• 한국운동역학회지
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.139-153
• /
• 2003

The purpose of the study was to present technical guidance about the field goal kicking motion in American football for novices. For this purpose, kinematic analysis on the field goal kicking motion of two skilled players and two unskilled players was carried out. The following conclusions were made: 1. In comparison on the total elapsed time of the kicking, there were no significant differences between two groups. The progressing time from BP event to impact among experts group, however, took 0.141 second less than that of novices group. 2. The experts group showed right hip rotatier horizontally toward the targeted ball fixing left hip as the axis. On the other hand, the novices group didn't use the left hip as the axis in the kicking motion. 3. At the impact of kicking the ball, regarding with the distance of the ball and the supporting leg, the right and left distance of experts was 3.45cm longer than that of novices, the front and the rear distance of experts was 5.14cm shorter than novices. 4. At the impact, experts' initial velocity of the targeted ball was $5.27^m/s$ faster than novices', besides experts' incidence angular displacement was $3.78^{\circ}$ larger than novices'. 5. After BP event, experts showed a stable movement maintaining flexion and extension at left hip joint and knee joint. On the other hand, for novices, the angle of the left lower extremities became larger. 6. Experts showed the efficient flexion and extension of the hip joint and the knee joint during following procedure in the whole event of the kicking motion. At the BP event, the right knee joint angle of novices was $11.46^{\circ}$ larger than that of experts. However, the duration of the impact event and FT event among, novices had less extension of knee joint than experts. 7. At the 2nd phase, for both of the groups, the angular velocity of the knee joint drastically increased as the angular velocity of hip joint decreased. However, only novices showed the largest negative angular velocity at the impact.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제8권1호
• /
• pp.43-55
• /
• 1988

This study intended to find the differences between expert's and novice's thinking processes when they solve physics problems. Five physics professors and twenty sophomore students in a physics department were participated in the study. The researcher investigated their thinking processes in solving three physics problems on NEWTON's law of motion. The researcher accepted so called "Thinking Aloud" method. The thinking processes were recorded and transfered into protocols. The protocols were analysised by problem solving process coding system which was developed by the researcher on the basis of Larkin's problem solving process model. The results were as follows: (1) There was no difference of time required in solving physics problem of low difficulty between expert and novices; but, it takes 1.5 times longer for novices than experts in solving physics problems which difficulties are high and average. (2) Novices used working forward strategy and working backward strategy at the similiar rate in solving physics problems which difficulties were average and low. while Novices mo mostly used working backward strategy in solving physic problems which difficulty was high. Experts mostly used working forward strategy in solving physics problems whose difficulties was average and low, however experts used working forward strategy and working backward strategy at the similiar rate in solving physics problem which difficulty was high. (3) Novices usually wrote only a few information on the diagram of figure they drawn, on the other hand experts usually wrote almost all the information which are necessary for solving the problems. (4) Experts spent much time in understand the problem and evaluation stage than novices did, however experts spent less time in plan stage than novices did. (5) Physics problems are solved in sequence of understanding the problem, plan, carrying out the plan, and evaluation steps regardless of problem difficulty.

• 감성과학
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.55-64
• /
• 2009

기존의 전문성 연구들은 참가자들에게 일상적인 과제를 수행하게 함으로써 전문가와 초보자들의 차이를 알아보고자 하였다. 하지만, 본 연구는 일상적 비행 상황에 익숙해진 조종사들이 이전에 경험해보지 못한 새로운 비행 상황에서도 유연하게 대처할 수 있는지 알아보고자 하였다. 즉, 조종사의 숙련정도에 따라 정상적 및 비정상적 상황에서의 상황인식 능력이 차이가 나는지 관찰하였고 추가적으로, 전문성이 자극 제시 시간에 따른 수행변화에 영향을 주는지 알아보았다. 이를 위해 42명의 조종사들을 전문성의 정도에 따라 초보자와 전문가 집단으로 나누고 이들의 수행이 상황의 특수성 및 자극 제시 시간에 따라 어떻게 달라지는지 알아보았다. 연구를 위하여 조종실 계기판을 모방한 동영상이 제작되었는데, 동영상에 보여지는 계기판들이 모두 정상으로 움직이는 정상적 상황과 이들 중 하나의 계기가 오작동을 일으키는 비정상 상황이 연출되었다. 또한 상황을 지각하기 위한 시간의 차이가 전문성에 따라 다른 효과를 가져오는지 살펴보기 위해서 계기판 상황이 오랫동안 제시되는 긴 제시 조건과 상대적으로 짧게 제시되는 조건으로 조작되었다. 실험 결과, 정상적인 상황에서는 초보자와 전문가 집단 사이의 상황 인식이 유의한 차이가 없었으나, 비정상적인 상황에서는 전문가 집단의 상황인식이 초보자 집단보다 유의하게 높은 것으로 나타났다. 또한, 비행 상황의 제시 시간이 짧아졌을 때 조종사들의 전반적인 상황인식 정확도가 떨어졌지만, 전문가와 초보자의 수행차이는 변함없이 초보자 집단에 비해 전문가 집단의 높은 수행이 유지되었다. 비행 상황의 특수성과 제시 시간의 상호작용에 따라 초보자와 전문가의 상황인식은 어떻게 달라지는지 보았을 때, 비행 상황의 제시 시간이 길고 짧음에 관계없이 정상적 상황에서는 초보자와 전문가 집단의 상황인식 차이가 나타나지 않았으나, 비정상적 상황에서는 전문가 집단의 상황인식 정확도가 초보자 집단 보다 유의하게 높은 것으로 나타났다. 전반적으로 볼 때, 비정상적 상황은 전문가 집단의 수행에 미치는 영향에는 큰 영향을 미치니 못하나 초보자 집단의 수행에는 현저한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다.

