Journal of Energy Engineering (에너지공학)

The Korean Society for Energy (한국에너지학회)
권호 표지

Conditions to Introduce the Renewable Portfolio Standards in Korea

신$\cdot$재생에너지 의무비율할당제(Renewable Portfolio Standards) 국내도입시 고려사항에 관한 연구

  • Chang, Han-Soo (Department of Energy Studies, Graduate School, Ajou University) ;
  • Choi, Ki-Ryun (Department of Energy Studies, Graduate School, Ajou University) ;
  • Kim, Su-Duk (Department of Energy Studies, Graduate School, Ajou University)
  • 장한수 (아주대학교 대학원 에너지학과) ;
  • 최기련 (아주대학교 대학원 에너지학과) ;
  • 김수덕 (아주대학교 대학원 에너지학과)
  • Published : 2005.06.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

RPS (Renewable Portfolio Standards) is a policy tool to disseminate renewable energies through market mechanism. RPS promotes renewable power generation by obligating electricity market participants to deliver the required amount of electricity from renewable energies. To promote and encourage renewable energies, Korean government is considering to introduce RPS to domestic market in the near future. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the definition and market mechanism of RPS and to review key considerations in its design. In conclusion, we recommend some prerequisite in its introduction to Korea.

RPS(Renewable Portfolio Standards)란 전력의 일정 양 또는 비율을 신$\cdot$재생에너지에 의하여 충당하도록 의무화하는 제도로써 정부지원에 의존한 신$\cdot$재생에너지 보급을 시장기능에 의하여 활성화하려는 새로운 정책도구이다. 본 논문은 이와 같은 RPS제도의 국내 도입에 대비하여 RPS의 기본 개념과 시장기구 하의 운용방식, 정책설계 시 고려사항 등을 살펴보았다. 이를 통하여 신$\cdot$재생에너지 전망 및 계획상의 문제점과 RPS도입에 따른 전력시장에서의 효과 등을 확인하고, 최종적으로는 향후 RPS도입을 위한 정책제언을 도출한다.

