1 |
Clinkenbeard, P. R. (1991). Unfair expectations: A pilot study of middle school students' comparisons of gifted and regular classes. Journal For The Education Of The Gifted, 15(1), 56-63.
DOI
|
2 |
Cobb, P. (1994). Where Is the mind? constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 13-20.
DOI
|
3 |
Davidson, N., & Kroll, D. L. (1991). An overview of research on cooperative learning related to mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(5), 362-365.
DOI
|
4 |
Diezmann, C. M. & Watters, J. J. (2001). The collaboration of mathematically gifted students on challenging tasks. Journal For The Education Of The Gifted, 25(1), 7-31.
DOI
|
5 |
Eisner, E. W. (2001). The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school program. New York: Macmillan.
|
6 |
Fuks, H., & Pimentel, M. (2009). Studying response-structure confusion in VMT. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Studying Virtual Math Teams (pp. 373-398). New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media.
|
7 |
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7-23.
DOI
|
8 |
Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157-172.
DOI
|
9 |
Goos, M. (2004). Learning mathematics in a classroom community of inquiry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(4), 258-291.
DOI
|
10 |
Goos, M. & Galbraith, P. (1996). Do it this way! Metacognitive strategies in collaborative mathematical problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 30(3), 229-260.
DOI
|
11 |
Hurme, T. & Jarvela, S. (2005). Students' activity in computer-supported collaborative problem solving in mathematics. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 10(1), 49-73.
DOI
|
12 |
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1991). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction book company.
|
13 |
Kennedy, D. A., Archambault, F. X., & Hallmark, B. W. (1995). The effect of group composition on gifted and non-gifted elemenary students in cooperative learning groups. Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
|
14 |
Koschmann, T. (1996). Paradigm shifts and instructional technology: An introduction. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 1-23). Mawha, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
|
15 |
Kramarski, B., & Mevarech, Z. R. (2003). Enhancing mathematical reasoning in the classroom: The effects of cooperative learning and metacognitive training. American Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 281-310.
DOI
|
16 |
Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). The Psychology of Mathematical Abilities in Schoolchildren (J. Teller, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
|
17 |
Kulik, J. A. (2003). Grouping and tracking. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 268-281). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
|
18 |
Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and refutations: The logic of mathematical discovery. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
|
19 |
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation (Learning in doing: Social, cognitive and computational perspectives). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
|
20 |
Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27(1), 29-63.
DOI
|
21 |
Lee, S. (2014). The growth of school mathematics: Korean secondary gifted students' collaborative problem solving using the Wiki. (Doctoral dissertation paper, University of Missouri- Columbia).
|
22 |
Lerman, S. (2000). The social turn in mathematics education research. In K Boaler (Ed.). Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 19-44). Westport, CT: Alblex Publishing.
|
23 |
Li, A. K. F., & Adamson, G. (1992). Gifted secondary students' preferred learning style: Cooperative, competitive, or individualistic? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16(1), 46-54.
DOI
|
24 |
Litz, I. R. (2007). Student adoption of a Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) mathematical problem solving environment: The case of The Math Forum's Virtual Math Team (VMT) chat service. Ph.D. dissertation paper, Nova Southeastern University.
|
25 |
Matthews, M. (1993). Meaningful cooperative learning is key. Educational Leadership, 50(6), 64.
|
26 |
Moss, J., & Beatty, R. (2006). Knowledge building in mathematics: Supporting collaborative learning in pattern problems. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(4), 441-465.
DOI
|
27 |
Narasimhan, R. (2009). Incorporating current research, wikis, and discussion lists in a mathematics capstone course. PRIMUS, 19(1), 29-38.
DOI
|
28 |
Nason, R., & Woodruff, E. (2004). Online collaborative learning in mathematics: Some nesseary innovations. In T. S. Roberts (Ed.), Online Collborative Learning: Theory and Practice (Vol. Hershey, PA, pp. 103-131): Information Science Publishing.
|
29 |
Nason, R., & Woodruff, E. (2002). New ways of learning mathematics: Are we ready for it? Paper presented at the The International Conference on Computers in Education.
|
30 |
Nason, R., & Woodruff, E. (2003). Fostering authentic, sustained, and progressive mathematical knowledge-building activity in computer collaborative learning (CSCL) communities. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 22(4), 345-363.
|
31 |
NCTM. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
|
32 |
Neber, H., Finsterwald, M., & Urban, N. (2001). Cooperative learning with gifted and highachieving students: A review and meta-analyses of 12 studies. High Ability Studies, 12(2), 199-214.
DOI
|
33 |
Olsen, R. E. W. B., & Kagan, S. (1992). About cooperative learning. In C. Kessler (Ed.), Cooperative language learning: A teacher's resource book (pp. 1-30). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
|
34 |
Ormrod, J. E. (2009). Human learning (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
|
35 |
Oxford, R. L. (1997). Cooperative learning, collaborative learning, and interaction: Three communicative strands in the language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 443-456.
DOI
|
36 |
Patrick, H., Bangel, N. J., Jeon, K. N., & Townsend, M. A. R. (2005). Reconsidering the issue of cooperative learning with gifted students. Journal For The Education Of The Gifted, 29(1), 90-108.
DOI
|
37 |
Reich, J., Murnane, R., & Willett, J. (2012). The State of Wiki Usage in U.S. K-12 Schools. Educational Researcher, 41(1), 7-15.
DOI
|
38 |
Peterson, E. (2009). Using a wiki to enhance cooperative learning in a real analysis course. PRIMUS, 19(1), 18-28.
