• 한국치위생학회지
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.111-118
• /
• 2015

Objectives: The aim of the study is to investigate the health belief model affecting the oral health behavior in middle and high school students. Methods: The subjects were 296 middle and high school students in Seoul, Gyeonggi and Incheon from February 15 to March 21, 2014. The students filled out the self-reported questionnaires after receiving informed consents. The instrument was adopted and revised from those of Kim & Hwang, and Choi & Joo. The questionnaire consisted of 4 questions of general characteristics, 9 questions of oral health status including subjective oral health status, frequency of tooth brushing, duration of tooth brushing, method of tooth brushing, use of oral health devices, dental clinic visit, scaling services, snack intake, and smoking. The oral health belief consisted of 25 questions including susceptibility, seriousness, barriers, benefit, and self-efficacy using Likert 5 scale. The reliability of Cronbach's alpha in the study was 0.725. Data were analyzed using SPSS ver 18.0 for frequency analysis, t-test, ANOVA, ${\chi}^2$-test, and Pearson's correlation coefficient, simple regression, and binary logistic regression. Results: Oral health beliefs of middle and high school students affected the oral health behaviors. Susceptibility, barriers and self-efficacy also influenced on the oral health behaviors. In order to provide the best oral health education, susceptibility and self-efficacy are the primary factors to increase motivation because the motivation endows the students with correction of oral health behaviors that improve the knowledge, attitudes, and decrease barriers in oral hygiene. Conclusions: It is important to correct oral health behaviors in the middle and high school students by providing the continuing and systematic oral health education.

• 치위생과학회지
• /
• 제5권4호
• /
• pp.179-184
• /
• 2005

본 연구는 경기지역에 위치한 치위생과 2, 3학년 학생을 대상으로 구강암에 대한 지식과 태도 및 신념을 파악하고자 하였으며, 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 1. 구강건강에 대한 태도를 알아본 결과 응답자의 41.0%가 구강질환을 경험한 적이 있었으며, 발생 시에는 대부분 치과의원을 이용하는 것으로 나타났다. 구강검진 또한 치과의원에서 1년에 1번씩 검진을 받는다는 응답이 가장 많았으며, 구강건강에 우식성 식품의 섭취가 가장 좋지 않다고 답하였다. 2. 구강건강에 대한 신념에 있어서 42.9%가 본인의 구강이 건강하다고 생각하고 있었으며, 88.6%는 본인의 구강에 대해 염려가 된다고 하였다. 3. 구강암에 대한 지식에서 63.3%가 학교에서 알게 되었으며, 32.2%만이 구강암에 대한 예방법을 알고 있다고 답하였다. 구강암의 치료방법에서 수술이 가장 높게 나타났다. 4. 구강암에 대한 태도에 있어 구강암의 관심정도를 알아본 결과 45.4%가 관심이 있다고 답하였다. 5. 구강암의 신념에서는 불량한 구강환경을 구강암의 첫 번째 원인으로 꼽고 있으며, 91.3%가 구강암이 심각하다고 생각하고 있었다. 또한 응답자의 대부분은 구강암에 대한 예방과 치료가 모두 가능하다고 답하였다. 구강암 예방을 위해 정기적인 구강검진이 가장 중요하다고 하였다. 6. 구강건강과 구강암에 대한 신념의 상관관계를 조사한 결과 약한 양의 상관관계로 구강에 대한 염려가 높을수록 구강암에 대한 관심도가 높고 구강암에 대해서도 심각하다고 생각하고 있었으며, 통계적으로 유의한 관계를 보이고 있었다.

• 대한치과기공학회지
• /
• 제39권3호
• /
• pp.197-204
• /
• 2017

Purpose: This study aims to discover the degree of department of dental technology students' oral health recognition and to find out the differences of oral health beliefs depending on oral health behaviors. Method: The subjects in this study were the students who attended department of dental technology in Daejon, Daegu, Iksan. After a survey was conducted, the collected data were analyzed with SPSS 23.0. An analysis of frequency, independent t-test, one-way ANOVA, correlation was used. Result: Among the general things related to oral health behaviors was the statistical significant differences(p<0.05) in the area of oral health belief depending on the opportunity of oral health education, attendance of oral health course, self-aware of oral health, the number of times of teeth brushing, teeth brushing status, experience and the degree of smoking. There was a positive correlation between the degree of susceptibility and that of response to severity, barrier, salience and benefit. Severity also showed the positive correlation with barrier. Higher barrier susceptibility meant higher salience and higher benefit. So was the correlation between benefit and salience. Conclusion: This study showed that college education should focus on the students' possible behaviors in order to convey the effective oral health knowledge.

