• 제목/요약/키워드: culvert drainage performance

검색결과 4건 처리시간 0.018초

배수효율이 높은 지하암거의 간격과 주름유공관의 통수능 비교분석 (A Comparative Study on the Spacing and Discharge Performance of Subsurface Drainage Culvert to Increase Drainage Efficiency)

  • 김현태;유전용;정기열;박영준
    • 한국농공학회논문집
    • /
    • 제61권6호
    • /
    • pp.67-72
    • /
    • 2019
  • This study compared the theory of a culvert spacing and analytical results of the seepage flow for the subsurface drainage. i) If culvert spacing (Sc) is within 5 m, the unit drainage (q) is very larger; in contrast, if Sc is 5 m or more, there is very little drainage in the middle between drains. Therefore, the drain spacing should be within 5 m to ensure high drainage efficiency. ii) Since the planned culvert drainage increases linearly with the soil's permeability coefficient (k), k must be taken into account when determining the drain diameter by the planned culvert drainage. iii) As a result of analyzing the drainage performance of the absorbing culvert, the drainage performance is sufficient with the diameter of the corrugated drain pipe Dc = 50 mm at the length of the drain Lc = 100 m. iv) Therefore, if the drain spacing (Sc) is less than 5 m using the low-cost non-excavated drainage pipe method (${\Phi}50mm$ the corrugated drain pipe and fiber mat) rather than the conventional trench drain method (Sc > 10 m, Dc > 100 mm), uniform and high drainage efficiency can be ensured as well as low construction cost. v) The sub-irrigation+drainage culvert requires narrower drain spacing (Sc < 2-3 m) for irrigation. As a result of examining the condition of 35 mm in diameter (Dc) and 2~3 m in drain spacing, it is possible to apply the non-excavated drainage pipe method to the sub-irrigation+drainage culvert because drainage performance is sufficient at the drain length Lc = 50 m.

Performance evaluation of a subsurface drainage culvert system in converted paddy fields

  • Do, Jong Won;Park, Jongseok;Kim, Hyuntai;Lee, Kwangya;Shin, Hyungjin
    • 농업과학연구
    • /
    • 제47권2호
    • /
    • pp.263-273
    • /
    • 2020
  • With the change of the agricultural environment (increased rice production, decreased rice consumption, and rice production policies), converting paddy fields into upland fields is an increasing trend. In terms of conversion into upland fields, subsurface drainage is one of the most important factors for good field crop growth. This study evaluates the performance of a subsurface drainage culvert system in paddy fields and reclaimed lands. The obtained results are briefly summarized as follows: 1) After a comparative evaluation of several subsurface drainage culvert systems, including excavated subsurface drainage and non-excavated subsurface drainage types, type 3 (non-excavated, perforated drain pipe 50 mm, filter mat B50 cm, subsoiling 70 cm and culvert spacing 5 m) shows relatively high values among four types in terms of effectiveness (subsurface discharge capability) and economic efficiency (construction cost). 2) Type 3 has proven that it is suitable for design standards of discharge capacity through field tests performed in paddy fields (three sites: Gong-geom, Gae-san, Juk-san) and reclaimed lands (two sites: Gum-ho, Mi-am). 3) In the experiment of Sesamum indicum growth according to the existence of a drainage system, Sesamum indicum growth with a subsurface drainage culvert system had good value in terms of plant shoot and root length, shoot fresh and dry weight, and root fresh and dry weight).

비굴착 지하배수암거 형태별 지하배수 성능 비교분석 (Comparative Study on the Subsurface Drainage Discharge Performance by the Type of Non-Excavation Subsurface Drainage Culvert)

  • 김현태;유전용;정기열;서동욱
    • 한국농공학회논문집
    • /
    • 제60권6호
    • /
    • pp.73-81
    • /
    • 2018
  • In this study, subsurface discharge performance has been studied through theoretical seepage analysis on four types of culverts that can be installed under the condition of non-excavation, such as (a)perforated pipe(${\Phi}50mm$), (b)perforated pipe+horizontal mat (B50cm) (c)perforated pipe+horizontal mat+vertical gravel(B<10cm), (d)perforated pipe+vertical gravel(B<10cm), and existing typical type (e)perforated pipe with gravel (B40, h=40cm) which can be installed by excavation. The analysis results were as follows. i) Subsurface discharge performance per unit (m) was (a)type 56%, (b) 91%, (c) 96%, (d) 76%, respectively, lower than the value of (e)culvert. ii) However, considering that non-excavation culvert can be installed at a spacing of 5m with the installation cost of the existing excavation culvert at the interval of 10m, it was analyzed that unit subsurface discharge(q) of (a)20.2mm/day(110%), (b)32.8(178%), (c)34.6(188%) (d)27.5(149%) in the four types of non-excavation culvert installed at intervals of 5m under the condition of $ k=10^{-4}cm/s$ was much larger than the amount of (e)type 18.5(100%), existing excavation culvert installed at 10m interval. iii) Through the test construction, peak subsurface drainage discharge($q_p$) was 38.4mm/day, which is larger than the value of design criteria and confirmed that it satisfies the analysis results as well. iv) In particular, it was evaluated that (b)perforated pipe+horizontal mat(B50cm) are low cost, high efficiency subsurface drainage culvert type with sufficient drainage performance(178%).

저토피부 암거상부 포장의 도상피해 예방을 위한 단명설계 (A design guide to minimize frost heave in unbound pavement layers over box culverts)

  • 서영국
    • 한국도로학회논문집
    • /
    • 제9권3호
    • /
    • pp.111-121
    • /
    • 2007
  • 지난 2005년 12월 호남지역에 내린 폭설과 연이은 한파로 서해안고속도로와 호남고속도로에 많은 피해가 보고되었다. 특히 2.0m 이하의 저토피고를 갖는 통로 암거 상부의 포장에 최대 6.0cm 높이의 노면 융기와 횡방향 균열이 발생하였다. 이는 포장의 수명단축 및 공용성 저하, 교통사고 발생 등에 영향을 미치기 때문에 시급한 대책마련이 요구되었다. 현장 조사 결과 단기간에 증가한 침투수가 노상과 노체에 함유된 세립분의 영향으로 포장 내부의 배수가 지연되고 저온에서 발생한 동상이 포장 파손의 일차적인 원인으로 지적되었다. 최근 한국도로공사는 도로교통기술원과 공동연구를 통해서 신설되는 암거상부 포장에 대한 새로운 설계안을 제시하였다. 본 설계안은 암거 상단부에 맹암거를 설치하여 침투수의 원활한 배수를 유도하고 간극수압의 저감을 통해 포장하부의 동상을 예방하고자 한다. 본 논문에서는 위의 설계법 개발을 위해서 수행한 실험과 수치해석결과를 다루고 있다. 현장에서 채취한 지반시료에 대한 점토함유량 분석을 실시하고 2차원 유한요소해석을 실시하여 골재 입경에 따른 침투류의 배수특성을 조사하였다. 저토피고(2.0m 이하) 암거 상부 포장에 적용될 맹암거의 규격은 침투류 해석결과와 현장 시공성을 고려하여 폭과 높이를 각각 400mm, 800mm로 결정하였다.

  • PDF