Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2022.vol9.no5.0135

The Relationship Between Three-Level Review System and Audit Quality: Empirical Evidence from China  

TANG, Kai (Department of Accounting, College of Business, Chungbuk National University)
YAN, Sibei (Department of Accounting and Taxation, School of Management, Kyung Hee University)
BAE, Khee Su (Department of Accounting, College of Business, Chungbuk National University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business / v.9, no.5, 2022 , pp. 135-145 More about this Journal
Abstract
To improve audit quality, certain Chinese auditing firms have added a third-level review by an additional signing auditor to the general evaluation by a signing auditor team consisting of an engagement auditor and a partner. Nonetheless, our research-based on 36,033 firm-year observations from 2004 to 2019 reveals that compared to the general review system, auditor teams under the three-level review system are less likely to issue modified audit opinions when abnormal financial conditions arise. This finding suggests that, while larger auditor teams' knowledge, experience, and information advantages can theoretically sharpen their judgment, their performance is more susceptible to interference from divergent opinions, the diffusion of responsibility, and lower energy invested by individual auditors, ultimately impairing their judgment regarding the audited enterprises' abnormal financial conditions. That is, the three-level review system, which aims to improve audit quality, actually worsens audit quality. This conclusion remains valid after the problems of heteroscedasticity and endogeneity are addressed by using firm-level cluster robust standard errors and two-stage regression. We hope that our research will draw the attention of auditing firms, prompting them to reconsider the rationality of the three-level review system.
Keywords
Three-level Review System; General Review System; Modified Audit Opinions; Audit Quality;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Workgroup diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1008-1022. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008   DOI
2 Wang, Q., Wong, T. J., & Xia, L. (2008). State ownership, the institutional environment, and auditor choice: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 46(1), 112-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.04.001   DOI
3 Aube, C., Rousseau, V., & Tremblay, S. (2011). Team size and quality of group experience: The more the merrier? Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 15(4), 357-375. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025400   DOI
4 Tahir, S. H., Akram, S., Perveen, S., Ahmad, G., & Ullah, M. R. (2020). Entrenchment effect and audit quality in the family business of Pakistan. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(8), 95-102. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no8.095   DOI
5 Robinson, D. (2008). Auditor independence and auditor-provided tax service: Evidence from going-concern audit opinions before bankruptcy filings. Auditing: a Journal of Practice and Theory, 27(2), 31-54. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2008.27.2.31   DOI
6 Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
7 Tao, Y. (2004). Issues in the implementation of the three-level review system and analysis of their causes. Business Trading and Accounting, 2, 37-40.
8 Alawaqleh, Q. A., Almasria, N. A., & Alsawalhah, J. M. (2021). The effect of the board of directors and CEO on audit quality: Evidence from listed manufacturing firms in Jordan. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 8(2), 243-253. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no2.0243   DOI
9 Chen, K. C. W., & Yuan, H. (2004). Earnings management and capital resource allocation: Evidence from China's accounting- based regulation of rights issues. Accounting Review, 79(3), 645-665. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2004.79.3.645   DOI
10 Sharma, M., & Ghosh, A. (2007). Does team size matter? A study of the impact of team size on the transactive memory system and performance of IT sector teams. South Asian Journal of Management, 14(4), 96-115.
11 Wang, H., & Duan, C. (2009). Comparison of audit quality measurement in empirical studies and its inspirations. Journal of Audit & Economics, 24(1), 16-21.
12 Williams, K. Y., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20(3), 77-140. https://ils.unc.edu/courses/2013_spring/inls285_001/materials/WIlliams.OReilly.1996.Diversity&demography.pdf
13 Zhang, L., Feng, J., & Chen, J. (2016). Media supervision, internal control, and audit opinion. Auditing Research, 5, 73-81.
14 Chidambaram, L., & Tung, L. L. (2005). Is it out of sight, out of mind? An empirical study of social loafing in technology-supported groups. Information Systems Research, 16(2), 149-168. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1050.0051   DOI
15 Carnevale, P. J., & Probst, T. M. (1998). Social values and social conflict in creative problem solving and categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1300-1309. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1300   DOI
16 Chen, J., Dong, W., Han, H., & Zhou, N. (2020). Does audit partner workload compression affect audit quality? European Accounting Review, 29(5), 1021-1053. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2020.1726196   DOI
17 Chen, S., Sun, S. Y. J., & Wu, D. (2010). Client importance, institutional improvements, and audit quality in China: An office and individual auditor level analysis. Accounting Review, 85(1), 127-158. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2010.85.1.127   DOI
18 Aharony, J., Lee, C. J., & Wong, T. J. (2000). Financial packaging of IPO firms in China. Journal of Accounting Research, 38(1), 103-126. https://doi.org/10.2307/2672924   DOI
19 Gul, F. A., Ma, S., & Lai, K. (2017). Busy auditors, partner-client tenure, and audit quality: Evidence from an emerging market. Journal of International Accounting Research, 16(1), 83-105. https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar-51706   DOI
20 Francis, J. R., & Yu, M. D. (2009). Big 4 office size and audit quality. Accounting Review, 84(5), 1521-1552. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2009.84.5.1521   DOI
21 Hambrick, D. C., & D'Aveni, R. A. (1992). Top team deterioration as part of the downward spiral of large corporate bankruptcies. Management Science, 38(10), 1445-1466. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.38.10.1445   DOI
22 Li, X. (2002). The three-level review system for audit working papers. Audit Information and Technique of China, 3, 25.
