• Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management
• /
• 제11권4호
• /
• pp.61-85
• /
• 2004

It is tried that evaluation areas and items of information system in public sector are derived ration-ally and its weight value call be applied differently to type of information system to enhance validity and objectiveness of measurement in evaluating IS in this research. To obtain the goal of this research, firstly, five sectors - system sector, user sector, organization and management sector, the degree of strategic contribution to IS, and the degree of optimizing re-source in IS - are categorized based on broadly reviewing previous theoretical and practical research. Secondly, IS type in public sector is divided into internal operation one and customer oriented one that is object of the IS, and divided into application oriented and IT infrastructure oriented which are influence by IS. Thirdly, evaluation areas and its items are measured by 5 point scales (Likert summated scales) in addition to analysis of validity and reliability to improve objectiveness of establishing evaluation areas and its items. Fourthly, the weight values in the evaluation areas and its items are derived by using analytic hierarchy process. According to the results of analysis of weight value through AHP, it were found to be 30.4% to organization and management sector. 25.5% to degree of strategic contribution, 21.0% to user sector, 13.5% to degree of optimization of resource management, and 9.6% to system sector. and. different weight values each of the four IS type are proposed which establishing in this research. The main implications of this study is that the criteria by which IS in public sector can be categorized 4 ones is suggested and The weighted evaluation for four types of IS based on the AHP analysis enables proposing an objective evaluation method of IS in public sector for considering individual IS characterics.

• 한국의료질향상학회지
• /
• 제5권2호
• /
• pp.296-310
• /
• 1998

Background : Performance evaluation of medical care providers has become more important than before in Korea. Especially in university hospitals, job contents of medical staffs are so complicated that evaluation is not easily performed. In addition, in order that the feedback of evaluation be successful, acceptance of staffs to be evaluated is essential. This study is aimed at the development of items for evaluation and weighting of each item in one university hospital, and clustering departments by different weight given by medical staffs. Methods : Through resource group meeting. performance items were listed up by categories of education, research, medical services, and other activities in and out of the hospital. For each item, all the medical staffs were asked how important they thought, compared with publishing one original article. By factor analysis, the items in each category were grouped into a few subgroups. In turn, cluster analysis was done for the purpose of grouping departments by priority the medical staffs gave. Results and Conclusion : Among five major categories, medical staffs regard education, research, and medical services more important than other activities in and out of the hospital. Five categories consisted of two or three components. Departments in hospital were grouped into three. However, characteristics of each group was not clearly delineated. This result suggests that more comprehensive tool should be developed and applied in the process of performance evaluation in university hospitals.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제46권4호
• /
• pp.209-217
• /
• 2023

In this study, the evaluation items related to the effectiveness evaluation of the LVC (Live, Virtual, Constructive) training system of the Air Force were derived and the weights of each item were analyzed. The LVC training system evaluation items for AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) analysis were divided into three layers, and according to the level, 3 items were derived at level 1, 11 items at level 2, and 33 items at level 3. For weight analysis of evaluation items, an AHP-based pairwise comparison questionnaire was conducted for Air Force experts related to the LVC training system. As a result of the survey, related items such as (1) Achievement of education and training goals (53.8%), (1.2) Large-scale mission and operational performance (25.5%), and (1.2.1) Teamwork among training participants (19.4%) was highly rated. Also, it was confirmed that the weights of evaluation items were not different for each expert group, that is, the priority for importance was evaluated in the same order between the policy department and the working department. Through these analysis results, it will be possible to use them as evaluation criteria for new LVC-related projects of the Air Force and selection of introduction systems.

