• 한국수자원학회논문집
• /
• 제45권10호
• /
• pp.1069-1079
• /
• 2012

본 연구에서는 새로운 시공간적 가뭄해석 방법을 제안하기 위해, 강우관측지점별 가뭄사상을 추출하여 가뭄사상의 시작 시점이 동일한 강우관측지점을 선정하여 CASE를 구분하였다. 그 결과 SPI3에서는 36개, SPI6에서는 38개, SPI9에서는 40개, SPI12에서는 39개의 CASE가 분석대상으로 선정되었으며, 이를 이용한 연구방법의 적용성을 검토하기 위해, 과거 우리나라의 대표적 가뭄사상으로 알려진 장기가뭄과 단기가뭄에 대한 시공간적 가뭄발생특성을 재현하여 비교분석한 결과, 실제 과거가뭄사상에 잘 부합하는 것으로 확인되었다. 또한, 가뭄의 이동경로 및 전이특성을 분석하기 위한 방안으로 질량모멘트 개념을 이용하여 가뭄의 중심 및 영향권을 결정하는 새로운 가뭄해석 기법을 제안하였다. 그 결과 시간의 흐름에 따라 가뭄이 발생한 지역의 순서를 확인할 수 있었으며, 시공간적 가뭄패턴분석을 수행하기 위해서는 크게 두 가지로 구분되는 가뭄의 중심 및 영향권의 변화양상을 선행적으로 고려해야 함을 확인할 수 있었다.

• 한국수자원학회논문집
• /
• 제47권5호
• /
• pp.435-446
• /
• 2014

지금까지 많은 연구를 통하여 제안된 다양한 가뭄지수들은 사전에 정의된 등급을 통하여 가뭄을 평가하기 때문에 가뭄현상에 내재된 불확실성을 고려하지 못하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 월 유출량 자료에 내재되어 있는 불확실성을 고려하기 위해 은닉 마코프 모형(HMM) 기반의 가뭄지수(HMDI)를 제안하고, 이를 이용하여 수문학적 가뭄에 대한 확률론적 평가를 수행하였다. WAMIS에서 제공하는 한강유역의 평창강과 남한강상류의 월평균 유출량 자료(1966~2009)를 이용하여 3, 6, 12개월씩 누적시킨 후, HMM에 적용하여 은닉상태의 사후확률을 계산하였다. 연구방법의 검증을 위해 HMM을 이용하여 추정된 각 은닉상태 별 사후확률(HMDI)과 기준값에 의해 가뭄을 평가하는 방법 중 하나인 표준유출지수(SSI)와 비교를 하였다. 분석결과, 기존 가뭄지수(SSI)를 사용하였을 때는 하나의 지수로 특정 시점에서의 가뭄 상태를 판단하였지만, HMDI는 자료에내재된 불확실성을 이용하여 가뭄의 상태를 분류하였고, 이는 특정 시점에서 가뭄 상태들이 나타날 확률로 표현되었다. 또한, 실제 가뭄사례와의 비교를 통해서 HMDI가 SSI에 비하여 가뭄에 대한 재현능력이 우수한 것으로 나타났다.

• 대한토목학회논문집
• /
• 제26권1B호
• /
• pp.69-78
• /
• 2006

제반 수문학적 문제 해결을 위하여 강우사상에 대해 최대평균우량깊이-유역면적-지속기간 관계곡선을 작성하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 상기 관계곡선의 항목 중 최대평균우량깊이를 가뭄심도의 항으로 대체한 가뭄심도-영향면적-지속기간 관계 곡선의 작성방법을 제시하고자 한다. 우리나라 전역의 기상청 월 강수량 자료로부터 산정된 SPI 가뭄지수는 EOF 기법을 이용하여 핵심적인 공간정보로 축약되며, 이를 다시 Kriging 기법을 이용하여 우리나라 전역에 대해 $6km{\times}6km$의 해상도를 가진 SPI 값으로 할당하였다. 격자기반의 가뭄지수 자료의 시간적 분포특성과 공간특성이 고려된 주요 가뭄사상을 식별한 후, 이를 분석하여 최종적으로 영향면적별 지속시간별 가뭄지수가 산정된다. 이에 따라 가뭄심도-가뭄면적-가뭄지속기간 관계곡선이 도시된다. 우리나라 전역에 대한 곡선 작성 결과, 지속기간이 짧고 영향면적이 작을수록 가뭄심도가 깊어지며 영향면적이 증가할수록 가뭄심도가 낮아진다는 면에서는 강우분석시와 비슷한 모양을 보여준다고 할 수 있으나, 가뭄심도의 면적에 따른 감소율은 가뭄분석시의 강우깊이의 면적에 따른 감소율보다 훨씬 작은 것으로 나타났다.

