• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제20권4호
• /
• pp.858-887
• /
• 2017

본 연구는 과학기술분야 정부출연 연구기관의 자율성과 독립성을 보장하고, 연구기관 간의 협력과 유기적인 연결이라는 정책목표하에 1999년 이후 지금까지 그 목표달성을 위해 정책수단으로 존재하고 있는 연구회제도의 정책변동 사례를 대상으로 하고 있다. 연구회제도가 어떤 과정을 거쳐 정책변동이 이루어졌고 그 결과 정책목표가 달성되었는지 여부를 분석하였으며, 이를 통해 향후 정책의 효율적 추진에 기여하려는 목적으로 수행되었다. 과학기술 연구회는 김대중 정부이후 박근혜 정부까지 네 번의 정권교체기마다 변화과정을 거쳐왔다. 여기서는 그 사례에 Kingdon의 다중흐름모형을 이용하여 각 정부별 주요 정책결정요인과 정책변동 과정을 비교 분석했으며, 그 결과로서 Hogwood and Peters의 정책변동유형과 출연(연)의 자율성 및 책임성이라는 정책목표의 달성정도를 살펴보았다.

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.191-214
• /
• 2006

위성을 이용한 방송사업을 위해서는 방송사업을 위한 권리 이외에 위성궤도 및 주파수 자원의 이용을 위한 권리가 필요하며, 이에는 국제전기통신연합(ITU)가 정한 무선규칙 및 국내 전파법 등의 제도가 적용된다. 무선규칙은 위성용 주파수 및 궤도의 이용에 대해서 이용자 및 이용자에 대한 관할권을 갖고 있는 정부가 다른 무선국에 위해한 영향을 주지 말아야 할 의무와 그와 관련된 국제조정을 수행할 의무를 규정하고 있다. 이를 이행함에 있어서 제기되는 것은 국제규범으로서의 무선규칙을 준수함과 동시에 국내 산업 발전 및 기업의 해외 경쟁력 강화에 기여하는 제도의 수립 및 이행이다. 이러한 견지에서 국내 사업자가 위성망을 실질적으로 발사, 운용하고 있지 않더라도 위성망을 확보할 수 있는 권리를 갖도록 하고, 사후적으로 동 사업자에게 국제조정의무의 이행을 부과하는 방안이 효율적이다. 아울러 그러한 방안은 국제 규범의 국내 이행 방식으로서 적정하다고 판단된다.

• 한국건설관리학회논문집
• /
• 제11권4호
• /
• pp.80-88
• /
• 2010

정부에서는 건설산업의 발전을 위해 다양한 기술정책을 추진하고 있다. 그러나 정책 추진의 정확한 목표나 성과 분석은 상대적으로 미흡한 편이다. 기존의 정책 성과분석은 추진과정의 투입물에 대한 분석만을 수행하였다. 이에 본 연구는 국토해양부에서 2003년부터 2007년까지 5년간 추진한 '제3차 건설기술진흥기본계획'의 성과분석을 실시하였다. 이를 통해 계획 당시 수립한 정량적인 목표 달성여부를 분석하였으며, 정책추진 부서와 건설전문가를 대상으로 설문조사를 수행하여 정성적 인 성과도 분석하였다. 그 결과 계획 당시 명확한 정책 목표와 성과평가 방법론이 수립되지 않으면 성과분석이 어렵다는 것을 알 수 있었다. 본 논문의 결과는 추후 건설 기술정책 수립과정의 기초로 활용될 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

• 상하수도학회지
• /
• 제33권6호
• /
• pp.421-428
• /
• 2019

This study developed an evaluation system of adaptation countermeasures for climate change in the water resources sector using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and the assessment procedures were applied to the Second Chungcheongnam-do Climate Change Adaptation Implementation Plan (Chungnam Implementation Plan). Firstly, the evaluation criteria are composed of two levels according to the hierarchical structure, and AHP gives priority to 4 evaluation criteria of the first level and 16 alternative indicators of the second level. Secondly, after the importance of the evaluation criteria or indicators has been determined, the significance of each measure was evaluated by applying it to the water-sector measures of the Chungnam Implementation Plan, and the effectiveness of the evaluation system was validated. The Chungnam case study shows that the evaluation system will be more effective and efficient when it is applied during development phase rather than after the implementation plan is finalized. It is also expected that the evaluation system will be used to evaluate and prioritize climate change adaptation policies in other regions, and then to compare the means of adaptation to climate change in various regions and to select recommendation policies.