• 한국융합학회논문지
• /
• 제7권4호
• /
• pp.209-215
• /
• 2016

본 연구는 중년층을 대상으로 구강건강신념과 구강병 예방행동에 관한 융합적 관계를 분석하였다. U시 일부 중년층 280명을 최종 분석 대상으로 하였다. 회귀분석의 결과로 볼 때 구강건강신념 중 구강병 예방행동의도, 구강병 예방행동에 가장 큰 영향을 미치는 요인은 구강건강은 가치 있는 것이라고 느끼는 중요성이었다. 구강병 예방행동의도를 매개로 직간접적 영향을 알아본 결과, 중요성, 유익성 변인이 구강병 예방행동에 미치는 영향은 부분매개효과를 가지는 것으로 나타났고, 자기 효능감은 완전매개효과를 가지는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구 결과, 이미 구강병에 이환되어 심각성과 장애를 느끼고 있는 중장년층의 구강예방행동을 수행할 수 있도록 하기 위해서는 구강 건강이 전신질환만큼 중요하다는 중요성과 구강건강이 전신건강에 유익하다는 것을 계몽할 수 있는 중재프로그램 개발이 필요 하겠다.

• 한국치위생학회지
• /
• 제8권4호
• /
• pp.165-180
• /
• 2008

The present study is a descriptive survey on factors affecting middle school students' oral health belief and oral health practice. In order to find methods for forming right beliefs and inducing desirable behavioral patterns, we conducted a questionnaire survey with 470 students at two middle schools in Cheongju and drew conclusions as follows. Of the 470 questionnaires, 457 were recovered. With 10 inappropriately answered ones excluded, 446 questionnaires were analyzed. 1. As to oral health belief according to general characteristics, susceptibility was 2.63 points (p=0.035) in male students, 2.68 (p=0.016) in 3rd year students, and 2.92 (p=0.002) in only child students. Seriousness was 2.57 (p=0.017) in male students, 2.67 (p=0.001) in 3rd?year students, and 2.92 (p=0.001) in only child students. barrier was 2.62 (p=0.009) in 3rd year students, and 2.95 (p=0.002) in only child students. Benefit was 3.40 (p=0.011) in female students, and 3.43 (p=0.003) in 1st year students. salience was 3.21 (p=0.006) in female students, and 3.24 (p=0.009) in 1st year students. 2. As to oral health belief according to oral?health?related factors, susceptibility and seriousness were 2.69 (p=0.003) and 2.72 (p=0.000), respectively, in the lower?middle class group, 2.83 (p=0.001) and 2.80 (p=0.003), respectively, in the drink taking group, and 2.80 (p=0.000) and 2.75 (p=0.000), respectively, in the low conversation group. barrier was 2.63 (p=0.018) in the lower?middle class group, 2.67 (p=0.021) in the low conversation group, and 2.77 (p=0.000) in the group fearing the visit to the dental clinic. Benefit was 3.36 (p=0.000) in the high conversation group, and 3.37 (p=0.0l5) in the group visiting the dental clinic for prevention. salience was 3.26 for beverage and 3.20 (p=0.003) for fruit and vegetable. 3. As to oral health practice according to general characteristics, the score of oral health practice was 3.21 (p=0.000) in female students, 3.30 (p=0.000) in those aged 12 or below, and 3.27 (p=0.000) in 1st?year students. 4. As to oral health practice according to factors related to oral health, the point was 3.17 (p=0.002) in the middle upper class group, 3.24 (p=0.001) in the group eating mainly fruit or vegetable, and 3.18 (p=0.030) in those with experience in education. 5. Oral health practice was in a negative correlation with susceptibility (r=-0.143), and in a positive correlation with benefit (r=0.229) and salience (r=0.286).