• 한국농공학회논문집
• /
• 제61권3호
• /
• pp.1-14
• /
• 2019

North Korea has frequently suffered from extreme agricultural crop droughts, which have led to food shortages, according to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). The increasing frequency of extreme droughts, due to global warming and climate change, has increased the importance of enhancing the national capacity for drought management. Historically, a meteorological drought index based on data collected from weather stations has been widely used. But it has limitations in terms of the distribution of weather stations and the spatial pattern of drought impacts. Satellite-based data can be obtained with the same accuracy and at regular intervals, and is useful for long-term change analysis and environmental monitoring and wide area access in time and space. The Evaporative Stress Index (ESI), a satellite-based drought index using the ratio of potential and actual evaporation, is being used to detect drought response as a index of the droughts occurring rapidly over short periods of time. It is more accurate and provides faster analysis of drought conditions compared to the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI), and the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI). In this study, we analyze drought events during 2015-2017 in North Korea using the ESI satellite-based drought index to determine drought response by comparing with it with the SPI and SPEI drought indices.

• 한국농공학회논문집
• /
• 제63권3호
• /
• pp.13-26
• /
• 2021

Recent drought events in the South Korea and the magnitude of drought losses indicate the continuing vulnerability of the agricultural drought. Various studies have been performed on drought hazard assessment at the regional scales, but until recently, drought management has been response oriented with little attention to mitigation and preparedness. A vulnerability assessment is introduced in order to preemptively respond to agricultural drought and to predict the occurrence of drought. This paper presents a method for spatial, Geographic Information Systems-based assessment of agricultural drought vulnerability in South Korea. It was hypothesized that the key 14 items that define agricultural drought vulnerability were meteorological, agricultural reservoir, social, and adaptability factors. Also, this study is to analyze agricultural drought vulnerability by comparing vulnerability assessment according to weighting method. The weight of the evaluation elements is expressed through the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), which includes subjective elements such as surveys, and the Entropy method using attribute information of the evaluation items. The agricultural drought vulnerability map was created through development of a numerical weighting scheme to evaluate the drought potential of the classes within each factor. This vulnerability assessment is calculated the vulnerability index based on the weight, and analyze the vulnerable map from 2015 to 2019. The identification of agricultural drought vulnerability is an essential step in addressing the issue of drought vulnerability in the South Korea and can lead to mitigation-oriented drought management and supports government policymaking.

• 한국농공학회논문집
• /
• 제65권3호
• /
• pp.57-67
• /
• 2023

A flash drought is a rapid-onset drought that develops over a short period of time as weather and environmental factors change rapidly, unlike general droughts, due to meteorological abnormalities. Abnormally high evapotranspiration rates and rapid declines in soil moisture increase vegetation stress. In addition, crop yields may decrease due to flash droughts during crop growth and may damage agricultural and economic ecosystems. In this study, Flash Drought Intensity Index (FDII) based on soil moisture data from Gravity Recovery Climate Experiment (GRACE) was used to analyze flash drought. FDII, which is calculated using soil moisture percentile, is expressed by multiplying two factors: the rate of intensification and the drought severity. FDII was developed for domestic flash drought events from 2014 to 2018. The flash drought that occurred in 2018, Chungcheongbuk-do showed the highest FDII. FDII was higher in heat wave flash drought than in precipitation deficit flash drought. The results of this study show that FDII is reliable flash drought analysis tool and can be applied to quantitatively analyze the characteristics of flash drought in South Korea.

• 한국농공학회논문집
• /
• 제60권4호
• /
• pp.37-48
• /
• 2018

The extreme 2017 spring drought affected a large portion of central and western South Korea, and was one of the most climatologically driest spring seasons over the 1961-2016 period of record. This drought was characterized by exceptionally low precipitation, with total precipitation from January to June being 50% lower than the mean normal precipitation (1981-2010) over most of western South Korea. In this study, for the quantitative drought impact analysis, the widely-used Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) and the statistical drought frequency are compared with observed meteorological characteristics and anomalies. According to the drought frequency analysis of monthly cumulative precipitation during January and May in 2017, Gyeonggi-do, Chungcheong-do, and Jeollanam-do areas showed more than drought frequency over 100 years. Gyeongsangnam-do area showed more than drought frequency over 200 years based on annual precipitation in 2017. The South Korean government (Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) and Korea Rural Community Corporation (KRC)) have been operating a government-level drought monitoring system since 2016. Results from this study can be used to improve the drought monitoring applications of future drought events, as well as drought planning and preparedness in South Korea.

