• 한국멀티미디어학회논문지
• /
• 제22권8호
• /
• pp.974-982
• /
• 2019

Contemporary narrative and documentary share across boundaries between the 'actuality' and the 'creative treatment.' The documentary has blended modes of representation from various genre to reflect the world changing. The narrative movies also has applied the historicality of 'evidence' and 'documents' from documentary to obtain the new form of realism. Boyhood shows a differentiated realism to retain both the narrative structure and the documentary temporality, containing 12 years of timeline with the limited artificial space time. Boyhood also takes the analogical concept of 'the dramatization of the actual materials' from the early documentary films.

• 보존과학회지
• /
• 제26권1호
• /
• pp.69-76
• /
• 2010

행정박물이란 공공업무의 활동을 반영하는 유형적 증거물로서 역사적 상징적 문화적 예술적 가치를 지니는 영구기록물이며, 공공기관의 업무수행과 관련하여 생산 및 활용한 형상기록물로 행정적 문화적 예술적 가치가 높은 기록물이다. "공공기록물 관리에 관한 법률"에서는 행정박물을 기록물관리 범위에 처음으로 편입시키고 있으며, 기록물관리법령 제3조에서는 행정박물의 보존 및 관리체계를 법제화하고 있다. 행정박물의 관리는 형태 재질별 분류만으로는 기록으로서 행정박물의 특성을 반영하기 어렵다. 행정박물은 일반적인 기록물과 비교해 다양한 연유에서 수집되기 때문에 행정박물에 대한 기초적인 재질 조사와 적합한 보존 및 관리 방식이 필요하다. 행정박물은 문화재로서 아직 그 수요량이 많지 않으나, 국민 의식수준 향상 및 알 권리를 위한 행정박물의 공개 가능성이 증가되고 있으며, 향후 역사 및 문화의 해석을 위해 보존 활용 가능하며 근대문화유산으로서의 가치를 가질 수 있다. 우선적으로 행정박물의 보존적인 측면에서 열화를 방지하기 위해서는 각 유물별 손상등급을 부분적으로 분류, 관리하여 상태를 점검할 수 있는 표준조사카드를 만들어야 한다. 또한, 다양한 재질의 행정박물에 대한 관리 및 운영 방안을 체계적으로 확립하고 행정박물을 보존적인 측면에서 연구할 수 있는 전문 인력을 육성하여 종합적이고 선진화된 행정박물의 보존 복원 및 활용이 이루어져야 한다.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제54권
• /
• pp.99-122
• /
• 2012

According to the United Nations Convention on the International Sale of Goods, the Seller must deliver the goods, hand over any documents relating to the them and transfer the property the to the goods as required by the contract, and buyer must pay the price for the goods and take delivery of them as required by the contract. In particular, the seller provides the documents is important. If the documents are discrepancies in credit, the beneficiary may not receive the payment. So It is important to study on conditions of documents in international trade. Documents provided by the seller shall be determined by express terms. If there is no agreement on the express terms, it shall be determined by the implied terms or governing law terms. In practice Seller shall provide the documents are as follows, For example, transport documents, commercial invoice, certificate of origin, insurance policy, packing list, inspection certificate etc. As stated above if it can not be determined by express terms, it is determined by the implied terms. In international trade, leading to the implied terms is incoterms(R) 2010 and UCP 600. Incoterms(R) 2010 define the seller must provide the goods and the commercial in conformity with the sales contract and any other evidence of conformity that may be required by the contract and UCP 600 are rules that apply to documentary credit. This paper, the practical utility between Incoterms(R) 2010 and UCP 600 is studied.

• 동의생리병리학회지
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.45-51
• /
• 2002

This paper deals with the documentary study on article 39 of Shanghanlun(傷寒論). It has been reported that symptom of Daqinglong-tang(大靑龍湯) of article 39 of Shanghanlun is caused by the following four factors: 1) the additional evidence of article 38 2) the transformation into heat-syndrome of cold evil 3) the chronic and less acute process of Taiyangshanghan(太陽傷寒) 4) a kind of anasarca coming from an evil of wind-warm. After studying and comparing the above artide with the article of Daqinglong-tang of Jinguiyaolue, I found that symptom of Daqinglong-tang of article 39 is anasarca.

• 대한가정학회지
• /
• 제23권4호
• /
• pp.9-17
• /
• 1985

The pur[pose of this study is to investigate the research method and to provide a guide to the ways in which researcher, interested in costume history, can obtain in formation. There are comparison, induction, observation, awnalysis, experience and synthesis in method of science. Firstly, comparative research is to ascertain the accumulated evidence. Secondly, we can compare with historical phenomenon. A research intend to verify the hypothesis based upon the sources of information. It is an available method to investigate the costumes and adornments in the past. Whatever the approach, the researcher much discribe the facts objectively. Historical research has been approached in many warys in the field of costume. There are visual and documentary sources. Visual sources are paintings, sculptutre, frescoes, coins, potteries, medals, mosaics, wall paintings, stained glasses, seals, tapestries, illustrations, photographs, movies, and fashion dolls. Documentary sources are archives, letters, diaries, literature, wardrobe accounts, sumpturary laws, newspapers, and recollections.

