• 제목/요약/키워드: peer review

검색결과 365건 처리시간 0.032초

YouTube as a source of patient education information for elbow ulnar collateral ligament injuries: a quality control content analysis

  • Yu, Jonathan S;Manzi, Joseph E;Apostolakos, John M;Carr II, James B;Dines, Joshua S
    • Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
    • /
    • 제25권2호
    • /
    • pp.145-153
    • /
    • 2022
  • Background: While online orthopedic resources are becoming an increasingly popular avenue for patient education, videos on YouTube are not subject to peer review. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate the quality of YouTube videos for patient education in ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries of the elbow. Methods: A search of keywords for UCL injury was conducted through the YouTube search engine. Each video was categorized by source and content. Video quality, reliability, and accuracy were assessed by two independent raters using five metrics: (1) Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria (range 0-4) for video reliability; (2) modified DISCERN score (range 1-5) for video reliability; (3) Global Quality Score (GQS; range 1-5) for video quality; (4) ulnar collateral ligament-specific score (UCL-SS; range 0-16), a novel score for comprehensiveness of health information presented; and (5) accuracy score (AS; range 1-3) for accuracy. Results: Video content was comprised predominantly of disease-specific information (52%) and surgical technique (33%). The most common video sources were physician (42%) and commercial (23%). The mean JAMA score, modified DISCERN score, GQS, UCL-SS, and AS were 1.8, 2.4, 1.9, 5.3, and 2.7 respectively. Conclusions: Overall, YouTube is not a reliable or high-quality source for patients seeking information regarding UCL injuries, especially with videos uploaded by non-physician sources. The multiplicity of low quality, low reliability, and irrelevant videos can create a cumbersome and even inaccurate learning experience for patients.

Effectiveness of low-level laser therapy on recovery from neurosensory disturbance after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Firoozi, Parsa;Keyhan, Seied Omid;Kim, Seong-Gon;Fallahi, Hamid Reza
    • Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
    • /
    • 제42권
    • /
    • pp.41.1-41.11
    • /
    • 2020
  • Background: Orthognathic surgery such as bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO) for the treatment of mandibular deformities is one of the most common procedures in maxillofacial operations that may lead to neurosensory disturbance. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on augmenting recovery of neurosensory disturbance of inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) in patients who underwent BSSRO surgery. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted by two independent authors in PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar electronic databases. Besides, a manual search of all textbooks and relevant articles were conducted. Searches took place in August 2020 and were limited to published and peer-reviewed articles from 2000 to 2020. All analysis was performed using the comprehensive meta-analysis (CMA) and the STATA MP (version:16) software. The weighted mean difference (WMD) using the inverse variance method and the standard mean difference (SMD) was considered for continuous variables. Results: Seventy-four papers were retrieved after removing duplicate studies and finally, eight studies were assessed for qualitative synthesis and five for meta-analysis. Totally, 94 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Based on the meta-analysis, it was shown that LLLT was not effective in a short interval (0 to 48 h) after surgery, but in a period of more than 1 month after surgery, the positive results of treatment can be observed strikingly. Also, LLLT side/group showed no significant difference in some aspects of neurosensory recovery such as thermal sensation compared to the placebo side/group. Conclusions: The meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials revealed that LLLT generally improves IAN sensory disturbance caused by BSSRO. Further high-quality clinical trials with longer follow-up periods and larger sample sizes are recommended.

일개 의과대학 본과 4학년의 롤 모델링 경험과 성찰수준 분석: 임상실습을 중심으로 (Analysis of Role Modeling Experiences and Reflection Level of Fourth-Year Medical Students at a Single Medical College: A Focus on the Clinical Clerkship)

  • 이상미;박경혜;박연철;예병일
    • 의학교육논단
    • /
    • 제24권1호
    • /
    • pp.46-55
    • /
    • 2022
  • This study aimed to analyze the subjects, situations, and reflection levels related to role modeling experienced by medical students during their clinical clerkship and their own reflections. This study intends to suggest ways of improving how residents and clinical faculty should treat and teach medical students. Written interviews were conducted regarding senior medical students' role modeling experiences during their clinical clerkships in 2018 and 2019. Content analysis was conducted for a total of 224 cases from 196 students. Content analysis revealed three types of role modeling content: subjects (faculty, residents, nurses, peer students), situations (clinical competence, personal qualities, teaching skills), and the level of reflection (critical reflection, reflection, thoughtful action, and habitual action) in each case. As role model subjects, faculty were found to be the paramount role model (n=142, 62.83%). Role modeling was the most frequently performed for clinical competence (n=103, 45.98%). Clinical competence was frequently shown in communication and empathic listening during rounds and outpatient relationships between the patient and doctor. Regarding the level of reflection for role modeling, the number of critical reflections was 86 (38.39%) and that of reflections was 80 (35.71%). In particular, negative role modeling showed a high level of critical reflection in relation to faculty (64.44%) and nurses (8.89%). In conclusion, role modeling of medical students participating in clinical clerkships occurs in situations that the role models are not aware of, with positive or negative effects on the formation of professional identity among medical students.

