• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2014년도 춘계 학술논문 발표대회
• /
• pp.234-235
• /
• 2014

Recently, waterproof construction used to self adhesive waterproofing sheet in the actual field in winter for reduce cost and term. However self adhesive waterproofing sheet's quality is declined in low temperature condition. So, this study was to confirm on the low temperature condition of concrete substrate effecting the adhesion of self adhesion waterproofing sheet using interface leakage test. As a result of this study, self adhesion waterproofing sheet must not be used at temperature below 5℃. Also, adhesion between waterproofing sheet and concrete is declined in low temperature.

• International Journal of Automotive Technology
• /
• 제7권5호
• /
• pp.565-570
• /
• 2006

The development of a light-weight vehicle is in great demand for enhancement of fule efficiency and dynamic performance. The vehicle weight can be reduced effectively by using lightweight materials such as aluminum and magnesium. However, if such materials are used in vehicles, there are often instances when different materials such as aluminum and steel need to be joined to each other. The conventional joining method, namely resistance spot welding, cannot be used in joining different materials. Self-piercing rivet(SPR) and adhesive bonding, however, are good alternatives to resistance spot welding. This paper is concerned with the crushing test of double hat-shaped member made by resistance spot welding, SPR and adhesive bonding. Various parameters of crashworthiness are analyzed and evaluated. Based on these results, the applicability of SPR and adhesive bonding are proposed as an alternative to resistance spot welding.

• 한국신뢰성학회지:신뢰성응용연구
• /
• 제9권4호
• /
• pp.331-341
• /
• 2009

PSA (Pressure Sensitive Adhesive) is used for various purposes in electronic appliances such as double-sided tape for fitting parts, product's name plate, and surface protecting film, and so forth. In several kinds of PSAs, this paper dealt with the failure analysis of PET (Polyethylene Terephthalate) acrylic adhesive tapes. The causes of interface failure were investigated through the test of adhesive strength, thickness, and structure. And test standard methods to prevent recurrences were established.

• Korean Chemical Engineering Research
• /
• 제48권2호
• /
• pp.193-197
• /
• 2010

현재 포장 공정에서 사용되고 있는 stretch wrapping 공정은 초기 포장기의 장치 구비 등의 가격문제와 사용 후 폐기되는 포장재의 처리문제가 심각하다. 이에 대해 미끄럼 방지 접착제(Slip-resistant adhesive)를 사용하여 물류를 고정하여 운반하는 방식은 간단한 접착제의 도입으로 폐기물 발생이 없고 공정이 간단하며 비용이 매우 낮은 장점을 지닌다. 본 연구에서는 다습한 환경에서 polyethylene 필름 상에 미끄럼 방지 접착제를 적용했을 경우 접착력이 저하되는 것을 peel test를 통해 확인하고 적절한 첨가제의 선정 및 도입을 통해 접착력을 개선하는 연구를 수행하였다. 이를 통해서 maltodextrin의 첨가 시에 내습성에 대한 개선으로 인해 미끄럼 방지 접착력의 저하가 억제되었으며 10 wt% 도입 시에 최적의 성능을 나타내었다.

• 마이크로전자및패키징학회지
• /
• 제26권2호
• /
• pp.1-8
• /
• 2019

금속, 세라믹스, 플라스틱 등 고체의 표면에 적용되는 접착제와 페인트 도장막의 수요와 중요성은 점점 증가하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 금속 피착재에 고분자 재료인 접착제 혹은 페인트 도장막을 적용할 때, 이들 고분자 코팅층과 금속 피착재 사이의 접착강도 측정시 영향인자에 대한 연구를 돌리테스트로 수행하였다. 접착제로는 2액형 에폭시 접착제가 사용되었으며, 페인트로는 방청용 2액형 에폭시 페인트인 EH2350가 사용되었다. 특히, 영향인자로는 피착재의 종류(Al, Fe, STS, Cu, Zn), 표면거칠기 및 표면오염(수돗물, 소금물) 등을 선택해서 접착강도에 미치는 영향에 대해 연구하였다. 접착제와 피착재의 접착강도는 동일한 접착제를 사용해도 피착재의 종류가 달라지면 다르게 나타났으며, 수돗물 혹은 소금물로 산화 오염된 피착재의 표면은 페인트 도장공정 이전에 수돗물로 스프레이 세척이 필수적임을 알았다. 본 연구의 결과로 돌리테스트는 도장막과 피착재의 접착강도를 측정하는데 향후 널리 사용될 수 있음을 확인하였다.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제1권2호
• /
• pp.63-67
• /
• 2009

