• 한국치위생학회지
• /
• 제14권6호
• /
• pp.789-794
• /
• 2014

The increasing cross-border mobility of dental school or dental hygiene students, educators, practitioners, programs and providers takes challenges for existing national quality assurance and accreditation frameworks and bodies, as well as for the systems for recognizing foreign qualifications. The new dental hygiene accreditation system was introduced to encourage the improvement of dental hygiene programs, to ensure the quality of education and, most of all, to establish an internationally compatible system of evaluation and accreditation. The accreditation procedure takes 1 year to complete. The result of the accreditation is released after evaluation via self-study report, site visit, preliminary draft report, responses from the institution and the results from the conciliation and review committees. The result from the accreditation procedure is either 'accreditation' or 'no accreditation'. Accredited schools receive one of several statuses following the evaluation. These are next general review, interim report and interim visit or suspension. Dental healthcare quality is not improved instantaneously, but instead gradually through continuous communication within the dental field. For this accreditation system to be successful, the following are essential: the accreditation agency should adopt hygiene education accreditation; it needs to become financially independent and managed efficiently; the autonomy and regulations surrounding the system need to be balanced; the professionalism of the system is ensured; and the dental field which includes not only dental program, but also hygiene program, needs to play an active role in the operation of the system.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제23권6호
• /
• pp.33-39
• /
• 2020

This paper analyzes the current state of operation and the effect of introduction of the single accreditation system, which was fully introduced in 2016 by the Accreditation Board of Engineering Education Korea(ABEEK). Because Engineering Education Accreditation are program-based certification, and department operates accreditation programs and non-accreditation programs, if a student under the accreditation program fails to graduate from the accreditation program, he or she must complete the transfer to a non-accreditation program at least one year before graduation. Since 2016, when the single accreditation system was introduced, freshmen of department have allowed non-accreditation graduation only for reasons prescribed separately by the program's regulations or guidelines. In order to identify and reflect the operational status and effectiveness of the single accreditation system in the 2020 accreditation review, ABEEK conducted a complete survey on the current status of graduates in February 2020 among 157 programs at 26 universities receiving the 2020 accreditation review. The results of this study are expected to be used as basic data for the improvement of the single accreditation system in the future by examining the effects of the single accreditation system implemented after 2016 and considering the problems at the site due to the introduction of the single accreditation system of programs that ABEEK had not previously expected.

• 시스템엔지니어링학술지
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.44-55
• /
• 2023

The defense M&S system, which has been classified as a weapon system between requirements determination and project implementation, is being developed by applying the weapon system development procedure of the Defense Acquisition Program Administration. The M&S system abstracts and models the real world to suit the intended use and proceeds with the process of developing it as a software-oriented system. Overseas, the conceptual model development stage is staged before entering the design stage after the requirements analysis. In addition, each step includes verification and validation processes. In Korea, while establishing and applying the weapon system development procedure based on the SE process, the M&S system is also applied in the same way as the general weapon system, limiting appropriate development outputs and verification and validation. In this study, the system development procedure of the M&S system is established and presented based on the relevant standards and SE process of developed countries.

• 한국군사과학기술학회지
• /
• 제2권2호
• /
• pp.261-270
• /
• 1999

본 논문은 측정시스템의 정확도와 불확도 설정, 측정기법 및 측정시스템에 대한 공인화 방안을 제시하고 있다. 측정오차는 크게 정적오차 및 동적오차로 구분되는데, 측정시 항상 존재할 수 있는 정적오차를 구할 수 있는 오차방정식과, 공인화 절차를 제안하였다.

• 한국의료질향상학회지
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.69-90
• /
• 2017

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of healthcare accreditation and to provide empirical evidence to validate positive effectiveness. Methods:Six electronic databases (KERIS, KoreaMed, NDSL, Ovid-medline, Embase, Cochrane library) were accessed in May 2016. Keywords used were 'accreditation' and 'Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organization (JCAHO)'. Of the initially identified 3,008 articles, 60 studies on healthcare accreditation were selected based on inclusion criteria that are hospital accreditation, accreditation by disease and clinical center accreditation. These were retrieved and analyzed. Result: The 60 study results were on the impact of healthcare accreditation. Results were classified into four perspectives of Balanced Score Card (Financial, Customer, Internal Process, Learning & Growth). In internal process perspective, results revealed that healthcare accreditation has made a positive impact on "care process and procedure". In learning & growth perspective, healthcare accreditation has made a positive influence on "leadership", "organizational cultures" and "change mechanisms". However, it revealed that healthcare accreditation does not directly affect financial performance. It is also difficult to reach a definitive conclusion that healthcare accreditation programs affect patient satisfaction of customer and clinical outcome of the internal process. Conclusion: Healthcare accreditation programs provide positive impact on change of care process and building communication-oriented hospital culture. However, more rigorous and diverse research is needed on financial effects and clinical outcomes of healthcare accreditation.

