• The Journal of Economics, Marketing and Management
• /
• v.4 no.2
• /
• pp.20-32
• /
• 2016

The purpose of the present study is to investigate the audit quality and Investment efficiency of the listed companies on the Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE). The population includes 94 firms selected through systematic sampling. The data is collected from the audited financial statements of the firms provided by TSE's website from 2008 to 2015. In this study the variables, auditor industry specialization, auditor reputation, auditor tenure and auditor independence has been used to investigate audit quality. The results of multiple linear regression analysis show that there is a significant relationship audit quality and Investment efficiency.

• Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering
• /
• v.18 no.36
• /
• pp.315-322
• /
• 1995

Quality audit is one of tools to evaluate the effectiveness and compliance of quality system. Quality system will be improved through quality audit. This paper describes the considerations such as audit team, audit process, audit checklist and auditor's communication skills to perform effective quality audit. The result of quality audit depends on the auditees attitudes. Thus, the auditor's manner is very important to gain a good audit result.

• Journal of Industrial Convergence
• /
• v.21 no.4
• /
• pp.65-72
• /
• 2023

This study's purpose is to verify how the periodically designated auditor in the recently implemented periodic auditor designation system affects audit quality. In this study, hypotheses were established by reviewing previous studies, and 980 samples of 2019 and 2020 were selected for KOSPI-listed companies. Dechow & Dichev (2002)'s accrual quality was used as the dependent variable, and the effect of whether or not a company was periodically designated as an auditor and whether or not a Big 4 auditor was selected was empirically analyzed. As a result of the analysis and correlation analysis, a statistically significant difference was confirmed in the quality of the dependent variable accrual and the independent variable designated auditor (PA). However, as a result of the regression analysis model 1, it was found that the designated auditor was not significant, but it was confirmed that there was a significant difference in the control variables. Further analysis confirmed the difference in audit quality according to the Big 4 auditors. This study is significant in that it is a study that uses empirical data to study the effect of audit quality and the selection of regularly designated auditor companies after the introduction in 2019 and 2020. Due to the non-disclosure of government-designated companies, there is a limit that there may be a difference from the selection based on the researcher's published selection criteria.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.10 no.4
• /
• pp.877-886
• /
• 2009

Since 1982, the auditee have selected the auditor under market mechanism. Under the system on which the auditor have been chosen by client, there have been chances for opinion shopping, etc. To prevent those, some audit regulations have been introduced. Prior studies have documented the positive effect of these audit regulations. Those studies, however, had some limitations which they dealt with just short event period for empirical tests. This study examines the effect of Auditor Turnover Ratio on the Quality of Earnings using a sample of firms that were listed on Korea Exchange(KRX) from 1995 to 2004. The firms that change auditor frequently are expected to have low disclosure quality. The CEO with the incentives to manage or manipulate earnings could accomplish this purpose by replacing existing auditor with more friendly auditor, which could result in eventually lowering earning's quality of the firm. The result of empirical test shows that the accrual quality of firms which have high auditor turnover ratio are significantly lower than those of firms which have low ratio. This result is consistent with our hypothesis that the more frequently a firm changes auditor, the lower the quality of earning is. This evidence might give the implication to policy-making supervisor.

• The Journal of Economics, Marketing and Management
• /
• v.3 no.3
• /
• pp.1-6
• /
• 2015

Quality auditor and auditors of larger firms have a positive effect on profit is unusual. The auditors smaller negative effect on profit companies profit is unusual. Change to larger audit shows the quality of earnings and to respond more investors positive changes in income and increased costs and reduced profitability is less negative price changes. Similarly, switching to a smaller auditor confirms the low quality of earnings, resulting in a negative response to the market. In this article market reaction (response investors) the quality of the audit and the auditor were studied in the Tehran Stock Exchange. in general, information about companies in capital market accounting to investors and the capital market is considered to be valuable.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• v.9 no.5
• /
• pp.135-145
• /
• 2022

To improve audit quality, certain Chinese auditing firms have added a third-level review by an additional signing auditor to the general evaluation by a signing auditor team consisting of an engagement auditor and a partner. Nonetheless, our research-based on 36,033 firm-year observations from 2004 to 2019 reveals that compared to the general review system, auditor teams under the three-level review system are less likely to issue modified audit opinions when abnormal financial conditions arise. This finding suggests that, while larger auditor teams' knowledge, experience, and information advantages can theoretically sharpen their judgment, their performance is more susceptible to interference from divergent opinions, the diffusion of responsibility, and lower energy invested by individual auditors, ultimately impairing their judgment regarding the audited enterprises' abnormal financial conditions. That is, the three-level review system, which aims to improve audit quality, actually worsens audit quality. This conclusion remains valid after the problems of heteroscedasticity and endogeneity are addressed by using firm-level cluster robust standard errors and two-stage regression. We hope that our research will draw the attention of auditing firms, prompting them to reconsider the rationality of the three-level review system.

