• Title/Summary/Keyword: cryptography processor

Search Result 63, Processing Time 0.015 seconds

Design of a Binary Adder Structure Suitable for High-Security Public Key Cryptography Processor (고비도 공개키 암호화 프로세서에 적합한 이진 덧셈기의 구조 연구)

  • Moon, Sang-Gook
    • Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering
    • /
    • v.12 no.11
    • /
    • pp.1976-1979
    • /
    • 2008
  • Studies on binary adder have been variously developed. According to those studies of critical worst delay and mean delay time of asynchronous binary adders, carry select adders (CSA) based on hybrid structure showed 17% better performance than ripple carry adders (RCA) in 32 bit asynchronous processors, and 23% better than in 64 bit microprocessor implemented. In the complicated signal processing systems such as RSA, it is essential to optimize the performance of binary adders which play fundamental roles. The researches which have been studied so far were subject mostly to addition algorithms or adder structures. In this study, we analyzed and designed adders in an asp;ect of synthesis method. We divided the ways of implementing adders into groups, each of which was synthesized with different synthesis options. Also, we analyzed the variously implemented adders to evaluate the performance and area so that we can propose a different approach of designing optimal binary adders.

Benchmarking Korean Block Ciphers on 32-Bit RISC-V Processor (32-bit RISC-V 프로세서에서 국산 블록 암호 성능 밴치마킹)

  • Kwak, YuJin;Kim, YoungBeom;Seo, Seog Chung
    • Journal of the Korea Institute of Information Security & Cryptology
    • /
    • v.31 no.3
    • /
    • pp.331-340
    • /
    • 2021
  • As the communication industry develops, the development of SoC (System on Chip) is increasing. Accordingly, the paradigm of technology design of industries and companies is changing. In the existing process, companies purchased micro-architecture, but now they purchase ISA (Instruction Set Architecture), and companies design the architecture themselves. RISC-V is an open instruction set based on a reduced instruction set computer. RISC-V is equipped with ISA, which can be expanded through modularization, and an expanded version of ISA is currently being developed through the support of global companies. In this paper, we present benchmarking frameworks ARIA, LEA, and PIPO of Korean block ciphers in RISC-V. We propose implementation methods and discuss performance by utilizing the basic instruction set and features of RISC-V.

A Hardware Design Space Exploration toward Low-Area and High-Performance Architecture for the 128-bit Block Cipher Algorithm SEED (128-비트 블록 암호화 알고리즘 SEED의 저면적 고성능 하드웨어 구조를 위한 하드웨어 설계 공간 탐색)

  • Yi, Kang
    • Journal of KIISE:Computing Practices and Letters
    • /
    • v.13 no.4
    • /
    • pp.231-239
    • /
    • 2007
  • This paper presents the trade-off relationship between area and performance in the hardware design space exploration for the Korean national standard 128-bit block cipher algorithm SEED. In this paper, we compare the following four hardware design types of SEED algorithm : (1) Design 1 that is 16 round fully pipelining approach, (2) Design 2 that is a one round looping approach, (3) Design 3 that is a G function sharing and looping approach, and (4) Design 4 that is one round with internal 3 stage pipelining approach. The Design 1, Design 2, and Design 3 are the existing design approaches while the Design 4 is the newly proposed design in this paper. Our new design employs the pipeline between three G-functions and adders consisting of a F function, which results in the less area requirement than Design 2 and achieves the higher performance than Design 2 and Design 3 due to pipelining and module sharing techniques. We design and implement all the comparing four approaches with real hardware targeting FPGA for the purpose of exact performance and area analysis. The experimental results show that Design 4 has the highest performance except Design 1 which pursues very aggressive parallelism at the expanse of area. Our proposed design (Design 4) shows the best throughput/area ratio among all the alternatives by 2.8 times. Therefore, our new design for SEED is the most efficient design comparing with the existing designs.