Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2020.20.11.292

Artificial Agent-based Bargaining Game considering the Cost incurred in the Bargaining Stage  

Lee, Sangwook (목원대학교 정보통신융합공학부)
Publication Information
The Journal of the Korea Contents Association / v.20, no.11, 2020 , pp. 292-300 More about this Journal
Abstract
According to the development of artificial intelligence technology, attempts have been made to interpret phenomena in various fields of the real world such as economic, social, and scientific fields through computer simulations using virtual artificial agents. In the existing artificial agent-based bargaining game analysis, there was a problem that did not reflect the cost incurred when the stage progresses in the real-world bargaining game and the depreciation of the bargaining target over time. This study intends to observe the effect on the bargaining game by adding the cost incurred in the bargaining stage and depreciation of the bargaining target over time (bargaining cost) to the previous artificial agent-based bargaining game model. As a result of the experiment, it was observed that as the cost incurred in the bargaining stage increased, the two artificial agents participating in the game had a share close to half the ratio and tried to conclude the negotiation in the early stage.
Keywords
Bargaining Game; Artificial Intelligence; Bargaining Cost; Evolutionary Computation; Co-evolution;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 M. H. Seong and S. Y. Lee, "A Bargaining game using artificial agents based on genetic algorithms and particle swarm optimization,"International Journal of Software Engineering and Its Applications, Vol.8, No.5, pp.205-218, 2014.
2 이상욱, "입자군집최적화와 차분진화알고리즘 간의 공진화를 활용한 교섭게임 관찰," 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 제14권, 제11호, pp.549-557, 2014.   DOI
3 K. M. Page, M. A. Nowak, and K. Sigmund, "The spatial ultimatum game," Proceedings, Biological sciences, Vol.267, No.1458, pp.2177-2182, 2000.   DOI
4 T. D. Stanley and U. Tran, "Economics Students Need Not Be Greedy: Fairness and the Ultimatum Game," The Journal of socio-economics, Vol.27, No.6, pp.657-664, 1998.   DOI
5 R. H. Thaler, "Anomalies: The ultimatum game," Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol.2, pp.195-206, 1988.   DOI
6 R. Suleiman, "Expectations and fairness in a modified Ultimatum game," Journal of economic psychology, Vol.17, No.5, pp.531-554, 1996.   DOI
7 R. Strorn and K. Price, "Differential evol-tion- a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces," Journal of Global Optimization, Vol.11, No.4, pp.341-359, 1997.   DOI
8 J. Holland, Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems, University of Michigan Press, 1975.
9 J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart, "Particle Swarm Optimization," Proceedings of The IEEE International Conference of Neural Networks, IV (pp.1942-1948), Piscataway:IEEE, 1995.
10 M. Clerc, Particle swarm optimization, ISTE, 2006.
11 M. Nakayama, "E-commerce and firm bargaining power shift in grocery marketing channels: A case of wholesalers' structured document exchanges," Journal of information technology(JIT), Vol.15, No.3, pp.195-210, 2000.   DOI
12 I. Stahl, Bargaining Theory, Stockholm, Stockholm School of Economics, 1971.
13 T. Omoto, K. Kobayashi, and M. Onishi, "Bargaining model of construction dispute resolution," IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol.7, pp.7-1, 2002.
14 S. Berninghaus, W. Guth, R. Lechler, and H. Ramser, "Decentralized versus collective bargaining - An experimental study," International journal of game theory, Vol.7, No.3, pp.437-448, 2002.