• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제35권1호
• /
• pp.1-15
• /
• 2017

Locoregional failure is the most frequent pattern of failure in locally advanced head and neck cancer patients and it leads to death in most of the patients. Second primary tumors occurring in the other head and neck region reach up to almost 40% of long-term survivors. Recommended and preferred retreatment option in operable patients is salvage surgical resection, reporting a 5-year overall survival of up to 40%. However, because of tumor location, extent, and underlying comorbidities, salvage surgery is often limited and compromised by incomplete resection. Reirradiation with or without combined chemotherapy is an appropriate option for unresectable recurrence. Reirradiation is carefully considered with a case-by-case basis. Reirradiation protocol enrollment is highly encouraged prior to committing patient to an aggressive therapy. Radiation doses greater than 60 Gy are usually recommended for successful salvage. Despite recent technical improvement in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), the use of concurrent chemotherapy, and the emergence of molecularly targeted agents, careful patient selection remain as the most paramount factor in reirradiation. Tumors that recur or persist despite aggressive prior chemoradiation therapy imply the presence of chemoradio-resistant clonogens. Treatment protocols that combine novel targeted radiosensitizing agents with conformal high precision radiation are required to overcome the resistance while minimizing toxicity. Recent large number of data showed that IMRT may provide better locoregional control with acceptable acute or chronic morbidities. However, additional prospective studies are required before a definitive conclusion can be drawn on safety and effectiveness of IMRT.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.68-72
• /
• 2002

최근 들어 새로운 방사선치료법인 강도변조방사선치료가 많은 종류의 종양치료에 적용되어 치료에 따른 부작용을 줄이고 치료율을 향상시키려는 노력들이 이루어지고 있다. 특히 전립선암에서 강도변조방사선치료법을 적용하여 삼차원입체조형치료에 비해 향상된 선량분포와 이로 인한 주위 정상조직의 방사선량을 줄임으로써 더욱 많은 양의 방사선을 전립선에 투여할 수 있고 이로 인하여 치료율의 상승을 기대할 수 있게 되었다. 저자들은 강도변조방사선치료를 전립선암에 적용하였기에 이에 대한 문헌고찰과 함께 치료과정을 보고하고자 한다.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제36권4호
• /
• pp.276-284
• /
• 2018

Purpose: Traditionally, three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) is used for neoadjuvant chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) was later developed for more conformal dose distribution, with the potential for reduced toxicity across many disease sites. We sought to use the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to examine trends and predictors for IMRT use in rectal cancer. Materials and Methods: We queried the NCDB from 2004 to 2015 for patients with rectal adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation to standard doses followed by surgical resection. Odds ratios were used to determine predictors of IMRT use. Univariable and multivariable Cox regressions were used to determine potential predictors of overall survival (OS). Propensity matching was used to account for any indication bias. Results: Among 21,490 eligible patients, 3,131 were treated with IMRT. IMRT use increased from 1% in 2004 to 22% in 2014. Predictors for IMRT use included increased N stage, higher comorbidity score, more recent year, treatment at an academic facility, increased income, and higher educational level. On propensity-adjusted, multivariable analysis, male gender, increased distance to facility, higher comorbidity score, IMRT technique, government insurance, African-American race, and non-metro location were predictive of worse OS. Of note, the complete response rate at time of surgery was 28% with non-IMRT and 21% with IMRT. Conclusion: IMRT use has steadily increased in the treatment of rectal cancer, but still remains only a fraction of overall treatment technique, more often reserved for higher disease burden.

