• 제목/요약/키워드: lawsuit case

검색결과 62건 처리시간 0.025초

산업안전 분야에서의 PL사고유형 분석 (Analysis on the Case of PL Accident in the Area of Industrial Safety)

  • 홍한국;강병영
    • 한국안전학회지
    • /
    • 제20권2호
    • /
    • pp.140-145
    • /
    • 2005
  • The PL(Product Liability) Law has been going into effect in Korea since July 2002. Accordingly, a company's responsibility for customers who are damaged by the defect in the product safety has been gradually strict and imposed burden on management. Not only general consumers but also labors who work with machine in the field of production are included in the concept of victim of the PL Law. That is to say, when a worker is damaged by the defect of machine he can institute a PL lawsuit more aggressively, not just get the industrial accident compensation as usual, only if not his own fault but the defect of machine used in the course of production can be demonstrated. This paper intends to present suggestions to PL prevention of manufacturing companies of industrial machine through the case research of PL accidents in the area of industrial safety.

공동주택 하자감정업무 표준절차개발을 위한 사례분석 (Case Study for Developing of Standard Process about Defect Consulting Work in Apartment Building)

  • 박준모;서덕석
    • 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 한국건축시공학회 2014년도 춘계 학술논문 발표대회
    • /
    • pp.158-159
    • /
    • 2014
  • There is urgent for defect consulting work to standardize the investigated method, repaired and reinforced method, and estimated cost about defect in increasing a defect lawsuit of apartment building. For the purpose of developing the standard process of defect consulting work, the review that a used process in law and institution should take precedence. There is not prepared the national standard for defect consulting but is dependent on an experience and a practice of consultants. This study analyzes defect consulting case, defines main steps for developing the standard process, and draws phased work factors. As systemizing this, it is expected to apply to basic structure for developing the standard process of defect consulting work for the next.

  • PDF

응급의료서비스 중 발생되는 소송사례와 대책 연구 (A Study on Lawsuit Cases and Measures of Emergency Medical Service)

  • 권혜란
    • 한국응급구조학회지
    • /
    • 제13권3호
    • /
    • pp.77-90
    • /
    • 2009
  • Civil complaints and lawsuits filed in the process of providing emergency medical service include fall accident on the way of carrying the patient, transfer consent, refusal and rejection of rescue request, range and behavior restriction of emergency medical technicians, false registry of logbook, neglect of duty and emergency patient, and violation of traffic laws on the way of dispatch to the scene of accident. This study suggested the measures by cases as follows. 1. The accidents on the way of carrying a patient could be divided into fall of patient and fall by paramedic's mistake. In the former case, damages caused by the ambulance's shaking must be notified to the patient and guardian and recommended to fasten seat belt, in the latter case, the plan of patient's posture, route of transport, rescue and equipments should be comfirmed before fixing the patient. 2. Transfer consent must be made as implied when the patient is unconscious under delusion and was not able to consent physically, and paramedic must take an action by his judgment and record details of services on logbook. 3. When a patient refused to transfer, get 'confirmation of transfer refusal' and inform him of refusal. Paramedic should receive the signature. In addition, in case of refusal, transfer request should be made after hearing doctor's opinion and it should be notified to transfer request and superintendent of fire station after making 'confirmation of transfer refusal'. 4. Emergency medical technicians should perform their duties within the range of services prescribed by Article 41 of Law of Emergency Medical Service and Article 33 of Its Enforcement Regulations and shall not make announcement of death. In case of reporting the death to guardian, it is desirable to use record data like ECG results. 5. The best way to have protection from legal problems is making and keeping the exact records of accident and patient. Paramedic should not mention his subjective opinion about the accident-related matter. He must record correctly and keep the original medical records. 6. As emergency medical technicians are responsible for taking care of emergency patients, they must contact a briefing room when they meet a difficult situation suddenly due to vehicle stop or treatment of other patients and then must have support from neighboring hospital and other safety centers. 7. Since the ambulance operator is responsible for safety and careful driving of ambulance, he must be careful when he violates traffic regulations unavoidably. The operator should drive slowly below 10km/h at an intersection and pass it after getting way from general vehicles driving from all directions.

