• 에너지공학
• /
• 제23권4호
• /
• pp.31-40
• /
• 2014

국제적인 온실가스 감축 논의에 대한 구체적인 대응방안의 하나로, 우리나라는 2035년까지 신재생에너지 보급률 11% 달성을 목표로 하는 제2차 에너지기본계획을 수립하였다. 국내 신재생에너지 부문은 8개 분야 재생에너지(태양열, 태양광발전, 바이오매스, 풍력, 소수력, 지열, 해양에너지, 폐기물에너지)와 3개 분야 신에너지(연료전지, 석탄액화가스화, 수소에너지) 등 총 11개 분야로 구성되어 있다. 신재생에너지 보급 확대를 위한 정부와 민간의 투자가 늘어나면서, 신재생에너지 부문의 경제적 파급효과를 규명할 필요성도 증가하고 있다. 이에 본 논문에서는 가장 최근에 발표된 2012년도 산업연관표를 이용한 산업연관분석을 적용하여 신재생에너지 부문의 경제적 파급효과를 분석하고자 한다. 먼저 수요유도형 모형을 이용하여 신재생에너지 부문의 생산유발효과, 부가가치 유발효과, 취업유발효과를 분석한다. 둘째, 공급유도형 모형을 활용하여 공급 지장효과를 살펴본다. 마지막으로 레온티에프 가격모형을 통해 물가파급효과를 도출한다. 분석결과는 다음과 같이 된다. 첫째, 신재생에너지 부문의 1원 생산 또는 투자는 2.1776원의 생산과 0.7080원의 부가가치를 유발한다. 아울러 신재생에너지 10억원 생산 또는 투자의 취업유발효과는 9.0337명이다. 둘째, 신재생에너지 부문의 1원 공급지장으로 인한 국민경제 전체적인 생산 차질액은 1.6314원으로 분석되어 그 값이 작지 않았다. 셋째, 신재생에너지 부문 산출물의 가격이 10% 오를 때의 국민경제 전체적인 물가파급효과는 0.0123%로 작은 편이다. 이상의 정량적 정보는 신재생에너지 부문의 생산 및 투자 확대의 경제적 파급효과를 사전적으로 예측하는 데 중요한 정보로 활용될 수 있다.

• 한국신재생에너지학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국신재생에너지학회 2008년도 춘계학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.87-90
• /
• 2008

Levelized generation cost(LGC) has been widely used in assessing feed-in tariffs(FiT) for electricity generating from new and renewable energies. Current FiTs for renewable electricity in Korea have been fixed and applied with realistic economic data by the efforts of KERI(Korea Electrotechnology Research Institute) since October 2006. Some critical issues on the estimation of LGC are, however, found in KERI's report. Major issues are the estimation of capital cost, the consideration of corporate tax, and the application of economic life cycle in the formulae for LGC. These critical issues are examined and interpreted in a correct way in this paper.

• 신재생에너지
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.79-86
• /
• 2005

This study conducted an analysis of economic feasibility with unit generating costs calculated based on scenarios of capacity factors, discount rates, government supporting rates, installation costs. However, It Is clear that few new and renewable energies can meet the tariffs [government purchasing prices] set by the government in light of the current market reality. Without the government support, solar PV is not economically feasible at the tariff of \716.40/kWh. in the case of wind Power, the current tariff of \107.66/kWh is not enough to make it competitive except for a mid- and large-scale wind farm The analysis showed that even small hydro is not economically acceptable at the current tariff of \73.69/kWh.

• 에너지공학
• /
• 제14권2호
• /
• pp.82-97
• /
• 2005

RPS(Renewable Portfolio Standards)란 전력의 일정 양 또는 비율을 신$\cdot$재생에너지에 의하여 충당하도록 의무화하는 제도로써 정부지원에 의존한 신$\cdot$재생에너지 보급을 시장기능에 의하여 활성화하려는 새로운 정책도구이다. 본 논문은 이와 같은 RPS제도의 국내 도입에 대비하여 RPS의 기본 개념과 시장기구 하의 운용방식, 정책설계 시 고려사항 등을 살펴보았다. 이를 통하여 신$\cdot$재생에너지 전망 및 계획상의 문제점과 RPS도입에 따른 전력시장에서의 효과 등을 확인하고, 최종적으로는 향후 RPS도입을 위한 정책제언을 도출한다.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.67-79
• /
• 2008

