• 보건교육건강증진학회지
• /
• 제29권4호
• /
• pp.67-81
• /
• 2012

Objectives: This article examines the diversity of healthy cities evaluation in practice and discusses the major conflicting issues in evaluating healthy cities to offer implications to academics and cities for application in their field. Methods: The author discusses issues on major topics that arose from a review of literature on selected articles from peer-reviewed journals, books and gray literature. The recently developed Korean Healthy Cities evaluation framework is used as a main source of reference. Results: Evaluating healthy cities is in itself a political process and requires multiple methodologies and diverse sources of data. Details of the evaluation process depend on the purposes and goals predetermined by the stakeholders. The Korean Healthy Cities evaluation framework applies these principles and suggests a participatory approach to evaluation, selection of indicators that provide evidence on the process of change and to use mixed evaluation methods. The involvement of stakeholders in the evaluation process can also be a useful tool to further strengthen partnerships and strategies for healthy cities. Conclusion: Cities need to engage more in evaluation activities and develop necessary skills and capacity to produce utility-driven evidence.

• 한국병원경영학회지
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.1-15
• /
• 2018

Recently, the importance of emergency medical services has emerged, as rapid advances in urbanization and industrial development. Accordingly, the need for effective emergency medical services is increasing, and the evaluation of an emergengy medical services centers is conducted to meet these policy needs. The purpose of this study was to analyse the relationship between the structure and the process domain of the evaluation of an emergency medical services center based on the Donabedian's model and to verify the validity as an index of quality evaluation through the results. As a result of the analysis, there were some indicators that showed a different direction than expected, but generally there was a significant correlation between the structure and process domains of the evaluation of an emergency medical services center. This suggests that the process can be improved by improving the structure. In conclusion, as structure and process indicators in evaluation of an emergency medical services center show significant relationship, it can be evaluated as validity as a tool to measure the quality of emergency medical services.

• 한국철도학회논문집
• /
• 제9권4호
• /
• pp.432-440
• /
• 2006

Prior to the service evaluation, many kinds of its attributes must be identified on the basis of rational decision owing to complexity and ambiguity inherent in logistics service. there are so many evaluation methods but they are not applicable to logistics service the have property of non-additivity and overlapped attributes. Therefore, probability measure can not used to evaluate logistics service but Fuzzy Measure is required. And the method should be easy to calculate it Recently Fuzzy theory has been applied in Various evaluation problem. Fuzzy evaluation based on Fuzzy theory can accommodate fuzziness in judgement with people through introducing Fuzzy Measure. In this paper, Hierarchical Fuzzy Process is applied to evaluate level of logistics service in Korail and the biggest six logistics companies in the korea which is called 3PL Company. Also Fuzzy Relation Equation which is problem identifying evaluation value at these fuzzy evaluation is applied to verify relation between Input and Output data through @-operation. Therefore, we apply this Fuzzy Relation Equation to Hierarchical Fuzzy Process and verify evaluation value which objects of evaluation are able to possess.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제48권3호
• /
• pp.303-334
• /
• 2014

본 연구는 대학도서관 경영평가를 위한 표준지표 및 평가방법의 개발을 목표로, 다양한 이해관계자들의 의견 수집 및 합의를 통하여 평가체계 안을 제안하였다. 이를 위해 우선 대학도서관 평가의 목적과 요구조건을 살펴보고, 다수의 이해관계자의 의견에 기초하여, 심층면담, 설문조사, 포커스 그룹 등을 이용한 다단계 합의의 방법으로 평가지표를 추출하였으며, 이의 구성 및 배점체계 등을 개발하였다. 전반적 평가체계는 과정적 접근을 큰 틀로 하여, 내부적/기능적인 과정 범주와, 외부적/서비스중심적인 자원 및 결과 범주를 고려하였으며, 범주들 간의 중요도의 균형 속에서 조사 분석 결과의 항목별 중요성에 따라 배점체계를 구축하였다. 더불어 평가방법 및 연차별 평가개선 로드맵을 제시하였다. 평가체계의 개발을 통해 본 연구는 대학도서관 평가활동에 기여할 뿐 아니라 대학도서관의 성과요소 및 예측변인들에 대한 논의의 활성화에도 기여할 수 있기를 기대한다.

• 한국생활과학회지
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.609-618
• /
• 2009

The study examined the effects of parenting process(supportive and involving mother-adolescent relationship, father-adolescent relationship) and school process(teachers' support, school life satisfaction) on adolescents' academic achievement and self-evaluation. Participants were 1787 middle school students (902 boys, 885 girls) in KEEP(Korean Education and Employment Panel). Structural equation modeling indicated that parenting and school process influenced adolescents' self-evaluation through adolescents' academic achievement. Also, the analysis with One Way ANOVA revealed that positive school (parenting) processes can serve a protective-stabilizing function when parenting(school) processes are negative.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.11-23
• /
• 2005

It is difficult to put it into practice in that it requires bearing too much burden to draw out the planning itself in a case of large construction work. Consequently in this paper we select evaluation criteria by construction progress, classify into several categories, and regard potential danger which often occurs, as a evaluation criterion. Further step is to allow workers or collaborated companies to express their expert opinions or experiences and to encourage quality and process control and autonomous safety control by applying PSM(Process Safety Management) method using AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) and to development of PSIM(Process Safety Information Management) evaluation method in the construction. The reason why PSIM method should be quantitative and substantial progress is because it contributes Korean constructing companies to enhancing their safety control ability and to taking an equal stance just like developed countries, thereby strengthening their competitive edges.

