• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제38권3호
• /
• pp.95-99
• /
• 2015

The IRR(internal rate of return) is often used by investors for the evaluation of engineering projects. Unfortunately, it has serial flaws: (1) multiple real-valued IRRs may arise; (2) complex-valued IRRs may arise; (3) the IRR is, in special cases, incompatible with the net present value (NPV) in accept/reject decisions. The efforts of management scientists and economists in providing a reliable project rate of return have generated over the decades an immense amount of contributions aiming to solve these shortcomings. Especially, multiple internal rate of returns (IRRs) have a fatal flaw when we decide to accep it or not. To solve it, some researchers came up with external rate of returns (ERRs) such as ARR (Average Rate of Return) or MIRR (MIRR, Modified Internal Rate of Return). ARR or MIRR. will also always yield the same decision for a engineering project consistent with the NPV criterion. The ERRs are to modify the procedure for computing the rate of return by making explicit and consistent assumptions about the interest rate at which intermediate receipts from projects may be invested. This reinvestment could be either in other projects or in the outside market. However, when we use traditional ERRs, a volume of capital investment is still unclear. Alternatively, the productive rate of return (PRR) can settle these problems. Generally, a rate of return is a profit on an investment over a period of time, expressed as a proportion of the original investment. The time period is typically the life of a project. The PRR is based on the full life of the engineering project. but has been annualised to project one year. And the PRR uses the effective investment instead of the original investment. This method requires that the cash flow of an engineering project must be separated into 'investment' and 'loss' to calculate the PRR value. In this paper, we proposed a tabulated form for easy calculation of the PRR by modifing the profit and loss statement, and the cash flow statement.

• Journal of Forest and Environmental Science
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.61-72
• /
• 2001

본 연구는 해외조림을 통한 목재의 안정적 확보를 기하기 위하여 태국을 대상으로 투자환경과 수익성 분석을 하였다. 연구결과 태국은 정책적으로 산림률을 현재 25%에서 40%로 유지하려고 노력하고 있기 때문에 조림을 널리 장려하고 있으며, 조림과 목가공산업(합판, 베니어, Chip board, Hard board)은 최소한의 투자요건을 요구하는 업종으로 구분하고 있어 다른 분야보다 상대적으로 유리한 입장이다. 태국에서 현재 가장 역점을 두고 있는 조림수종은 유칼리로서 특히 펄프용으로 이용할 경우 유칼리의 벌기령은 4~5년으로서 매우 짧고 IRR도 29.1~59.3%로 매우 높게 나타났다.

• Current Research on Agriculture and Life Sciences
• /
• 제32권3호
• /
• pp.165-169
• /
• 2014

계란 세척기 평가 금액 추정 결과는 다음과 같다. 계란 세척기 총수입(인건비 절감으로부터의 조수입 증대)에서 산정하였으며, 계란 세척기 총비용은 구입가격, 고정비용 및 유동비용의 합계로 나타내었다. 계란 세척기 평가액은 할인율 수준에 따라 최소 44,778천원(할인율 10%)에서 최대 45,778천원(할인율 5%), 평균 45,278천원으로 추정된다(Table 7). 계란세척기의 경제적 타당성을 살펴보면, 내부수익율 IRR의 값은 가정했던 할인율(5%~10%)보다 훨씬 높고, 순현재가치(NPV)는 0보다 훨씬 크며, B/C 비율도 1.0 이상으로 나타나 계란 세척기 개발사업의 경제적 타당성은 있는 것으로 판단된다(Table 8).

