• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2019년도 추계 학술논문 발표대회
• /
• pp.110-111
• /
• 2019

In ACI 318-19 published recently, the conditions and development length equation to use the headed deformed bars were changed considerably. Although the use of the larger-diameter(No.14 and 18) headed deformed bars isn't yet permitted, the use of the high strength(80,000psi) headed deformed bars is permitted and the effect of bar-diameter($d_b$) on the development length is increased considerably. Therefore, structures using larger-diameter headed deformed bars will be expected to be affected by this code change. We will study the effect of the code change on the development design and find out the design optimization method to minimize the effect of the changed conditions and development length equation.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2014년도 춘계 학술논문 발표대회
• /
• pp.80-81
• /
• 2014

Generally significant reinforcement is used for nuclear power plant structures and may cause potential problems when concrete is poured. In particular pouring concrete into structural member joint area is more difficult than other areas since the joint area is very congested due to hooked bars, embedded plates, and other reinforcements. The purpose of this study is to solve the problem by applying high-strength(ASTM A615 Gr. 75/80) bars. In addition large-sized(#14 & #18) headed deformed bar could be used as alternative of standard hooked bars to relieve the congestion to some extent. In order to apply headed deformed bars to nuclear power plant structures effectively, the large-sized diameter bars and the high-strength bars shall be used as thick as clear cover thickness 1". Therefore, test results were obtained by taking bar size, yield strength, and clear cover thickness as variables.

• Earthquakes and Structures
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.113-127
• /
• 2020

In this study, the behavior of external beam-column joints reinforced by plain and deformed bars with non-seismic reinforcement details is investigated and compared. The beam-column joints represented in this study include a benchmark specimen by seismic details in accordance with ACI 318M-11 requirements and four other deficient specimens. The main defects of the non-seismic beam-column joints included use of plain bar, absence of transverse steel hoops, and the anchorage condition of longitudinal reinforcements. The experimental results indicate that using of plain bars in non-seismic beam-column joints has significantly affected the failure modes. The main failure mode of the non-seismic beam-column joints reinforced by deformed bars was the accumulation of shear cracks in the joint region, while the failure mode of the non-seismic beam-column joints reinforced by plain bars was deep cracks at the joint face and intersection of beam and column and there was only miner diagonal shear cracking at the joint region. In the other way, use of plain bars for reinforcing concrete can cause the behavior of the substructure to be controlled by slip of the beam longitudinal bars. The experimental results show that the ductility of non-seismic beam-column joints reinforced by plain bars has not decreased compared to the beam-column joints reinforced by deformed bars due to lack of mechanical interlock between plain bars and concrete. Also it can be seen a little increase in ductility of substructure due to existence of hooks at the end of the development length of the bars.

• 한국콘크리트학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국콘크리트학회 1999년도 봄 학술발표회 논문집(I)
• /
• pp.647-652
• /
• 1999

The purpose of this study is to find the bond properties of deformed bars in hign-strength concrete by experimental and analytical method. In this study the following variables were adopted, i.e. (1) the compressive strength of concrete : 270, 400 and 600kg/$\textrm{cm}^2$ (2) the corrosion the bars : corroded and normal bars (3) the mixing ratio of natural and smashed fine aggregate : 7 : 3 and 5 : 5 (natural sand : smashed sand) For analytical method, the finite element analysis is performed. And the Pull-out test is performed as the experimental method.

• 한국콘크리트학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국콘크리트학회 2004년도 춘계 학술발표회 제16권1호
• /
• pp.120-123
• /
• 2004

The lap splice lengths of deformed steel reinforcing bars and GFRP bars were experimentally compared using beam specimens. The purpose was to evaluate the length required of the GFRP bar to develop strength at least equivalent to the conventional steel reinforcing bar. The main test variable was the lap splice length: 10, 20, 30 $d_b$ for the deformed steel bars and 20, 30, 40 $d_b$ for the GFRP bars. Two different types of GFRP bars were tested: (1) one with spiral-type deformation and (2) plain round bars. Elastic modulus was about 1/5 of the steel bars while the tensile strength was about 690 MPa for the GFRP bars. Nominal diameter of the GFRP bars and steel bars was 12.7 and 13 mm, respectively. Normal strength concrete (28-day $f_{cu}$ = 30 MPa) was used. For the conventional steel bars (SD400 grade), strength over 400 MPa in tension was developed using the lap splice length of 20 and 30 $f_{cu}$. Only $87\%$ of the nominal yield strength was reached with the lap splice length of 10 $d_b$. For the spiral-type deformed GFRP bars with $40-d_b$ lap splice length, 440 MPa in tension was determined. The maximum tensile strength developed of the GFRP bars with smaller lap splice lengths decreased. The plain GFRP bar was not effective in developing the tensile strength even with $40-d_b$ lap splice length. Development of the cracks on beam surface was clearly visible for the beams reinforced with the GFRP bars. Mid-span deflections, however, were significantly smaller than the comparable beams with conventional steel bars indicating potential ductility problem.

