• 대한수학교육학회지:수학교육학연구
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.161-182
• /
• 2000

This study is to develop assessment framework, test items and questionnaire for the National Assessment of Educational Achievement(NAEA), which administered in the elementary and secondary schools across the country in this year(2000). According to the first year study result of the NAEA, the test was administered in two core subjects, Mathematics and Social Studies. In this study, test items and sets of questionnaire and administered pretest were developed in the last year. In this year, the NAEA was administered with the adjusted test items and questionnaires and the results was analyzed and would be reported to the public. NAEA was developed on the basis of national curriculum, especially of the nature and objectives of subject curriculum in Mathematics (and also Social Studies). In the framework of assessment, we set up four differentiated levels of student achievement: 'under basic', 'basic', 'intermediary', and 'advanced'. Here 'the intermediary level' means the level of educational achievement in which students can understand average content of subject curriculum. 'Advanced level' indicates the level of educational achievement in which students master all the content of subject curriculum and apply basic concepts and principles to a variety of situations. 'The basic level' means the level of educational achievement in which students do not achieve the intermediary level. Students who do not understand average content of subject curriculum are classified as belonging to the basic level. Finally, this study would explain how to administer and analyze the test in the future. The test result was analyzed to report students' educational achievement according to regions, content areas, behavioral characteristics, and etc. This study would show how to report test result\ulcorner and how to set up students' academic achievement.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제57권4호
• /
• pp.329-352
• /
• 2018

This study analyzed each process of demand analysis(A), design(D), development(D), implementation(I) and evaluation(E) of the program to support mathematics learning of students with under-achievement of math in high school. To analyze the demand, a survey was conducted on 235 high school math teachers and 334 high school students who were under-achieved in mathematics. To design and develope the program, this study linked middle school math to high school math so that the students with poor math learning could easily participate in mathematics learning. The programs developed in this study were implemented in three high schools, where separate classes were organized and run for students with poor math learning. The evaluation of the programs developed in this study was done in two ways. One was a quantitative evaluation conducted by five experts, and the other was a qualitative evaluation conducted through interviews with teachers and students participating in the program. This study found that students with poor mathematics learning were more motivated to learn, started to do mathematics, and encouraged to be confident when using learning materials that included easy problems and detailed solutions that they could solve themselves. From these results, the following three implications can be derived in developing a program to support students who are experiencing poor mathematics learning in high school. First, we should develop learning materials that link middle school mathematics to high school mathematics so that students can supplement middle school mathematics related to high school mathematics. Second, we need to develop learning materials that include detailed solutions to basic examples and include homogeneous problems that can be solved while looking at the basic example's solution process. Third, we should avoid the challenge of asking students who are under-achieving to respond too openly.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈C:초등수학교육
• /
• 제5권1호
• /
• pp.21-39
• /
• 2001

This study is to develop assessment framework, test items and questionnaire for the National Assessment of Educational Achievement(NAEA), which administered in the elementary and secondary schools across the country in this year(2000). According to the first year study result of the NAEA, the test was administered in two core subjects, Mathematics and Social Studies. In this study, test items and sets of questionnaire and administered pretest were developed in the last year. In this year, the NAEA was administered with the adjusted test items and questionnaires and the results was analyzed and would be reported to the public. NAEA was developed on the basis of national curriculum, especially of the nature and objectives of subject curriculum in Mathematics (and also Social Studies). In the framework of assessment, we set up four differentiated levels of student achievement:‘under basic’,‘basic’,‘intermediary’, and ‘advanced’. Here ‘the intermediary level’means the level of educational achievement in which students can understand average content of subject curriculum. ‘Advanced level ’indicates the level of educational achievement in which students master all the content of subject curriculum and apply basic concepts and principles to a variety of situations. ‘The basic level’means the level of educational achievement in which students do not achieve the intermediary level. Students who do not understand average content of subject curriculum are classified as belonging to the basic level. Finally, this study would explain how to administer and analyze the test int he future. The test result was analyzed to report students’s educational achievement according to regions, content area, behavioral characteristics, and etc. This study would show how to report test results and how to set up student’s academic achievement.

• 한국학교수학회논문집
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.339-354
• /
• 2011

본 본문에서는 수학 기초학력이 부진한 P대학 입학예정자들의 문제해결력 향상을 위해 겨울방학을 이용하여 개설한 기초수학 특강을 수준별로 학급을 편성하여 운영하고, 그 결과를 토대로 효율적 기초수학 학습지도 방안과 수준별 학급운영에 대한 유의점 및 그 개선방안에 대해 알아보고자 한다. 연구 대상 학생들을 대상으로 학생실태 설문조사와 수학 기초학력 진단평가를 실시하고, 진단평가 성적에 따라 수준별 학급을 편성하여, 각 학급에 조교를 배정하여 대학생활에 대한 안내, 문제풀이 및 컴퓨터 활용학습을 지도하도록 하였다. 또한, 기초수학 수준별 학습지도를 위해 작성한 표준지침서에 의거하여 차별화된 수준별 수업을 진행한 후, 학업성취에 미치는 효과를 분석하여 보다 효율적인 기초수학 학습지도 방안을 찾아보고자 하였다.