• 한국산림과학회지
• /
• 제59권1호
• /
• pp.9-14
• /
• 1983

본(本) 연구(硏究)는 I.B.R.D. 차관(借款)에 의해 실시(實施)된 연료림조성사업(燃料林造成事業)으로 인하여 발생(發生)하는 편익(便益)과 비용(費用)을 비교(比較)함으로써 사업(事業)의 수익성(收益性) 또는 투자효율(投資效率)을 판정하여 경제성(經濟性)을 검토(檢討)하기 위하여 실시(實施)되었다. 조사지역(調査地域)을 선정(選定)하여 조사(調査)한 자료(資料)와 그 외 관계자료(關係資料)를 이용(利用)하여 B/C율(率)과 IRR(내부투자수익율(內部投資收益率)방법(方法)에 적용(適用)한 결과(結果) 다음과 같은 결론(結論)을 얻었다. 1) 연료림(練料林)의 경제성(經濟性) 분석(分析)에 있어서 연료림(練料林)의 생산가액(生産價額)을 연탄가격(煉炭價格)으로 환산(換算)했을 때, B/C율(率)은 할인율(割引率) 6%에서 1.18, IRR은 12.2%로 수익성(收益性)이 있는 것으로 평가(評價)되었다. 2) 농촌임금(農村賃金)의 년평균(年平均) 27% 상승요인(上昇要因)에 의한 감응도분석(感應度分析)에 있어서 B/C율(率)은 1.07, IRR은 9.2%로 낮은 수익성(收益性)이 있는 것으로 평가(評價)되었다. 3) 연탄가격(煉炭價格)의 년평균(年平均) 26% 상승요인(上昇要因)에 의한 감응도분석(感應度分析)에 있어서 B/C율(率)은 1.34, IRR은 15.7%로 높은 수익성(收益性)이 있는 것으로 평가(評價)되었다. 4) 연료림조성사업(練料林造成事業)의 간접효과(間接效果)를 가산(加算)하면 경제적(經濟的) 효과(效果)는 더 높다고 할 수 있다.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제2권2호
• /
• pp.53-62
• /
• 1979

A widely accepted indicator of a project's economic potential is the internal rate of return (IRR). The primary objective of feasibility analysis for any project is to measure the economic potential for the project, normally defined as the expected return on capital investment. The analysis should be designed to determine whether a project is technically and economically sound, and under what conditions. Therefore, there are factors other than economic potential that must be taken into account in the reasonable composition of an investment program. These kinds of factors can be given proper consideration in project selection after the economic feasibility of alternative projects has been determined. The primary reason for having to choose among different projects is that capital resources are scare : the investment budget is limited. The case project, casting facilities investment project, treated in this paper were selected for their value in illustrating the methods of feasibility analysis. This case project an actual potential project and is analyzed on the basis of the best available data for the specific conditions for that project.

• 수산경영론집
• /
• 제29권2호
• /
• pp.199-216
• /
• 1998

An economic appraisal of a proposed marine ranching project is analysed using capital budgeting model such as net present value(NPV) and internal rate of return( IRR) as well as sensitivity analysis and goal seeking model. Of the factors for economic appraisal, direct benefits are to be determined by estimated harvest, prices and costs incurred by catching fishes, and indirect benefits include the additional economic effect of recreational fishing. And judging the worth of these project options depends upon the choice of discount rate of which 8.5% is recommended here. On the basis of estimated production, prices and costs the project is expected to yield NPV=615 million won and IRR=8.8%, which is quite accepted for an economic feasibility, under the first scenario, and NPV= -127 million won and IRR=7.93%, which is rejected, under the second scenario. Sensitivity analysis has been performed by calculating the switching value and sensitivity indicator in respect of the main project parameters. The results suggest that the project NPV and IRR are especially sensitive to fishes(rock fish and other rock fish) prices and fixed costs. Finally goal seeking analysis is carried out in order to reach a desired level of performance like NPV=0 in respect of the amount of hatchery-reared juverniles, the prices and the discount rate.