• 한국환경과학회지
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.129-142
• /
• 2007

The main purpose of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the local agenda 21 of Daegu City based on the evaluation model and propose important measures to solve its problems and improve the limitations. As a whole, the evaluation result of the local agenda 21 of Daegu City showed very low score, only 151 points out of 500 points and revealed it was below the level in all three domains of making process, designed content, and evaluation of implementation. The making process got only score below the half in all large indicators of under-standing, driving, and rationality. This unsystematic and irrational process inevitably resulted in ambiguous and proclamatory content mainly expressing willingness to do. This fact means that the local agenda 21 of Daegu City has not served as the comprehensive local environmental plan containing visions, policies, ends and means. It did not suggest evaluation system and institutionalization of evaluation. These results of evaluation suggested that the existing local agenda 21 of Daegu City was neither useful nor effective and thus the totally new local agenda 21 should be prepared. Finally, important measures in making process, designed content and evaluation of implementation were proposed for the remaking.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.141-162
• /
• 2011

The controls of Information Systems (IS) have been an more critical issue controls as the sophistication and integration of IS is more proceeded. ITGI (The Information Technology Governance Institute) of ISACA (Information Systems Audit and Control Association) has suggested COBIT (Control Objectives for Information and related Technology) and this has been widely recognized the evaluation model of IS controls. In COBIT, IS was evaluated in terms of process, information quality, and IT resources. This study used COBIT in order to suggest and empirically test an evaluation model of IS service. The data was collated from one major Chinese SI (Systems Integration) company in four domains of processes : planning and organization, acquisition and implementation, delivery and support, and monitoring. Seven factors are extracted using an exploratory factor analysis as follows : Overall IT planning process, technological assessment process in IT planning of IT, cost-benefit assessment process in IT planning, implementation process, support process, monitoring process, post-implementation evaluation process. The results of confirmatory analysis of three alternative measurement models indicated that the measurement model with one inherent or conceptual variable has greater model fitness than the other models. This study suggests the logical and general way to test and apply COBIT in evaluating IS services.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제35권4호
• /
• pp.41-47
• /
• 2012

To adapt to a rapidly changing business environment, introduction of new management techniques and innovative activities are crucial. In the case of small and medium companies, the compensation for scarce management resources and sustainable development can be obtained from advantage of management consulting. In this study, we propose the enterprise process evaluation model for small and medium business consulting, which can deploy the process improvement activities with considering the process maturity level within an organization. The process evaluation area of proposed Small and Medium Business, Staged Maturity Model (SMB-SMM) consists of four following parts: supply management, demand management, business management, and research and development (R&D) management. For each area, we set goals and also define the practices to achieve their goals respectively. By applying the SMB-SMM model to the small and medium sized companies, the process maturity level can be defined. And then to overcome the gap between the goals and evaluation results, the customized management consulting activities can be drawn from the predefined consulting approaches from the SMB-SMM.

• 직업교육연구
• /
• 제29권3호
• /
• pp.157-185
• /
• 2010

이 연구의 목적은 조직의 성과 향상과 개인의 성장을 추구하는 인재개발에서 사이버 기반의 교육 프로그램에 대한 개선과 계속성 여부 등 의사결정에 관련한 유용한 가치 판단을 위하여 필요한 정보를 획득, 기술, 제공하는 과정에서 활용할 수 있는 과정중심 평가준거를 개발하는 데 있었다. 이 연구의 결론은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 문헌고찰 등 이론적 탐색과 내용분석법 적용을 통하여 인재개발 사이버 교육 프로그램의 과정중심 평가준거를 4개 차원, 13개 대영역, 29개 하위영역, 125개 평가문항으로 도출하였다. 둘째, 도출한 평가준거에 대하여 세 차례의 델파이 조사를 통하여 4개 차원, 13개 대영역, 29개 하위영역, 93개 평가문항을 최종 개발하였다. 셋째, 개발된 평가준거의 내용타당도 비율(CVR)은 .31~1.00으로 나타났으며 합의도는 .75이상, 수렴도는 .5이하로 나타나 개발한 평가문항이 타당한 것으로 확인하였다. 이러한 평가문항의 신뢰도 Cronbach's ${\alpha}$는 .980으로 나타나 내적일치도가 만족스러우며 신뢰도는 높은 것으로 나타났다.