• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.41-53
• /
• 2017

Recently, due to the economic recession and increase of ITO (IT Outsourcing), bidding in software industry has been recognized as more competitive and the importance of software bid evaluation for corporate selection is being increased. This study aims to analyze and prioritize influential factors in the software bid evaluation criteria which is adopted as the main evaluation model of national software businesses by Ministry of Science. The priority was developed by AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) through pair-wise comparison. For the analysis, this study developed analysis model for AHP and conducted survey of experts who have work experience for more than 10 years in the IT industry. As the result of analysis, weighted factors in the evaluation criteria were deduced and differences of priority factors between purchaser and bidder were investigated. The analysis showed differences of view point in the bidding process. With these results, this study suggests how to write a proposal strategically and effectively in perspective of the purchaser. It is expected that priority factors will be adopted in strategic proposals in both bidder and purchaser. For purchaser, the priority will be adopted to select reliable bidder. So, we expect that the priority factors will be used to get more values for both bidder and purchaser in their business atmosphere.

• 한국건축시공학회지
• /
• 제12권6호
• /
• pp.682-700
• /
• 2012

Over the last several years, Korea has increasingly adopted design-build for public construction projects. There is a much greater awareness of the need to change to a system based on 'Value for Money', which is high on the government's agenda. A whole life performance bid evaluation model is proposed to aid decision makers in the selection of a design-builder. This is based on the integration of a framework using an analytic hierarchy process, as the bid awarding system is being changed from one based on the lowest price to one based on best value over the life-cycle. Key criteria such as whole life cost, service life planning and design quality are important through the key stages of the evaluation process. The model uses a systematic and holistic approach, which enables the public sector client to make better decisions in design-builder selection, which will deliver whole life benefits based on long-term cost-effectiveness.

• 한국인터넷방송통신학회논문지
• /
• 제21권4호
• /
• pp.171-176
• /
• 2021

본 논문은 설비 설치비용과 판매단가로 구성된 다수의 구매처 입찰정보로부터 구성품을 구매함에 있어 최소의 비용으로 구매하기 위해 구매처와 구매 물량을 선정하는 입찰평가 문제를 다룬다. 이 문제에 대해 기존에 알려진 방법은 분기한정 법(BB)과 분기절단 법(BC)이 알려져 있다. 그러나 이들 방법으로 얻은 해가 최적 해가 되지 않는 문제점이 있다. 본 논문에서는 판매단가 순위 또는 설치비용 순위 우선 구매물량 배정원칙을 적용하여 초기 실현 가능 해를 얻고, 판매단가 또는 설치비용을 고려하여 물량을 이동(구매업체 변경)시키는 최적화를 수행하는 방법을 제시하였다. 제안된 방법을 실험 데이터에 적용한 결과 BB와 BC에 비해 구매비용을 크게 절감할 수 있었다.

• 대한토목학회논문집
• /
• 제34권6호
• /
• pp.1881-1891
• /
• 2014

2010년부터 턴키심의위원 풀 제도를 폐지하고, 상설심의위원 제도를 도입하여 현재까지 턴키입찰공사는 설계적합최적가방식, 종합평가방식으로서는 입찰가격, 설계점수조정, 가중치기준, 확정금액최상설계방식의 5가지 낙찰자 결정방식으로 선정하고 있다. 또한 낙찰자 결정방식으로서 설계심의분과위원회를 크게 중앙 지방 특별 설계자문위원회의 분과위원으로 구성하여 운영하고 있으나, 아직 로비 부담에 대해서 개선되지 못한 것은 심의위원 풀제에서 상설심의위원으로 심의 주체만 변경되었을 뿐, 턴키입찰에서 설계심의가 가지는 비중과 설계심의방식도 과거와 유사하기 때문이다. 그러므로 가격경쟁을 부분적으로 강화하여 설계점수가 낙찰을 좌우하는 풍토를 개선하고, 기술경쟁은 영업력보다 실질적인 기술력이 경쟁력을 가질 수 있도록 설계심의제도를 개선하는 것이 필요하다. 이에 이 연구는 낙찰자 결정방식의 설계심의 운영제도와 문제점 그리고 개선된 설계심의방안을 제시하였다.

• 한국주거학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국주거학회 2009년 춘계학술발표대회 논문집
• /
• pp.211-216
• /
• 2009

Bidding systems in the domestic public construction work have been amended many times since the lowest-bidding system was implemented in 1951. However, this hasn't had much success. Competition in technical development among companies has declined as the contracts for buildings are given to company which submits the lowest price without considering traits of projects. In addition, as the construction market turns to the limitless competition system due to FTA(Free Trade Agreement), advanced techniques are needed to promote the national competitive power. Considering the needs of the times, Korean government announced that "Best Value Contract (Design-Bid-Build)" and "Bridging Contracts (Design-Build)" are included to 4 existing bidding systems in October 2007. Thus this study aims to suggest devised the evaluation criteria including major items for evaluating bidders, in order to establish and revitalize the best-value bid system successfully.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.17-24
• /
• 2016

The regulation for industrial accident rate level assessment of construction companies was introduced to the construction industry in the Republic of Korea since 1993 and has brought positive outcome on industrial accidents reduction at construction work sites. There were considerable decrease of industrial accident ratio and enforcing of contrators' safety organizations from the beginning of the regulation for industrial accident rate level assessment. In spite of these positive outcomes, there were some negative effects such as contractors' shrinking accident reports to keep good accident ratios since these figures had a great impact on pre-qualification stage of bidding when general contractors were competing for new construction projects. In addition, Comprehensive evaluation bid system, which replaces the lowest price bid system is applied to government-ordered construction projects since 2016. Comprehensive evaluation bid system includes construction company's accident rate as one of the evaluation items and carries out with the industrial accident rate level assessment of construction companies at the same time. The regulations of two systems have been called for improvement to unify these different procedures and standards which have led business stakeholders to confusion for several years. This study aims to devote on lessening shrinking accident reports and to reduce the waste of business stakeholders through changing the regulation for industrial accident rate level assessment.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 5th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• pp.479-487
• /
• 2013

