• 한국수학사학회지
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.55-74
• /
• 2005

본 논문은 수학 교육방법 개선을 위한 노력의 하나로 학습 모델에 대하여 연구하였다. 그 중 특히 협동학습 유형을 역사적으로 종합 정리하고 협동학습의 이론적 배경과 소집단 협동학습의 필요성 그리고 협동학습과 전통 조별학습의 차이점 등을 조사하였다. 또한 협동학습에서 나타나는 특징과 다양한 협동학습의 유형을 제시하고 그 효과에 대하여 연구를 하였다. 본 연구에서는 역사적으로 수학교육학적 견지에서 의미 있는 협동학습 유형으로 팀보조개별학습(TAI: Team-Assisted Individualization), 직소우(JIGSAW) 협동 학습, 직소우II(JIGSAW II) 협동 학습, 직소우III(JIGSAW III) 협동 학습, STAD(Student Team-Achievement division) 협동학습, 팀경쟁 협동학습(TGT: Teams-Games-Tournament) 등을 집중적으로 연구하였다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제42권3호
• /
• pp.327-335
• /
• 2003

This study analyzes the effectiveness of cooperative learning in the instruction of the underachieved students. The result of this study showed that students who participated in the cooperative teaming tended to exert positive effects on the cognitive and affective(interest, self-confidence, motivation) domains. In the cooperative teaming, the underachieved students were encouraged in mathematics teaming and improved the efficiency of loaming in mathematics.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제44권3호
• /
• pp.397-408
• /
• 2005

This research developed self-directed teaming program for students who learn mathematics to improve their abilities for learning mathematics. A small-group cooperative teaming model was based on the self-directed loaming program which this research developed. The main target of this program was the second grade students of middle school. The program was consisted with three developing parts. The part 1 of program developing was consisted with analyzing and reconstructing mathematics curriculum, devising small-group cooperative learning program, and structuring teaching and teaming plans. The part 2 included the management of small-group cooperative Loaming and how to use the materials which this research developed. The part 3 provided various cooperative learning opportunities for students to improve their abilities for loaming mathematics.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제24권5호특별호
• /
• pp.595-601
• /
• 2005

In this study, the scientifically gifted students and the general students were compared in terms of the following components in cooperative teaming: whom they interacted with, to/from whom they gave/received help and why, and what kinds of the verbal interaction patterns they engaged in. The subjects were 4th graders. The data were collected through the investigation of the students' perception and videotaping of the small group interactions of each group. The results showed that the gifted students interacted with most students in their groups. They complemented each others' opinions and their discussion was enriched through their interactions. On the other hand, the interactions of the general students occurred mostly around a leader, and more teamed students explained the content to the less teamed students. Predominantly, the gifted students' most verbal behaviors were related with the teaming contents. Most frequent verbal behavior were a giving specific information and an explanation of their opinions. The general students, however, gave simple and short information, and more often they showed the management behaviors, such as encouraging participation and suggesting their directions.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.177-186
• /
• 2001

Recently, introduced open education, there are some models applied several cooperative teaming, but there is no case in applied Jigsaw Ⅱ. So this research is selected objects which are 147 students in the fifth grade in 1999' school year and 143 students in 2000's on Yongwon elementary school. It makes share a partial responsibility for planner, leader, investigator, helper, writer and reporter in the small groups, and apply the Jigsaw Ⅱ model. Qualitative and quantitative analyses show that they have effects of Jigsaw Ⅱ cooperative Learning on Student's knowledge, inquiry ability and attitudes on Elementary School Science Study. The final results are following. The significance of Knowledge has .02 in 1999 and .01 in 2000. Testification of Inquiry ability has 1.75 in 1999 and 2.25 in 2000. The significance of Attitudes has .03 in 1999 and .00 in 2000. Research that has emerged from the cooperative teaming has led us to better understandings of multi purposed roles, interactions, and communities that arise when students work together to team science. Each of students can also cooperative as co-builders, working as equal participants to create a product that is better than that while would have built by either individual alone. Upon asking their intention, cooperative loaming shows more participation.

• 한국학교수학회논문집
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.197-205
• /
• 1998

This study aims to examine how cooperative teaming of small ability level groups influences the enhancement of their scholastic achievement in mathematics. The conclusions are as follows; 1. The students which participate in cooperative learning in small ability level groups demonstrate academic improvement over those that participate in non-cooperative learning groups. 2. In particular, this method is more effective for high-level classes, than for middle or low-level students. 3. The learners' perception, interest and attitude towards mathematics has not changed through their placement in small ability groups involved in cooperative activities.

