• 융합경영연구
• /
• 제4권2호
• /
• pp.20-32
• /
• 2016

The purpose of the present study is to investigate the audit quality and Investment efficiency of the listed companies on the Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE). The population includes 94 firms selected through systematic sampling. The data is collected from the audited financial statements of the firms provided by TSE's website from 2008 to 2015. In this study the variables, auditor industry specialization, auditor reputation, auditor tenure and auditor independence has been used to investigate audit quality. The results of multiple linear regression analysis show that there is a significant relationship audit quality and Investment efficiency.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제18권36호
• /
• pp.315-322
• /
• 1995

Quality audit is one of tools to evaluate the effectiveness and compliance of quality system. Quality system will be improved through quality audit. This paper describes the considerations such as audit team, audit process, audit checklist and auditor's communication skills to perform effective quality audit. The result of quality audit depends on the auditees attitudes. Thus, the auditor's manner is very important to gain a good audit result.

• 산업융합연구
• /
• 제21권4호
• /
• pp.65-72
• /
• 2023

본 연구는 최근에 시행된 주기적 감사인지정제의 주기적으로 지정된 감사인이 감사품질에 어떠한 영향을 미치는 지 검증하고자 한다. 본 연구에선 선행연구를 검토하여 가설을 설정하고, 코스피상장기업을 대상으로 2019년과 2020년의 980개의 표본을 선정하였다. 종속변수로는 Dechow & Dichev(2002)의 발생액의 질을 사용하였으며, 주기적 감사인 지정 기업 여부와 Big4 감사인 여부에 따른 영향을 실증분석한다. 분석결과, 상관관계분석결과에서 종속변수 발생액의 질과 독립변수지정 감사인 여부(PA)는 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 확인되었다. 그러나 회귀분석모형 1의 분석결과, 지정 감사인 여부는 유의하지 않은 것으로 나타났지만 통제변수들에서는 유의한 차이가 있는 것으로 확인되었다. 그리고 추가적인 분석에서 Big 4 감사인에 따른 감사품질의 차이를 확인할 수 있었다. 본 연구는 실증자료를 사용하여 2019년과 2020년의 도입된 시점 이후의 주기적 지정 감사인 기업의 선정과 감사품질의 영향을 연구한 연구라는 데 그 의의가 있다. 정부의 지정기업 비공개로 인하여 본 연구자의 공시된 선정기준에 의한 선정과는 차이가 있을 수도 있다는 한계가 있다.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제10권4호
• /
• pp.877-886
• /
• 2009

선행연구를 통해 자유선임제도의 폐해를 방지하기 위한 여러 제도의 도입이 회계정보의 투명성을 개선시켰다는 점이 밝혀졌다. 그러나 이들 선행연구들은 제도 도입 전후만을 살펴보았다는 한계점을 갖는다. 따라서 제도의 도입이 장기적으로도 효과가 있었는지 여부를 살펴보는 것은 중요한 의미를 갖는다고 할 수 있다. 이에 본 연구는 1995년부터 2004년까지 한국증권선물거래소(KRX)에 상장되어 있는 12월 결산법인을 대상으로 외부감사인 교체빈도가 회계이익의 질에 미치는 영향을 실증분석하였다. 회계이익의 질은 모형과 수정 Jones모형(1991)을 통해 측정하였다. 실증 분석결과, 외부감사인 교체빈도가 높은 기업의 재무보고 신뢰성(회계이익의 질)이 그렇지 않은 기업의 경우보다 유의적으로 낮게 나타났으며, 회계이익의 질에 영향을 주는 변수를 통제한 후에도 이 결과는 여전히 유의 적이면서 일관되었다. 이는 외부감사인 자유선임제도 하에서 경영자에게 제공되는 외부감사인 선임권이 이익조정을 하기 위한 우호적 환경을 제공할 수 있으며 궁극적으로 해당 기업의 회계이익의 질을 저하시키는 요인으로 작용할 수 있다는 사실을 의미한다.

• 융합경영연구
• /
• 제3권3호
• /
• pp.1-6
• /
• 2015

Quality auditor and auditors of larger firms have a positive effect on profit is unusual. The auditors smaller negative effect on profit companies profit is unusual. Change to larger audit shows the quality of earnings and to respond more investors positive changes in income and increased costs and reduced profitability is less negative price changes. Similarly, switching to a smaller auditor confirms the low quality of earnings, resulting in a negative response to the market. In this article market reaction (response investors) the quality of the audit and the auditor were studied in the Tehran Stock Exchange. in general, information about companies in capital market accounting to investors and the capital market is considered to be valuable.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제9권5호
• /
• pp.135-145
• /
• 2022

To improve audit quality, certain Chinese auditing firms have added a third-level review by an additional signing auditor to the general evaluation by a signing auditor team consisting of an engagement auditor and a partner. Nonetheless, our research-based on 36,033 firm-year observations from 2004 to 2019 reveals that compared to the general review system, auditor teams under the three-level review system are less likely to issue modified audit opinions when abnormal financial conditions arise. This finding suggests that, while larger auditor teams' knowledge, experience, and information advantages can theoretically sharpen their judgment, their performance is more susceptible to interference from divergent opinions, the diffusion of responsibility, and lower energy invested by individual auditors, ultimately impairing their judgment regarding the audited enterprises' abnormal financial conditions. That is, the three-level review system, which aims to improve audit quality, actually worsens audit quality. This conclusion remains valid after the problems of heteroscedasticity and endogeneity are addressed by using firm-level cluster robust standard errors and two-stage regression. We hope that our research will draw the attention of auditing firms, prompting them to reconsider the rationality of the three-level review system.