• 한국의료질향상학회지
• /
• 제28권1호
• /
• pp.14-33
• /
• 2022

Purpose: To examine whether the Patient Experience Assessment (PEA) has led to perceptible changes at the ground level of health care, as a way of evaluating PEA as a policy intervention for quality improvement. Methods: Four focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted, each comprising six to eight participants who were employees responsible for patient experience at their respective hospitals. The primary focus of the FGDs was on questions such as: 1) How do hospitals respond to PEA? 2) What significant changes were observed after the implementation of PEA? 3) What were the unintended consequences of implementing PEA, if any? 4) What areas of improvement have been identified for maximizing the potential of PEA? Results: Two broad themes emerged out of the FGDs: changes observed post implementation of PEA, and areas for improvement of PEA. Four significant changes were reported by participants: changes in perception and attitude regarding patient experience in hospital employees, increased active involvement by the hospital leadership, enhanced efforts to improve patient experience, and increased cooperation between such activities. Furthermore, eight areas of improvement were identified, which have been grouped in three categories: improving the process of data collection for PEA, introducing additional catalysts to facilitate further changes, and paying attention to structure- and patient-level constraints that must be addressed in parallel. Conclusion: The implementation of PEA led to perceptible changes within hospitals, which implies that it can serve as an effective catalyst for improving patient experience. A number of areas of improvement that would aid in maximizing the potential of PEA were also identified.

• 한국환경과학회지
• /
• 제2권4호
• /
• pp.245-254
• /
• 1993

This paper attempts to analyze the institutionalization process of Environmental Impact Assessment(EIA) system within the context of Korean environmental policy. The implementation of EIA in the 1980's was not seriously considered by other government agencies and was sometimes degraded as mere formality due to the inherent problems of the system. With viewing the theory and practice of EIA in Korea, this paper argues that it is essential to reinforce ex post facto management incorporate the participation of residents of concerned areas, upgrade the validity of assessment by selecting a credible assessment-agenices and develop the required technologies. Finally, this paper acknowledge the necessity of devising the mechanism to reconcile the conflict between the regional interest and the national interest.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제11권11호
• /
• pp.156-172
• /
• 2011

본 연구는 오랜 기간 동안 난항을 거듭해왔던 한 사례를 통해 지방정부의 정책추진과정에서 갈등관리능력이 차지하는 중요성을 부각시켜보고자 하는 목적으로 시도되었다. 본 연구가 주목한 사례는 지난 1991년 입지선정에서 시작하여 무려 20년이란 긴 세월 동안 정책추진의 난항을 거듭해오다가 최근에 이르러서야 해결의 문턱을 넘어 비교적 안정적인 정책추진의 기미를 보이고 있는 경기도 남양주시의 쓰레기 소각잔재 매립장 건설사례다. 유사한 입지선정 및 건설과정의 갈등을 겪었음에도 불구하고 상대적으로 짧은 기간 내에 성공적인 정책추진을 경험했던 기타의 많은 지방정부 사례와 달리 남양주시 사례의 경우 장기간 동안 대립적 상황을 거듭해 왔던 점은 갈등관리의 차원에서 주목해 볼만한 특이사례다. 과연 남양주시는 왜 정책추진에 그토록 오랜 세월을 허비하며 난항을 거듭해 온 것일까? 본 연구는 일정한 분석모형에 입각하여 정책 성패요인의 인과관계를 검증하는 연역적 접근과는 달리, 정책단계별 사례의 개요와 쟁점 및 구조를 기술하는데 치중함으로써 정책단계별 갈등관리의 중요 요소를 귀납적으로 추론해 나가는 방식을 취했다. 분석 결과, 지방정부의 정책추진과정에서 갈등관리는 정책수립 및 결정단계와 홍보단계 그리고 집행단계에 이르기까지 지속적인 민주적 절차와 토론 및 주민과의 협력을 도출하기 위한 노력을 요하는 연속적 과정임을 확인할 수 있었으며, 이는 궁극적으로 정책성공의 중요한 요인으로 작용하고 있음을 확인하고 있다.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제11권4호
• /
• pp.54-69
• /
• 2001