• The Journal of Economics, Marketing and Management
• /
• v.3 no.2
• /
• pp.1-8
• /
• 2015

In this paper, the effects of auditor change on audit quality in companies accepted in Tehran stock exchange placed review and we assessed the presence or absence of a significant correlation between them. to assess the quality of data auditing and tax distortions, falsification of accounting estimates, distortion of rules, distortion caused by mistakes in applying accounting policies and other distortions are used as the dependent variable Is. the sample group consisted of 56 companies as experimental group and a control group of 56 other companies a 4-year period, during the years 2011 to 2014 were studied. data needed for research discovery success ratio distortion before and after the change of auditor. To test the research hypotheses paired comparison method is used.

• Journal of Distribution Science
• /
• v.15 no.8
• /
• pp.47-54
• /
• 2017

Purpose - According to agency theory, managers have incentives to adjust firm revenues to meet earnings expectations or delay bad news disclosure because of performance-based compensation and their reputation in the market. When the bad news accumulates, stock prices fail to reflect all available information. Thus, market prices of stocks are higher than their intrinsic value. After all, bad news crosses the tipping point, it comes out all at once. That results in stock crashes. Auditors can decrease stock crash risk by reducing agency costs through their informational role. Especially, stock price crash risk is expected to be lower for firms adopting high-quality audits. We focus on distribution and service industry to examine the relation between audit quality and stock price crash risk. Industry specialization and auditor size are used as proxies for auditor quality. Research design, data and methodology - Our sample contains distribution and service industry firms listed in KOSPI and KOSDAQ during a period of 2004-2011. We use a logistic regression to test whether auditor quality influences crash risk. Auditor quality was measured by industry specialist auditor and Big4 / non-Big4 dichotomy. Following the approach in prior researches, we use firm-specific weekly returns to measure crash risk. Firms experiencing at least one stock price crash in a specific week during year are classified as the high risk group. Results - The result of analyzing 429 companies in distribution and service industry is summarized as follows: Above all, it is shown that higher audit quality has a significant negative(-) effect on the crash risk. Crash risk is alleviated for firms audited by industry specialist auditors and Big 4 audit firms. Therefore, our results show that hypotheses are supported. Conclusions - This study is very meaningful as the first study which investigated the effects of high audit quality on stock price crash risk. We provide evidence that high-quality auditors reduce stock price crash risk. Our finding implies that the risk of extreme losses can be reduced through screening of high-quality auditors. Therefore investors and regulators may utilize our findings in their investment and rule making decisions.

• Korean Management Science Review
• /
• v.34 no.2
• /
• pp.115-123
• /
• 2017

IS audit has been regarded as contributing to the improvement of the quality of information Systems, recently, it has been argued that it is not possible to expect a effectiveness, because it can offset the schedule burden due to the preparation of additional documents for Audit and it affect to the project schedule. The effectiveness and quality criteria of IS audit are different between groups, because IS audit is responsible for checking the results and process of the developer company. In this study, we modeled between IS effectiveness and auditor competence, audit firm competence, IS audit standards. As a result, it was concluded that auditor competence, audit firm competence, IS audit standards have a positive effect on IS audit effectiveness. However, according to the result of comparing between interest groups, audit firm competence and audit standards were significant in auditor group, but audit standard was significant in requesting organization and developing company thought that auditor was a important factor to audit effectiveness.

• Journal of Advanced Navigation Technology
• /
• v.16 no.6
• /
• pp.1080-1091
• /
• 2012

Information system for audit target that was done in the past business unit system presided over the development process for an integrated information system in three steps further from the audit step 2 step-by-doing, for in the presiding quality party check for the information systems audit requirements of social responsibility is growing. Therefore, efforts are needed for research on factors affecting the quality of the audit and audit improve the quality in order to improve the quality of the Methodist This study, the general auditor competence and supervision, empowerment and the causal relationship between the quality of service, presided over by a model that can be analyzed in the field to develop and take advantage of the auditor's general theory of leadership was developed from existing research capabilities identification and analysis on a supervisor's empowerment survey conducted for the auditor to perform Methodist, its contents and using the LISREL structural equation methods were empirically tested.