• 예술인문사회 융합 멀티미디어 논문지
• /
• 제6권12호
• /
• pp.587-594
• /
• 2016

주요 인공지능 기술 선진국에서는 인공지능으로 운행하는 자율주행 자동차가 이미 실험 단계의 수준을 넘어섰다. 운전자가 없이 운행하는 자율주행 자동차에서 가장 큰 문제 가운데 하나는, 사고 발생과 그 사고에 대한 책임 문제이다. 운전자와 보행자 모두를 함께 고려해야 하는 사고 상황에서 자율주행 자동차는 윤리적 딜레마에 부딪힐 수 있다. 이런 딜레마를 해결할 최선의 판단이 자율자동차의 인공지능에 어떻게 설계되어야 하는지 물을 수 있다. 책임의 주체로서 자율주행 자동차에 대해 법적 책임을 어떻게 부여할 수 있는지는 어려운 문제이다. 필자는 우선, 사고 상황에서 자율자동차의 윤리적 딜레마가 무엇인지 소개한다. 다음으로, 사고에 대한 책임의 주체로서 자율주행 자동차에 법적 책임을 부여할 방법을 찾는다. 특별히 인과적 책임에 대한 상당성 개념으로 자율주행 자동차 사고의 법적 책임을 해명할 방법을 모색한다. 상당성은 법적 판단에서 인과적 책임을 해명하는 데에 가장 일반적으로 수용하는 개념이다. 그러나 여전히 해명이 필요한 모호한 개념이다. 필자는 사건 수준의 인과에 대한 확률 이론으로 보다 명료한 인과적 책임에 대한 상당성 개념을 제시한다. 이처럼 해명된 상당성은 자율주행 자동차뿐 아니라 일반적인 영역의 법적 판단에서 요구되는 인과적 책임을 설명하는 데에 기여할 수 있다.

• 논리연구
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.21-67
• /
• 2017

이 글에서 필자는, 선언 인과(disjunctive cause)를 위한 사토리오(Satorio 2006)의 논증을 비판적으로 검토하고 평가한 후, 사토리오가 선언 인과로 의도한 바를 우리의 직관에 더 잘 부합하는 인과 구조로 보여주고자 한다. 우선, 선언 원인을 주장하는 사토리오의 논증을 소개한다. 다음으로, 이 논증에 가능한 반론들에 대한 사토리오의 응답과 그 논증에서 필자가 새롭게 주목하는 문제를 논의한다. 마지막으로, 사토리오가 선언 원인의 근거로 제시한 인과 구조를, 조절 효과 변수와 인과 상호작용 그리고 확률 궤적으로 해명한다. 결과 사건과 관련하여 원인 사건과 조절 효과의 인과 상호작용, 그리고 결과 사건의 비결정성이 갖는 의미와 역할을 본다. 이들 논의를 통해 선언 원인 사건에 대한 사토리오의 해명보다 필자의 해명이 우리의 직관에 더 부합하며, 또한 인과적 책임을 행위자에게 할당하는 데에 더 설득적임을 보여준다. 이 글에서 필자의 핵심 주장은 다음과 같다. 선언 인과 구조는 사토리오가 주장하는 것과 다르게 해명해야 한다. 선언 원인 사건이 아니라, 사건들이 결과 사건에 연결될 성향들이 있는 데 이들 성향의 선언 관계가 있다. 인과적 책임을 행위자에게 부여하려면, 인과 사건의 비결정성에 주목해야 한다.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제9권5호
• /
• pp.365-376
• /
• 2022

This study aims to look into the causal relationships between corporate social responsibility and firm value, corporate social responsibility and institutional ownership, and firm value and institutional ownership. This study develops a triangle model of causal relationships among the three endogenous variables. Samples for this study are manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2014-2018. The model is operated in the system of simultaneous equation models using the generalized method of moments technique to estimate parameter coefficients. After controlling the effects of trade-off/balancing capital structure and managerial ownership, the research findings show a positive causal relationship between CSR and firm value and firm value and institutional ownership. Institutional ownership has a positive effect on CSR, while the effect of CSR on institutional ownership is negative in the firms without managerial ownership and positive in the firms with managerial ownership. This study finds that the causal relationship between CSR and firm value is stronger after the trade-off/balancing of capital structure is included in the model. Capital structure has a convex effect on firm value and positively impacts institutional ownership. In addition, an independent commissioner has a negative impact on CSR but has no direct impact on firm value.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.83-108
• /
• 2006