• 한국항공운항학회지
• /
• 제22권4호
• /
• pp.42-55
• /
• 2014

The purpose of this research was to identify expertise in ait traffic control by using cognitive skill analysis for novices and experts in routine and non-routine situations. The result of study was to understand expertise in air traffic control tasks in terms of what cognitive processes are responsible for the expert's high performance levels. The problem solving task was difficult for novices, but performed relatively automatically by experts in a routine situation. The difficulty could indicate the presence of controlled processing. Rather than rules and strategies, novices focused more on environmental factors, which merely increase cognitive load. In a non-routine situation, novices showed that they did not categorize the information consistently and alternative resources were not available for them. Experts, however, performed automatically a task by arranging and organizing information related to problem solving components in contexts without regard to a routine and non-routine situation. Especially experts developed a stable representation and directed alternative resources for air traffic flow and efficiency. Based on the results, cognitive processes of experts could be useful to understand expert performance and analyze the learning process, which imply the necessity of developing expertise systematically.

• Journal of Acupuncture Research
• /
• 제40권1호
• /
• pp.44-52
• /
• 2023

Background: Previous studies have investigated technology-aided needling training systems for acupuncture on phantom models using various measurement techniques. In this study, we developed and validated a vision-based needling training system (noncontact measurement) and compared its training effectiveness with that of the traditional training method. Methods: Needle displacements during manipulation were analyzed using OpenCV to derive three parameters, i.e., needle insertion speed, needle insertion angle (needle tip direction), and needle insertion length. The system was validated in a laboratory setting and a needling training course. The performances of the novices (students) before and after training were compared with the experts. The technology-aided training method was also compared with the traditional training method. Results: Before the training, a significant difference in needle insertion speed was found between experts and novices. After the training, the novices approached the speed of the experts. Both training methods could improve the insertion speed of the novices after 10 training sessions. However, the technology-aided training group already showed improvement after five training sessions. Students and teachers showed positive attitudes toward the system. Conclusion: The results suggest that the technology-aided method using computer vision has similar training effectiveness to the traditional one and can potentially be used to speed up needling training.

• 컴퓨터교육학회논문지
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.13-21
• /
• 2011

본 연구의 목적은 CL(Computatioanl Literacy) 교육에서 중요한 교육 내용인 프로그래밍 문제해결 과정을 규명하는데 있다. 프로그래밍 초보학습자들의 인지적 사고과정 분석을 통해 프로그래밍 문제해결 과정에서 나타나는 사고 특성을 조망하는 분석틀을 제시하고, 실제 CL 문제해결 과정에서의 초보학습자들의 사고과정을 규명하는 것이다. 이를 위해 사고발성법을 적용하여 프로그래밍 과정에서 나타나는 여러 상황을 분석하였다. 본 연구에서는 학생들의 사고 특성을 추출하는 분석코드와 프로그래밍 과정 코드를 이용한 코딩조직를 개발하였고, 프로그래밍 과정에서 겪는 어려움과 이를 해결하는 과정을 Nvivo를 사용하여 종합적으로 분석하였다. 특히 프로그래밍 과정에서 나타나는 사고력의 활용에 대한 분석과 시사점을 제시하였다. 본 연구는 프로그래밍 과정에서 나타나는 인지적 사고 특성과 흐름을 이해하는데 기여하며 프로그래밍에서의 사고 과정을 과학적으로 분석할 수 있는 준거를 제시한다.