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.107-127
• /
• 2016

한-칠레 FTA발효 이후 10년 이상의 기간이 경과하였음에도 아직까지 국내거래단계에서의 원산지 정보 유통과 관리는 FTA활용 이익의 수출자 편향성과 발급유인 부족 등의 원인으로 원활하게 이루어 지지 않고 있다. 또한 발급 유통되고 있는 원산지증빙서류의 경우에도 정확성이 담보되지 않아 최종 수출자가 발급하는 원산지증명서에 오류를 유발할 수 있는 등 다양한 문제를 내포하고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 원산지(포괄)확인서의 발급과 유통을 장려할 수 있는 방안과 유통되는 국내거래단계 원산지정보의 정확성과 신뢰도를 제고하기 위한 방안을 찾아보았다. 이를 위해 본 연구에서는 우리 기업들의 원활한 FTA활용 지원을 위해 국내적 영역에서의 원산지(포괄)확인서의 유통 활성화와 오류 방지를 위한 제도적 보완책과 최종 수출자의 의도하지 않은 원산지증명서 오류로 인한 손실방지책의 도입방안을 제시하였다.

• 한국기록관리학회지
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.219-235
• /
• 2022

이 연구는 법적 증거의 개념이 기록관리의 원칙에 어떤 영향을 미쳤는지 분석하고 그 의미와 한계를 정리하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 이를 위하여 우선 로마법전에서 현대 법제에 이르기까지 증거로서 기록의 신빙성을 판단하는 방법론이 어떻게 변화해 왔는지를 개괄하였다. 또한 이러한 역사적 전개과정에 대한 기록학적 의미를 다음과 같은 측면에서 분석해 보았다. 첫째, 법적 증거로서 기록의 신빙성을 판단하기 위하여 적용한 주된 방법론은 무엇이었는지 시대별로 살펴보았다. 둘째, 법적 증거로 인정받을 수 있는 기록이 갖추어야 할 특성 혹은 품질은 무엇이라고 보았는지를 살펴보았다. 신빙성, 진본성, 진실성, 신뢰성, 정확성 등과 같은 특성이 해석되고 기록의 증거능력 판단의 기준으로 채택되는 과정을 살펴보았다. 셋째, 기록에 대한 인식과 함께 당시에 주요 관리대상으로 삼은 기록의 유형도 살펴보았다. 시대별 방법론의 배경을 이해하는 데에 도움이 된다고 보았기 때문이다. 마지막으로 법적 증거 기반의 기록관리가 갖는 의미와 한계를 제시하였다.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제21권3호
• /
• pp.21-54
• /
• 2011

International commercial arbitration has established itself as the primary dispute resolution mechanism for international business transactions. Certainly, there are commonly-accepted standards that have evolved to reflect an internationally-harmonized approach to issues relating to the taking of evidence. This is reflected in International Bar Association("IBA") Rules for Taking of Evidence in International Evidence("IBA Rules"). This IBA Rules were revised in 2010. Designed to assist parties in determining what procedures to use in their particular case, IBA Rules present some of the methods for conducting international arbitration proceedings. Parties and arbitral tribunals may adopt IBA Rules in whole or in part - at the time of drafting the arbitration clause in a contract or once an arbitration commences - or they may use them as guidelines. They supplement applicable national laws and institutional or ad hoc rules. The IBA Rules were an ambitious undertaking, designed to overcome fundamental cultural differences relating to the taking of evidence under different national court systems. While it is difficult to assess how frequently the IBA Rules are actually adopted by parties, it is fair to say that they have had a considerable influence on the practice of taking evidence in international arbitration. This article mainly describes the essential provisions of IBA Rules, as revised in 2010, including but not limited to production of document, witnesses of fact, party-appointed experts, and tribunal-appointed experts. It also provides a comparison of relevant procedural rules of civil law and common law systems to each of the above mentioned provisions. It is important for arbitration practitioners to understand the differences in the taking of evidence under civil law and common law systems, respectively. This article will be helpful for practitioners and academics not only to understand the revised IBA Rules themselves but also to prepare for, and adequately deal with, the frictions that may arise as a result of the differences in approach for taking evidences. Indeed, so prepared, the arbitration practitioner will be able to anticipate the expectations, perceptions and the conduct of the parties, their counsel and the tribunal members.

• 동아시아경상학회지
• /
• 제11권4호
• /
• pp.29-39
• /
• 2023

Purpose - Disputes arising from documentary letter of credit transactions are not decreasing. According to a statistical data from the ICC, 60-70% of letters of credit in use around the world, so, Incoterms rule specifically defines the bill of lading review procedure. Research design, data, and methodology - The refusal due to large or small inconsistencies in terms and conditions when first presenting documents with bill of lading. First of all, confusion was caused by the ambiguous regulation as the bill of lading is a document that serves as evidence of the transportation contract. Result - Bill of lading indicates the rights to the cargo as well as a bill of lading, which is evidence of a transportation contract concluded between carriers, is a document that allows a carrier to receive or ship cargo and ship it by sea. It is a security that promises to be delivered through transportation to the rightful holder of the bill of lading. Conclusion - Because of its importance, the Uniform customs practices for Letters of Credit stipulate acceptance requirements for transport documents, including bills of lading. In addition, the International Standard Banking Practices (ISBP) established by the International Chamber of Commerce also provide supplementary provisions.

• Safety and Health at Work
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.11-18
• /
• 2010

In the UK, a person or organisation that creates risk is required to manage and control that risk so that it is reduced 'So Far As Is Reasonably Practicable (SFAIRP).' How the risk is managed is to be determined by those who create the risk. They have a duty to demonstrate that they have taken action to ensure all risk is reduced SFAIRP and must have documentary evidence, for example a risk assessment or safety case, to prove that they manage the risks their activities create. The UK Health and Safety Executive (HSE) does not tell organisations how to manage the risks they create but does inspect the quality of risk identification and management. This paper gives a brief overview of where responsibility for occupational health and safety lies in the UK, and how risk should be managed through risk assessment. The focus of the paper is three recent major UK incidents, all involving fatalities, and all of which were wholly avoidable if risks had been properly assessed and managed. The paper concludes with an analysis of the common failings of risk assessments and key actions for improvement.