Regarding the ocean carrier's responsibility for damage indemnification, both his or her duty of care and reason of legal exemption have been considered important. The International Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules relating to Bills of Lading also provides that the ocean carrier indemnifies for the loss or damage of freight on the basis of the principle of liability with fault. In other words, the carrier assumes responsibility only for the loss or damage of freight which is under his or her control and whose safety must be carefully maintained by him or her. The carrier's duty of care which is required for freight safety in accordance with the convention is associated with two themes, seaworthiness of vessel and freight itself. To make ocean freight shipping effective necessities the seaworthiness of the ship that will conduct the shipping service under its responsibility. This will ultimately lead to making the service impressive to the shipper as freight owner. Thus the purpose of this study is to contribute to more reasonable shipping by the shipowner or the carrier who needs to ensure seaworthiness of vessel, and prevent unseaworthiness that may be incurred in accordance with freight characteristics. For the purpose, this paper reviewed the meaning of seaworthiness of vessel through a juridical approach to its causal relationship with ocean freight shipping.

• Asian Journal for Public Opinion Research
• /
• 제11권3호
• /
• pp.182-200
• /
• 2023

A recent nationwide survey reported that South Koreans perceive large corporations as the party that should be the most responsible for tackling climate change. This public opinion result offers insight into the argument that defining who is responsible for the climate change issue can guide campaigners and policymakers in designing effective communication strategies. This study examines how attributing responsibility to large corporations can affect behavioral intention to support government policy and regulation via a moderated mediation model of the perceived risk of climate change and corporate social responsibility (CSR). A nationwide online survey of 295 South Koreans was conducted. The findings reveal an indirect effect of responsibility attribution on behavioral intention through risk perception. Moreover, perceived CSR moderated the causal link between risk perception and behavioral intention, such that South Koreans reported higher levels of behavioral intention when they reported higher CSR. However, perceived CSR failed to moderate the indirect effect. These findings have implications for communication processes and policymaking to address climate change problems in South Korea.

• 가정과삶의질연구
• /
• 제8권1호
• /
• pp.15-30
• /
• 1990

The purpose of this study was to provide basic data for consumer complaining behavior. For this purpose, questionaire was given to 600 individuals who have resided in Seoul as the housewife consumer and possessed the experience to use the purchased refrigerators within the period of 5 years. 437 data were analyzed by the statistical methods like frequency, percentage, ANOVA, Duncan's Multiple Range Test, X2-test, Pearson's correlation and multiple regression analysis. The results of this study were described as follows; 1) Complaining behavior have shown significant differences according to housewife's age, degree of perceived housewife's consumer education, husband's job and housewife's job. 2) The type of attribution of dissatisfaction have shown significant differences according to husband's job, housewife's job and family income. 3) There was significant difference in the complaining behavior according to the type of causal attribution and responsibility attribution. 4) The complaining behavior was influenced by causal attribution of dissatisfaction, responsibility attribution of dissatisfaction, family income, degree of perceived housewife's consumer education, husband's job and housewife's age. And the relative contribution of each variable explaining the complaining behavior was decreased according to the order of variables that were described.

• 한국시스템다이내믹스연구
• /
• 제16권4호
• /
• pp.103-128
• /
• 2015

This study investigated dynamic causal relationship between CSR implementation and consumption of environmentally friendly fashion products through systems thinking. Based on literature review and empirical research, we drew causal loop diagram for CSR implementation in environmentally friendly fashion product industry. By analyzing feedback loops, we found that companies and consumers interact in the process of CSR activities. In the process of CSR implementation, companies and consumers are closely related and affect each other as stimuli and prior condition. This study suggests that companies adopt push strategy to actively create demand by developing and promoting environmentally friendly fashion products and that companies communicate with consumers in order to be recognized and rewarded by consumers for their CSR activities. In addition, this study suggests that consumers not only support companies of CSR activities but also actively boycott anti-environmental companies by collective action.