• 대한방사선치료학회지
• /
• 제29권1호
• /
• pp.57-68
• /
• 2017

목 적: 본 연구는 모양이 불규칙하고 손상위험장기(Organ At Risk, OAR)에 매우 인접한 타겟(Target)의 방사선 치료 시, 비동일평면상(Non-coplanar)의 빔(Beam)을 이용한 Fixed-field 세기변조 방사선치료(Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy, IMRT)와 용적변조회전 방사선치료(Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy, VMAT) 치료계획의 유용성을 평가 및 비교해 보고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법: 본원에서 True Beam STX(Varian Medical Systems, USA)를 이용하여 전체 두피(Whole Scalp), 부분적 두피(Partial Scalp), 그리고 전체 뇌실(Whole Ventricle)에 방사선 치료를 받은 환자 중 각 부위별로 2명 씩, 총 6명을 대상으로 하였다. VMAT 치료계획 시, Beamlet에 포함되는 OAR의 용적을 최소화하기 위해 Coplanar 또는 Non-coplanar 빔을 이용하였고, Fixed-field IMRT는 6명 모두 2개 이상의 카우치(Couch) 각도를 이용한 Non-coplanar IMRT(이하 ncIMRT)로 치료계획 하였다. 결 과: 양측 수정체, 양측 시신경, 시신경 교차, 그리고 뇌 줄기의 최대선량과 양측 안구와 해마의 평균선량을 측정하였고, 6명 모두 9개의 OAR 중 6개 이상에서 VMAT 치료계획이 ncIMRT보다 1.1배에서 8.2배가량 높은 선량 값을 나타내었다. 전체 두피와 부분적 두피의 치료 시, 20 Gy가 조사되는 뇌의 용적은 VMAT이 ncIMRT의 2배 이상이었고, 전체 뇌실의 치료 시에는 두 치료계획이 큰 차이를 보이지 않았다. 타겟 Coverage는 두 치료계획 모두 $PTV_{100%}=95%$를 만족시켰고, 타겟 내 최대선량과 치료 시 필요한 총 Monitor Unit(MU)은 ncIMRT가 VMAT보다 높았으며 두 치료계획 모두 임상적용을 위한 Gamma test 시행 결과, 2 mm/2 % 조건을 통과하였다. 결 론: 본 연구 결과, ncIMRT는 VMAT에 비해 치료 시 필요한 MU가 높아 치료시간과 장비의 로딩(Loading)을 증가시키므로 치료의 효율성은 다소 떨어지지만, VMAT과 비슷한 타겟 Coverage를 유지하면서, OAR의 선량은 훨씬 감소시키는 것을 알 수 있었다. 따라서 모양이 불규칙하고 OAR에 매우 인접해 있는 타겟의 방사선 치료 시에는 ncIMRT 치료계획을 고려해 볼 필요가 있다고 사료된다.

• 한국방사선학회논문지
• /
• 제17권3호
• /
• pp.481-487
• /
• 2023

본 연구에서는 15 MV를 이용한 전립샘암의 세기조절방사선치료 시 빔의 개수에 따른 광중성자선량의 부작용 발생률을 분석하고자 한다. 전립샘암 세기조절방사선치료의 방사선치료계획설계는 1회 처방선량 220 cGy, 전체 치료 횟수는 33회로 총 7260 cGy로 수립하였다. 실험에 사용된 선형가속기는 Varian의 True Beam STx(Varian, USA)이며, 계획용 표적체적(Planning target volume; PTV)에 15 MV로 광중성자 선량이 발생되도록 하였다. 치료계획의 설계는 Eclipse System (Varian Ver 10.0, USA)을 사용하여 세기조절방사선치료 5, 7, 9 portals로 하였다. 광중성자 선량 측정을 위해 광자극발광선량계 (Optically stimulated luminescence albedo neutron dosimeter, Landauer Inc., USA)를 사용하였다. 세기조절방사선치료 5 portals 시 1,000명당 1.7명, 7 portals 시 1,000명당 1.8명, 9 portals 시 1,000명당 2.0명이 광중성자 선량으로 인하여, 갑상샘에 부작용을 나타낼 확률임을 산출하였다. 본 연구는 세기조절방사선치료 시 2차 피폭선량의 위험성을 연구하여, 향후 방사선의 확률적 영향과 관련된 의미 있는 자료로 활용될 수 있기를 기대한다.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제30권1호
• /
• pp.27-35
• /
• 2012

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of common three photon energies (6-MV, 10-MV, and 15-MV) on intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans to treat prostate cancer patients. Materials and Methods: Twenty patients with prostate cancer treated locally to 81.0 Gy were retrospectively studied. 6-MV, 10-MV, and 15-MV IMRT plans for each patient were generated using suitable planning objectives, dose constraints, and 8-field setting. The plans were analyzed in terms of dose-volume histogram for the target coverage, dose conformity, organs at risk (OAR) sparing, and normal tissue integral dose. Results: Regardless of the energies chosen at the plans, the target coverage, conformity, and homogeneity of the plans were similar. However, there was a significant dose increase in rectal wall and femoral heads for 6-MV compared to those for 10-MV and 15-MV. The $V_{20Gy}$ of rectal wall with 6-MV, 10-MV, and 15-MV were 95.6%, 88.4%, and 89.4% while the mean dose to femoral heads were 31.7, 25.9, and 26.3 Gy, respectively. Integral doses to the normal tissues in higher energy (10-MV and 15-MV) plans were reduced by about 7%. Overall, integral doses in mid and low dose regions in 6-MV plans were increased by up to 13%. Conclusion: In this study, 10-MV prostate IMRT plans showed better OAR sparing and less integral doses than the 6-MV. The biological and clinical significance of this finding remains to be determined afterward, considering neutron dose contribution.