• 콘크리트학회논문집
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.165-173
• /
• 2008

철근콘크리트구조물의 거동에서 가장 중요한 요구사항 중의 하나는 철근과 콘크리트 상호간의 합성 거동을 위한 부착 성능의 확보이며, 순환골재 콘크리트를 구조체로 적용하기 위해서는 순환골재와 철근의 부착 거동을 구명하는 것이 매우 중요한 요소로 등장하게 된다. 이러한 분석에 따라 본 연구에서는 순환굵은골재를 사용한 콘크리트와 철근 상호간의 부착거동을 평가하기 위하여 총 36개의 시험체를 제작하여 압축인발 실험을 수행하였다. 연구를 수행함에 있어 실험에 사용된 변수는 0, 30, 60, 100%의 4가지의 순환굵은골재 치환율 및 철근의 배근 방향 및 위치 (상단근, 하단근)로 하였다. 본 연구를 통하여 얻어진 실험 결과를 종합해 보면, 순환굵은골재를 사용한 콘크리트와 철근간의 부착강도는 실험에 사용된 변수인 철근의 배근방향/위치 및 순환굵은골재 치환율에 따라서 그 영향이 상호 다르게 나타나는 것으로 파악되었다. 즉, 수직배근된 철근의 경우는 순환골재의 치환율에 관계없이 상호 유사한 값을 나타내고 있는 반면, 수평 배근된 시험체의 경우는 순환굵은골재 치환율 및 철근의 배근 위치에 영향을 받는 것으로 나타났다. 이는 순환골재의 치환율 변화에 따라 콘크리트 침하량의 차이가 발생되며 추가적으로 상부철근을 통과하지 못한 기포의 영향으로 인해 부착면적이 감소되었기 때문인 것으로 판단되며, 이로 인하여 HU type 시험체의 최대부착응력이 다른 시험체에 비하여 현저히 작은 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 순환골재 콘크리트를 포함하여 철근과 콘크리트의 부착강도 평가를 위한 기존의 규준식에서 철근의 위치에 따른 기여도를 재검토할 필요성이 있을 것으로 사료된다.

• 한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 논문집
• /
• 제18권5호
• /
• pp.59-67
• /
• 2014

현행 콘크리트구조기준 (KCI2012) 및 ACI318-11에서 B급이음된 일자형 이형철근에 대하여 인장력에 대한 겹침이음길이를 정착길이의 1.3배로 산정하고 있다. 동일 기준에서 확대머리 이형철근의 정착길이를 제시하고 있지만 겹침이음상세에 대한 규정은 없다. 이에 본 연구에서는 400MPa과 500MPa 설계기준항복강도를 가지는 확대머리 이형철근의 겹침이음실험을 실시함으로써, 기준의 정착길이식을 겹침이음설계에 적용가능한 지를 평가하고자 하였다. 실험결과, SD400과 SD500의 설계기준항복강도를 적용한 확대머리 이형철근에 대하여 겹침이음길이를 정착길이의 1.3배로 산정할 경우, 실험 최대휨강도가 공칭휨강도에 비하여 16~31% 크게 평가되었고 연성적인 휨파괴 거동을 나타내었다. 따라서, 이들 철근에 대해 정착길이 1.3배의 겹침이음길이로 설계함으로써 강도 및 변형성능 측면에서 겹침이음 성능을 확보할 수 있는 것으로 사료된다.

• 한국콘크리트학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국콘크리트학회 2008년도 춘계 학술발표회 제20권1호
• /
• pp.1089-1092
• /
• 2008

철근과 콘크리트의 부착성능 확보는 철근콘크리트 구조물의 거동에서 중요한 요구사항이다. 구조체에 순환 잔골재 콘크리트를 적용하기 위해 순환 잔골재 콘크리트와 철근의 부착거동에 대한 규명이 매우 중요하다. 이에 따라 본 연구에서는 순환잔골재를 사용한 콘크리트와 철근 상호간의 부착거동을 평가하기 위하여 직접인발 실험을 수행하였다. 연구를 수행함에 있어 실험에 사용된 변수는 0, 100%의 순환잔골재 치환율 및 철근의 위치(상단근, 중간근, 하단근)로 하였다. 실험 결과는 CEB-FIP가 규정한 부착강도와 비교하였다. 본 연구를 통하여 얻어진 실험결과를 종합해 보면, 순환잔골재 콘크리트와 철근의 부착거동은 순환 잔골재 치환율 및 철근 위치에 영향을 받는다. H type 시험체의 경우 블리딩 현상이 일어나 V type 시험체와 HB 시험체만이 CEB-FIP가 규정한 부착강도를 만족하였다.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2017년도 춘계 학술논문 발표대회
• /
• pp.200-201
• /
• 2017

Generally, a lot of reinforcements are used in nuclear power plant concrete structures, and it may cause several potential problems when concrete is poured. Because of the congestion caused by hooked bars, embedded materials, and other reinforcements, it is too difficult to pour concrete into structural member joint area. The purpose of this study is to change ACI 349 Code for using the large-size(57mm) and high-strength(Gr.80) headed deformed bars instead of standard hooked bars in nuclear power plant concrete structures in order to solve the congestion problems.

• Advances in concrete construction
• /
• 제14권5호
• /
• pp.331-339
• /
• 2022

Geopolymer concrete (GPC) is one of the best substitute materials for conventional concrete in construction. The conventional concrete provided by Portland cement has a detrimental influence on the environment during its production. In this study, the bond strength, which is an important structural property, of deformed steel bars with slag-based GPC was measured. In accordance with the ASTM C234 procedure, bond strength was measured on 18 specimens of slag-based GPC with three sizes of steel bars and different embedded lengths. Two groups of GPC specimens with different compressive strengths, which were cured under ambient conditions, were tested. The results indicated that the bar diameter has a great effect on the bond strength, and the bond strength behavior of the slag-based GPC is comparable with that of conventional concrete. The ACI-318 Code for the bond strength of ordinary Portland cement concrete can be used conservatively to determine the bond strength of the GPC reinforced with deformed steel bars.