• 한국국방경영분석학회지
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.79-92
• /
• 1980

In cost-only incentive contract the emphasis is the attainment of efficient and effective cost control. In contrast multiple incentives contract correlates contractor's profit motives with the generalized government objective function, the decision variables of which are performance or quality (technical progress), time or schedule (timely development and delivery) and the cost (efficient and effective cost control) Under multiple incentive structure, it is essential to formulate the trade-off curves between cost and performance, which are called iso-fee curves. Trade-off curves depict the combination of cost and performance achievement for which the contractor will be rewarded with the same fee. The basic function of trade-off curves is to show he the contractor will be motivated by incentive arragement to trade off or sacrifice the achievement in one incentive element for the acnievment in another.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2021년도 가을 학술논문 발표대회
• /
• pp.240-241
• /
• 2021

For the sustainable development of the domestic construction project management field, each CM company should try to diversify in terms of service contract types and scope of work while having internationally competitive technical and service capabilities as follows. First, from the initiation of the service to the completion, the CMr should be able to establish and execute a plan to create specific outcomes. Second, CMr must have the capability to produce weekly or monthly cost, schedule, risk, and scope management reports. In addition, it should be possible to apply the cost plus sliding fee method or to systematically and continuously accumulate and process data generated during the construction process.

• Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.531-548
• /
• 1991

신생아의 질적 관리를 위해 신생아실 의료인력과 의료수가의 타당성을 파악하고자 영남지역내 24개 소아과 수련병원 가운데 신설병원과 모(母)병원의 수련프로그램에 의존해 있는 병원을 제외한 20개 병원의 신생아실을 대상으로 1991년 7월 29일에서 8월 14일 사이에 각 병원을 방문하여 자료를 수집하였다. 자료는 신생아실 대장에서 1991년 6월 한달동안 입.퇴원한 정상 및 환아수를 조사하고 신생아실 수간호사와 소아과 의사를 면담하여 정상신생아 관리에 소요되는 최소한의 간호시간, 인력현황, 인력의 적정성, 그리고 인력확보의 문제점을 조사하였고 자 병원 보험심사과에서 정상 질분만시와 제왕절개분만시 산모 1인당 평균 산모 및 신생아관리분의 의료비를 조사하였다. 정상신생아 1명당 하루에 필요한 최소한의 간호시간은 평균 179.5분(${\pm}58.6$)이었고 대학병원은 202.3분(${\pm}50.7$), 종합병원은 164.2분(${\pm}60.5$)이었다. 최소한의 간호 요구시간 대 제공가능한 간호시간 비는 평균 1.42였고 환아에 대한 간호 요구량을 감안했을 때는 평균 비가 2.06으로 간호인력이 매우 부족하였다. 미국 소아과학회가 권장한 신생아실 간호인력을 기준으로 할 경우 간호사는 31%, 간호조무사는 17%가 충원된 상태였다. 신생아실 수간호사의 90%와 소아과 의사의 85%가 간호사가 부족하다고 했고 간호조무사는 각각 75%가 부족하다고 했다. 간호인력 보충이 안 되는 주된 이유는 재정사정이라고 하였다. 간호조무사의 경우는 인력구하기 힘든 것이 재정사정 다음으로 중요한 이유였다. 그러나 국립대학병원의 경우는 의사와 간호사는 T.O.의 제한이 주된 이유라고 했다. 정상 질분만으로 2박 3일만에 퇴원하는 경우 총 의료비는 평균 219,430원이었고 이 중 신생아분은 20,323원(9.3%)이었으며, 제왕절개분만으로 6박 7일만에 퇴원할 경우 평균 732,578원이었고 이 중 신생아분은 76,937원(12.0%)이었다. 원가계산방식에 의한 신생아관리에 대한 최소한의 원가는 3차진료기관의 경우 1일 16,141원, 기타 종합병원은 14,576원으로 원가가 의료보험수가의 각각 5.0배, 4.9배나 되었다. 오늘날의 의료인력의 인건비 수준과 병원시설 및 관리비를 감안할 때 현행 의료수가로 양질의 신생아관리를 기대하기 어려운 것으로 생각된다.

• Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain
• /
• 제30권2호
• /
• pp.257-268
• /
• 2005

우리나라 건강보험제도는 보수지불방식에서 전체적으로 보면 행위별수가제(fee for service)를 유지하고 있다. 이 제도에서는 진료수가의 설계에서 각 의료서비스의 단위를 설정하기 위해서는 현재 임상에서 이루어지고 있는 모든 의료행위에 대한 목록이 필요하게 된다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 측두하악장애 의료의 수가구조와 수가항목에 대해 재분류를 통한 체계화과정을 통해서 향후 투입자원에 기초한 상대가치를 산정하여 수가수준을 결정할 수 있는 준거를 제시하고자 하였다. 현행 행위별 수가제도의 범위내에서 측두하악장애 진료행위에 대한 델파이법을 이용하여 의료행위에 대한 재분류하여 항목화 작업을 거치면서 자원기준 상대가치 산출모델의 선행연구를 시행하였다. 이를 통해 의료행위분류에서는 총 151개의 의료 행위를 규명하였다. 이를 건강보험 수가항목이 되도록 하기 위해서는 지속적인 정련화 과정이 필요하게 되므로 용어의 정리 및 통일, 명확한 진료범위의 설명, 체계적인 분류구조 등이 고려되어야 한다. 이상의 연구결과는 향후 치과의료의 구조적 문제점과 현안과제를 해결하는 기초자료로 활용하고, 앞으로 치과의료의 수가 수준을 결정하는 후속연구의 방향설정과 참고자료로 활용하며, 의료수가체계의 표준화를 유도하여 의료이용의 편의성을 도모하고 의료정책에 대한 국민적 신뢰를 회복하여 측두하악관절장애 진료의 건강보험 확대적용 및 향후 민간 사보험 도입시 기초자료로 활용될 것으로 사료된다.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제29권2호
• /
• pp.130-137
• /
• 2019