Global warming, which is one of the most serious challenges, has been the subject of intense debate and concern for many scientists, policy-makers, and citizens for at least the past decade. To protect the health and economic well-being of current and future generations, we must reduce our emissions like carbon dioxide. Alternatives to achieve an energy future without serious global warming are to change to clean and renewable sources of energy like the wind, the sun lights, rivers, the biomass, hydrogen, and oceans. To identify some of the key and new environmental impacts associated with renewable energy and hydrogen energy, we set up the new conceptual methodology. Specifically, new identified environmental and health impacts are related with the usage of hydrogen energy. When comparing with fossil fuel, the renewable energies can reduce the release of carbon dioxide when they are used except hydrogen produced from fossil fuel. However, all renewable energy technologies are not appropriate to all applications or locations. Our results suggest that all of alternatives to replace fossil fuel can release the several global and local impacts although they seems to be smaller than the impacts from fossil fuel. Therefore, the quantitative and detail analysis to assess environmental impacts of the alternative energies might be useful to make our decision for the future energy against the global warming.

• 한국신재생에너지학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국신재생에너지학회 2005년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.604-604
• /
• 2005

• 대한안전경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한안전경영과학회 2007년도 추계학술대회
• /
• pp.493-502
• /
• 2007

The oil consuming country, Korea is spending amount to 220bn barrel per day. It is higher-ranked as 8th country among oil consuming country. France, Brazil, Italia, Spain have recorded GDP than it of Korea. But, the oil consuming of Korea is more than it of them. The GDP of Korea is ranked 11th country, based on 2005. But Korea is higher-ranked as 8th country among oil consuming country. The new and renewable energy as alternative of oil is first measurement. But, the supply of new and renewable energy is inactive 2.13% among total energies. The economist prospects about 1bn job creation during the ten years through new and renewable energy. The merit of new and renewable energy is capital intensive and higher valuable industry.

• 한국응용과학기술학회지
• /
• 제30권3호
• /
• pp.480-487
• /
• 2013

Bioenergy is classified to one of the renewable energy resources such as solar, wind, hydro and tidal energies. It should be noted that all the renewable energies contribute to the reduction of greenhouse gases emission. In some cases, energy from wastes was also categorized as a renewable energy in our country even though it has only negligible effect on the emission reduction. In this paper, we tried to identify the bioenergy in order to follow the global indices of the renewable energy. The indices evaluated here were whether a resource is renewable, biogenic, biodegradable, combustible and organic. Biogenic and combustible were selected as the indices to identify the bioenergy. It was also suggested that combustible as an index can be exchangeable to organic.

• 한국태양에너지학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국태양에너지학회 2008년도 춘계학술발표대회 논문집
• /
• pp.281-286
• /
• 2008

Current feed-in tariffs(FIT) of Electricity generating from new and renewable energy sources are reappraised with the corrected formula of levelized generation cost(LGC) of utility power. The LGC of new and renewable electricity should be formulated in explicitly reflecting the capital cost and corporate tax during the economic life cycle based on its realistic application data. An applicable term of the FITs should, especially, be equal to the economic life cycle. The revised FITs issued in 2006 were, however, derived from the incorrect formula described in the study of KERI(Korea Electrotechnology Research Institute), and consequently misestimated. The reappraisal values for FIT of new and renewable electricity were shown and interpreted in this paper. An FIT of PV more than 30 kW, for example, should be 972.86 won/kWh instead of current 677.38 won/kWh increasing 43.6%. An upward revision of other FITs for new and renewable electricities should also be required in the range of 8.6% to 47.3%.

• Journal of Electrical Engineering and Technology
• /
• 제10권4호
• /
• pp.1408-1414
• /
• 2015

The renewable energies such as photovoltaic power, wind power and biomass have grown to a greater extent as decarbonization techniques. The renewable energies are interconnected to power systems (or electrical grids) in order to increase benefits from economies of scale, and the extra attention is focused on the Grid Code. A grid code defines technical parameters that power plants must meet to ensure functions of power systems, and the grid code determined by considering power system characteristics is various across the country. Some TSO (Transmission System Operator) and ISO (Independent System Operator) have issued grid code for wind power and the special requirements for offshore wind farm. The main purpose of the above grid code is that wind farm in power systems has to act as the existing power plants. Therefore wind farm developer and wind turbine manufacturer have great difficulty in grasping and meeting grid code requirements. This paper presents the basic understanding for grid codes of developed countries in the wind power and trends of those technical requirements. Moreover, in grid code viewpoint, the active power control of wind power is also discussed in details.