• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제20권11호
• /
• pp.292-300
• /
• 2020

인공지능 기술이 발전함에 따라 경제, 사회, 과학 분야 등 실세계 다양한 분야의 현상을 가상의 인공 에이전트를 활용한 컴퓨터 시뮬레이션을 통해 해석하려는 시도가 이어져 왔다. 기존의 인공 에이전트 기반 교섭 게임 해석에서는 실세계의 교섭 게임에서 단계가 진행될 때 발생하는 비용 및 시간이 지남에 따라 교섭 대상이 감가상각 되는 것을 반영하지 않은 문제가 있었다. 본 연구에서는 기존의 인공 에이전트 기반 교섭 게임 모델에 교섭 단계에서 발생하는 비용 및 교섭 대상 감가상각을 (교섭 비용)을 반영하여 그 효과를 관찰하였다. 실험 결과 교섭 단계에서 발생하는 비용이 커질수록 게임에 참여하는 두 인공 에이전트는 반반 비율에 가까운 몫을 가졌으며 이른 단계에서 협상을 타결하는 현상을 관찰하였다.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제37권4호
• /
• pp.145-153
• /
• 2014

In this paper, we study the bargaining strategy of a manufacturer who sells a product through the online and offline distribution channels. To do this, we derive and analyze the equilibrium solutions for both simultaneous and sequential bargaining games. The result shows that the optimal bargaining strategy heavily depends on the size of the online distribution channel's loyal customers and the difference between the retail prices of the online and the offline distribution channels. It is also shown that, in some cases, the online distribution channel has incentive to downsize its loyal customers and its retail price for a better bargaining outcome.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제38권2호
• /
• pp.31-39
• /
• 2015

In this paper, we study the bargaining strategy of a distributor who sells vertically differentiated, i.e. high and low brand products. We derive and analyze the equilibrium solutions for both simultaneous and sequential bargaining games among the distributor, the high brand product manufacturer and the low brand product manufacturer. The result shows that the optimal bargaining strategy for the distributor heavily depends on the relative quality and price level of the low brand product comparing to those of the high brand product. It is also shown that, for more bargaining profit, the distributor has strong motivation to prefer a low brand product which has lower quality level per unit price.

• 한국경영과학회지
• /
• 제22권3호
• /
• pp.209-222
• /
• 1997

In this paper, we study a bargaining order problem where one buyer sequentially bargains with two sellers whose reservation prices are unknown to the buyer but correlated. Our main question is who the buyer should bargain first with to maximize his expected payoff. This type of problem is widely applicable to business and political situations where one party negotiates with multiple parties sequentially. One of the most important element in a sequential bargaining is "linkage effect" which exists when the aggreement of the previous bargaining affects the outcome of the following bargaining. To examine "linkage effect", we assume that the sellers'objects are similar so that the sellers' reservation prices are correlated. In addition, to consider incomplete information aspect regarding reservation prices, it is assumed that the sellers' reservation prices are unknown to the buyer. That is, we deal with one sided incomplete information case. In our model, there are two stages in each of which the buyer meets one seller. Since we are concerned with the bargaining order, we consider two different bargaining orders. Using game theory, we find a perfect Bayesian equilibrium and compute the buyer's expected payoff for each bargaining order. Finally we identify the advantageous bargaining order for the buyer by comparing the expected payoffs obtained under two different bargaining orders. Our results are as follows: the advantageous bargaining order depends on the prior probability of the seller type. However, in general, the buyer should bargain first with the seller whose object is less valuable to the buyer. The basic reason for our result is that the buyer wants to experiment in the first stage to find out the sellers' reservation prices and in doing so, to minimize the experimental cost and maximize potential gain in case of negotiation failure in the first stage. in the first stage.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제14권4호
• /
• pp.1683-1689
• /
• 2013

협상과정을 Markov 확률과정으로 전제하고 확률과정의 상태별 이행확률의 크기가 협상참가자의 사적인 정보에 의하여 결정된다고 가정한다. 예를 들어, 판매자와 구매자의 가격협상의 예에서 협상상대방의 특징-예를 들어, 유보가격-에 대한 정보가 사적인 정보일 때 협상참가자 모두가 수용가능한 가격을 찾는 과정이 이행확률의 크기에 영향을 받고, 결과적으로 협상지연의 정도를 결정함을 보인다. 또한 협상의 참가자가 모두 교대로 제안을 하는 제안과 대응제안의 방법의 협상에서보다 협상참가자중 어느 한 쪽의 일방에서 제안을 하는 방법의 협상에서 협상지연이 더욱 길어짐을 보인다.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제8권5호
• /
• pp.873-884
• /
• 2021

People are often motivated by money. The salary a worker is paid by his employer can have a great influence on his performance in the administration. The study aims to identify and measure the impact of collective bargaining on the income of employees in enterprises. Participants were given a questionnaire consisting of 21 observation variables with a 5-point Likert scale. Independent variables were measured from 1 "without effect" to 5 "strongly". Based on the literature review and results of interviews, a total of 285 questionnaires were sent to participants in 95 enterprises in three typical fields: industry, construction, textile, and garment; 255 of them met the standards and were subject to be analyzed. We use qualitative research methods combined with quantitative research methods. SPSS20 software is used to synthesize and analyze data. The results of Cronbach's alpha, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Multiple Regression Analysis (MRA) identify, the objective for collective bargaining (MT), time to organize collective bargaining (TD), the competence of the parties of the collective bargaining (NL), collective bargaining organization process (QT) are positively correlated with the income of workers in enterprises; information provided for collective bargaining (TT) has a negative correlation with the income of employees in enterprises. Based on the findings, some suggestions have been given for collective bargaining to increase the income of employees in enterprises in Vietnam.