Zebrafish as a research tool for human diseases pathogenesis and drug development

  • Kim, Young Sook;Cho, Yong Wan;Lim, Hye-Won;Sun, Yonghua
    • 한국응용과학기술학회지
    • /
    • 제39권3호
    • /
    • pp.442-453
    • /
    • 2022
  • 다양한 동물 모델이 인간 질병, 의약품의 효능 및 작용 메커니즘을 연구하는 데 사용되고 있다. Zebrafish(Danio rerio)는 여러 가지 장점이 있어 인간 질병에 대한 중개 연구의 모델로 점점 더 폭넓게 활용되고 있다. 본 논문은 Pubmed, Google Scholar, Scopus에서 2020년 12월까지 최근 10년간 zebrafish 모델, 천연물(한약), in vivo 스크리닝의 키워드를 사용하여 저널에 게재된 논문을 검토하여 필요한 정보를 얻었다. 이 리뷰에서 우리는 천연물(한약) 연구에 대한 다양한 제브라피쉬 질병 모델의 최근 경향에 대해 논의하였다. 특히, 암, 안질환, 혈관 질환, 당뇨병 및 합병증, 피부질환에 중점을 두었고, zebrafish 배아를 사용하여 이들 질병에 대한 의약품의 분자 작용 메커니즘에 관해 언급하였다. Zebrafish는 실험실에서 임상 연구까지의 격차를 줄이는 데 중추적 역할을 할 수 있는 중요한 동물 모델이다. Zebrafish는 의약품이나 화장품 개발, 질병의 병인론을 이해하기 위해 사용되고, 이로 인해 생의학 연구에서 설치류의 사용을 줄이는 데 크게 기여하고 있다.

유럽연합의 개방형 정책조정 (Open Method of Coordination)에 대한 이론적 기대와 현실: 빈곤정책의 사례 (Evaluation of the Open Method of Coordination in Social Inclusion: Theoretical Expectations and Reality)

  • 김승현
    • 국제지역연구
    • /
    • 제14권3호
    • /
    • pp.57-80
    • /
    • 2010
  • 이 연구에서는 개방형 정책조정방법이 사회적 포용의 영역에 도입된 이후, 과정의 변화와 정책효과에 대한 평가를 시도한다. 2000년 리스본이사회에서 결정된 개방형 정책조정방법의 정책도구들은 결과지향적인 신공공관리론과 과정지향적인 숙의적 다중질서라는 거버넌스이론을 배경으로 한다고 볼 수 있다. 역사적 변화과정을 살펴볼 때 결과지향적인 신공공관리론의 정책도구인 목표설정, 수범사례의 벤치마킹, 분권적 의사결정의 경우 애매하거나 아예 거부되었고, 제도적 틀을 넘지 못함으로써 효율성을 추구할 수 없었다. 아울러 규범적인 숙의적 다중질서이론이 제시하는 것처럼 학습을 위해 숙의와 상호검토를 추구하고 있으나, 실제 운영은 성찰적인 숙의과정에 미치지 못하고, 상호검토도 제도적 한계를 보임으로써 원활한 학습이 이루어지지 않는다. 10여 년간 개방형 정책조정방법이 집행되었지만 정책효과의 측면에서도 유의미한 결과를 찾을 수 없다. 그렇지만 빈곤문제에 대한 인식이 변하고 시민사회가 활발하게 조직되어 참여가 확대되고 있는 점은 긍정적인 효과이다.

학술연구정보의 오픈 액세스 관행에 대한 인식 연구 - 과학기술분야 학회의 개방형 동료심사 관행을 중심으로 - (A Study on Awareness of Open Access Practices for Academic Research Information.)

