• Title/Summary/Keyword: cultural center

Search Result 2,066, Processing Time 0.03 seconds

A Status Analysis for the Standards on Permission of Altering Cultural Heritage's Current State Focusing on the Results of Handling Application Cases on Permission of State-Designated Cultural Heritage (Historic Site) for the Last Five Years (2015~2019) (문화재 현상변경 인·허가 검토기준 마련을 위한 실태분석 연구 - 최근 5년(2015~2019)간 국가지정문화재(사적)의 허가신청 안건 처리결과를 중심으로 -)

  • CHO, Hongseok;SUH, Hyunjung;CHOI, Jisu
    • Korean Journal of Heritage: History & Science
    • /
    • v.54 no.3
    • /
    • pp.24-51
    • /
    • 2021

  • Since June 2006, there have been active efforts to systematize the permission system including the amendment of [Cultural Heritage Protection Act]. Cultural Heritage Administration prepared standards on reviewing each type of cultural heritages(CH) in 2015, promoted a project on the modification of permission standards and showed remarkable performances in quantitative aspects. But as there has been little change for the cases applied for permission, additional studies on policy are required to improve the management efficiency and reduce the citizens'inconvenience. In response, this study aims to identify the actual management status on the current state alteration permission system, and establish practically utilizable reference materials at permission review. While historic sites(HS) constitute a relatively small proportion in state-designated CHs, they are subject to the designation of permission standards. Also, with their location in the downtown area, the application rate is high (51.4%) and the results are commonly utilizable to other types of CH. We constructed a DB based on the minutes of Cultural Heritage Committee(CHC) on HS and categorized similar features in permission handling results. The result of the analysis is as follows. Out of a total of 5,243 cases for permission applied for HS, 1,734 cases of cultural heritage areas(CHA) and 3,509 cases of historic and cultural environment preservation areas(HCEPA) have been applied. CHA has a great proportion of the applications for events and festivals, which are highly related to CHs or representing the local area. There is a high permission rate on applications for the purpose of public service by local governments. Meanwhile, HCEPA has a high proportion of applying for the installation and extension of buildings and facilities at the private level. Thus, negative decisions were made for tall buildings, massed facilities, or suspected scattering of similar acts. Our actual condition analysis has identified a total of 78 types of harmful acts which may influence the preservation of CHs. 31 types in CHA and 37 types in HCEPA are categorized. Especially, 10 common types of permission have been confirmed in both sectors. As a result, it is expected to secure consistency in the permission administration, enhance the management efficiency and improve the public's satisfaction over the regulatory administration by providing practically utilizable reference materials for altering the current state of CH and for decision making on the part of CHC.

  • https://doi.org/10.22755/kjchs.2021.54.3.24 인용 PDF KSCI

A Study on Improvement Examination Standard for the Limit of changing Current State of the Cultural Properties (문화재 유형별 현상변경 검토기준 마련 연구)

  • Cho, Hong-Seok;Park, Hyun-Joon;Lee, You-Beom;Lee, Cheon-Woo;Kim, Chul-Ju;Park, Jung-Seop;Kim, Sang-Dong
    • Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture
    • /
    • v.33 no.4
    • /
    • pp.148-165
    • /
    • 2015

  • The Cultural Properties Protection Law Act 1962 has been achieving its role for systematic preservation, management and application of the cultural heritage under rapid economic growth circumstances through continuing revisions. Introduced the influence review system for cultural heritages in 2000, and legislated the guideline for the state-change allowance standard for the National Cultural Heritage in 2006 in specific, the law has been contributing significantly for the cultural properties and historical/cultural environment preservation, along with increase in administrative efficiency and improvement on settlement environment. However, increase in public awareness about the cultural property's value and the needs for the local revitalization by utilizing the heritages, while some allowance standard not peoperly delivering the surrounding conditions, such as the value of the properties and their substantial characteristics, land utilization, etc. being applied, complaints from the local residents are increasing continuously. Thus this research focuses on clear vision/value of the heritage and apply them to create the review criteria for the state-change allowance per heritages. Here we set the Focus of Landscape Management Indicators in order to actively preserve and manage the physical characteristics and the native value by analyzing the Cultural Heritage Protection Laws and related guidelines, manuals and research papers, and redesign the cultural propertiy's classification scheme and propose the Review Standard for state-change from the view point of changing the current state. With this research, we expect increase in the satisfaction for the Property management system with public understanding promotion regarding the Standards by applying the reviewed state-change allowance Standards, white securing the consistency for the review criteria as well as the systematic management of historical/cultural environment with their typification characteristics and the value for short-term.

  • https://doi.org/10.14700/KITLA.2015.33.4.148 인용 PDF