• Research in Mathematical Education
• /
• v.26 no.1
• /
• pp.19-30
• /
• 2023

This study analyzes the tasks selected and implemented by pre-service mathematics teachers to support students' development of epistemic actions. Data was collected from 20 students who participated in a mathematics education curriculum theory course during one semester, and multiple data sources were used to gather information about the microteaching sessions. The study focused on the tasks selected and demonstrated during microteaching by pre-service teachers. The results suggest that providing students with a variety of learning opportunities that engage them in different combinations of abductive and deductive epistemic actions is important. The tasks selected by pre-service teachers primarily focused on understanding concepts, calculation, and reasoning. However, the use of engineering tools may present challenges as it requires students to engage in two epistemic actions simultaneously. The study's findings can inform the development of more effective approaches to mathematics education and can guide the development of teacher training programs.

• Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education
• /
• v.43 no.4
• /
• pp.519-535
• /
• 2024

This study investigated the specific aspects of three elementary pre-service teachers' epistemic cognition depicted in their science teaching language during a simulation teaching experiment on the seasonal change of air temperature. The integrated analytic methods of practical epistemology analysis and the AIR model were used. Also, the working processes involved in the language teaching as an epistemic tool to promote student learning were identified. At the hypothesis-forming stage of the simulation teaching, three pre-service teachers presented explicitly presented the epistemic learning goal of hypothesis-creating through giving encounters. As the epistemic ideals about assessing the achievement of an epistemic goal, the teachers mainly used the criterion whether the new knowledge was connected with the previously learned knowledge. However, all the three pre-service teachers needed to disclose the reliable process in enough detail. At the hypothesis testing stage of the simulation teaching, they presented their epistemic goals, such as sharing the results of the experiments and comparing the results with the hypothesis through encounters. They used the experimental conditions as standing fast language use. The similarity relations between the empirical evidence obtained through the experiments and the language used for the experiments were employed as the epistemic ideals for the hypothesis test. However, based on the correlation obtained from the experiment, pre-service teachers tried to verify the causal hypothesis that the seasonal change in the air temperature occurred due to the differences in the Sun's meridian altitude. The mismatch between the correlation and causality created a gap, which needed to be resolved, i.e., the reliable process was not satisfied. The results of analyzing the teaching language in this study are significant because they inform the elementary pre-service teachers of the points at which they need to improve their teaching language to facilitate the students' knowledge construction process.

• Journal of the Korean earth science society
• /
• v.31 no.1
• /
• pp.106-117
• /
• 2010

The purpose of this study was to explore students' argumentation in perspectives of epistemology and psychology and to find out how teacher can promote students' abilities of developing argumentation. The 60 hours of lessons from the interaction between one science teacher (Mr. Physics, who had 35 years of teaching experience) and his 26 students were observed, transcribed, and analyzed using two different analyzing tools; one is from the perspective of epistemology and the other from the perspective of psychology, which can portray how argumentation is constructed. Mr. Physics created the environment where students could promote the quality of scientific argumentation through explicit teaching strategy, Claim-Evidence Approach. The low level of argumentation was portrayed through examples from students' prior knowledge or experience in the form of an Appeal to the instance operation and the Elaboration reasoning skill. Students' own claims were developed through application of knowledge in a different context in the form of an Induction operation and Generativity reasoning skill. Higher level of argumentation was portrayed through Consistency operation with other knowledge or experience and Explanation reasoning skills based on students' ideas with more active teacher's inputs. The teacher in this study played a role as a helper for students to enact identities as competent "sense makers," as an elaborator rather than evaluator to extend students' ideas, and as a mentor to foster and monitor the students' development of ideas of a higher quality. It is critical for teachers to understand the nature of argumentation, which in turn is connected to their explicit teaching strategy with the aim of providing opportunities where students can understand the science enterprise.

• Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics
• /
• v.25 no.4
• /
• pp.717-754
• /
• 2015

As a design research, this study aims to identify students' collaborative problems solving patterns using the Wiki and design factors triggering MKB(mathematical knowledge building) in virtual environment. For 70 days, 14 Korean secondary gifted students, who enrolled in calculus II courses in one of gifted institutions in Korea, solved 10 math problems together using the Wiki. In this study, I considered five design factors; motivation, practice of LaTeX, norms of participation, epistemic agency, and two types of educational settings. The primary pattern emergent in students' collaborative problem solving process is identified as 'solutions and refutations' along the double helix consisting of the constructive line and the critical line, which is very similar to the pattern of 'Conjectures and Refutations'(Lakatos, 1976). Despite that most participants had difficulty in using LaTeX for mathematical expressions, this study shows that Wikis are valuable tools for providing Korean secondary students opportunities to learn social virtue such as humility and courage (Lampert, 1990), which is considered to be have been neglected in Korean educational environment but is emphasized as precious for doing mathematics in the field of mathematics education.

• Cross-Cultural Studies
• /
• v.46
• /
• pp.297-325
• /
• 2017

In this paper, I would like to reconsider the evidential category (or the mediation category) in languages with language specific values, especially in Korean and French evidentials. We tried to analyze how the evidentials are represented in both languages including their linguistic markers (grammatical, lexical or discursive) and their semantic meanings. According to the precedent studies from the general linguistic point of view, we would like to reconsider the semantic meanings of both languages' grammatical markers, the so-called Korean retrospective marker '-te-' and French conditionals in the framework of the enunciative operation theory suggested by $Descl{\acute{e}}s$ & $Guentch{\acute{e}}va$ (2000), which proposed to classify the type of discourse by the language-independent description tools conceived after the enunciation theory suggested by Bally (1965), Benveniste (1956), Culioli (1973). Through this approach, we would like to contribute to establishing the linguistic basis not only for the general linguistic research to determine the invariant meaning of linguistic evidentials and their system, but also for the applied linguistics to the language engineering field.