• 제목/요약/키워드: health benefit

검색결과 1,104건 처리시간 0.029초

건강신념모델에 기반한 초등학생의 코로나19 예방접종에 대한 어머니의 접종의도에 영향을 미치는 요인 (Factors Associated Intention of Mothers regarding COVID-19 Vaccination for Elementary School Students based on the Health Belief Model)

  • 허방글;이현예;김진주;정미의;하영미
    • 한국학교보건학회지
    • /
    • 제35권1호
    • /
    • pp.22-30
    • /
    • 2022
  • Purpose: Based on the Health Belief Model, this study aimed to identify factors influencing on COVID-19 vaccination intention of mothers with elementary school children by examining the relationships between perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefit, perceived barrier, cue to action, and perceived self-efficacy. Methods: Mothers with elementary school children were recruited from three elementary schools. An online survey was conducted of 130 mothers in November, 2021. Results: As a result, the factors influencing on vaccination intention were perceived self-efficacy (β=.33), perceived susceptibility (β=.18), perceived benefit (β=.16), and perceived barrier (β=-.17). Conclusion: Based on our findings, there is a need to develop a tailored nursing intervention that enhances perceived self-efficacy, perceived susceptibility and perceived benefit while decreasing perceived barrier in order to improve vaccination intention.

국민건강보험과 민영의료보험에 대한 집단 간의 인식도 분석 (The Recognition of Groups between the Korean National Health Insurance and the Private Health Insurance)

  • 임복희;임정도
    • 보건의료산업학회지
    • /
    • 제5권2호
    • /
    • pp.157-172
    • /
    • 2011
  • The purpose of this study is to provide basic information for improving medical security between the Korean National Health Insurance Corporation and the private health insurance in Pusan Metropolitan area by investigating of the recognition with the benefit groups. Questionnaires of 431 were taken between Feb. 11th and Feb. 25th 2008. The survey was carried out to gather information about SES and contents of insurance and recognition between the benefit group of the Korean National Health Insurance and the private health insurance on the financial conditions and the stability. The result of survey is as follows. First, there is a difference between the National Health Insurance and the private health insurance on the financial conditions and the stability of the Korean National Health Insurance. Second, there is a high score at the private health insurance on the financial conditions and the stability of the private health insurance. Third, privatizing of a National Health Insurance is high score at increase of the premium, medical payments of the National Health Insurance group and is high score at enhance of quality of medical service and decrease of loss of medical payment of the private health insurance group. Therefore, to provides more information and improved medical security with the benefit group. it is necessary for concerns to put more efforts in creating Conflicting vs. Complementing of systemic base.

자동차보험 진료비심사 일원화 이후 의료기관 진료행태 변화 (Changes in Providers' Behavior after the Reviewer Unification of Auto Insurance Medical Benefit Claims)

  • 김재선;서원식
    • 보건행정학회지
    • /
    • 제27권1호
    • /
    • pp.30-38
    • /
    • 2017
  • Background: This study aims to analyze the behavioral changes of healthcare providers and influencing factors after the reviewer unification of auto insurance medical benefit claims by an independent review agency. Methods: The comparison data were collected from the second half of 2013 and the same period of 2014. The key indicators are the number of admission days, the number of outpatient visits, inpatient ratio, inpatient medical expenses, and outpatient medical expenses. Results: Four indicators (number of admission days, number of outpatient visits, inpatient ratio, and outpatient medical expenses) showed statistically significant drops, while one indicator (inpatient medical expenses) showed no significant change. Conclusion: The reviewer unification of auto insurance medical benefit claims by an independent review agency showed significant reduction in cost and patient days.

의료비 지출이 소득불평등에 미치는 영향 (The Effect of Health Care Expenditure on Income Inequality)

  • 송은철;김창엽;신영전
    • 보건행정학회지
    • /
    • 제20권3호
    • /
    • pp.36-57
    • /
    • 2010
  • The degree of income inequality deepened by health care expenditure was useful in assessing the health security level. This exploratory study was conducted to provide a basic evidence to prove the necessity of reinforcement the benefit coverage of South Korea's health security systems. Data from the Household Income and Expenditure Survey of Korea and Luxembourg Income Study were used. Income inequality indices before and after deduction of health care expenditure were computed, and the degree of the increase in the indices was compared among 13 countries. The degree of decrease against the effect of income inequality reduction policies by health care expenditure was determined. The relationships between the national characteristics and the increase in income inequality were examined. In South Korea, all income inequality indices increased after deducting health care expenditure, but the difference was not high compared to the mean of 13 countries. However, the degree of decrease against the effect of income inequality reduction policies by health care expenditure was high, compared to the mean of 13 countries. The proportion of public sector spending on health care proved to be statistically significant with the increase of income inequality indices (p<0.05). In the context of the continuous increase in health care expenditure, if benefit coverage of health security systems is not reinforced, income inequality will all the more increase due to health care expenditure. In the establishment of the policies for reinforcement of the benefit coverage, income inequality after deduction of health care expenditure should be continuously monitored.