• 경영과정보연구
• /
• 제34권5호
• /
• pp.71-92
• /
• 2015

본 연구는 기업의 사회적 책임(CSR: corporate social responsibility)활동이 재무성과에 미치는 영향을 베이지안 네트워크를 통해 분석하였다. 본 연구에서는 선행연구에서 널리 사용되어 온 분석방법인 다중회귀분석방법의 종속변수와 설명변수간에 획일적인 선형함수만을 가정하는데에서 나오는 문제점을 극복하고자 한다. 즉, 기업의 재무성과에 영향을 미치는 경영자의 사회적 책임활동간에 존재하는 인과관계를 도출할 필요가 있다. 이는 어떤 변수가 다른 어떤 변수와 직접 또는 간접적 인과관계를 통하여 기업의 재무성과에 영향을 주는지를 의사결정자에게 알려줌으로써 보다 효과적으로 기업의 재무성과를 개선시킬 수 있도록 지원할 수 있다. 이를 위하여 본 연구에서는 일반 베이지안 네트워크 (GBN: General Bayesian Network)을 제안하고 GBN에서 유도되는 마코프 블랭킷 (Markov Blanket)을 제시한다. 본 연구는 경제정의실천시민연합 산하 경제정의연구소에서 조사한 한국의 대표적 기업 약200개의 2005년부터 2011년까지 경제정의지수(Korean economic justice institute index: KEJI index)를 기초로 실험한 결과 기업성과측정치에 따라 차이는 보이지만 건전성(CSR1_20)과 경제발전기여도(CSR7_10)는 모든 기업의 재무성과에 직접적인 인과관계를 나타내었으며, 소비자보호만족도(CSR4_7), 환경보호만족도(CSR5_10) 및 종업원만족도(CSR6_10)는 각 측정지표간의 직 간접적인 인과관계를 나타내어 서로에게 중요한 영향을 미치고 있음을 나타내었다. 또한, what-if 민감도 분석을 통해 기업재무성과에 직접적인 인과관계가 있는 변수들의 사전확률이 변할 대 사후확률의 변화를 분석하여, 본 연구에서 제안한 방법이 모두 통계적으로 유의한 결과를 제공한다는 것이 실증적으로 검증되었다.

• 한국안전학회지
• /
• 제34권5호
• /
• pp.119-131
• /
• 2019

Among the themes for CSR(Corporate Social Responsibility), consumer issues include protecting the health and safety of consumers who purchase and use the products. In particular, ensuring product safety is a major theme of consumer issues for corporate social responsibility. Currently, the government implements the Electrical Appliances and Consumer Products Safety Control Act for product safety management and selects products that may harmful to consumers as safety control items, and manages the products by designating them as 4 types of safety certification, safety confirmation, supplier conformity verification, and safety standard compliance. In this paper, we propose management plans for the establishment of a more reasonable classification type of safety management target for 48 items of consumer products to be controlled by the act, and confirm the validity of the plan. First, we perform cluster analysis using data for CISS (Consumer Injury Surveillance System) to derive a new classification type of the safety management target. Next, we compare the results of the cluster analysis with the classification type of the act and the existing scenario classification method RAS (Risk Assessment by Scenario) and the causal network method RAMP (Risk Assessment Method based on Probability). Based on these results, we propose two new plans of safety management target classification and verify its validity.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제8권3호
• /
• pp.793-805
• /
• 2021

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) program has become one of the primary concerns of companies worldwide. For many companies, treating the environment and the community well is important to business practice and reputation, and this is reflected in their CSR programs. CSR is a company's obligation to consider the interests of its employees, customers, shareholders, communities, and the environment and to consider the social and environmental consequences of their business activities. CSR plays an important role in relationship building with customers. Thus, the main purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship between customer perception of CSR and customer trust. The model of this study considers two mediating variables, i.e., company reputation and word of mouth to link CSR to customer trust. This study employs a causal survey design. The respondents were 160 consumers who have purchased products and knew about CSR programs of a global food company. Data analysis was using structural equation modeling (SEM) to test the hypotheses. The results of this study revealed that CSR negatively impacts customer trust. Furthermore, CSR positively impacts corporate reputation and word of mouth. Besides, this study found corporate reputation positively impacts word of mouth and customer trust. While the mediating effect of reputation and word of mouth also positively impacts the relationship between CSR and consumer trust. A good reputation and word of mouth could be connecting buyers and enhances the power of suppliers.