• 한국초등수학교육학회지
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.101-124
• /
• 2008

본 연구에서는 초등학교 5학년 학생들을 대상으로 구조중심 협동학습을 적용한 문제 만들기 학습이 수학학업성취도 및 수학적 성향에 어떠한 효과가 있는지를 분석하여 초등학교 학습지도에 도움을 줄 수 있는 교수-학습 방법을 제공하기 위한 것이다. 여기서 활용한 문제 만들기 학습 유형은 송민정(2004)의 내용을 참고로 하였으며, 협동학습 구조를 수업 시에 적절히 활용함으로써 학생들에게 수학에 대한 관심과 흥미를 유발시켜서 학업성취도 및 수학적 성향에 긍정적인 영향이 있음을 알 수 있었다.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.101-109
• /
• 2002

A cooperative teaming has been taken to consolidate the autonomous motivation of students and to develop a desirable attitude in a mutual cooperative atmosphere. Some studies on the reward effect showed that the reward after the evaluation, in the processes of cooperative learning, worked on students' learning motive directly, and the group reward was effective in learning attitude and the individual reward in academic achievement, respectively. Assuming that the group reward and the individual reward are organized and applied as a complex reward, the effects of rewards will appear, this study examined the effect of the complex reward on academic achievement and teaming attitude. For this study. 2 classes were randomly selected out of a elementary school in Gwangju and the teaming unit was based on chapter 4「The structure and function of plants」 in the 5-1 elementary Science textbook. This research has been done for 4 weeks after the students learned STAD for 8 weeks previously. The learning attitude was examined in pre and post tests, and the academic achievement was inspected twice at 2-week intervals after the pre test. The results were analysized by the SAS program In the case of academic achievement, both groups showed a significant improvement(p<.05). The experimental group showed no significant improvement in the first test, compared with the control group(p>.05), but after 4 weeks, it showed a significant improvement in the second test, compared with the control group(p<.05). From this result, it is identified that the reward should be done for a long time and the individual reward of the complex reward is successful in improving academic achievement. However, in the case of learning attitude, there was no meaningful difference in both groups(p>.05). But the control group showed a significant improvement, compared with the experimental group(p<.05). According to this result, it is indicated that the group reward only is more effective in improving learning attitude and complex reward can decrease the individual competition in experimental group.

• 한국지구과학회지
• /
• 제23권8호
• /
• pp.640-648
• /
• 2002

본 연구의 목적은 천문영역에서 STAD 모형의 협동학습이 고등학생들의 학업 성취도와 과학적 태도에 미치는 영향을 밝히는데 있다. 본 연구의 또 다른 목적은 천문영역에 있어서 향상 점수에 근거한 협동 학습과 교사 주도로 수업이 이루어지는 전통적 학습 사이의 영향을 비교해 보는 것이다. 본 연구는 인천시 소재 일반계 고등학교 1학년 남학생 2개 반을 대상으로 하였다. 협동학습 집단의 학생들은 협동학습 방법으로 주당 4시간씩 4주 동안 수업을 받았다. 협동학습을 받는 동안에 학생들은 매주 ‘태양계 탐사와 별’ 단원에 대한 형성 평가를 받았다. 그 결과, 위의 두 가지 접근 방법은 학생들의 천문학적 지식에 있어서 상당히 다른 영향을 주었으며, 학생들이 전통적인 학습방법보다는 협동적인 학습방법에 보다 긍정적인 과학적 태도를 취하는 것을 보여주고 있다. 결론적으로 협동 학습은 천문학적 지식의 학습과 과학적 태도에 있어서 전통적인 학습보다 보다 효과적이고 긍정적인 것으로 나타났다.

• 한국수학사학회지
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.125-134
• /
• 2002

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the the effect on the academic improvement, applying various teaching methods throughout cooperative teaming in small groups to inspire slow-learners'interest on mathematics and impove capability to solve problems and achievement degree of studies. The subject of the study is as follows: 1. What is the difference of students'interest on mathematics between cooperative learning in small groups and large group learning\ulcorner 2. Is there any difference of slow-learners' achievement degree of studies between cooperative learning in small groups and large group learning?