• 한국치위생학회지
• /
• 제8권4호
• /
• pp.205-217
• /
• 2008

The purpose of this study was to provide information on the development of an oral-health promotion program geared toward office workers. The subjects in this study were 240 employees at the headquarters of S construction company. After a survey was conducted in July and August 2008, the answer sheets from 208 respondents were gathered, and 191 answer sheets were analyzed except 17 unanalyzable ones. The findings of the study were as follows: 1. In regard to subjective oral health status, the largest number of the participants that accounted for 37.2% found their mouth to be neither healthy nor unhealthy. The greatest number of them that represented 58.1% had never visited a dentist's office to receive preventive treatment. 2. Regarding relationship between toothbrushing education experience and toothbrushing frequency, the most common toothbrushing frequency was three times a day( 46.5%) among the company employees who had ever received that education. In the event of the office workers without that experience, the most prevalent frequency was three times(63.6%). The toothbrushing frequency was statistically significantly different according to the toothbrushing education experience(p<0.05). As to the relationship of toothbrushing education experience to tooth- brushing method, the largest number(48.2%) of those who had ever received that education brushed their upper and lower teeth along with the gums by rotating the toothbrush downward from the top and upward from the bottom respectively. In the event of the office workers without that experience, 49.4 percent brushed their teeth and gums by rotating the toothbrush up and down. Thus, whether they had ever received education about toothbrushing made a statistically significant difference to their toothbrushing method(p<0.05). 3. As a result of evaluating their oral health belief by utilizing a five-point scale, they got a mean of 2.95. In each area of oral health belief, they got the best marks in benefit(3.66), salience(3.42), barrier(2.84), susceptility(2.58) and seriousness(2.23). Given the above-mentioned finding of the study, two sorts of oral health beliefs, which are benefit and salience, should be stressed in the development of oral health education programs that cater to company employees. And sustained research efforts should be channeled into finding out the relationship between oral health and actual oral health care.

• 한국치위생학회지
• /
• 제3권2호
• /
• pp.169-182
• /
• 2003

The present study attempts to investigate the knowledge, belief, attitude and behavior of healthcare major students and non-healthcare counterparts concerning their oral hygiene. The purpose is to provide basic data for positive oral health activities to the students with non-healthcare major, who tend to have insufficient information on oral hygiene. A survey was conducted to 400 students in K college in Incheon from May 1-30, 2003. A total of 384 surveys were analyzed using the SPSS program Version 10.0. The result is as follows: 1. There was a statistically significant difference in the knowledge on oral hygiene between the healthcare(M=3.08) and non-healthcare(M=2.78) students(pE0.05). 2. As for the beliefs and attitudes toward oral health behaviors, 56.9% of the healthcare students and 60.6% of non-health care counterparts responded "moderate" to the question asking if they liked tooth-brushing. The reason they liked tooth-brushing were cleanliness(60.3% of healthcare and 71.9% of non-healthcare students). They didn't like brushing their teeth because they felt it was a nuisance(60.6% of healthcare and 54.5% of non-healthcare students). 90.6% of healthcare students and 90.1% of their non-healthcare counterparts said they wanted to keep their oral health intact. Most of the subjects seemed to acquire information on oral hygiene through mass media(62.2% of healthcare and 55.3% of non-healthcare students). The persons who give them oral health information are their friends or neighbors(26.8% of healthcare and 22.8% of non-healthcare students), and dental hygienists were the last in the list of the sources of information(3.4% of healthcare and 2.5% of non-healthcare students). 3. Their oral health behaviors were also considered, 64.4% of the healthcare students and 53.7% of the non-healthcare counterparts brush their teeth once or twice a day, 51.4% of the former brush their teeth for 2 minutes and 44.8% of the latter for 3 minutes. Some of them use oral health measures other than tooth-brushing(13.3% of healthcare and 14.3% of non-healthcare students). Not many of them used oral health products(6.6% of healthcare and 5.9% of non-healthcare), and the difference was statistically significant(pE0.05). The largest number of healthcare students brush their teeth right before going to bed(29.9%), while their counterparts do it after breakfast(25.8%)