부산시 개원 의사와 개국 약사의 의약분업 정책목적 달성도와 손익에 대한 인식도 (Physicians and Pharmacists' Perceptions about the Goal Achievement of the Separation Policy of Drug Prescribing and Dispensing, and Benefit and Loss Caused by the Policy in Busan)

  • 박재성;남은우;권영철
    • 보건행정학회지
    • /
    • 제11권4호
    • /
    • pp.70-87
    • /
    • 2001
  • The purpose of this study was to identify health care providers' perceptions about the goal achievement and benefit/loss caused by the separation policy of drug prescribing and dispensing after the policy implemented on July 1, 2001. Uslng stratified sampling method based on the administration area, Ku, 315 physicians and pharmacists were sampled from the rosters of physician and pharmacist association in the city of Busan on 2001. There were 122 and 115 responses from physician and pharmacist sample, respectively. 78.3% of physicians and 50.4% of pharmacists evaluated that the goal of the policy was not achieved. Moreover, 75.3% of physicians and 40.7% of pharmacists did not support the policy. Most physicians and pharmacists considered preventing the citizens with drug abuse and misuses as the most important benefit derived from the policy. However, physicians and pharmacists concerned over raising health care cost that could be patients' burden. The most important physicians' benefit derived from the policy was free choice of all possible medicine that might result in effectiveness of medication. In physicians' the most important loss, most physicians worried about that breaking traditional patient and physician relationship might cause physicians' authority in treating diseases to be damaged. Pharmacists considered the most important policy benefit as hiked social status resulted from enforcement of profession due to the policy whereas they considered the most significant loss as expected financial problems of small pharmacies compared to that of large pharmacies or pharmacies adjacent to hospitals. In the current problems of the policy, physician and pharmacists blamed the government for inadequate preparations of the policy implementation. Physicians and pharmacists also considered citizens' mature attitudes toward the policy as a crucial success factor.

  • PDF

의료보험 건강진단사업의 개선방안 (Reform Measures of Health Examination Program in Health Insurance Scheme)

  • 박재용
    • 보건교육건강증진학회지
    • /
    • 제16권2호
    • /
    • pp.205-233
    • /
    • 1999
  • This study is an effort to make policy suggestions by analysing the current health examination program as a benefit service provided by the national health insurance system, including health screening for the insured, screening of cancer and chronic diseases for their dependents. Analyses found some issues being gave attention to; 1) The insured under the community health insurance system do not get the health examination benefit. A program for them should be set to have equity in benefit services. 2) Low rates of using screen services compromise purpose and the efficiency the services have first intended to. An immediate attention should be made to increase low rate of use of screen test to detect chronic diseases in particular. 3) Selection of diseases and test items covered by health examination program does not reflect the need of the insured, but to reflect financial resources of the national health insurance system. 4) Lack of health screening facilities and their geographical maldistribution is observed, which with preference of a general hospital as a screening post by the insured may lead to unreliable test. 5) A follow-up system should have been developed for the suspected classified by test results of carrying chronic diseases. They should be cared for within the health examination program. Public health care systems incorporate such a system, along with caring for those who are in need of having a health counselling on preventive care. In conclusion, the national health insurance system should be a medical insurance of giving a higher priority on preventive care benefits, health examination program in particular. That could be done by making rearrangements of test items, screening methods and system, rationalizing current reimbursement system of service fee, increasing accessibility to and utilization of the services, and making an establishment of follow-up system.

  • PDF

치기공과 학생들의 구강건강관련행위에 따른 구강건강신념의 차이 (The difference of health belief model in the oral health promotion behaviors of dental technology students)

  • 임혜정;강월;김웅철;김지환
    • 대한치과기공학회지
    • /
    • 제39권3호
    • /
    • pp.197-204
    • /
    • 2017
  • Purpose: This study aims to discover the degree of department of dental technology students' oral health recognition and to find out the differences of oral health beliefs depending on oral health behaviors. Method: The subjects in this study were the students who attended department of dental technology in Daejon, Daegu, Iksan. After a survey was conducted, the collected data were analyzed with SPSS 23.0. An analysis of frequency, independent t-test, one-way ANOVA, correlation was used. Result: Among the general things related to oral health behaviors was the statistical significant differences(p<0.05) in the area of oral health belief depending on the opportunity of oral health education, attendance of oral health course, self-aware of oral health, the number of times of teeth brushing, teeth brushing status, experience and the degree of smoking. There was a positive correlation between the degree of susceptibility and that of response to severity, barrier, salience and benefit. Severity also showed the positive correlation with barrier. Higher barrier susceptibility meant higher salience and higher benefit. So was the correlation between benefit and salience. Conclusion: This study showed that college education should focus on the students' possible behaviors in order to convey the effective oral health knowledge.