• 융합경영연구
• /
• 제3권2호
• /
• pp.1-8
• /
• 2015

In this paper, the effects of auditor change on audit quality in companies accepted in Tehran stock exchange placed review and we assessed the presence or absence of a significant correlation between them. to assess the quality of data auditing and tax distortions, falsification of accounting estimates, distortion of rules, distortion caused by mistakes in applying accounting policies and other distortions are used as the dependent variable Is. the sample group consisted of 56 companies as experimental group and a control group of 56 other companies a 4-year period, during the years 2011 to 2014 were studied. data needed for research discovery success ratio distortion before and after the change of auditor. To test the research hypotheses paired comparison method is used.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제15권8호
• /
• pp.47-54
• /
• 2017

Purpose - According to agency theory, managers have incentives to adjust firm revenues to meet earnings expectations or delay bad news disclosure because of performance-based compensation and their reputation in the market. When the bad news accumulates, stock prices fail to reflect all available information. Thus, market prices of stocks are higher than their intrinsic value. After all, bad news crosses the tipping point, it comes out all at once. That results in stock crashes. Auditors can decrease stock crash risk by reducing agency costs through their informational role. Especially, stock price crash risk is expected to be lower for firms adopting high-quality audits. We focus on distribution and service industry to examine the relation between audit quality and stock price crash risk. Industry specialization and auditor size are used as proxies for auditor quality. Research design, data and methodology - Our sample contains distribution and service industry firms listed in KOSPI and KOSDAQ during a period of 2004-2011. We use a logistic regression to test whether auditor quality influences crash risk. Auditor quality was measured by industry specialist auditor and Big4 / non-Big4 dichotomy. Following the approach in prior researches, we use firm-specific weekly returns to measure crash risk. Firms experiencing at least one stock price crash in a specific week during year are classified as the high risk group. Results - The result of analyzing 429 companies in distribution and service industry is summarized as follows: Above all, it is shown that higher audit quality has a significant negative(-) effect on the crash risk. Crash risk is alleviated for firms audited by industry specialist auditors and Big 4 audit firms. Therefore, our results show that hypotheses are supported. Conclusions - This study is very meaningful as the first study which investigated the effects of high audit quality on stock price crash risk. We provide evidence that high-quality auditors reduce stock price crash risk. Our finding implies that the risk of extreme losses can be reduced through screening of high-quality auditors. Therefore investors and regulators may utilize our findings in their investment and rule making decisions.

• 경영과학
• /
• 제34권2호
• /
• pp.115-123
• /
• 2017

IS audit has been regarded as contributing to the improvement of the quality of information Systems, recently, it has been argued that it is not possible to expect a effectiveness, because it can offset the schedule burden due to the preparation of additional documents for Audit and it affect to the project schedule. The effectiveness and quality criteria of IS audit are different between groups, because IS audit is responsible for checking the results and process of the developer company. In this study, we modeled between IS effectiveness and auditor competence, audit firm competence, IS audit standards. As a result, it was concluded that auditor competence, audit firm competence, IS audit standards have a positive effect on IS audit effectiveness. However, according to the result of comparing between interest groups, audit firm competence and audit standards were significant in auditor group, but audit standard was significant in requesting organization and developing company thought that auditor was a important factor to audit effectiveness.

• 한국항행학회논문지
• /
• 제16권6호
• /
• pp.1080-1091
• /
• 2012

정보시스템에 대한 감리대상이 과거 업무단위 시스템을 중심으로 수행하던 2단계 감리에서 통합 정보시스템에 대한 감리가 개발 전과정을 3단계로 더 심화된 감리를 단계별로 수행하고 있어, 감리품질에 대한 제3자 확인 등 정보시스템 감리에 대한 사회적 책임의 요구가 높아지고 있다. 따라서 감리품질을 향상시키기 위해 감리품질에 영향을 주는 요인에 대한 연구와 감리품질 향상에 대한 노력이 필요하다. 본 연구는 기존 연구에서 개발된 리더십 이론을 총괄감리원의 역량 규명 및 감리원의 임파워먼트 분석에 활용하여 총괄감리원 역량과 감리인 임파워먼트 등이 감리서비스 품질 간의 인과관계를 분석할 수 있는 모형을 개발하고 현장에서 감리를 수행하는 감리원들을 대상으로 설문을 실시하고, 그 내용을 LISREL을 이용하여 구조방정식인 방법으로 실증적으로 검증하였다.