• 한국응용과학기술학회지
• /
• 제35권4호
• /
• pp.1413-1420
• /
• 2018

본 연구는 간호학생의 구강건강에 관해 알아보고자 시행되었고, 207명을 대상으로 자가 보고식 설문을 진행하였다. 연구결과 지난 1년간 치과를 방문한 학생은 64.3% 였고, 치과 방문 이유는 정기검진이 25.9%, 충치치료가 23.5%이었다. 치과를 방문하지 않는 이유는 '덜 중요해서'가 12.6%로 가장 많았고, '치과 가기가 두려워서'가 10.6%로 나타났다. 하루동안 평균 잇솔질 횟수는 3.1회 이었으며 잇솔질 시간은 2~3분이 56.0%를 차지했다. 그러나 치과 방문 의도에 관한 질문에는 '치료 받을 때만'이 51.7%고 가장 많았고, '통증이 있을 때만'도 10.1%나 되었다. 구강교육을 받을 용의에 대해서는 54.6%가 '그렇다'고 응답하였고, 구강교육 희망내용으로는 '미백'이 34.5%로 가장 많았고, '구취예방'이 19.2%이었다. 구강건강정보 획득 경로로는 '인터넷'이 42.0%로 가장 많았고, '가족이나 친구'가 25.6%로 나타났다. 구강건강신념 중 감수성은 2.47점, 심각성은 2.00점, 유익성은 4.03점으로 나타났다. 치과치료가 필요했지만 치료를 받지 않은 학생에 비해 치료받은 학생에서 구강건강신념이 높게 나타났고(p<.001), 충치가 없는 학생에 비해 충치가 있는 학생에서 구강건강신념이 높게 나타났다(p<.001). 충치 개수와 감수성(r=.330, p=.002), 심각성(r=.25, p=.019)은 유의한 상관관계가 있었다. 본 연구 결과를 토대로 간호대학생의 구강건강을 위한 효과적인 프로그램 개발에 활용할 필요가 있다고 사료된다.

• 대한소아치과학회지
• /
• 제35권1호
• /
• pp.118-126
• /
• 2008

치과공포는 치과의료서비스를 이용하는데 방해요인 중 하나로, 정기구강검진이나 반드시 받아야 하는 치료를 피하게 만들어 구강건강상태를 악화시키며, 많은 치과의료인력에서 환자의 행동을 조절하는데 실패의 원인으로 작용한다. 따라서 치과공포는 구강건강증진과 진료 효율성 측면에서 중요하게 관리되어야 한다. 이에 저자는 만13세 이상 18세 이하인 청소년 총 313명을 대상으로 Dental Fear Survey 척도를 이용하여 치과공포도를 측정하였고, 치과공포와의 관련된 요인 및 이에 영향을 미치는 요인을 분석하여 다음의 결과를 얻었다. 1. 응답자의 치과공포도는 구강건강상태가 좋은 선진국과 비교할 때 높은 수준이었다. 2. 진료동안 가장 강하게 경험한 생리적 반응은 '근육긴장'이었고, 치과공포를 유발하는 주된 자극요인은 '마취주사기'와 '치아삭제용 드릴'로 나타났다. 3. 치과공포도가 높을수록 치과의료서비스 이용 횟수가 적었고, 정기구강검진을 시행하지 않았으며, 자가 인지한 구강병 증상도 많은 것으로 조사되었다. 4. 치과공포도에 가장 많은 영향을 미치는 요인은 직접통증경험과 치과의사에 대한 신뢰도로 나타났다.

• 치위생과학회지
• /
• 제13권4호
• /
• pp.369-377
• /
• 2013

본 연구는 일부 대학생의 흡연실태와 흡연실태에 따른 흡연신념을 파악하여 대학생의 건강증진에 도움이 될 수 있는 흡연 예방 및 금연 프로그램 개발과 활용에 필요한 자료를 제공하고자 2012년 5월 1일부터 6월 1일까지 전라북도에 위치하고 있는 10개 대학교 학생 중 1,696명을 대상으로 분석한 결과 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 1. 흡연실태는 흡연경험이 있는 학생은 23.7%였고, 처음 흡연한 시기는 고등학교가 42.1%로 가장 높았고, 흡연기간은 4년 이상이 46.1%로 가장 높게 나타났다. 2. 일반적 특성에 따른 흡연신념은 한 달 용돈이 30만원~39만원과, 40만원 이상에서 1.91점으로 가장 높았고(p<0.001), 흡연과 구강건강 관련성은 '전혀 그렇지 않다'가 2.00점으로 가장 높게 나타났다(p<0.001). 3. 흡연실태에 따른 흡연신념은 처음 흡연한 시기에서 초등학교가 2.66점으로 가장 높았고, 친한 친구 5명 중 흡연하는 친구는 4명이 2.60점으로 가장 높게 나타났다(p<0.05). 4. 흡연의존도와 금연의도에 따른 흡연신념은 흡연의존도에서 '매우 그렇다'가 2.75점으로 가장 높았고(p<0.001), 금연의도는 '금연하지 않음'이 2.68점으로 가장 높게 나타났다(p<0.01).