• 대한수학교육학회지:학교수학
• /
• 제8권3호
• /
• pp.301-326
• /
• 2006

학생평가 전문성은 교사들에게 실질적으로 필요한 능력이며 그 질적 제고에 대한 요구가 사회적으로 증대되고 있다. 본 연구는 사범 대학에서 학생평가 전문성을 갖춘 수학 교사를 양성하기 위하여 어떤 노력이 필요한지를 제안하고자 했다. 이를 위해 사범대학에서의 평가 관련 강좌 개설의 현황을 조사하였고, 현장 교사들이 학생평가 활동에서 어떤 어려움이 있는지를 면담을 통해 살펴보았다. 그리고 국가 수준에서 제시된 교사의 학생평가 전문성 기준에 비추어 예비교사들이 알아야 할 교육 내용을 제안하고 그 교육 방법을 논하였다. 수학학습평가 강좌는 교과교육학의 필수 과목으로 수학 교사들이 현대 수학교육이론에 더하여 학교 현장에서 실제 업무를 수행할 수 있도록 개설되어야 할 것이다.

• 대한수학교육학회지:수학교육학연구
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.277-292
• /
• 2012

예비교사에게 요구되는 학생 평가 전문성은 평가방법을 선택하고, 평가도구를 개발하고, 평가를 실시하여 채점하고, 평가 결과를 분석하고 해석하고 활용하는 일련의 과정을 경험하고, 그것을 반성할 때 신장될 수 있다. 본 연구는 예비교사들을 대상으로 평가 과정 전반을 경험하는 실습과 학습 일지를 통한 반성을 경험하게 하여 이들의 평가 전문성 신장이 어떠한지 알아보았다. 학습일지는 예비교사의 평가 관련 지식, 학생과 교사의 이중적 입장, 평가 실행의 영역에서 분석되었고, 그 결과 이 세 가지 영역은 상호작용하며 예비교사의 전문성을 신장시키는 데 기여했으며, 각각의 영역은 예비교사의 평가 전문성을 구성하는 요소가 되었다. 그리고 예비교사의 평가 전문성 신장을 양적으로 확인한 결과, 사전 검사에 비해 사후 검사의 평균 점수가 신장되었다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제44권2호
• /
• pp.281-295
• /
• 2005

To evaluate students properly in mathematics, it is essential to clarify and specify the object of study. Proper assessment tools are also needed coupled with an effective assessment method. The assessment tools have to be reasonable and trustworthy. Conducting the assessment should always produce fair and positive results and effectiveness. Establishing standards for the student evaluation competence of mathematics teachers should satisfy such objectives. Referring to the previous study suggested by Korea Institute' of Curriculum & Evaluation(KICE), this study classified the elements of capacity for evaluation competence into the general assessment, the assessment content understanding, and the assessment conduct & application areas. The specific elements of each area are established as standards. At last, 13 standards were suggested and summarized. to describe the math teachers' student evaluation competence.

• Child Health Nursing Research
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.117-125
• /
• 2016

Purpose: This study was done to examine the effect of direct practice of newborn health assessment on nursing student's clinical competence and self-efficacy and to propose effective strategies for clinical education on newborn care. Methods: Design was a nonequivalent control group quasi-experimental study. The direct practice program was composed of a lecture, demonstration, drill and feedback using a manikin, and repeated direct practice regarding newborn health assessment. Participants were 65 student nurses taking the pediatric nursing practicum in the nursery room at M hospital. The experimental group (n=33) participated in the direct practice program for newborn health assessment and the control group (n=32) received the traditional practice method. Nursing clinical competence was assessed by two nurse investigators and structured questionnaires were used to measure self-efficacy. Results: The experimental group's clinical competence was significantly higher than that of the control group (t=-4.82, p=.000). However no significant difference was found between the two groups for self-efficacy (t=1.264, p=.211). Conclusion: These findings indicate that the direct practice program is effective in improving nursing student's clinical competence, but it was not effective in increasing self-efficacy. Direct practice in various clinical education settings is recommended and longitudinal effects be evaluated.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제38권3호
• /
• pp.419-430
• /
• 2018

본 연구의 목적은 과학교육에 협력적 문제해결 중심 교수모델 적용에서 학생의 인성 역량을 평가하는 평가 도구를 개발하는 것이다. 문헌 분석을 통해 개방성, 공감, 관용, 배려, 성실, 자기조절, 정직, 책임, 협력의 9개 인성 역량 구성요인을 추출하였다. 기존 인성 역량 관련 척도를 바탕으로 전문가 협의를 통해 협력적 문제해결 중심 교수모델에 기반 한 학생 인성 역량 평가 문항을 개발하였다. 전문가 집단을 대상으로 88개의 예비문항에 대한 1차 조사를 하였고, 예비조사 결과를 바탕으로 문항을 수정 보완하였다. 재구성된 문항의 타당도를 확인하고자 중 고등학교 과학교사 71명을 대상으로 2차 내용타당도 조사를 하였고, 해당 문항의 신뢰도를 검증하기 위해 평정자간 신뢰도를 산출하였다. 평가 문항의 내용타당도 및 평정자간 신뢰도는 전반적으로 양호한 수준으로 나타났고 분석 결과를 토대로 53문항을 최종적으로 선정하였다. 본 연구에서 개발한 평가 도구는 협력적 문제해결 중심 교수모델을 통한 학생의 인성 역량 변화를 알아보고 과학교육에서 학생 인성 역량을 평가하는 데 유용하게 사용될 수 있을 것이다.