  • PDF

미국의 공공공사 설계변경조항 해석동향 연구 (A Study on the Interpretation for Change Order Clause of USA Government Contract)

  • 조영준
    • 한국건축시공학회지
    • /
    • 제9권5호
    • /
    • pp.103-110
    • /
    • 2009
  • 건설사업계약은 매우 다양한 계약으로 구성되어 있다. 그리고 이는 일의 완성을 필요로 하는 도급계약의 일종이다. 따라서 당사자들은 계약의 이행과정중에 항상 많은 분쟁에 봉착하게 된다. 실제로 발주자의 지시에 의한 설계변경으로 인해 많은 분쟁이 발생하고 있다. 이러한 분쟁을 해결하기 위해서는 계약의 해석이 수반되어야 하지만, 우리나라에서는 종국적으로 분쟁을 해결하게 하는 분쟁해결절차가 중재와 소송에 국한되어 있으므로 계약당사자들이 비효율성으로 인해 이를 꺼리게 되는 실정이다. 따라서 우리나라에서는 계약의 해석을 찾아보기는 쉽지 않은 반면, 미국의 경우 발주자별로 분쟁해결절차를 둠으로써 다양한 계약의 해석유형을 찾아볼 수 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 과업의 범위를 초과하는 변경, 수량의 변경, 이행기간의 변경, 이행방법과 태도의 변경, 정부제공물품이나 인도장소의 변경, 시공자의 변경절차 수용, 감액조정에 대한 사항에 대한 해석동향을 분석하여 제시하였다.

의료과실판단에서의 가이드라인의 역할 -일본에서의 논의를 참고하여- (The Role of Guidelines on the Judgement of Medical Negligence - Referring to Debates in Japan -)

  • 송영민
    • 의료법학
    • /
    • 제11권2호
    • /
    • pp.209-235
    • /
    • 2010
  • According to the development of medical technology, new medical treatments have been dramatically increased as an inevitable consequence, however, it is not easy for medical workers to learn the knowledge that is necessary for new medical treatments and their additions in the medical services. Therefore, it could not be helped increasing the guidelines for applying new medical treatments, and then, the problem would come out whether to attribute the medical negligence to the doctors who did not follow the guidelines when the patient became worse because of his non-compliance. Nevertheless, there is no document to review the problem mentioned above and also no definite precedents. Thus, the civil lawful character and obligation of guidelines on the lawsuit against the medical default have been examined in this studies. The medical negligence is defined as usual doctors violate the care obligation which is demanded for them to follow when they treat patients under the proper medical standard in those days. It is resonable to assume that the matter of guidelines is to decide the level of the care obligation, that means the care which is required of the rational doctors under same circumstances, and in general, the experts' testimonies should be needed in this case. In addition, the issue comes out whether the guidelines can be the standard of the judgement of the medical negligence. Finally, I suppose, the evaluation of the issue depends on who makes the guidelines, what materials are based on, and also depends on whether there is another guidelines in the same disease, what the purpose of guidelines is to save the medical costs or to realize the appropriate medical services, in addition, it depends on how often renew the guidelines, and how wide is the usage of guidelines.

  • PDF

2013년 주요 의료 판결 분석 (Review of 2013 Major Medical Decisions)

  • 이동필;정혜승;이정선;유현정
    • 의료법학
    • /
    • 제15권1호
    • /
    • pp.263-302
    • /
    • 2014
  • The court handed down meaningful rulings related to medical sectors in 2013. This paper presents the ruling that the care workers could be the performance assistants of the care-giving service although the duties of care worker are not included in the liability stipulated in the medical contract signed with the hospital for reason of clear distinction of duties between care workers and nurses within the hospital in connection with the contract which was entered into between the hospital and patients. In relation to negligence and causal relationship, the court recognized medical negligence associated with the failure to detect the brain tumor due to the negligent interpretation of MRI findings while rejecting the causal relationship with consequential cerebral hemorrhage. The court also recognized negligence based on the observation on the grounds of inadequate medical records in a case involving the hypoxic brain damage caused during the cosmetic surgery. In terms of the scope of compensation for damages, this paper presents the ruling that the compensation should be estimated based on causal relationship only in case the breach of the 'obligation of explanation' is recognized, however rejecting the reparation for de factor property damages in the form of compensation, and the ruling that the lawsuit could be instituted in case that the damages exceeded the agreed scope despite the agreement that the hospital would not be held responsible for any aftereffects of surgery from the standpoint of lawsuit, along with the ruling that recognized the daily net income by reflecting the unique circumstances faced by individual students of Korean National Police University and artists of Western painting. Many rulings were handed down with respect to medical certificate, prescription, etc., in 2013. This paper introduced the ruling which mentioned the scope of medical certificate, the ruling that related to whether the diagnosis over the phone at the issuance of prescription could constitute the direct diagnosis of patient, along with the ruling that required the medical certificate to be generated in the name of doctor who diagnosed the patients, and the ruling which proclaimed that it would constitute the breach of Medical Act if the prescription was issued to the patients who were not diagnosed. Moreover, this paper also introduced the ruling that related to whether the National Health Insurance Service could make claim to the hospitals for the reimbursement of the health insurance money paid to pharmacies based on the prescription in the event that the hospitals provided prescription of drugs to outpatients in violation of the laws and regulations.