• 한국초등수학교육학회지
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.97-114
• /
• 2009

본 연구는 초등학교 6학년 수학 쌓기나무 단원의 디지털교과서 활용 수업이 공간능력, 수학학업성취도, 수학 교과에 대한 흥미도 등에 미치는 영향을 분석함으로써 수학 수업에 있어서 학습효과를 향상시킬 수 있는 방안을 모색하고자 하는데 그 목적이 있다. 위의 연구를 위하여 실험반은 디지털교과서, 비교반은 서책교과서로 수업을 진행하였다. 그 결과 실험처치 후 실험반과 비교반의 공간 감각 능력 및 수학 교과에 대한 흥미도에 있어서 통계적으로 유의미한 차이는 발견할 수 없었다. 그러나 공간능력 성적의 중위 그룹에서 실험반이 통계적으로 유의미하게 높게 나타났는데, 이는 디지털교과서가 다수의 중위권 학생들에게 학습에 대한 관심을 유도하고 흥미를 유지시키는 역할을 할 수 있다는 점을 시사한다. 또한 공간 능력 검사지의 대부분의 문항에서 실험반이 더 높은 정답률을 보인 점은 구체물과 멀티미디어를 병행 활용한 학습 형태가 공간 능력에 긍정적인 영향을 주었을 가능성이 있음을 보여준다.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.1-10
• /
• 2021

본 연구의 목적은 고등 수학교육에 있어서 스마트러닝기반의 수업이 학업성취도가 낮은 학생들에게 어떤 영향을 미치고 효과성은 어떠한지 분석하는 것이다. 본 연구는 2018년 G대학에서 공학인증 과목인 미적분학II를 수강하는 학생들 중 이전 학기 미적분학I에서 C학점 이하이고, 성취수준이 아주 낮은 학생들로 구성된 '특별반'에 속했던 학생들 중 미적분학II를 공학인증으로 받아야만 하는 16명의 학생들로 구성하여 진행되었다. 스마트폰의 앱에서 3D와 증강현실(AR)을 수업시간에 적극적으로 활용하였으며, 연구결과에 따르면 SNS와 중간고사와 기말고사의 문제분석 결과와 강의평가 결과를 통하여 공간에 대한 시각적 이해가 이루어졌음을 알 수 있었다. 또한 스마트폰의 앱을 활용한 스마트러닝기반 수학수업이 사전 학업성취도에 관계없이 학업성취도 증진 및 수학적 흥미와 태도에 긍정적인 영향을 미쳤음을 알 수 있었다.

• 한국학교수학회논문집
• /
• 제4권2호
• /
• pp.103-113
• /
• 2001

The teaching-learning method utilizing Web makes it possible for the students take the initiative in any field and offers the teaching strategy, methodology and teaching-learning materials suitable for students' ability and standard. The purpose of this study is to investigate the characteristics of WBI in mathematics class for the effective teaching and learning focusing on the unit 'Function' in the 1st grade of middle school and verify its effectiveness by developing the WBI programs which can progress learning achievement and applying them to math class. Two hypotheses were established for this study. Hypothesis 1 : There will be meaningful difference between the group that studies under WBI and the one that doesn't, Hypothesis 2 : There will be meaningful difference in the attitude and interest toward learning between the group that studies under WBI and the one that doesn't. In order to find out the result, I have made a comparative analysis through t-verification on the object of two classes of the 1st grade in P middle school that I have been working for. The result shows that the class utilizing WBI is more effective than the traditional lecture-oriented class since there is a meaningful difference between the control group and experimental one and also that the class based on WEB has a great influence on students' interest and positive attitude toward math class.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈C:초등수학교육
• /
• 제3권2호
• /
• pp.115-131
• /
• 1999

The purpose of this study is to examine meaning, factors, and diagnostic method of underachievers in mathematics and to propose the idea of the individualized teaching method for underachievers. For the first purpose, previous literatures on underachievers are reviewed. For the second purpose, this study described the procedure of developing the individualized instructional program, and the method of diagnosing and prescribing errors in mathematics. In the future, individualized instructional program need to be developed based on correct diagnosis of factors effecting under achievement for the effective teaching of underachievers.

• 한국초등수학교육학회지
• /
• 제21권2호
• /
• pp.391-414
• /
• 2017

본 연구에서는 초등학교 6학년 학생들이 교육과정에서 제시하는 확률과 통계에 대해 얼마나 이해하고 있는지 진단하고 통계적 소양과 어떻게 관련되는지에 대해 알아보았다. 그래서 통계적 소양의 이론적 틀을 분석하고, 교과서 내용과 연관되는 요소를 찾아보고 이를 바탕으로 확률과 통계의 내용에 대한 성취 정도와 통계적 소양을 측정하였다. 이를 통해 초등 6학년의 통계적 소양과 관련하여 우리나라 교육과정에서 보완해야 될 요소를 알아보았다.

• 대한수학교육학회지:학교수학
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.337-352
• /
• 2013

이 연구의 목적은 초등학교 교사들의 수학교과에 대한 자기효능감이 학생들의 수학교과 학업성취도에 영향을 미치는지를 밝히는데 있다. 초등학교 교사들의 수학영역에서의 자기효능감 측정을 위해, 량도형의 MTEBI 16개 문항을 수정하여 새롭게 구성된 15개 문항의 검사도구를 통하여 살펴본 이 연구의 결과는 다음과 같이 요약된다. 수학 교수효능감이 높은 집단과 낮은 집단으로 나누어 그들이 담임하고 있는 학급의 수학 학업성취도를 비교한 결과, 수학교과에 대한 교사의 자기효능감이 높은 상위집단의 학급이 하위집단의 학급보다 학업성취에 있어 통계적으로 유의미하게 높은 성취도를 보이는 것으로 분석되었다. 결론적으로 교사의 수학교과에 대한 자기효능감이 학생들의 학업성취에도 영향을 미치는 것으로 확인되었다.