DOI
|
39 |
Popper, K. (1963/2002). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. NY: Routledge Classics.
|
40 |
Reed, C. F. (2005). Mathematically gifted in the heterogeneously grouped mathematics classroom: What is a teacher to do? In S. K. Johnsen & J. Kendrick (Eds.), Math education for gifted students (pp. 17-31). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
|
41 |
Reynolds, B. E., Hagelgans, N. L., Schwingendorf, K. E., Vidakovic, D., Dubinsky, E., Shahin, M., et al. (1995). A practical guide to cooperative learning in collegiate mathematics (Vol. 37). Wasington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America.
|
42 |
Robinson, A. (1990a). Cooperation or exploitation? The argument against cooperative learning for talented students. Journal For The Education Of The Gifted, 14(1), 9-27.
DOI
|
43 |
Robinson, A. (1990b). Response to Slavin: Cooperation, consistency, and challenge for academically talented youth. Journal For The Education Of The Gifted, 14(1), 31-36.
DOI
|
44 |
Robinson, A. (2003). Cooperative learning and high ability students. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of Gifted Education (3rd ed., pp. 282-292). Boston, MA: Allyn
|
45 |
Ruth, A., & Houghton, L. (2009). The wiki way of learning. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(2), 135-152.
|
46 |
Sheehy, G. (2008). The Wiki as knowledge repository: Using a Wiki in a community of practice to strengthen K-12 education. emph TechTrends, 52(6), 55-60.
DOI
|
47 |
Sarmiento-Klapper, J. W. (2009). The sequential co-construction of the joint problem space. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Studying Virtual Math Teams (pp. 83-98). New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media.
|
48 |
Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive resposibility for the advancement of knoweldge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal Education in a Knowledge Society (pp. 67-98). Peru, IL: Carus Publishing Company.
|
49 |
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97-118). New York: Cambridge University Press.
|
50 |
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1996). In fostering community of inquiry, must it matter that teacher knows "the answer"?, For the Learning of Mathematics, 16(3), 11-16.
|
51 |
Slavin, R. E. (1980). Cooperative Learning. Review of Educational Research, 50(2), 315-342.
DOI
|
52 |
Slavin, R. E. (1990a). Ability grouping, cooperative learning and the gifted. Journal of the Education of the Gifted, 14(1), 3-8.
DOI
|
53 |
Slavin, R. E. (1990b). Response to Robinson: Cooperative learning and the gifted: Who benefits? Journal For The Education Of The Gifted 14(1), 28-30.
DOI
|
54 |
Stahl, G. (2006a). Group Cognition: Computer Support for Building Collaborative Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
|
55 |
Stahl, G. (2009c). Meaning making in VMT. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Studying Virtual Math Teams (pp. 505-527). New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media.
|
56 |
Stahl, G. (2006b). Supporting group cognition in an online math community: A cognitive tool for small-group referencing in text chat. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(2), 103-122.
DOI
|
57 |
Stahl, G. (2009a). Introduction to part I. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Studying Virtual Math Teams(pp. 3-6). New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media.
|
58 |
Stahl, G. (2009b). A chat about chat. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Studying Virtual Math Teams(pp. 7-16). New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media.
|
59 |
Swan, M. (2002). Collaborative learning in mathematics: A challenge to our beliefs and practices. Chelmsford, Essex: Redlin.
|
60 |
Thom, R. (1992). Leaving mathematics for philosophy. In C. Casacuberta & M. Castellet (Eds.), Mathematical Research Today and Tomorrow: Viewpoints of Seven Fields Medalists (pp. 1-12). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
|
61 |
Webb, N. M. & Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. D. C. Berliner (Ed), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841-873). New York, NY: Macmillan.
|
62 |
Wee, J. D. (2007). Mathematical knowledge construction through the use of guided collaborative critique in a quasi-synchronous chat environment. Paper presented at the Association for Active Educational Researchers Conference (AARE 2007), Perth, Australia.
|
63 |
Wee, J. D. & Looi, C. K. (2009). A Model for Analyzing Math Knowledge Building in VMT. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Studying Virtual Math Teams (pp. 475-497). New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media.
|
64 |
Williams, K. S., & Hardy, K. (1988). The Red Book of Mathematical Problems: Dover Publications.
|
65 |
Brandon, D. P. & Hollingshead, A. B. (1999). Collaborative learning and computer-supported groups. Communication Education, 48(2), 109-126.
DOI
|
66 |
Zemel, A., Xhafa, F., & Cakir, M. P. (2009). Combining Coding and Conversation Analysis of VMT Chats. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Studying Virtual Math Teams (Vol. 11, pp. 421-450). New York, NY: Springer.
|
67 |
이승우(2015). 학교수학이란 무엇인가? 수학교육학연구, 25(3), 381-405
|
68 |
Barbeau, E. J. (2000). Mathematical Fallcies, Flaws, and Flimflam: The Mathematical Association of America.
|
69 |
Ben-Zvi, D. (2007). Using wiki to promote collaborative learning in statistics education. Technology Innovations in Statistics Education, 1(1), 1-18.
|
70 |
Boaler, J. & Greeno, J. (2000). Identity, agency and knowing in mathematics worlds. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 171-200). Westport, CT: Alblex Publishing.
|
71 |
Brett, C., Nason, R. A., & Woodruff, E. (2002). Communities of inquiry among pre-service teachers investigating mathematics. Themes in Education, 3(1), 39-62.
|
72 |
Bruffee, K. A. (1995). Sharing our toys - Cooperative learning versus collaborative learning. Change (Jan/Feb), 12-18.
DOI
|
73 |
Carter, J. F. (2009). Lines of communication: Using a wiki in a mathematics course. PRIMUS, 19(1), 1-17.
DOI
|