보건의료 정책 의사결정과 시민참여 : 『건강보험 보장성 시민위원회』의 사례 (Public Participation in Healthcare Decision Making : Experience of Citizen Council for Health Insurance)

  • 권순만;유명순;오주환;김수정;전보영
    • 보건행정학회지
    • /
    • 제22권4호
    • /
    • pp.467-496
    • /
    • 2012
  • Public participation in the decision making for scarce health resources is important because health policy requires trust based consensus, which can be achieved by public's understanding and involvement of related policies. In the past, opportunities for interaction between health policy decision makers and lay public were rare in Korea. As political impulses towards public participation in health policy have increased, a few of deliberation methods were attempted. However, there is little research, reporting such cases with a critical examination of relevant theories and previous studies. We first critically review the literature on public participation within theories of democracy, governance, and empowerment. Next, we report a case of a citizen council experiment, which was held to examine public's preferences among different benefit options regarding new drugs and medical technologies. Specifically, in an one-day long citizen council with a total of 28 lay public, twelve questions of whether a drug or a technology should be included in the benefit package of health insurance were asked. Pre- and post-surveys investigated participants' perception of public engagement in health policy. Although it was experimental, the citizen council ensured that lay public could be careful enough to rationally compare the costs and benefits of different options and collectively make decisions. Further, results from pre- and post-survey showed a strong willingness of members to be involved in health care decision making. In the conclusion, we emphasize that better theories and methods need to be developed for more cases of citizen participation in health care policy and management.

과부담 의료비 지출이 빈곤화 및 빈곤 지속에 미치는 영향 (The Effect of Catastrophic Health Expenditure on the Transition to Poverty and the Persistence of Poverty in South Korea)

  • 송은철;신영전
    • Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
    • /
    • 제43권5호
    • /
    • pp.423-435
    • /
    • 2010
  • Objectives: The low benefit coverage rate of South Korea's health security system has been continually pointed out. A low benefit coverage rate inevitably causes catastrophic health expenditure, which can be the cause of the transition to poverty and the persistence of poverty. This study was conducted to ascertain the effect of catastrophic health expenditure on the transition to poverty and the persistence of poverty in South Korea. Methods: To determine the degree of social mobility, this study was conducted among the 6311 households that participated in the South Korea Welfare Panel Study in both 2006 and 2008. The effect of catastrophic health expenditure on the transition to poverty and the persistence of poverty in South Korea was assessed via multiple logistic regression analysis. Results: The poverty rate in South Korea was 21.6% in 2006 and 20.0% in 2008. 25.1 - 7.3% of the households are facing catastrophic health expenditure. Catastrophic health expenditure was found to affect the transition to poverty even after adjusting for the characteristics of the household and the head of the household, at the threshold of 28% or above. Conclusions: 25.1% of the households in this study were found to be currently facing catastrophic health expenditure, and it was determined that catastrophic health expenditure is a cause of transition to poverty. This result shows that South Korea's health security system is not an effective social safety net. As such, to prevent catastrophic health expenditure and transition to poverty, the benefit coverage of South Korea's health security system needs to the strengthened.

병원 전자구매조달시스템의 경제성 분석 (Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Electronic Purchase and Supply System in Hospitals)

  • 최원호;유승흠;정우진;김영훈;이선미
    • 한국병원경영학회지
    • /
    • 제8권1호
    • /
    • pp.42-63
    • /
    • 2003
  • There is a rapidly growing expansion of internet-based infrastructure throughout industries in Korea. The internet-based Electronic Purchase and Supply System(EPSS) is being considered a supportive tool to increase the economic efficiency of hospital management. In this study, we conducted an economic evaluation of the system, analyzing data on four hospitals in Korea. According to the results, four hospitals was estimated to make net benefit of about 611 million Won in one year and about 2,809 million Won in the next five years. Further, the adoption of all hospitals in Korea to the system may generate net benefit of about 31,575 million Won in one year and about 166,938 million Won in the next five years. Furthermore, we expect that as the system covered many kinds of inputs in hospitals like pharmaceuticals, the benefit of the system would go up by a considerable degree.

  • PDF