• 감성과학
• /
• 제6권3호
• /
• pp.21-28
• /
• 2003

본 연구에서는 악보 읽기에서 나타나는 전문가와 초보자의 작업기억에서의 처리 유형의 차이를 연구하기 위해 조음 억제 조건을 사용하여 2개의 실험을 실시하였다. 실험 1에서는 8개의 4분 음표가 스크린에 제시되었다가 사라지면, 참가자가 그 음표들을 기억해서 악보에 그리도록 했다. 자극은 선율적인 멜로디와 비선율적인 멜로디로 나뉘어졌다. 같은 방법으로, 실험 2에서는 각각 3개의 음으로 구성된 4개의 코드가 제시되었다. 자극은 화성적인 코드와 비화성적인 코드로 나뉘어졌다. 실험 1과 2의 분석 결과, 초보자는 공통적으로 조음 억제를 하지 않은 조건에서 조음 억제 조건보다 나은 수행을 보였다. 하지만 전문가들은 화성적 자극에 대해서는 상대적으로 조음 억제의 영향을 덜 받았다. 이러한 결과는 초보자가 조음 루프에 전적으로 의지하여 음을 처리하는 반면, 전문가는 자극이 친숙할 경우, 조음 루프로 정보를 넘기기 전에 시공간 잡기장을 통해 음을 부호화할 수 있음을 암시한다.

• 대한인간공학회지
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.49-63
• /
• 2004

In this study. differences in attention allocation patterns between expert and novIce pilots were investigated by a verbal protocol when pilots were engaged in a task during the instrument flight. Ten pilots including experts and novices were participated to conduct a pre-determined task(a fix-to-fix) on F-5E Cockpit Procedure Trainer Simulator. Experts show better performance as expected with more stable variations in speed. altitude. and attitude. In attention allocation patterns. novices allocated about 83% of attentional resources on the primary instruments (airspeed indicator. altitude indicator. and attitude) relating to the task of the basic flight while experts spent 57%. This difference in the availability of attentional resources allowed expert pilots to accomplish the task better than novices. In other words. training a pilot should consider a program for building up wider instrument scanning patterns to become an expert in a shorter time.

• 한국의류산업학회지
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.230-239
• /
• 2017

In the clothes industry, there are lack of experts including technical designers who can analyze the fit of clothes. This study is to provide practical data available for fit analysis education by distinguishing the differences in standards and aspects of garment fit between experts and novices, through the eye-tracking technology to quantify the sense of fit. For this study, two groups were organized; one composed of 7 experts with over 15 year-experience including technical designers and patternmakers, and the other composed of 7 novices who are students majoring in clothing. Wearing the goggle type eye-tracker Tobii Pro Glasses 2, the participants in the experiments were required to conduct fit analyses for a pair of pants on a live model. After those experiments, they were required to check the items for fit analysis and assess the importance level of them on a questionnaire. The differences between the two groups in the ratios of total visit count and total visit duration by each AIO(Area of Interest) of clothes were analyzed through non-parametric statistical test. The results of eye tracking experiments showed that experts focused on center front and back line, crotch area, and side seam, while novice's fixation points were dispersed around the pants. The survey results showed that the experts put importance on the center line position and its verticality, front-back proportion of side seam line, and front-back proportion of waist line, 71.4~100% of whom checked them, while 14.3% of the novices checked them.

• 인지과학
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.53-67
• /
• 2005

본 연구는 전문성에 따른 범주화 양상의 차이를 확인하고, 범주화 훈련이 전문성에 따라 인지 문제 해결에 어떠한 영향을 주는지 살펴보았다. 실험 떼서는 수학 연립방정식 문제를 사용하여 전문성 수준에 따른 집단별 문제 범주화 양상의 차이를 확인하였다. 전문가는 주로 문제 해결방법과 관련된 문제의 구조적 특징을 범주화의 기준으로 사용하였지만, 초보자는 문제의 표면적 정보를 기준으로 하여 범주화하였다. 그러나 문제의 구조를 명시적으로 표현한 조건 범주화 상황에서 초보자의 범주화 양상이 전문가와 같은 형태로 변화하는 것을 확인할 수 있었다. 초보자와 전문가의 범주화 양상이 다른 것은 초보자들이 문제의 깊은 구조를 파악하는데 어려움이 있기 때문인 것으로 보인다. 실험 2에서는 문제의 구조가 명시적으로 표현된 조건 범주화 훈련이 문제해결 능력의 향상을 가져올 수 있는지 알아보기 위하여 문제 해결 훈련을 한 집단과의 비교를 통해 전이 검사수행을 살펴보았다. 실험 결과, 전문가 집단은 문제해결 훈련이 효과적이었던데 반해, 초보자 집단은 문제 분류훈련이 더 효과적인 것으로 나타났다. 이는 초보자의 경우 문제의 깊은 구조를 파악하기 어렵기 때문에 이를 명시적으로 보여주어 훈련시킴으로써 문제 해결에 도움을 주기 때문인 것으로 보인다. 따라서 전문성의 수준에 따라 서로 다른 형태의 교육방법이 사용되어야 할 것이다.