This study was conducted to assess factors associated with the degree of performance of qualify improvement(QI) activities. A mailed questionnaire survey was conducted between September 15 and October 30, 2000, with the staffs being charge of QI at each of the hospitals with 400 beds or greater. Of the 108 hospitals eligible for inclusion in our study, 79 participated, yielding a response rate of 73.1%. After excluding 12 hospitals that did not perform any QI activities, 117 responses from 67 hospitals were used for the analysis. Using the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award Criteria(MBNQAC), perceived performance of QI was measured in terms of the improvement of the quality of clinical practice, clinical supporting department, administrative procedure of receiving care, customer satisfaction, efficiency and standardization of work process. Factors evaluated for the association were the extent of QI implementation, compliance to 5 QI principles, participation of hospital CEOs, budget allocation, history of QI, and bed size. Path analysis was performed to assess the relationship between QI performance and these factors. Major findings of this study are as follows. Hospitals showing higher degree of QI implementation (path coefficient=0.5967, p<0.001)) and better compliance with the basic principes of QI(0.5736, p<0.05) tended to achieve better performance. Path analysis results showed that interest and participation of hospital CEOs(0.1954, p<0.05) and compliance with the basic principes of QI(0.4028, p<0.0001) indirectly affected the outcomes of QI by influencing the intermediate variable of the level of QI implementation. This study results suggest that having employees have a good orientation of the basic concept and principes of QI through relevant training be the most important requirement to achieve better outcomes from QI activities. In addition, to educate leaders of hospitals the need of active implementation of QI is important to encourage their participation and draw strong support for QI programs.

• 대한의용생체공학회:의공학회지
• /
• 제43권3호
• /
• pp.153-160
• /
• 2022

As new types of medical devices are emerging through convergence with advanced technology, innovative technologies are becoming hot issues in health policy because of their disruptiveness. This study analyzed the innovative medical device management systems in the US, China and Korea. Innovative medical devices have been defined differently depending on the country's management system, but in common, they are defined as products that do not exist or have dramatically improved performance compare to existing products by applying innovative technologies. Innovative medical devices have been supported by regulatory authorities during product development and approval processes. While the US and China have more than 300 products designated as innovative medical devices with diverse functions, application fields, and manufacturing countries considering the initial situation of the implementation for the system, Korea has only 16 products, mainly radiology and diagnostic devices and made in Korea only as innovative medical device. In addition, Korea shows the highest market approval rate of innovative medical devices compare to the US and China, and it is necessary to prepare the approval process in consideration of product diversity.

• 동의생리병리학회지
• /
• 제29권1호
• /
• pp.66-71
• /
• 2015

The purpose of the study is to establish priorities in integrated medicine policy. Delphi method was used in conducting a survey on integrated medicine specialists regarding the policies of integrated medicine and actions. For specialists in integrated medicine, total 17 persons selected included scholars who performed minimum one study on integrated medicine, medical staff who performing integrated medical service at institutions that implemented integrated medical care or those who were involved in creating or implementing policies on integrated medicine. The first Delphi-method survey conducted from Apr. 14 through 18, while the second survey was carried out from Apr. 21 through 25. To prioritize the policies based on the results of the mini Delphi-method survey, Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) was performed for 15 persons answered to mini Delphi-method from May 2 through 16, 2014. From the Delphi-method survey, four policies and 16 actions were obtained. AHP showed the first priority placed on 'Building the Infrastructure of Industrialization in the Integrative medicine' of the 4 policies and 'Developing new diagnostic and treatment instruments' was given the highest priority of the 16 actions. For implementation of integrated medicine policy, the 4 policies and the 16 actions found in this research require government support and should be urgently implemented according to its priority.