  • 정용일;안성수;노지윤
    • 한국정보통신학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 한국정보통신학회 2022년도 춘계학술대회
    • /
    • pp.18-21
    • /
    • 2022
  • 최근 정보기술(IT)의 급속한 발전, 코로나19(COVID-19)로 인한 글로벌 팬데믹 현상 등으로 오픈 액세스(OA), 오픈 사이언스(OS), 개방형 동료평가(Open Peer Review, OPR)와 같은 새로운 학술출판 관행이 과학기술분야 학술연구 현장에도 영향을 미치고 있다. OPR 시스템의 도입과 같은 새로운 학술연구출판 관행과 제도는 가치, 동기, 수단, 라이센스, 인센티브 등과 서로 밀접하게 연결되어 있다. OPR의 개념과 실체가 무엇인지는 기존 연구들을 통하여 최근 어느 정도 정립이 됐다. 하지만 OPR을 통해 연구자 개인이나 학회, 출판사 등에 새로운 기회, 도전 과제 및 미래 전망에 대하여 어떠한 영향을 미치는 가에 대한 연구는 중요하지만 제한적이다. 특히 학술연구출판 관행에 대한 다양한 연구가 국내외에서 진행되었지만 국내에서 학술지를 발간하는 학회차원에서 학술연구출판 관행, 특히 OPR에 대한 구체적인 조사분석은 거의 진행되지 않았다. 그렇기에 OPR에 대한 학술출판 생태계의 다양한 참여 주체들의 관점을 자세히 탐구할 필요성이 있다. 이에 본 연구는 과학기술분야 학술지의 학술연구출판 관행과 관련하여 학회 차원에서 새로운 학출연구 출판관행, 특히 OPR에 어떠한 인식을 가지고 있는가에 대한 연구를 진행하고자 한다. 본 연구는 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 학술연구논문투고심사시스템(ACOMS)를 활용하는 학회를 중심으로 설문조사를 통하여 수집된 OPR 관련 학술연구출판 관행과 제도 변화에 대한 인식을 분석했다.

  • PDF

숲 체험 활동이 유아의 사회성 발달의 효과에 관한 메타분석 (A Meta-Analysis on Effects of Infant's Sociality Development in Forest Experience Activities)

  • 김찬우;박덕병
    • 농촌지도와개발
    • /
    • 제29권4호
    • /
    • pp.225-250
    • /
    • 2022
  • This study aims to examine the effects of infant's social development forest experience activities through meta-analysis. The final nine studies(total of 165 in the experimental group and 159 in the control group) were selected as a method of systematic review. Meta-analysis on overall effect size estimation, chi-square test, significance analysis, publication bias analysis, and subgroup analysis was performed using the R program. The overall effect size of 9 studies was 1.59, indicating a large effect size. As a result of subgroup analysis of the sub-factors of sociality, autonomy showed the largest effect size at 1.47, the adjusted effect size of cooperation was 1.34, the effect size adjusted for peer interaction was 1.29, and the adjusted effect size for perspective-taking ability was 0.97. All were found to have a statistically significant effect. To analyze the moderating effect, a meta-regression analysis was conducted on the participation period(4, 5~6, 7~8weeks), the number of sessions(6~10, 11~15, 16~20), the frequency per week(1, 2, 5), and the participation time(40, 60, 90, 120, 150min), but there was no statistical difference. Although not statistically significant, the effect size was larger when the participation period was 4 weeks, the number of sessions was 16 to 20, the frequency was 2 times per week, and the participation time was 40 minutes. This results can be usefully utilized by policy makers and forest commentators related to the vitalization of forest education through forest experience activities.

G투어 참여 골프 선수들의 재미경험에 관한 현상학적 분석 (Phenomenological analysis of the fun experience of G-Golf Tour players)