State Highway Agencies (SHAs) have started utilizing cost-plus-time bidding (A+B bidding) since Federal Highway Agency (FHWA) declared it operational on May 4, 1995. Although this technique has successfully accelerated many projects by incorporating construction time in the bidding competition, a framework to illustrate the interactions of incentive/disincentive (I/D) rates on the competitiveness of contractors participating in the bid competition is yet to be developed. In a previous research, authors indicated that for each bid competition there is an efficient cap for I/D rates which are dictated by the capabilities of contractors in project acceleration. However, the results of previous study were based on the assumption that there is a statistically significant relationship between cost and time. In this study, the entire cost-plus-time projects implemented by the Oklahoma Department of Transportation (ODOT) were investigated. Then the significance of relationship between cost and time were analyzed for each contractor utilizing Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) technique, and the price-time function of each contractor was determined by regression analysis. The results of the analysis indicate that there is a significant relationship between cost and time for the majority of contractors. However, a quadratic relationship is not always significant and for some contractors a linear price-time relationship is significant. The results of this project can be used not only by ODOT to optimize the incentive/disincentive rates but also by contractors to determine the most competitive strategies of other bid participants.

• KDI Journal of Economic Policy
• /
• 제36권3호
• /
• pp.61-93
• /
• 2014

본 연구는 구조추정을 포함한 다양한 분석방법으로 온비드에서 진행된 승용차 공매자료를 분석하여 낙찰가에 영향을 주는 여러 요인과 그 특성을 파악하였다. 또한 분석 결과를 바탕으로 온비드에서 판매자수입을 극대화할 수 있는 공매방법에 대해 논의하였다. 온비드는 공공기관에서 자산을 처분할 때 이용되고 있는 인터넷 입찰시스템이므로 온비드 입찰시스템의 최적 설계는 국내 자산처분시장의 효율성 제고에 중요하다. 주요한 분석 결과는 다음과 같다: (ⅰ) 온비드 승용차 공매에서 입찰자들의 정보구조는 독립적인 사적가치모형과 가장 부합한다; (ⅱ) 캠코 공매에서는 이용기관 공매보다 입찰자 수가 적고 감정평가금액 대비 낙찰가율이 낮았다; (ⅲ) 이용기관 공매 중 2인 이상 유효한 입찰자가 있을 경우에만 유효한 입찰로 인정하는 공매에서는 입찰자 수가 적고 입찰자들의 사적가치가 낮았다; (ⅳ) 이용기관 공매에서 최저입찰가를 실제보다 5%, 10% 혹은 20% 올려 설정한 모의실험에서 판매자수입은 감소하였다.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 3th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• pp.827-834
• /
• 2009

In respond to the demand of an open, fair, transparent, and efficient environment for procurement, many governments have incorporated the use of internet in their procurement systems with online procurement (e-procurement). Given the different policies and laws which have to be complied with, the practice of government e-procurement system varies from one country to another. Thus, experiences in running e-procurement will vary as well. The achievements and obstacles of one country's experience will be a constructive reference for other countries in establishing e-procurement system. In this regard, government e-procurement system practices in two Southeast Asia countries i.e., Thailand and Indonesia particularly in public works are consecutively presented and finally compared in this paper. The government of Thailand has applied Online Auctions (e-Auctions) as the national procurement practice since 2005 and performed the e-Auctions in two types: Reverse Auction and Sealed Bid Auction. Contrary to the common practice of e-procurement, the Thai government, with some rationales, runs the bid documents obtaining manually as well as qualification and technical documents submission and holding the e-Auctions at bidding office. Whereas Indonesian government runs Online Sealed Bid Bidding (e-Procurement) and most of the bidding stages are performed electronically except bid evaluation for both technical and financial. The advantages and drawbacks of these two e-procurement practices are discussed as well as improvements that have to be made for successful of e-procurement.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 4th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management Organized by the University of New South Wales
• /
• pp.534-541
• /
• 2011

Risk evaluation approaches for bidding on international construction projects are typically partitioned into three stages: country selection, project classification, and bid-cost evaluation. However, previous studies are frequently under attack in that they have several crucial limitations: 1) a dearth of studies about country selection risk tailored for the overseas construction market at a corporate level; 2) no consideration of uncertainties for input variable per se; 3) less probabilistic approaches in estimating a range of cost variance; and 4) less inclusion of covariance impacts. This study thus suggests a three-staged risk evaluation model to resolve these inherent problems. In the first stage, a country portfolio model that maximizes the expected construction market growth rate and profit rate while decreasing market uncertainty is formulated using multi-objective genetic analysis. Following this, probabilistic approaches for screening bad projects are suggested through applying various data mining methods such as discriminant logistic regression, neural network, C5.0, and support vector machine. For the last stage, the cost overrun prediction model is simulated for determining a reasonable bid cost, while considering non-parametric distribution, effects of systematic risks, and the firm's specific capability accrued in a given country. Through the three consecutive models, this study verifies that international construction risk can be allocated, reduced, and projected to some degree, thereby contributing to sustaining stable profits and revenues in both the short-term and the long-term perspective.