• 산학경영연구
• /
• 제2권
• /
• pp.141-169
• /
• 1989

Most of the theories of collective bargaining outcomes start with a set of economic variables. The economic constraints, pressures, and incentives influence the bargaining power relationship between labor union and employer. In this paper, the critical macro and micro economic variables that need to be considered in analyzing the economic context of collective bargaining power relationship is outlined. The focus is on the role that economic forces play in shaping the results of bargaining, that is the outcome of negotiations. In this study, the elasticity of the demand for labor is introduced as one of the most important economic aspects that influence bargaining power. Unions will be most successful in increasing wages when they enjoy an inelastic demand for labor. If the demand for labor is not naturally inelastic, some institutional arrangement for "taking wages out of competition" must be sought. Inflation, business cycle, and income policy are influential in shaping both parties' goals and expectations as well. In addition to the analysis of the economic variables, the nature of power is diagonized with some introductory notions about its care and feeding before proceeding to the details of the above issues.

• 대한교통학회지
• /
• 제23권4호
• /
• pp.37-45
• /
• 2005

본 연구는 Nash의 협력게임인 협상게임(bargaining game)과 Wardrop의 사용자 균형해와의 관계를 규명하는 데 목적이 있다. Wardrop의 균형은 다수의 운전자들이 교통상황을 정확히 알고 있고(perfect information), 동시에 합리적으로 경로를 선택(rationality)한다는 경직된 가정이 존재하는데, 이는 실제로 존재하는 운전자 상호간의 교류나 타협을 배제하고 있다. 이런 측면에서 운전자간의 교류와 조절과정을 Nash게임의 협상과정(bargaining process)으로 표현할 경우, Wardrop의 경직된 기본가정들을 어느 정도 완화할 수 있을 것으로 보인다. 이를 위하여 본 연구에서는 Nash의 협상게임에 대한 교통망측면의 검토와 Nash의 협상해(bargaining solution)가 Wardrop의 사용자 균형(user equilibrium)과 동일함을 정리(theorem)를 통하여 증명하고 몇 가지 예제로 이를 확인한다. 협상게임은 대표적인 2인 협조게임(two-person cooperative game)으로 본 연구에서도 주로 2인 게임에 대해서 기술하며, 향후 n-인게임(n-person game) 모형에 대해서는 간략히 언급토록 한다.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제38권4호
• /
• pp.80-87
• /
• 2015

The proliferation of the Internet and communication technologies and applications, besides the conventional retailers, has led to a new form of distribution channel, namely home sopping through the telephone, TV, catalog or the Internet. The conventional and new distribution channels have different transaction costs perceived by the consumers in the following perspectives: the accessibility to the product information, the traffic cost and the opportunity cost for the time to visit the store, the possibility of 'touch and feel' to test the quality of the product, the delivery time and the concern for the security for the personal information. Difference in the transaction costs between the distribution channels results in the different selling prices even for the same product. Moreover, distribution channels with different selling prices necessarily result in different business surpluses. In this paper, we study the multilateral bargaining strategy of a manufacturer who sells a product through multiple distribution channels with different transaction costs. We first derive the Nash equilibrium solutions for both simultaneous and sequential bargaining games. The numerical analyses for the Nash equilibrium solutions show that the optimal bargaining strategy of the manufacturer heavily depends not only on the degree of competition between the distribution channels but on the difference of the business surpluses of the distribution channels. First, it is shown that there can be four types of locally optimal bargaining strategies if we assume the market powers of the manufacturer over the distribution channels can be different. It is also shown that, among the four local optimal bargaining strategies, simultaneous bargaining with the distribution channels is the most preferred bargaining strategy for the manufacturer.

• 대한산업공학회지
• /
• 제32권3호
• /
• pp.172-179
• /
• 2006

Over the past few years, a considerable number of studies have been conducted on modeling the bargaining game using artificial agents on within-model interaction. However, very few attempts have been made at study on between-model interaction. This paper investigates the interaction and co-evolutionary process among heterogeneous artificial agents in the bargaining game. We present two kinds of the artificial agents participating in the bargaining game. They play some bargaining games with their strategies based on genetic algorithm (GA) and reinforcement learning (RL). We compare agents' performance between two agents under various conditions which are the changes of the parameters of artificial agents and the maximal number of round in the bargaining game. Finally, we discuss which agents show better performance and why the results are produced.