23 Widmeyer, W. N., Brawley, L. R., & Carron, A. V. (1990). The effects of group size in sport. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 12(2), 177-190. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.12.2.177   DOI
24 Meng, X. H., Zeng, S. X., & Tam, C. M. (2013). From voluntarism to regulation: A study on ownership, economic performance, and corporate environmental information disclosure in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(1), 217-232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1462-8   DOI
25 Ringelmann, M. (1913). Animated engine research: Man's work. Annals of the National Agronomic Institute, 12, 1-40. https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k54409695.image.f14.langEN.
26 Choi, S. U., Bae, G. S., & Lee, J. E. (2020). Partner workloads, audit quality, and rank hours. Korean Accounting Review, 45(3), 35-61. https://doi.org/10.24056/KAR.2020.01.001   DOI
27 Haleblian, J., & Finkelstein, S. (1993). Top management team size, CEO dominance, and firm performance: The moderating roles of environmental turbulence and discretion. Academy of Management Journal, 36(4), 844-863. https://doi.org/10.5465/256761   DOI
28 Sheng, M., & Liu, J. (2000). Legal parties in the three-level review system. Finance and Accounting Monthly, 18, 37-38. https://doi.org/10.19641/j.cnki.42-1290/f.2000.18.024   DOI
29 DeFond, M. L., Raghunandan, K., & Subramanyam, K. R. (2002). Do non-audit service fees impair auditor independence? Evidence from going concern audit opinions. Journal of Accounting Research, 40(4), 1247-1274. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00088   DOI
30 Hua, M. (2019). Literature review on measuring audit quality indicators. Journal of Jiangsu Institute of Commerce, 144(4), 21-25. https://doi.org/10.16335/j.cnki.issn1672-2604.2019.04.006   DOI
31 Gul, F. A., Wu, D., & Yang, Z. (2013). Do individual auditors affect audit quality? Evidence from archival data. Accounting Review, 88(6), 1993-2023. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50536   DOI
32 Firth, M., Rui, O. M., & Wu, X. (2012). How do various forms of auditor rotation affect audit quality? Evidence from China. International Journal of Accounting, 47(1), 109-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2011.12.006   DOI
33 Gerber, A. (1998). Estimating the effect of campaign spending on senate election outcomes using instrumental variables. American Political Science Review, 92(2), 401-411. https://doi.org/10.2307/2585672   DOI
34 Gu, C. (2010). Literature review on audit quality measurement criteria in China. Modern Business Trade Industry, 22(3), 169-170. https://doi.org/10.19311/j.cnki.1672-3198.2010.03.102
35 Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 681-706. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.681   DOI
36 Wooldridge, J. M. (2013). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
37 Yan, H., & Xie, S. (2016). How does auditors' work stress affect audit quality? Empirical evidence from the Chinese stock market. China Journal of Accounting Research, 9(4), 305-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2016.09.001   DOI
38 Zhao, Y., & Zhang, L. (2017). The comparison and choice between different measures of audit quality: An empirical research based on China's A-share market. Business Management Journal, 39(5), 146-157. https://doi.org/10.19616/j.cnki.bmj.2017.05.05.010
39 Hardies, K., Breesch, D., & Branson, J. (2016). Do (fe) male auditors impair audit quality? Evidence from going-concern opinions. European Accounting Review, 25(1), 7-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2014.921445   DOI
40 Holmstrom, B. (1982). Moral hazard in teams. Bell Journal of Economics, 13(2), 324-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003457   DOI
41 Lim, C. Y., & Tan, H. T. (2008). Non-audit service fees and audit quality: The impact of auditor specialization. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(1), 199-246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2007.00266.x   DOI
42 Kang, S. H., & Sivaramakrishnan, K. (1995). Issues in testing earnings management and an instrumental variable approach. Journal of Accounting Research, 33(2), 353-367. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491492   DOI
43 Latane, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(6), 822-832. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.6.822   DOI
44 Lau, C., Lu, Y., & Liang, Q. (2016). Corporate social responsibility in China: A corporate governance approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(1), 73-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2513-0   DOI
45 Robinson, C., & Schumacker, R. E. (2009). Interaction effects: Centering, variance inflation factor, and interpretation issues. Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints, 35(1), 6-11. https://doi.org/10.1.1.620.5853   DOI
46 Knechel, W. R., & Vanstraelen, A. (2007). The relationship between auditor tenure and audit quality is implied by going concern opinions. Auditing: a Journal of Practice and Theory, 26(1), 113-131. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2007.26.1.113   DOI
47 Malone, T. W., & Crowston, K. (1994). The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Surveys, 26(1), 87-119. https://doi.org/10.1145/174666.174668   DOI
48 Omer, W. K. H., Aljaaidi, K. S., & Yusof, M. A. M. (2020). Effectiveness score of the board of directors and modified audit opinion: Empirical evidence from Malaysian publicly listed companies. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(8), 289-296. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no8.289   DOI
49 Peng, H., & Liu, Z. (1998). The two-level review system for working papers in internal audits. Audit Monthy, 3, 36.