• 한국농공학회논문집
• /
• 제63권5호
• /
• pp.95-105
• /
• 2021

Drought is a disaster that causes prolonged and wide scale damage. Recently, the severity and frequency of drought occurrences, and drought damage have been increased significantly due to climate change. As a result, a quantitative study of drought factors is needed to better understand and prevent future droughts. In the case of agricultural drought, several existing studies examine the economic damage caused by droughts and their causes, but these studies are not well suited to estimating crop-oriented agricultural drought damage and the factors that absolutely affect agricultural drought. This study determines which factors most affect agricultural drought. It examines meteorological factors and those related to agricultural water supplied by irrigation facilities. Rice paddy production per unit area is lower than the average from the last two years where agricultural drought occurred. We compare the relative frequency of agricultural drought impacts with irrigation facilities, effective reservoir storage, the number of water supply facilities, and the meteorological drought index such as Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI). To identify factors that affect agricultural drought, we correlate rice paddy production anomalies with irrigation water supply for the past two years. There was a high positive correlation between rice paddy production and irrigation water usage, and there was a low or moderate negative correlation between rice paddy production anomalies compared to the average of the past two years and SPI. As a result, agricultural water supply by irrigation facilities was judged to be more influential than meteorological factors in rice paddy production. This study is expected to help local governments establish policies related to agricultural drought response.

• 한국수자원학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국수자원학회 2021년도 학술발표회
• /
• pp.143-143
• /
• 2021

Climate change indicators, mainly frequent drought which has happened since the drought of 1994, 1995, and 2012 causing the devastating effect to the agricultural sector, and could be more disruptive given the context of climate change indicators by increasing the temperature and more variable and extreme precipitation. Changes in frequency, duration, and severity of droughts will have enormous impacts on agriculture production and water management. Since both the possibility of drought manifestation and substantial yield losses, we are propositioning an integrated method for evaluating past and future agriculture drought hazards that depend on models' simulations in the Hung-up watershed. to discuss the question of how climate change might influence the impact of extreme agriculture drought by assessing the potential changes in temporal trends of agriculture drought. we will calculate the temporal trends of future drought through drought indices Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index, Standardized Precipitation Index, and Palmer drought severity index by using observed data of (1991-2020) from Wonju meteorological station and projected climate change scenarios (2021-2100) of the Representative Concentration Pathways models (RCPs). expected results confirmed the frequency of extreme agricultural drought in the future projected to increase under all studied RCPs. at present 100 years drought is anticipated to happen since the result showing under RCP2.6 will occur every 24 years, RCP4.5 every 17 years, and RCPs8.5 every 7 years, and it would be double in the largest warming scenarios. On another side, the result shows unsupportable water management, could cause devastating consequences in both food production and water supply in extreme events. Because significant increases in the drought magnitude and severity like to be initiate at different time scales for each drought indicator. Based on the expected result that the evaluating the impacts of extreme agricultural droughts and recession could be used for the development of proactive drought risk management, policies for future water balance, prioritize sustainable strengthening and mitigation strategies.

• 한국수자원학회논문집
• /
• 제50권1호
• /
• pp.65-73
• /
• 2017

본 연구는 청미천 유역을 대상으로 1985년부터 2015년까지의 가뭄지수를 이용하여 첨두 가뭄심도와 가뭄기간을 분석하였다. 이을 위해 기상학적 가뭄지수로는 강수량만을 변수로 하는 SPI (Standardized Precipitation Index)와 강수량과 증발산량을 함께 고려하는 SPEI (Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index)를 적용하였으며, 수문학적 가뭄지수는 유역의 유출량을 변수로 하는 SDI (Streamflow drought index)를 적용하였다. SDI의 경우 청미천 유역을 구축한 SWAT 모형을 이용하여 도출한 유출량을 사용하였다. 그 결과 첨두 가뭄심도의 발생시기는 SPI, SPEI의 발생 후에 SDI가 발생하는 양상을 보였으며 평균적으로 SDI와 SPI는 0.59개월, SPEI는 0.72개월의 차이를 보인다. 최대 발생지체 시간은 SPI, SPEI 모두 2개월을 보인다. 또한 기상학적 가뭄이 해결될 수 있는 강우량임에도 수문학적 가뭄을 해결하지 못하는 경우가 발생함을 확인하였다.