia Ports Model was simplified by HFP-Hierarchical Fuzzy Process Method-adapted to integration of level variables of unit port model. Container cargo volumes in Northeast Ports Model is distributed by results of HFP method. And distributed container cargo volumes effected to unit port model. Developed model can estimate change of container cargo volumes in competitive relation by alternation of simple parameter, and reflects dynamics characteristics which are included in model.

• 한국항만학회지
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.11-26
• /
• 1999

The subject of port efficiency is one of the important issues facing port authorities and policy makers today. A number of studies have been undertaken which compare ports in terms of their efficiency. But any port comparison can only be valid and meaningful if a port’s efficiency is compared with a similar port. The main objective of this paper is to introduce a systematic approach to identifying similar ports based on the technique of principal component analysis and cluster analysis. And it seeks to identify the most important factors underlying the port classification. Lack of awareness of which factors differentiate ports has resulted in an unnecessary collection of data which are of limited use in port classification. This paper has identified five groupings of similar ports within which port comparision can be justifiably made. This approach can be used for any future port comparision.

• 수산해양교육연구
• /
• 제25권5호
• /
• pp.1136-1147
• /
• 2013

In recent years, as the operations of the ports are privatized, the operators in the ports are competing in order to host more customers. Under such circumferences, it is preferred that the operators set plans to provide the customized services to the customers by precisely recognizing and analyzing the needs of the customers for the bright futures of the ports rather than to host the customers by just lowering the freights. The present studies aimed to analyze on how the service capabilities of the ports affect the customer's trust, the customer's satisfaction and the repurchase intention have extracted the variables and the measurement items from a lot of the preceding studies conducted on the other industries, part of which were modified depending on the views from the ports and the statuses of the ports, so the measurements were conducted.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제32권1호
• /
• pp.65-72
• /
• 2008

본 연구의 목적은 동아시아 지역을 중심으로 글로벌 항만 물류네트워크를 구축하여 우리나라의 새로운 항만정책을 제안하는 것에 있다. 이러한 항만 물류네트워크의 구축을 위해 세계 50위 항만 중 21개의 항만을 중심으로, 컨테이너 화물량과 기항지를 분석하여 EU, 북미를 연결시 최소 물류비용인 동아시아 지역의 4개의 대표항만을 추출하였다. 그 결과 동아시아에서는 싱가포르, 홍콩, 상하이, 부산항이 추출되었다. 따라서, 우리나라는 싱가포르, 홍콩, 상하이항에 해외 터미널을 운영하고 부산항과 연계하는 글로벌 항만 물류네트워크를 구축하여 안정적인 화물을 확보해야 한다.

• 한국항공우주학회지
• /
• 제45권7호
• /
• pp.531-538
• /
• 2017

비행속력 및 받음각과 옆미끄럼각을 측정할 수 있는 플러시 대기자료측정장치를 소형의 무인항공기를 대상으로 설계/제작하였다. 동체 노즈콘 표면에 4개 압력 측정점과 5개 압력 측정점의 2가지 타입으로 플러시 압력공들을 만들었다. 플러시 압력공의 교정 압력 데이터는 전기체를 전산유체해석 코드로 계산하여 구축하였다. 교정압력 데이터로부터 받음각, 옆미끄럼각, 전압계수, 정압계수는 4차 다항식으로 표현하고, 최소자승법으로 교정계수 행렬을 구하였다. 비행시험 결과 4개 플러시 압력공 및 5개 플러시 압력공을 이용하여 예측된 비행속력, 받음각과 옆미끄럼각은 비교를 위해 장착한 5-압력공 프로브로 예측된 것과 잘 일치하였으며, 특히 4개의 압력공으로 5개 압력공과 거의 동일한 결과를 얻을 수 있었다.