  • 한지훈;이철원;서광봉
    • 한국체육학회지인문사회과학편
    • /
    • 제55권4호
    • /
    • pp.343-350
    • /
    • 2016
  • 본 연구는 G투어 참여 골프 선수들의 재미경험에 관하여 현상학적 분석 방법으로 규명하는데 그 목적이 있다. 연구대상은 2016년 현재 G투어에 참여하는 남, 여 프로 골프선수들을 대상으로 남자프로 3명, 여자프로 3명으로 총 6명을 눈덩이 표집법으로 연구 참여자를 선정 하였으며, 심층 면담과 참여관찰을 통해 자료를 수집하고 얻은 내용을 1차적으로 코딩 하여 체계적으로 정리하고 분석하였으며, 2차적으로 주요 주제들이나 현상들을 중심으로 영역을 분류하여 범주화 작업을 진행 하여 의미 있는 해석과 연구 결과를 도출 할 수 있도록 하였다. 또한, 본 연구의 진실성과 타당도를 높이기 위해서 질적 연구 전문가 교수 1명과 박사 2명을 통한 동료 검증을 하였다. 분석결과는 다음과 같다. G투어의 참여 동기, G투어의 인식변화, G투어의 중독, 그리고 G투어의 재미경험으로 결과가 도출되었으며, G투어의 재미경험에 대한 하위요인으로 미디어 노출, 대인관계와 실력향상이 나타났다.

Assessment and Support Measures of Academic Journals in the National Open Access Platform AccessON

  • Hyekyong Hwang;Eun Jee Lee;Wan Jong Kim;Jin Ho Park
    • Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice
    • /
    • 제12권3호
    • /
    • pp.75-88
    • /
    • 2024
  • This study aims to assess the maturity of Korean open access (OA) journals using the OA infrastructure provided by the Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information, and develop necessary strategies for future improvement. The assessment model consists of three dimensions, 12 items, and 24 sub-items. The importance of the three dimensions (A: OA policy establishment and disclosure, B: OA sustainability, and C: Journal openness quality) was differentiated by the Analytic Hierarchy Process, and the maturity stages were divided into five levels (Entry, Growth1, Growth2, Maturity1, and Maturity2). The assessment was carried out twice for 100 academic journals. The results indicated that the proportion of journals at or above the Growth1 level increased by 11% to reach 83% during the second assessment phase, which could be owing to the learnings of the first assessment. Following expert consultations on the assessment results, three support measures were identified to activate OA. The first includes OA promotion and education activities, which involve creating standard regulations and guidelines, and advancing educational activities for societies that are either preparing for or currently implementing OA. The second involves providing support for technical aspects, such as identifiers, XMLization, and copyright management, through peer review and OA publishing platforms. The third includes collaborative activities to enhance journal evaluations and the recognition criteria for researchers' achievements in OA journals, and fostering cooperation with national and research and development institutions for financial support.

한국보건행정학회 30주년 기념 특별호 (Special Issue for the 30th Anniversary of the Korean Academy of Health Policy and Management)

  • 박은철
    • 보건행정학회지
    • /
    • 제28권3호
    • /
    • pp.195-196
    • /
    • 2018
  • The Korean Academy of Health Policy and Management (KAHPM) has shown remarkable achievements in the field of health policy and management in Korea for the last 30 years. The KAHPM consists of experts in various fields of health policy and management, and has been the leading academic discussion forum for health policy agendas of interest to the public. Health Policy and Management (HPM), the official journal of the KAHPM, published the first issue of volume 1 in October, 1991 and is publishing the second issue of volume 28 as of 2018. Currently, it is one of Korea' main journals in the field of health policy and management. HPM has published a special issue in commemoration of the 30th anniversary of the KAHPM. The HPM invited authors, including former presidents of the KAHPM and current board members, to write about main issues in health policy and management. Although the HPM tried to set up an invited author on all subjects in the health policy and management field, 19 papers are published, that completed the peer review process by August, 2018. The authors of the special issue of the 30th anniversary of the KAHPM include six former presidents, a senior professor, and 12 board members. The subjects of this issue are reform of the healthcare delivery system, health insurance and medical policy, reform of health system governance, the role of National Health Insurance Service (NHIS), the Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs (KIHASA) and the National Evidence-based healthcare Collaborating Agency (NECA), ethical aspects of health policy change, regional disparities of healthcare, healthcare accreditation, new healthcare technology evaluation system, globalization of the healthcare industry, the epidemiological investigator system, the quarantine system, safety and disaster, and official development assistance. There are some remaining topics to deal with for the KAHPM: aged society, anti-smoking, non-infectious disease, suicide, healthcare resources, emergency medical care, out-of-pocket money, medical fee payment system, medical aid system, long-term care insurance, industrial accident compensation insurance, community-centered health welfare system, and central government and local government of health. The HPM will continue to publish review articles on the main topics in health policy and management. This is because the KAHPM, which has been the leading academic society of Korea's health policy and management for the last 30 years, feels responsible for continuing its mission for the next 30 years.