Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2012.30.1.27

The effect of photon energy on intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans for prostate cancer  

Sung, Won-Mo (Interdisciplinary Program in Radiation Applied Life Science, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
Park, Jong-Min (Interdisciplinary Program in Radiation Applied Life Science, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
Choi, Chang-Heon (Interdisciplinary Program in Radiation Applied Life Science, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
Ha, Sung-Whan (Interdisciplinary Program in Radiation Applied Life Science, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
Ye, Sung-Joon (Interdisciplinary Program in Radiation Applied Life Science, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
Publication Information
Radiation Oncology Journal / v.30, no.1, 2012 , pp. 27-35 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of common three photon energies (6-MV, 10-MV, and 15-MV) on intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans to treat prostate cancer patients. Materials and Methods: Twenty patients with prostate cancer treated locally to 81.0 Gy were retrospectively studied. 6-MV, 10-MV, and 15-MV IMRT plans for each patient were generated using suitable planning objectives, dose constraints, and 8-field setting. The plans were analyzed in terms of dose-volume histogram for the target coverage, dose conformity, organs at risk (OAR) sparing, and normal tissue integral dose. Results: Regardless of the energies chosen at the plans, the target coverage, conformity, and homogeneity of the plans were similar. However, there was a significant dose increase in rectal wall and femoral heads for 6-MV compared to those for 10-MV and 15-MV. The $V_{20Gy}$ of rectal wall with 6-MV, 10-MV, and 15-MV were 95.6%, 88.4%, and 89.4% while the mean dose to femoral heads were 31.7, 25.9, and 26.3 Gy, respectively. Integral doses to the normal tissues in higher energy (10-MV and 15-MV) plans were reduced by about 7%. Overall, integral doses in mid and low dose regions in 6-MV plans were increased by up to 13%. Conclusion: In this study, 10-MV prostate IMRT plans showed better OAR sparing and less integral doses than the 6-MV. The biological and clinical significance of this finding remains to be determined afterward, considering neutron dose contribution.
Keywords
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy; Prostate cancer; Photon energy; Treatment planning; Integral dose;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Ezzell GA, Schild SE, Wong WW. Development of a treatment planning protocol for prostate treatments using intensity modulated radiotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2001;2:59-68.   DOI
2 Mott JH, Livsey JE, Logue JP. Development of a simultaneous boost IMRT class solution for a hypofractionated prostate cancer protocol. Br J Radiol 2004;77:377-86.   DOI
3 Soderstrom S, Eklof A, Brahme A. Aspects on the optimal photon beam energy for radiation therapy. Acta Oncol 1999;38:179-87.   DOI
4 Ost P, Speleers B, De Meerleer G, et al. Volumetric arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for primary prostate radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost to intraprostatic lesion with 6 and 18 MV: a planning comparison study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011;79:920-6.   DOI
5 Thangavelu S, Jayakumar S, Govindarajan KN, Supe SS, Nagarajan V, Nagarajan M. Influence of photon energy on the quality of prostate intensity modulated radiation therapy plans based on analysis of physical indices. J Med Phys 2011;36:29-34.   DOI
6 De Meerleer GO, Vakaet LA, De Gersem WR, De Wagter C, De Naeyer B, De Neve W. Radiotherapy of prostate cancer with or without intensity modulated beams: a planning comparison. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000;47:639-48.   DOI
7 Lawton CA, Michalski J, El-Naqa I, et al. RTOG GU radiation oncology specialists reach consensus on pelvic lymph node volumes for high-risk prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009;74:383-7.   DOI
8 Kry SF, Salehpour M, Followill DS, et al. The calculated risk of fatal secondary malignancies from intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005;62:1195-203.   DOI
9 Kry SF, Salehpour M, Followill DS, et al. Out-of-fild photon and neutron dose equivalents from step-and-shoot intensitymodulated radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005;62:1204-16.   DOI
10 Kry SF, Salehpour M, Titt U, White RA, Stovall M, Followill D. Monte Carlo study shows no significant difference in second cancer risk between 6- and 18-MV intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol 2009;91:132-7.   DOI
11 Hussein M, Aldridge S, Guerrero Urbano T, Nisbet A. The effect of 6 and 15 MV on intensity-modulated radiation therapy prostate cancer treatment: plan evaluation, tumour control probability and normal tissue complication probability analysis, and the theoretical risk of secondary induced malignancies. Br J Radiol 2012;85:423-32.   DOI
12 Park JM, Choi CH, Ha SW, Ye SJ. The dosimetric effect of mixed-energy IMRT plans for prostate cancer. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2011;12:3563.
13 Howell RM, Hertel NE, Wang Z, Hutchinson J, Fullerton GD. Calculation of effective dose from measurements of secondary neutron spectra and scattered photon dose from dynamic MLC IMRT for 6 MV, 15 MV, and 18 MV beam energies. Med Phys 2006;33:360-8.   DOI
14 Welsh JS, Mackie TR, Limmer JP. High-energy photons in IMRT: uncertainties and risks for questionable gain. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2007;6:147-9.   DOI
15 Followill DS, Nusslin F, Orton CG. Point/counterpoint: IMRT should not be administered at photon energies greater than 10 MV. Med Phys 2007;34:1877-9.   DOI
16 Park JM, Kim JI, Choi CH, Chie EK, Kim IH, Ye SJ. Photon energy-modulated radiotherapy: Monte Carlo simulation and treatment planning study. Med Phys 2012;39:1265-77.   DOI
17 Pirzkall A, Carol MP, Pickett B, Xia P, Roach M 3rd, Verhey LJ. The effect of beam energy and number of fi elds on photonbased IMRT for deep-seated targets. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002;53:434-42.   DOI
18 Chung JB, Kim JS, Kim IA, Lee JW, Cho W, Suh TS. The effect of photon energy on the intensity-modulated radiation therapy plan for prostate cancer: a planning study. J Korean Phys Soc 2011;59:183-8.   DOI
19 Li S, Boyer A, Lu Y, Chen GT. Analysis of the dose-surface histogram and dose-wall histogram for the rectum and bladder. Med Phys 1997;24:1107-16.   DOI