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM. Use of custom tray and tray adhesive is clinically recommended for elastomeric impression material. However there is not clear mention of drying time of tray adhesive in achieving appropriate bonding strength of tray material and impression material. PURPOSE. This study is to investigate an appropriate drying time of tray adhesives by evaluating tensile bonding strength between two types of polyvinylsiloxane impression materials and resin tray, according to various drying time intervals of tray adhesives, and with different manufacturing company combination of impression material and tray adhesive. MATERIAL AND METHODS. Adhesives used in this study were Silfix (Dentsply Caulk, Milford, Del, USA) and VPS Tray Adhesive (3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany) and impression materials were Aquasil Ultra (monophase regular set, Dentsply Caulk, Milford, Del, USA) and Imprint II Garant (regular body, 3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany). They were used combinations from the same manufacture and exchanged combinations of the two. The drying time was designed to air dry, 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 15 minutes, 20 minutes, and 25 minutes. Total 240 of test specimens were prepared by auto-polymerizing tray material(Instant Tray Mix, Lang, Wheeling, Il, USA) with 10 specimens in each group. The specimens were placed in the Universal Testing machine (Instron, model 3366, Instron Corp, University avenue, Nowood, MA, USA) to perform the tensile test (cross head speed 5 mm/min). The statistically efficient drying time was evaluated through ANOVA and Scheffe test. All the tests were performed at 95% confidence level. RESULTS. The results revealed that at least 10 minutes is needed for Silfix-Aquasil, and 15 minutes for VPS Tray Adhesive-Imprint II, to attain an appropriate tensile bonding strength. VPS Tray Adhesive-Imprint II had a superior tensile bonding strength when compared to Silfix-Aquasil over 15 minutes. Silfix-Aquasil had a superior bonding strength to VPS Tray Adhesive-Aquasil, and VPS Tray Adhesive-Imprint II had a superior tensile bonding strength to Silfix-Imprint II at all drying periods. CONCLUSION. Significant increase in tensile bonding strength with Silfix-Aquasil and VPS Tray adhesive-Imprint II combination until 10 and 15 minutes respectively. Tray adhesive-impression material combination from the same company presented higher tensile bonding strength at all drying time intervals than when using tray adhesive-impression material of different manufactures.

• 반도체디스플레이기술학회지
• /
• 제5권2호
• /
• pp.33-36
• /
• 2006

Many issues arose to use the Pb-free solder as adhesive materials in MEMS ICs and packaging. Then this study for easy and simple sealing method using adhesive materials was carried out to maintain hermetic characteristic in MEMS Package. In this study, Hermetic characteristic using negative PR (XP SU-8 3050 NO-2) as adhesive at the interface of Si test coupon/glass substrate and Si test coupon/LTCC substrate was examined. For experiment, the dispenser pressure was 4 MPa and the $200\;{\mu}m{\Phi}$ syringe nozzle was used. 3.0 mm/sec as speed of dispensing and 0.13 mm as the gap between Si test coupon and nozzle was selected to machine condition. 1 min at $65^{\circ}C$ and 15 min at $95^{\circ}C$ as Soft bake, $200\;mj/cm^2$ expose in 365 nm wavelength as UV expose, 1 min at $65^{\circ}C$ and 6 min at $95^{\circ}C$ as Post expose bake, 60 min at $150^{\circ}C$ as hard bake were selected to activation condition of negative PR. Hermetic sealing was achieved at the Si test coupon/ glass substrate and Si test coupon/LTCC substrate. The leak rate of Si test coupon/glass substrate was $5.9{\times}10^{-8}mbar-l/sec$, and there was no effect by adhesive method. The leak rate of Si test coupon/LTCC substrate was $4.9{\times}10^{-8}mbar-l/sec$, and there was no effect by dispensing cycle. Better leak rate value could be achieved to use modified substrate which prevent PR flow, to increase UV expose energy and to use system that controls gap automatically with vision.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2018년도 추계 학술논문 발표대회
• /
• pp.163-164
• /
• 2018