• 대한방사선치료학회지
• /
• 제29권1호
• /
• pp.85-92
• /
• 2017

목 적: 세기조절방사선치료(Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy; IMRT)에서 영상유도 시스템은 치료의 정확성 확보에 유리하다. 특히 골반치료의 경우 장기들의 위치와 모양이 환자상태 및 외부적 환경에 따라 변형이 발생하여 치료 전 확인이 필요하다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 직장암 치료 시 골반 내 변화요인을 분석하였고, 자세의 재조정 방법을 고안해 적용하고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법: 본원에서 시행한 직장암 환자 40명을 대상으로 하였고, 환자들의 치료 전 영상 530건을 분석하였다. 평가 항목으로 골격구조, 방광, 직장 내 가스, 소장, 연부조직, 체중감소 여부를 매우 좋음, 좋음, 나쁨 3단계로 구분하였고 각각의 건수와 비율을 산출하였다. 나쁨의 경우가 1개 이상 시 각각의 방법으로 해당 항목에 대해 재조정을 시행하였으며 그 비율을 구하였다. 결 과: 각각의 평가조건에서 치료하기에 매우 좋은 경우는 19.2 %였다. 치료에 적절한 경우는 54.9 %, 치료에 부적절한 경우는 25.8 %였으며, 치료에 부적절한 경우에는 재조정을 시행하여 치료 진행을 하였다. 결 론: 골반 내 장기의 변화는 같은 환자일지라도 치료 시 마다 다른 결과를 나타냈다. 평가 지표에 따라 진행이 부적절한 경우는 25.8 %였으며 재조정을 통하여 환자 자세 재현성을 확보 후 치료가 가능하였다. 따라서 정밀하게 계획되는 IMRT의 직장암 치료 시에는 영상유도시스템을 이용하여 정확한 치료가 필요하다 사료된다.

• 대한방사선기술학회지:방사선기술과학
• /
• 제42권2호
• /
• pp.137-143
• /
• 2019

The aim of this study was analyzed the setup error of breast cancer patients in intensity modulated radiation therapy(IMRT) with deep inspiration breath holding(DIBH) and was analyzed the dose distribution due to setup error. A total of 45 breast cancer cases were performed a retrospective clinical analysis of setup error. In addition, the re-treatment planning was carried by shifting the setup error from the isocenter at the treatment. Based on this, the dose distribution of PTV and OARs was compared and analyzed. The 3D error for small breast group and medium breast group and large breast group were 3.1 mm and 3.7 mm and 4.1 mm, respectively. The difference between the groups was statistically significant(P=0.003). DVH results showed HI, CI for the PTV difference between standard treatment plan and re-treatment plan of 14.4%, 4%. The difference in $D_5$ and $V_{20}$ of the ipsilateral lung was 5.6%, 13% respectively. The difference in $D_5$ and $V_5$ of the heart of right breast cancer patients was 6.8%, 8% respectively. The difference in $D_5$, $V_{20}$ of the heart of left breast cancer patients was 7.2%, 23.5% respectively. In this study, there was a significant association between breast size and significant setup error in breast cancer patients with DIBH. In addition, it was found that the dose distribution of the PTV and OARs varied according to the setup error.

• 한국의학물리학회지:의학물리
• /
• 제32권4호
• /
• pp.83-91
• /
• 2021

Various types of high-precision radiotherapy, such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), tomotherapy (Tomo), and stereotactic body radiation therapy have been available since 1997. After being covered by insurance in 2015, the number of IMRT cases rapidly increased 18-fold from 2011 to 2018 in Korea. IMRT, which uses a high-beam irradiation monitor unit, requires higher shielding conditions than conventional radiation treatments. However, to date, research on the shielding of facilities using IMRT and the current understanding of its status are insufficient, and detailed safety regulation procedures have not been established. This study investigated the recommended criteria for the shielding evaluation of facilities using medical linear accelerators (LINACs), including 1) the current status of safety management regulations and systems in domestic and international facilities using medical LINACs and 2) the current status of the recommended standards for safety management in domestic and international facilities using medical LINACs. It is necessary to develop and introduce a safety management system for facilities using LINACs for clinical applications that is suitable for the domestic medical environment and corresponds to the safety management systems for LINACs used overseas.

• 한국의학물리학회지:의학물리
• /
• 제32권4호
• /
• pp.116-121
• /
• 2021

Purpose: To investigate the effects of dose rate on intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) quality assurance (QA). Methods: We performed gamma tests using portal dose image prediction and log files of a multileaf collimator. Thirty treatment plans were randomly selected for the IMRT QA plan, and three verification plans for each treatment plan were generated with different dose rates (200, 400, and 600 monitor units [MU]/min). These verification plans were delivered to an electronic portal imager attached to a Varian medical linear accelerator, which recorded and compared with the planned dose. Root-mean-square (RMS) error values of the log files were also compared. Results: With an increase in dose rate, the 2%/2-mm gamma passing rate decreased from 90.9% to 85.5%, indicating that a higher dose rate was associated with lower radiation delivery accuracy. Accordingly, the average RMS error value increased from 0.0170 to 0.0381 cm as dose rate increased. In contrast, the radiation delivery time reduced from 3.83 to 1.49 minutes as the dose rate increased from 200 to 600 MU/min. Conclusions: Our results indicated that radiation delivery accuracy was lower at higher dose rates; however, the accuracy was still clinically acceptable at dose rates of up to 600 MU/min.