• Archives of Plastic Surgery
• /
• 제33권2호
• /
• pp.225-232
• /
• 2006

The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical competence of medical student using short case test items. Development of short case test items with definition of an assessment of subject, choice of clinical stations sampling, identification of components of clinical competence to be evaluated, and assessment of practicability and results exploitation. For the last three years 28, 48 and 30 topics were developed annually. Among them 20, 23 and 23 topics were selected. About 50 students were examined annually. The mean score was 72.7, 57.1, 64.3 respectively. The mean preparation time of the students for the examination was 9.8 hours. About 60% of the students prepared the test in small group activity. Our experience suggests that short case test items be feasible for evaluation of student learning in Plastic Surgery. This method should be considered as a useful tool to assess medical student's competence or even an examination for board certification.

• Archives of Plastic Surgery
• /
• 제32권6호
• /
• pp.675-682
• /
• 2005

This is the evaluation report of clinical competence of undergraduate medical students in Plastic Surgery field using OSCE(Objective Structured Clinical Examination) executed in three years. OSCE comprises of assessment of subject, choice of clinical stations sampling, identification of components of clinical competence to be evaluated, the level of performance required, development of specification table, editing of OSCE presentation page and assessment of practicability and results exploitation. About fifty students were examined annually. Seven station stimuli with simulated patient participation were carried out. The mean OSCE score was $82.3{\pm}6.19$. The reliability of the total station was 0.72. The examination shows a positive response to the OSCE. Our experience shows OSCE's feasibility for Plastic Surgery during the initial course of education. Referring to our experiences, the Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (KPRS) applied the OSCE test for Korean Plastic Surgery Board Certification

• 한국융합학회논문지
• /
• 제6권3호
• /
• pp.79-86
• /
• 2015

최근 교육형태가 융합인재 양성을 목적으로 융합교육을 선호해 다양한 연구가 시도 중이다. 본 연구는 교과 외 과정 중 보건계열 전체 학생들이 일반적으로 숙지하고 있어야 할 임상술기를 선별하여 프로그램 개발 적용 후, 향후 전체 보건계열 학생에게 적용 가능한지 그 결과를 확인하고자 시도되었다. 분석결과 본 개요 프로그램은 임상수행능력, 임상수행 지식, 전문직 이미지에 도움을 주는 것으로 분석되었다. 본 연구는 대상자의 사전 사후연구이며, 이러한 융합 교육과정 환경을 변화시킨다면 의료진 및 환자 간의 대한 공감능력과 의사소통에 대한 문제를 해결할 것으로 사료된다.

• 한국간호교육학회지
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.159-165
• /
• 2009

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify clinical competence and to analyze influencing factors on clinical competence for second year college nursing students. Methods: The data were collected from 183 students by means of self reported questionnaires with clinical competence, satisfaction of clinical practice experience, critical thinking disposition, and self-directed learning, on June 18th 2007 and June 25th 2008. Results: The influencing factors on clinical competence of nursing students were satisfaction of clinical practice experience and critical thinking disposition. The more adaptable a student's major was, the higher the clinical competence and satisfaction of clinical practice experience. The score of self-directed learning was the highest in the well adapted group of a major. For clinical competence categories, the level of basic nursing was the highest followed by psychosocial nursing, patient education, nursing process, monitoring and patient physical assessment. The level of direct nursing care was the lowest among nursing students. Conclusion: In conclusion, results of this study suggest that constructing a cooperative system between colleges and educational hospitals, intensifying preceptors' and professors' clinical instruction, and developing a multimedia learning module and practice using simulators or standardized patient care is necessary to promote clinical competence of nursing students.

• 영어어문교육
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.45-68
• /
• 2012

This study aims to investigate the different opinions about feedback given to high level Middle School students about their writing.18 students in the Gifted Program participated in the study. They were divided into three groups through their presurvey answers according to their language learning opportunities and genders. Students language self-assessment was compared with achievement as well. Three times of students' written work were collected. They then received feedback from the teacher and their two peers respectively. With the teachers' and peers' feedback, they completed their final draft. The study then examines how much the students take feedback practically from the different feedback givers. Examples of formative and corrective feedback were arranged to find out the differences in the students practice when giving and taking feedback. These Gifted class students showed that they didn't care much about who gave them the feedback, instead they cared more about how much language competence they presumed the feedback giver had. Implications of the findings are discussed and future study is suggested.