In this study, the adhesion performance of the adhesive between the concrete base and the fiber panel was verified through experiments. Attachment to all three types by applying adhesive to panel and attaching to CRC board surface, method of applying adhesive to CRC board surface by panel, method of applying adhesive on panel and CRC board surface respectively, As a result of the performance test, the adhesive strength of the panel attached to the panel on the CRC board after the application of the adhesive was highest on both the back surface of the panel and the surface of the CRC board.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제29권4호
• /
• pp.353-364
• /
• 2004

The purpose of this study was to compare and to evaluate the combination use of 5 kinds of dentin adhesive systems and 5 kinds of composite resins using micro-shear bond test. Five adhesive systems (Prime & Bond NT (PBN). Onecoat bond (OC), Excite (EX), Syntac (SY), Clearfil SE bond (CS)) and five composite resins (Spectrum (SP), Synergy Compact (SC), Tetric Ceram (TC), Clearfil AP-X (CA), Z100 (Z1)) were used for this study ($5{\;}{\times}{\;}5{\;}={\;}25group$, n =14/group). The slices of horizontally sectioned human tooth were bonded with each bonding system and each composite resin, and tested by a micro-shear bond strength test. These results were analyzed statistically. The mean micro-shear bond strength of dentin adhesive systems were in order of CS (22.642 MPa), SY (18.368 MPa), EX (14.599 MPa). OC (13.702 MPa). PBN (12.762 MPa). The mean bond strength of self-etching primer system group (CS, SY) in dentin was higher than that of self-priming adhesive system groups (PBN, EX, OC) significantly (P<0.05). The mean bond strength of composite resins was in order of SP (19.008 MPa), CA (17.532 MPa). SC (15.787 MPa), TC (15.068 MPa). Z1 (14.678 MPa). Micro-shear bond strength of SP was stronger than those of other composite resins significantly (P < 0.05). And those of TC and Z1 were weaker than other composite resins significantly (P < 0.05). No difference was found in micro-shear bond strength of composite resin in self-etching primer adhesive system groups (CS, SY) statistically. However, there was significant difference of micro-shear bond strength of composite resin groups in self-priming adhesive systems group (PBN, EX, OC). The combination of composite resin and dentin adhesive system recommended by manufacturer did not represent positive correlation. It didn't seem to be a significant factor.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제34권2호
• /
• pp.113-119
• /
• 2009

본 연구의 목적은 다른 표면 젖음성을 갖는 상아질에 대한 수종의 자가접착레진시멘트의 인장접착강도를 비교하고자 하는 것이다. 이번 실험을 위해 Rely-X Unicem (3M, ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA), Embrace Wetbond (Pulpdent, Oakland, MA, USA), Maxcem (Kerr, Orange, CA, USA) 3 종의 자기접착레진시멘트를 사용하였다. 발거한 상, 하악 대구치 60개를 미세절단기 (Acutom P-50, Struers, Copenhagen, Benmark)를 이용해 한 치아에서 $2mm{\times}2mm{\times}7mm$의 치아 시편 두개씩 얻었다. 상아질 표면을 건조 그룹은 10초간 강한 공기로 건조시켰고, 습윤 그룹은 과잉의 수분을 2 초간 거즈로 압박해 제거하였다. 상아질 표면의 젖음성을 달리한 시편에 자가접착레진시멘트를 접착한 후 상온의 상대습도 100% 상태에서 24시간 보관했고, 만능시험기 (EZ Test, Shimadzu corporation, Kyoto, Japan)를 이용해 인장접착강도를 측정했고, 분리된 접착면의 파절양상을 근관 치료용 현미경 (OPMI pro, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany)을 이용해 20 배의 배율로 관찰하였다. $SPSS^{TM}$ Ver 10.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA)을 사용하여 동일한 자가접착레진시멘트에서 상아질 젖음성에 따른 인장접착강도를 T-test로 비교하였으며, 각 자가접착레진시멘트간의 인장접착강도를 One way ANOVA test로 비교 분석하고 95% 유의수준에서 Scheffe's test로 사후검정 하였다. 실험 결과 자가접착레진시멘트의 인장접착강도는 상아질 젖음성에 영향을 받지 않았으며, 상아질 표면 젖음성과 상관없이 Maxcem의 인장접착강도가 Unicem과 Embrace의 인장접착강도보다 유의성 있는 낮은 값을 나타내었다. 또한 모든 시편의 분리된 접착면은 접착실패 양상을 나타내었다. 이상의 실험 결과로 볼 때 자가접착레진시멘트는 상아질 표면 젖음성에 상관없이 사용할 수 있을 것이라고 생각된다.