• Current Research on Agriculture and Life Sciences
• /
• 제32권4호
• /
• pp.231-235
• /
• 2014

이 연구는 파각란 선별기 도입을 비용 편익분석 목적으로 수행되었다. 계란 파각란 선별기를 도입할 때의 총수입과 총비용 평가액의 추정결과는 다음과 같다. 총비용의 경우 구입가격, 고정비용 및 유동비용의 합계로 나타내었고, 할인율에 따라 5%, 10%일 때 각각 232,904천원과 242,904천원으로 산정되었다. 계란 파각란 선별기 평가액은 할인율에 따라 228,543천원(할인율 5%인 경우)과 218,543천원(할인율 10%인 경우)으로 추정되었다(Table 6). 파각란 선별기 기술가치에 대한 평가는 B/C비율, 순현재가치(NPV), 내부수익율(IRR)의 값으로 판단되었고, 내부수익율 IRR의 값은 가정했던 할인율보다 훨씬 높게 나타났고, 순현재가치도 0보다 큰 값으로 나타났으며, B/C비율도 1.0 이상으로 나타나 경제적 타당성을 가지는 것으로 판단되었다(Table 7).

• 수산경영론집
• /
• 제43권3호
• /
• pp.31-41
• /
• 2012

This paper was conducted to study the economic valuation for Nursery-Phase production of the tidal flat oyster in Korea. Benefit-cost(B/C) model used to indicate the effects of economic valuation. Using discounting rates(i.e., 4.5%, 6.5% and 8.5%), the model compared revenues and costs that occur at different times from 2012 to 2018. This study also estimated various submodels, which are Benefit Cost Ratio(B/C ratio), Net Present Value(NPV), Internal Ration of Return(IRR), to compare profit of Nursery-Phase production styles and analyzed returns to evaluate the scenarios. Sensitivity analysis were conducted for various scenarios. The results suggest as follows. First, the oyster spat to the shell height of 3~5cm was more profit than the shell height of 1~3cm. Second, all of sensitivity analysis with submodels were economic valuation such that B/C ratio > 1, NPV > 0 and IRR > discounting rate. Third, the payback period was about 3years after installed Nursery-Phase production system.

• 환경정책연구
• /
• 제2권2호
• /
• pp.41-63
• /
• 2003

CDM(Clean Development Mechanism) project is said to be a mechanism, which profits both the investing country and the host country, while additionally contributing to the reduction of greenhouse gases of the earth as a whole. However in reality, most of the proposed projects do not end up in agreement because of the problems related to differences in recognition between the investing country and the host country of the CDM project. This outlines the background for this research which proposes a new design of institutional arrangements of CDM projects in the Northeast Asian region, mainly Japan, China and Korea. In addition, we investigate the feasibility of the proposed design. The research firstly focuses on the reduction in transaction costs that the participation of Korea will have on a Japan-China CDM project. This paper further emphasizes the potential gains that would materialize if a CDM project involved the whole Northeast Asian region, and not only one country. Our research suggests that an approximate reduction of 23% in transaction costs, and about 4% reduction in the total costs of a CDM project can be expected to follow the Korean participation. In addition to decreasing costs we find that a Korean involvement in a CDM project with Japan will lead to efficiency gains illustrated by a higher increase in the IRR(Internal rate of return) in a Japan-Korea project(11.45% to 12.21%) compared to an IRR incresement of 10.57% to 11.27% for a pure Japanese CDM project. Similar results of a rise in the IRR is found for the whole investment period of 20 years. We can hence conclude that Korean participation in a Japan-China CDM project would improve the implementation possibilities of CDM project in the Northeast Asia region.

• 한국해양학회지:바다
• /
• 제13권3호
• /
• pp.260-270
• /
• 2008

본 연구는 최근의 금속가격변화를 고려한 36개의 시나리오를 작성하고 이에 대하여 망간단괴 채광, 제련의 경제성 평가를 수행하였다. 각 시나리오는 낙관/중립/비관의 채광 및 제련 비용전망과 2가지 생산규모, 그리고 6가지 금속가격 전망을 조합하여 작성되었다. 낙관/중립 비용전망에 따른 대부분의 시나리오에서 긍정적인 경제성 평가 결과가 도출되었다. 예로 300만 건톤의 망간단괴 채광의 경우, 중립적인 비용전망을 취하고 2007년 전반기의 금속가격을 가정하면 37.1%의 내부수익률을 얻는 것으로 나타났다.