• 가정과삶의질연구
• /
• 제31권1호
• /
• pp.49-59
• /
• 2013

The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship of caregivers' accreditation experience and their motivational self-concept. Questionnaire were gathered from caregivers who work in Seoul, Incheon, and Kyunggi areas. Data were analysed by t-test, MCA, and multiply regression analysis. The result showed that caregivers who experienced accreditation at child are centers had higher scores in their motivational self-concept than caregivers who inexperienced accreditation procedure yet had. This tendency was clear in caregiver groups who work at unsupported child care centers, and who got certificate from institutions except college. With controlling individual background variables which influence on caregivers' motivational self-concept, independent effect of caregivers' accreditation experience on their motivational self-concept was still significant especially at the caregiver group who work in unsupported child care centers.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제23권3호
• /
• pp.59-65
• /
• 2020

This paper introduces the association method for the program outcomes of engineering education accreditation and the competency units of National Competency Standards(NCS). This association method can be used to efficiently develop an engineering curriculum that is based on both of the NCS and the engineering education accreditation. The association method consists of an analysis phase, an association phase and a checking phase. We also deals with the curriculum development procedure that uses the proposed association of program outcomes and competency units. Also, we provide the application of this method to the computer engineering program for NCS-based engineering education accreditation. Thus we can systematically and efficiently develop curriculums for the NCS-based engineering education accreditation by using the proposed method.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제3권2호
• /
• pp.51-60
• /
• 2000

한국공학교육인증원이 발족되어 각 프로그램에 대한 인증작업이 시작되었으나 이를 준비해야 하는 교수진들은 인증 준비절차에 대한 실무적인 사례가 부족하여 많은 어려움을 겪고 있는 실정이다. 본 논문은 전체 인증 준비과정 중에서 프로그램 교육목적과 학습성과를 선정하는 과정을 구체적으로 제시하고자 한다. 프로그램 교육목적은 교육수요자들의 요구, 교육기관의 교육목적 및 특성, 프로그램별 특성을 반영한 구체적이고 평가 가능한 목적이어야 한다. 프로그램 학습성과는 한국공학교육인증원이 제시한 12가지 학습성과에 프로그램의 특성에 맞는 학습성과를 추가하여 완성하였다. 프로그램 교육목적과 학습성과는 각 과목의 교육목적 및 교육기관의 교육목적들 간에 서로 연관성이 확보되어야 하므로 상관관계분석표를 통하여 연관성을 확인하였다.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.26-47
• /
• 2001

한국공학교육인증원 인증기준 중 세 번째인 교육요소와 그에 따른 교과과정 개발은 현재 국내의 많은 대학들이 시행하고 있는 학부제가 특정 전공의 교육 프로그램을 인증하는 인증제와 상충하며, 또한 현재까지 인증기준에 따라 인증을 준비한 전례가 없기 때문에 여러 가지 흔란과 의문을 야기하고 있다. 본 논문에서는 명지대학교 공과대학 전자공학 전공을 예로 선정하여 인증기준에 의한 교육요소를 개발하고 그에 따른 교과과정을 개발한 사례를 소개함으로써 인증기준에 따른 교과과정 개발의 문제점을 조사하고 개발과정에서 경험한 여러 문제점과 개선점을 논의하고자 한다.

• 의학교육논단
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.16-27
• /
• 2020

The accreditation process (AccP) is both an opportunity and a burden for medical schools-which one it becomes depends on how medical schools recognize and utilize the AccP. In other words, if a medical school recognizes the AccP only as a formal procedure or as a means for continuing medical education, it will be a burden for the medical school. However, if a medical school recognizes the real and positive value of the AccP, it can be both an opportunity and a tool for developing medical education. The educational value of the AccP is to improve the quality, equity, and efficiency of medical education, along with increasing the options of choice. In order for the AccP to contribute to the development of medical education, accrediting agencies and medical schools must first be recognized as part of an "educational alliance" working together towards common goals. Secondly, clear guidelines on the accreditation standards should be periodically reviewed and shared. Finally, a formative evaluation using self-evaluation as a system that can utilize the AccP as an opportunity to develop medical education must be introduced. This type of evaluation system could be developed through collaboration among medical schools, academic societies for medical education, and the accrediting authority.