  • PDF

소송서류 전자파일링시스템 개발 사례 연구 (A case study of development on the electronic filing system for lawsuit)

  • 박준우;유상훈;백두권
    • 한국정보처리학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 한국정보처리학회 2006년도 춘계학술발표대회
    • /
    • pp.457-460
    • /
    • 2006
  • 법원의 사건수 증가와 인력확충의 한계로 인한 업무 부담이 증가함에 따라 사법서비스의 질이 저하되고 있고, 이러한 문제의 해결 방안으로 전자법원의 실현 방안이 대두되고 있다. 본 논문에서는 민사 소송절차에 있어서 전자파일링 기술을 도입, 활용하는 해외 법원의 적용실태를 연구하였으며 소송과정 중에서 가장 많은 인력과 비용, 시간이 소요되는 송달단계를 전자화 한 사법부의 소송문서전자시스템의 설계 및 구현을 통하여 송달 과정에서 비용을 절감하고 처리시간을 향상하였다.

  • PDF

경보음 발생 및 자동Locking 장치형 전선압축기에 대한 연구 (The study Alarm & Auto Locking System of Electric Wire Compressor)

  • 최명호;이상호;김동명
    • 대한전기학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 대한전기학회 2004년도 하계학술대회 논문집 B
    • /
    • pp.800-802
    • /
    • 2004
  • When an accident is happen due to using a bad Wire Compressor, some public resentments are caused and It cause lawsuit for we. In case, we will undergo a colossal financial loss. in addition to, Guide to improve quality of operation by using the number of times of pressing and pressing pressure with cooperative private enterprise. And because of needs for Thermal, Electrical and Chemical factor analysis of connection point of sleeve, expect to try improving problems of wire presser whole our company. We expect that reduce fault and save cost by this process. Consequently, we will prevent power losing and black out due to line faults by expulsion of inferiority equipment and prevent heating and line fault. This is possible using Alarming and Auto Locking Wire Compressor that is improve on this study.

  • PDF

혈액제제 제조물책임 소송과 증명책임 -대법원 2011. 9. 29. 선고 2008다16776 판결과 관련하여- (Pharmaceutical Product Liability and the Burden of Proof)

  • 문현호
    • 의료법학
    • /
    • 제12권2호
    • /
    • pp.65-117
    • /
    • 2011
  • This article analyzes the case (2008Da16776) which has the issue how patients have to prove causal relationship when patients claim against pharmaceutical companies alleging that patients were infected with virus due to contaminated blood products. The Supreme court held that: (1) if patients prove that they didn't have symptoms suggesting virus infection before administration of blood products, the virus infection had been confirmed after administration of blood products, and there were significant potential of contamination of the blood products with the virus, the defect in blood products or the negligence of pharmaceutical company in making blood products shall be presumed to cause the infection of the victim. (2) The pharmaceutical companies could reverse the presumption by proving the blood products were not contaminated, but the fact that the victims were treated with the blood products manufactured by other companies or had received blood transfusions is not enough to reverse the presumption. The case is the first decision whether the burden of proof about causal relationship could be reduced in pharmaceutical product liability lawsuit. Hereafter pharmaceutical product liability cases, it would be necessary to reduce the burden of proof about causal relationship in order to make substantive equality between patients and pharmaceutical companies.

  • PDF

한중일 3국의 중재제도의 조화를 위한 소고 - 특허권 중재를 중심으로 - (A Study on the Harmonization of a Mediation System through a FTA among China, Japan, and Korea - Focused on the Patent Mediation -)

  • 이헌희
    • 한국중재학회지:중재연구
    • /
    • 제23권1호
    • /
    • pp.153-175
    • /
    • 2013
  • The issue of patent validity becomes a subject of dispute under the FTA and there is a definite difference of opinion between China, Japan, and Korea. In other words, the validity of a judgment on the patent was exclusively under the jurisdiction of the administrative agency at a particular patent office. Thus, the issue arises where there is a potential judgment on patent validity. In this case, the Supreme Court rather than the patent office can offer a judgment from a judicial institution and can make a judgment in the case of a medication. In China, however, the lowest possibility of judgment on patent validity is predicted to occur in judicial institutions. Such a judgment is recognized as the Grand Bench Decision in Korea, and the court can judge the patent validation rather than the patent office. That is just the case in the Kilby case-it is invalid for reasons obvious in Japan. Therefore, there is a substantial difference between the three countries. Especially in Japan, where after the Kilby case, they revised the patent law in 2004 to introduce Article 104-3, placing the judgment of patent validity in the court, even if the "Apparentness"is not requisite. Per this law, infringers can argue for patent invalidity not only the judgment of the patent invalidation but also the infringement lawsuit. From the point of view of Japan, Korea became the judgment of trademark validation by extension and obvious cases can become directly to judge through the Supreme Court about the right that needs to examinations and registrations. In terms of the mediation, it also provides a clue about the judgment of intellectual property validation and expands the scope of the mediation in the future. From now on, in order to have active mediation procedures in the three countries, China, Japan, and Korea would need to unify regulations and application scopes for mediation in the FTA negotiation and to look forward to achieve a vigorous mediation approach.

  • PDF