• 한국식생활문화학회지
• /
• 제33권1호
• /
• pp.26-35
• /
• 2018

This study conducted an empirical analysis of the effects of job characteristics on work-family conflict relation and quality of life, as well as moderating effects in accordance with operation type, by targeting 245 dietitian/cooks working for contract foodservice companies. The results of this study are as follows. First, the autonomy and feedback had negative (-) effects on work-family conflict while functional diversity had positive (+) effects on work-family conflict. Job identity and job importance had no relation with work-family conflict. Second, work-family conflict had negative (-) effects on job satisfaction, work-family relation, job support, general happiness, and job environment while having positive (+) effects on job stress. Third, in all paths except for the path with effects of work-family conflict on job stress, there were no differences between the group of shops operating 365 days and the group of shops operating 5 days a week. It would be helpful to the effective operation of human resources by emphasizing the necessity of differentiated management for companies with shops operating 365 days and shops operating 5 days a week, as well as managing employees' job characteristic factors, work-family conflict, and even quality of life.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제12권5호
• /
• pp.331-345
• /
• 2012

본 연구의 목적은 위탁급식업체의 직 간접 운영요인이 거래관계의 질과 재이용의사에 미치는 영향을 파악하고자 하는 것이다. 위탁급식업체 E사의 고객사 담당자들을 대상으로 유효표본 126부의 자료를 수집하였고, 구조방정식 모형과 회귀분석을 이용하여 연구모형과 가설들을 검증하였다. 주요 연구 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 위탁급식업체의 운영요인들은 급식의 질과 신뢰 즉 거래관계의 질에 유의한 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 구체적으로 살펴보면, 첫째, 급식의 질에는 운영비용, 메뉴에 대한 관리 및 서비스관리의 직접운영요인과 브랜드 이미지의 간접운영요인이 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 특히, 서비스관리와 메뉴관리가 급식의 질에 상대적으로 큰 영향을 주었다. 둘째, 위탁급식 업체와 고객사간의 신뢰에는 메뉴관리, 위생/시설관리, 브랜드이미지, 영업관리능력 등이 유의한 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 특히 영업관리능력과 브랜드이미지가 신뢰 형성에 상대적으로 큰 영향을 주었다. 셋째, 위탁급식업체의 급식 질은 신뢰에 유의한 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났고, 마지막으로 급식의 질과 신뢰는 재이용의사에 유의한 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 이는 재이용의사를 높이기 위해서는 급식의 질 뿐만 아니라 무엇보다도 거래 상대방과의 신뢰가 더 중요하다는 것을 의미한다.

• Journal of Nutrition and Health
• /
• 제38권2호
• /
• pp.180-189
• /
• 2005

The purposes of this study were 1) to analyze the effect of the ERP quality (system quality, information quality, service quality) on the performance (end user satisfaction, user's performance, system utilization) of business, 2) to conduct the causal-effect analysis between outcome variables (user's satisfaction, user's performance, system utilization) of ERP in the contract foodservice management company. The questionnaires were distributed to 260 end users (dietitians, foodservice management managers) in charge of managing the institutional foodservice such as the office (government agencies, factories), schools (universities, middle and high school) and hospitals which were managed by contract foodservice management company 'C' in Seoul and Kyunggi. The surveys were performed from July 26, 2004 to July 30. 2004. Two hundred and fifty (250) questionnaires were responded (response rate: 96.2%). The statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS Win (11.5). And the descriptive analysis, factor analysis, reliability test, pearson correlation, simple and multiple regression analysis were performed. The results showed that among the 3 factors (system quality, information quality, service quality), the system quality and information quality were proved to have an effect on the user's satisfaction and user's performance significantly (p < .05). The influence of ERP quality (system quality, information quality, service quality) on system utilization were testified to be statistically significant (p < .05). The user's performance were affected significantly by system utilization (p < 0.001) and end user's satisfaction (p < 0.001). As a conclusion, to improve user satisfaction, which is the ultimate performance variable of an ERP system, high quality of an ERP system is the pre-requisite. And the user satisfaction and performance of business would be higher with the better quality ERP system. When constructing ERP system for the contract foodservice management company, we should improve system utilization and user satisfaction altogether so that user's performance could be ultimately enhanced and we should make efforts to enhance the quality level of ERP. (Korean J Nutrition 38(2): 180～189, 2005)