Keywords

References

  1. 대체에너지개발보급센터. 2003년도 대체에너지 분야별 기술자료, 2003
  2. 김수덕 외. 신.재생에너지 의무비율 할당제(RPS) 도입을 위한 경제적 파급효과 분석, 에너지경제연구원 연구보고서, 2004
  3. 김진오. 경쟁력전력시장에서의 재생에너지 활성화 방안 연구, 에너지경제연구원, 2002
  4. 김정인. 지속가능한 에너지를 위한 정책 전망과 과제, 에너지절약을 위한 제2회 정책포럼, 2001
  5. 대한민국정부. 제2차 국가에너기본계획(2002-2011), 2003
  6. 박광수 외. 전력수요 가격탄력성 추정 및 활용방안 연구, 에너지경제연구원, 2004
  7. 부경진 외. 녹색가격제도(Green Pricing)의 국내도입에 관한 연구, 정책연구보고서 2001-06, 에너지경제연구원, 2001
  8. 산업자원부. 대체에너지이용 보급촉진을위한 기본계획수립연구, 1998
  9. 산업자원부. 신.재생에너지구입요금산정기준에 관한 연구, 1999
  10. 산업자원부. 대체에너지 기술보급 종합 대책 , 2000
  11. 산업자원부. 대체에너지보급 확대를 위한 제도개선방안 연구, 2001
  12. 산업자원부. 원자력발전과 대체에너지공존 활성화 방안, 2002
  13. 산업자원부. 고시 2003-61호 대체에너지이용발전전력의 기준가격지침 , 2003a
  14. 산업자원부. 대체에너지보급목표 달성을 위한 세부 실행계획 수립연구, 2003-N-PS04-P-01, 2003b
  15. 산업지원부. 에너지관리공단, 에너지.자원기술개발사업 관련법령 및 규정, 2003
  16. 산업자원부 외. 2002년도 대체에너지보급 통계, 2003
  17. 에너지관리공단. 2002년 대체에너보급관련자료집, 2003
  18. 한국전력. 경영통계, 2004
  19. Abe, J.D.; Alexander, L.R.; Clark, C.F.; Rosen, R.A. NETS: Capturing Electricity Information in New England, The Electricity Journal, 1999, 12(4), 46-54 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1040-6190(99)00026-3
  20. Bernow, S.; Dougherty, W.; Duckworth, M. Renewables Portfolio Standard Prices in a Competitive Context, The Electricity Journal, 1997, 10(6), 2 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1040-6190(97)80415-0
  21. Bernow, S.; Dougherty W: Duckworth, M. Quantifying the Impacts of a National, Tradable Renewables Portfolio Standard, The Electricity Journal, 1997, 10(4), 42-52 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1040-6190(97)80558-1
  22. Berry, D., The Market for Tradable Renewable Energy Credits, Ecological Economics, 2002, 42(3), 369-379 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00128-3
  23. Berry, T.; Jaccard, M. Renewable Portfolio Standard: Design Considerations and an Implementation Survey, Energy Policy, 29(4), 263-277 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00126-9
  24. Berry, T.; Jaccard, M. The Renewable Portfolio Standard: Design Considerations and an Implementation Survey, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, 2002, 43(4), 272
  25. Bolinger, M.; Wiser, R.; Milford, L.; Stoddard M.; Porter, K. States Emerge as Clean Energy Investors: A Review of State Support for Renewable Energy, The Electricity Journal, 2001, 14(9), 82-95 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1040-6190(01)00246-9
  26. Chupka, M.W. Designing Effective Renewable Markets, The Electricity Journal, 2003, 16(4), 46-57 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1040-6190(03)00049-6
  27. Database of State Incentives for Renewable Energy (DSIRE), http://www.dsireusa.org/
  28. Energy Information Administration, Impacts of a 10-Percent Renewable Portfolio Standard, 2002a
  29. Energy Information Administration, Addendum: Impact of Renewable Fuels Standard/MTBE Provisions of S. 517, 2002b
  30. Energy Information Administration, The National Energy Modeling System (NEMS): An Overview 2003, 2003a
  31. Energy Information Administration, Analysis of a 10-Percent Renewable Portfolio Standard, 2003b
  32. Energy Information Administration, Addendum: Analysis of a 10-Percent Renewable Portfolio Standard, 2003c
  33. Energy Information Administration, Supplement to Analysis of a 10-Percent Renewable Portfolio Standard, 2003d
  34. Ericsson, Karin, Suvi Huttunen, Lars J. Nilsson and Per Svenningsson, Bioenergy policy and market development in Finland and Sweden, Energy Policy, In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online, 2003
  35. Espey, S. Renewables Portfolio Standard: A Means for Trade with Electricity from Renewable Energy Sources?, Energy Policy, 2001, 29(7), 557-566 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00157-9
  36. Fan, J.; Sun, W.; Ren, D.M. Renewables Portfolio Standard and Regional Energy Structure Optimisation in China, Energy Policy, In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online, 2003
  37. Haddad, B.M.; Jefferiss, P. Forging Consensus on National Renewables Policy: The Renewables Portfolio Standard and the National Public Benefits Trust Fund, The Electricity Journal, 1999, 12(2), 68-80 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1040-6190(98)00125-0
  38. Jung, Y. Growth of Energy Demand and Supply Diversification in the NE Asia Symposium on Pacific Energy Cooperation 2002 at Hotel Okura, Tokyo, 2002
  39. Klass, D.L. A Critical Assessment of Renewable Energy Usage in the USA, Energy Policy, 2003, 31(4), 353-367 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00069-1
  40. International Energy Agency, Standing Group on Long- Term Co-Operation Committee on Energy Research and Technology, IEA In-Depth Report of Swedish Energy Policies 2004, Draft Report of Sweden, IEA/SLT/CERT, 2004
  41. Langniss, O.; Wiser, R. The Renewables Portfolio Standard in Texas: an Early Assessment, Energy Policy, 2003, 31(6), 527-535 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00095-2
  42. Lauber, V. REFIT and RPS: Options for a Harmonised Community Framework, Energy Policy, In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online, 2003
  43. Minnesotans for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Projected Impact of a Renewable Portfolio Standard on Minnesotas Electricity Prices, MN Building Suite 600, 46 East Fourth Street, St. Paul, MN 55101, USA
  44. OECD/IEA, Renewables Information 2002, 2002
  45. Payne, A.; Duke, R.; Williams, R.H. Accelerating Residential PV Expansion: Supply Analysis for Competitive Electricity Markets, Energy Policy, 2001, 29(10), 787-800 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00014-3
  46. Rader, N.A.; Norgaard, R.B. Efficiency and Sustainability in Restructured Electricity Markets: The Renewables Portfolio Standard, The Electricity Journal, 1996, 9(6), 37-49 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1040-6190(96)80262-4
  47. Sissine, F. Renewable Energy: Tax Credit, Budget, and Electricity Production Issues, Congressional Research Service Reports, National Library for the Environment, National Council for Science and the Environment, 1725 K Street, Suite 212, Washington, DC, 20006
  48. State Energy Conservation Office, Renewable Energy and Your Electric Utility, 111 East 17th Street, Room 1114, Austin, Texas 78774, USA
  49. Tillman, D.A. Biomass Cofiring: The Technology, the Experience, the Combustion Consequences, Biomass and Bioenergy, 2000, 19(6), 365-384 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(00)00049-0
  50. Tonn, B.E.; Schweitzer, M. Institutional and Programmatic Suggestions for Satisfying Public Policy Responsibilities in a Retail Competitive Electric Industry, Energy Policy, 1997, 25(1), 29-42 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(96)00118-8
  51. Winkler, H. Renewable Energy Policy in South Africa: Policy Options for Renewable Electricity, Energy Policy, In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online, 2003
  52. Wiser, R.; Porter, K.; Grace, R.; Kappel, C. Evaluating State Renewables Portfolio Standards, prepared for National Geothermal Collaborative, 2003
  53. Wiser, R.; Pickle S.; Goldman, C. Renewable Energy Policy and Electricity Restructuring: A California Case Study, Energy Policy, 1998, 26(6), 465-475 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(98)00002-0