The fee-for-service system is used as the main payment system for health care providers in Korea. It has been argued that it can't reflect differences in the medical practice costs across regions because the fee schedule is calculated based on the average cost. So, some researchers and providers have disputed that there is need for adopting geographic practice cost index (GPCI) used in the United States for the Medicare program for the elderly to the fee-for-service payment system. This study performed to identify whether the difference in the practice costs among regions exists or not and to examine the feasibility of applying GPCI to Korea payment system. For this purpose, we calculated modified-GPCI and examined considerations to introduce GPCI in Korea. First we identified available data to calculate GPCI. Second, we made applicable GPCI equations to Korea payment system and computed it based on four types of regions (metropolitan, urban, suburban, and rural). We also categorize the regions based on the availability of the medical resources and the capability of utilizing them. As a result, we found that there wasn't any significant difference in the GPCI by regional types in general, but the indices of rural areas (0.91-0.98) was relatively low compared to the indices of other regions (0.96-1.07). Considering the need to use GPCI floor, the pros and cons of using GPCI, and the concern of the regional imbalance of resources, the introduction of GPCI needs to be carefully considered.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제17권3호
• /
• pp.1-25
• /
• 2007

Relative value scales introduced in 2001 remarkably improved health insurance fee schedule, but current relative value scales have many problems. In the beginning the government intended to introduce 'resource based relative value scales(RBRVSs)' like USA, but political adjustment of RBRVS studied in 19.17 weakened the relationship between relative value scale and resource consumption. So unbalance of health insurance fees are existing till now. Also relative value was not divided to physician work and practice expense, and malpractice fee was not divided separately. To correct the unbalance of current relative value scales, the refinement project of health insurance relative value scales started in 2003. The project team divided relative value scales into three components, which are physician work, practice expense, malpractice fee. Physician work was studied by professional organizations like Korean medical association. To develop the practice expense relative value, project team organized clinical practice expert panels(CPEPs) composed of physicians, nurses, and medical technicians. CPEPs constructed direct expense data like labor costs, material costs, equipment costs about each medical procedures. The practice expense relative values of medical procedures were developed by the allocation of the institution level direct & indirect costs according to CPEPs direct costs. Institution level direct & indirect costs were collected in 21 hospitals, 98 medical clinics, 53 dental clinics, 78 oriental clinics, and 46 pharmacies. The malpractice fee relative values were developed through the survey of malpractice related costs of hospitals, clinics, pharmacies. Putting together three components of relative values in one scale, the final relative values were made. The final relative values were calculated under budget neutrality by medical departments, that is, total relative value score of a department was same before and after the revision. but malpractice fee relative value scores were added to total scores of relative values. So total score of a department was increased by the malpractice fee relative value score of that department This project failed in making 'resource based' relative value scales in the true sense of the word, because the total relative value scores of medical departments were fixed. However the project team constructed the objective basis of relative value scale like physician's work, direct practice expense, malpractice fee. So step by step making process of the basis, the fixation of total scores by the departments will be resolved and the resource based relative value scale will be introduced in true sense.

• 간호행정학회지
• /
• 제5권2호
• /
• pp.253-280
• /
• 1999

A cost analysis for hospitalized patients was performed based on the RBRVS in order to determine an appropriate nursing fee schedule. The study was conducted through three phases as follows: 1) Nursing activities provided for the inpatients currently in Korea were identified and classified using a taxonomy which was developed by our research team through the Delphi process. 2) The resource-based relative points for every nursing activity according to nursing time, mental effort and judgement, technical skill, physical effort and stress were determined through a survey of 300 clinical RNs working at 5 tertiary hospitals from May 25 to July 25. 1998. 3) The nursing cost of every nursing activity for hospitalized patients was estimated based on the RBRVS. As a result, 136 nursing activities were identified and classified by nursing processes and nursing domains. However, our classification system of nursing activities should continue to be refined, and all nursing practices should be standardized. The nursing activities were given resource-based relative points ranging from 100 to 400 points, then each nursing activity was assigned a value for the RBRVS, which was determined by the exponential function of 2resource-based relative point/100. Thus, a value of 2 was calculated for 100 points, 4 for 200 points, 8 for 300 points, and 16 for 400 points. Meanwhile, the unit cost of nursing was calculated as 170 Won. The nursing cost of 136 nursing activities was estimated using the RBRVS as shown in