• 한국조리학회지
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.51-73
• /
• 2011

대학교 위탁급식업체에서도 현재 많은 외식기업들이 브랜드 자산의 구성요소인 브랜드 인지, 로열티, 지각된 품질, 연상이미지 등을 강화하기 위해 매스미디어를 이용한 커뮤니케이션에 예산을 늘리고 있는 것처럼 브랜드 자산 형성을 위한 투자가 뒷받침 되어야 한다. 본 연구를 위해서 설문지의 617부를 실증분석에 이용하였으며, 설문문항의 신뢰도검정을 위해 알파계수분석 (Cronbach's Alpha analysis)과 타당성검정을 위해서 탐색적 요인분석(exploratory factor analysis)과 확인 요인분석(confirmatory factor analysis)을 실시하였다. 조사자의 일반적인 특성을 파악하기 위해 빈도분석을 실시하였으며, 브랜드 인지가 브랜드 개성과 브랜드 이미지 형성 그리고 소비자-브랜드 관계의 질에 미치는 구조모형 가설검증을 위해 AMOS 17.0(Analysis of Moment Structure) 프로그램을 이용한 경로분석(path analysis)을 실시하였다. AMOS 분석결과 모든 가설이 유의한 것으로 나타났으며, 이는 대학교 위탁급식업체에서도 브랜드 인지에 대한 자산형성이 소비자-브랜드 관계의 질에 정(+)의 영향을 준다는 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 대학교 위탁급식업체의 고객에 긍정적인 브랜드 이미지 확립은 강한 소비자-브랜드 관계를 확립하게 되므로 향후 긍정적인 브랜드 이미지에 대한 연구가 지속되어져야 할 것으로 본다.

• 식품산업과 영양
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.7-11
• /
• 2010

• 대한영양사협회학술지
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.1-12
• /
• 2010

This study was conducted to characterize well-being menus and to examine the service frequency and profitability of those served in the contract-managed workplace foodservice. In-depth interviews were conducted with six persons who were in charge of menu management in the headquarters of six different foodservice management companies during March, 2007. In addition, 122 set menus consisting of 777 menu items, which were on one month menus served during January to April, 2007, were collected from three workplace operations managed by three different foodservice management companies. As a result of the in-depth interviews, four categories of well-being menu items were extracted: 'medicinal functional menu item', 'environmentally-friendly menu item', 'natural food menu item', and 'harmful components-limiting menu item'. Accordingly, a well-being menu item was defined as 'a menu item with increased nutrition value or decreased health risk by changing food material or cooking method'. When the menu items (n=777) were analyzed by applying the definition and categories, approximately 14% of the items were identified as well-being menu items and most of them were either medicinal functional (65%) or natural food menu items (33%). Approximately 59% of the 122 set menus included at least one well-being menu item, and therefore they were named the well-being set menus. These well-being set menus, however, were not significantly different from the rest set menus in terms of profitability as measured by the contribution margin. The results of this study could be useful for foodservice management companies to develop and plan well-being menus targeting workplace foodservice operations.

• 한국식품조리과학회지
• /
• 제20권5호
• /
• pp.423-435
• /
• 2004

The purposes of this study were to compare, through a factor analysis, the perceived level of importance of 4 categories of features relating to food service management between salespeople and clients, to establish an effective marketing strategy for successful contracting. To obtain data on the perceived level of importance level of the factors affecting foodservice management contracts, questionnaires were developed using the Delphi technique, which were modified by apilot test. The questionnaires consisted of 4 categories and 19 items on the factors affecting foodservice management contracts, with the importance level of these factors measured on a 5 point-Likert type scale. Between March 12 and April 13 2003, the self-administrative questionnaires were mailed to the 60 salespeople and 280 clients. A total of 50 clients (25%) and 48 salespeople(77%) responded to the questionnaires. As a result, forprivate contracts and in competitive biding, the differences of the perceived importance level between the salespeople and clients of the 3 categories (the appropriateness of foodservice operation plan, sales ability, the conditions and costs of the contract) were significant. For the 5 items relating to private contracts, Field trip, Menu Management Plan, Sanitation and Safety Management, Cost per meal and Food Cost per meal, both the salespeople and clients perceived high levels of importance for all these items. For competitive biding, both the salespeople and clients perceived high levels of importance for the 6 item the Foodservice operation supportive system, Field trip, Menu Management Plan, Renewal plans for interior and environment, Cost per meal and Food Cost per meal.