• 수산해양기술연구
• /
• 제56권4호
• /
• pp.361-373
• /
• 2020

In Jeju, in order to efficiently manage and coexist fishing boats and passenger ships in narrow ports, it is necessary to establish reasonable policies. The survey was conducted on 99 fishing ports, from December 1 to 31, 2018. A site survey was conducted on 30 parties (15 in Jeju City and 15 in Seogwipo City) concerning with the use of fishing ports in Jeju to review the appropriate conditions for selecting fishing ports as control subjects. The survey determined size of pleasure craft mooring within fishing port (20%), size of fishing boat mooring (20%), and accessibility of fishing port (20%) under on-site survey factors as well as willingness to form a consultative group between fishing boat and pleasure craft users (20%). Upon the request of the survey, positive and negative opinions were collected on the establishment of a safety control center in the fish port. Based on the survey results, the factors mentioned above were applied to each and every fishing port within Jeju. The bottom five fishing ports in Jeju with the lowest total factor scores were identified and selected as control subjects for review and study. Of the five fishing ports selected as control subjects amidst the 99 fishing ports in Jeju, Dodu Fishing Port had the lowest score of 22% among the national fishing harbors. Among the local fishing ports, Hwabuk Fishing Port had the lowest score of 18%, followed by Sagae Fishing Port with a score of 22%. Hamdeok Fishing Port had the lowest score of 24% among the fishing port villages, whereas Ojo Fishing Port had the lowest score of 24% among the small fishing ports.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제27권2호
• /
• pp.185-191
• /
• 2003

본 연구의 목적은 아시아 주요항만의 특성을 종합적으로 분석/분류하는 것이다. 특히, 본 연구에서는 기존연구가 지닌 연구대상 선정과 관련한 문제점을 극복하기 위해, 객관적인 지표에 의거하여 부산항이 속한 아시아 주요 대상 항만을 선정했다. 그리고, 연구 방법론의 측면에서 기존연구의 계층평가 알고리즘을 이용한 항만평가와 군집분석법을 이용한 연구의 경우 상호보완적인 장/단점을 지니고 있어, 두 가지 알고리즘을 연계하여 아시아 항만의 전체적인 판도와 항만의 경쟁력 순위 등을 종합적으로 고찰했다. 또한, 본 연구에서는 일반군집분석법에 퍼지 알고리즘을 적용한 FC<(Fuzzy C-Means)법을 이용하여, 기존 방법보다 다양한 고찰이 가능케 하였다. 분석결과, 아시아 16개 주요 항만들 중 10개 항만이 독자적이 위상을 가지고 6가지 항만군을 형성하고 있었으며, 순위면에서 싱가폴항, 홍콩항, 부산항 카오슝항이 높은 경쟁력을 가지고 있었다. 특히, 부산항과 카오슝은 여러 가지 특성에서 유사하여 동일 항만군으로 분류되었고, 싱가폴하엥 이어 2번째로 높은 경쟁력을 보유한 항만군을 형성하고 있는 것으로 파악되었으나, 경쟁력 면에서 싱가폴항과의 격차는 큰 것으로 파악되었다.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.1-32
• /
• 2003

The purpose of this study is to identify and evaluate the competitiveness of ports in ASEAN(Association of Southeast Asian Nations), which plays a leading role in basing the hub of global logistics strategies as a countermeasure in changes of logistics environments. This region represents most severe competition among Mega Hub ports in the world in terms of container cargo throughput at the onset of the 21st century. The research method in this study accounted for overlapping between attributes, and introduced the HFP method that can perform mathematical operations. The scope of this study was strictly confined to the ports of ASEAN, which cover the top 100 of 350 container ports that were presented in Containerization International Yearbook 2002 with reference to container throughput. The results of this study show Singapore in the number one position. Even when we compare with major ports in Korea (after getting comparative ratings and applying the same data and evaluation structure), the number one position still goes to Singapore and then Busan(2) and Manila(2), followed by Port Klang(4), Tanjung Priok(5), Tanjung Perak(6), Bangkok(7), Inchon(8), Laem Chabang(9) and Penang(9). In terms of the main contributions of this study, it is the first empirical study to apply the combined attributes of detailed and representative attributes into the advanced HFP model which was enhanced by the KJ method to evaluate the port competitiveness in ASEAN. Up-to-now, none has comprehensively conducted researches with sophisticated port methodology that has discussed a variety of changes in port development and terminal transfers of major shipping lines in the region. Moreover, through the comparative evaluation among major ports in Korea and ASEAN, the presentation of comparative competitiveness for Korean ports is a great achievement in this study. In order to reinforce this study, it needs further compensative research, including cost factors which could not be applied to modeling the subject ports by lack of consistently quantified data in ASEAN.