• 대한영양사협회학술지
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.72-90
• /
• 2011

The following study was taken in the Seoul, Gyeonggi, Incheon, Kangwon, and Chungcheong areas to analyze the performance levels of safety management by characteristics of school foodservice. The following results were obtained from a survey conducted on 2,271 middle and high school dietitians in 808 schools. Out of the 808 schools surveyed, 513 schools (63.5%) were self-operated and 295 schools (36.5%) were managed by a contract. Regarding the performance level of the hygiene duties, contract-managed schools were rated as 4.02 points while self-operated schools were rated relatively higher (4.16 points). The self-operated schools had an average score of 3.60 points for the TQM-based HACCP system, and the areas that scored lower than the average were strategies, human resources, data and analysis. The average score of the contract-managed schools was 3.42 points, and such areas as leadership, human resources, data and analysis, and customer satisfactory level scored below the average. For the analysis of CCP performance level, the contract-managed schools scored 4.28 points while self-operated schools scored 4.34 points. Overall, the hygiene duties, CCP performance level, and TQM-based HACCP system performance of the contracted schools were lower than those of the self-operated schools. Therefore, it is advised that the contract-managed schools consider new measures to strengthen their performance level for improved safety of school foodservice.

• Journal of Nutrition and Health
• /
• 제38권10호
• /
• pp.880-894
• /
• 2005

The purposes of this study were to a) measure the IC identified of CFMC (contract foodservice management company) ,b) examine IC circumstance of CFMC, c) evaluate practically IC measurement tool of CFMC, and d) present information for selecting an adequate CFMC to clients. The questionnaires of IC measurement were handed out to 108 CFMCs, there composing of main office employees, foodservice managers, customers, and clients of 207 school,38 hospital, and 86 husiness/industry foodservices. The statistical data analysis was completed using SPSS Win (ver 12.0) for descriptive analysis, t-test, Mann-Whitney U test. First, CFMCs had operational experience for an average of 8 years and 8 months, and served an average of 38,540 meals a day. Most of the respondent companies specialized in the school foodservice field and managed an average of 66 clients for the contract period of 2 years and 3 months. Second, the respondent companies had gotten a score of 77.78 points for the total average, 77.7 points in the large enterprise group and 78.1 points in the small and medium-sized enterprise group. Therefore, the minimum number of points for the accrediting license on Qualification is suggested to be over 70 out of a 100 point scale; this study would be serve as reference for the certification license on qualification. On the level of evaluation category, the scores were 14.15 to 20 points on $\ulcorner$finance$\urcorner$, 19.24 to 25 points on $\ulcorner$customer$\urcorner$, 19.33 to 25 points on $\ulcorner$process$\urcorner$, 14.31 to 20 points on $\ulcorner$human resource$\urcorner$, and 8.6 to 10 point on $\ulcorner$renewal and development$\urcorner$ . $\ulcorner$Renewal and development$\urcorner$ and $\ulcorner$customer focus$\urcorner$ received better grades than other evaluation categories. Third, $\ulcorner$Finance$\urcorner$ indicated similar distribution overall. Small and medium-sized companies had lower grades than large companies on 'market ability' of $\ulcorner$customer$\urcorner$ , but, clients of small and medium-sized companies had higher grade for 'client satisfaction' than large companies. Most of the companies supported 'infrastructure support for foodservice operation' of $\ulcorner$process$\urcorner$ by the main office of CFMCs, but, the branch chain offices of CFMCs were not applied efficiently. Large companies made more effort to improve the 'employee ability' of $\ulcorner$human focus$\urcorner$ than small and medium-sized CFMC. The 'research and development cost' of $\ulcorner$renewal and development$\urcorner$ was increased compared to the previous year. In conclusion, if CFMCs were to perform self-evaluation and a routine checkups by utilizing CFMC's IC measuring tool, improvements in CFMC operational capacities as well as foodservice quality can be noted. (Korean J Nutrition 38(10)'880$\sim$894,2005)

• 대한영양사협회학술지
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.38-49
• /
• 2007

The purpose of this study was to determine the attributes and factors of brand personality for contract foodservice management companies. Self-administered questionnaires were distributed to five students at universities operating under the top five companies in contract foodservice management. The following statistical analyses were conducted for the data assessment: descriptive analysis, t-test, ANOVA, reliability analysis, and factor analysis, using the SPSS Win(12.0) package program. From these analyses we divided a company's brand personality into the following five functional and emotional elements: sensibility, sincerity, confidence, competence, and excitement. Based on these five elements a total of 26 scales were developed to measure brand attributes of the companies. The variance was explained by 19.29% of sensibility, 17.65% of sincerity, 15.71% of confidence, 14.06% of competence, and 13.62% of excitement. The calculated Cronbach's alpha was more than .90 for all the scales measuring the five attributes, indicating good internal consistency. There were significant differences in sensibility(p<.01), sincerity(p<.001), creditability(p<.01), competence (p<.001), and excitement(p<.001) among the companies. In regards to overall brand personality, company a had a higher mean score for sincerity, while the other companies had higher mean scores for competence. Among the brand personalities, 'confidence' had the highest mean score with 3.36, followed by 'cooperation' (3.17), 'successful'(3.12), 'leadership'(3.11), and 'down-to-earth'(3.02).