• 해양환경안전학회지
• /
• 제26권3호
• /
• pp.277-285
• /
• 2020

Recently, studies have been actively conducted on seismic design and improvement of the seismic performance of bridges, buildings, factories, and plants. In particular, heavy items that are being manufactured or waiting to be shipped from factories (such as generators, engines, and boilers) must be equipped with seismic stoppers to prevent them from moving or falling during an earthquake. Seismic stoppers should be suitably determined by the size and weight of these heavy items; however, they have no general design standard. In this study, structural analyses and seismic tests were conducted to evaluate the performance of newly designed seismic stoppers. Structural analysis was performed on three stopper models to estimate the external load at which the yield stress of the material was not exceeded. Based on the analysis results, a seismic test of the stopper was carried out in accordance with the AC156 test method. Finally, product specifications for all three seismic stopper models were determined and their static/dynamic load performance was evaluated.

• 터널과지하공간
• /
• 제26권5호
• /
• pp.431-440
• /
• 2016

본 연구에서는 암반비탈면의 성능기반 평가기법을 제시하기 위해 이전 연구에서 도출된 평가 항목의 항목별 특성과 유사성 등을 검토하여 최종 평가항목을 도출하였다. 또한, 평가항목별로 상대적 중요도를 산출하여 평가항목의 가중치를 도출하였으며 암반비탈면에 대한 성능별 평가표를 제시하였다. 제시된 평가기준은 상관 분석을 이용해 검증을 실시하였다. 주요 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 각 성능별로 제시된 평가표를 활용하여 실제 조사 자료를 적용한 상관분석 결과, 모든 평가항목에서 유의 확률이 0.05 이하로 나타나 통계적으로 유의미한 결과가 도출되었고, 전체적으로 높은 상관성을 보였다. 특히, '낙석', '지반변형', '불연속면 특성', '불안정 지질' 등의 항목에서 상대적 상관계수(R)가 가장 높게 나타나 본 논문에 제시된 평가표는 암반비탈면의 특성을 적절히 반영하고 있다고 판단된다.

• 대한물리치료과학회지
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.1-10
• /
• 2015

Background : This study verified a correlation between gross motor performance measure (GMPM) and pediatric balance scale (PBS) for children, which are most widely used for assessment of children with cerebral palsy. Methods : The study subjects are 20 children aged between five and 13 who were diagnosed with cerebral palsy. Their mean age was $8.15{\pm}2.96years$ and consists of 15 males and 5 females. The subjects were divided into three groups according to muscle tone and motility disorders and then GMPM and PBS were assessed. In the assessment items in the GMPM, alignment, coordination, dissociated movement, stability, and weight shift were measured. The PBS consists of sitting to standing, standing to sitting, moving between chairs, standing without using hands, standing with one foot, turning 360 degrees, turning to look behind, retrieving object from floor, and reaching forward with outstretched arm while standing. A correlation of the collected data was analyzed using SPSS 18.0 for windows. Results : From Significant correlations were shown between items of GMPM and PBS as well as total scores of GMPM and PBS. Among them, coordination and weight transfer in the GMPM items had a high correlation with the PBS. In addition, the higher the GMPM total score was, the higher the PBS score was. Conclusion : This study result showed a significant correlation between GMPM and PBS, and this relation can be used to pediatric physical examination.

• 한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 논문집
• /
• 제22권4호
• /
• pp.27-36
• /
• 2018

현재 적용되고 있는 평가체계는 1996년 개정되어 이후 4차례 개정을 실시하였으나, 구조적 안전성의 확보 목표에 국한된 평가체계로 인해 장기적 관점의 성능저하 예측 및 예산투입을 위한 우선순위 의사결정의 근거로 활용하기에는 부족하다. 따라서, 본 연구에서는 델파이 기법과 AHP기법을 활용하여 기존 도로터널의 여러 구조형식 중 재래식(ASSM) 터널의 성능평가에 적합한 평가체계를 새롭게 제시하고자 한다. 국 내외의 기존 평가체계 및 평가항목을 검토한 결과, 도출가능한 평가항목이 한정적인 것으로 판단되어 기존에 적용되고 있는 항목에 대한 폐쇄적인 설문과 새로운 항목 도출을 위한 개방형 설문을 병행하여 설문조사를 실시하였다. 조사한 설문결과를 내용타당도 검증을 거쳐 재래식(ASSM)터널에 적합한 성능평가인자를 도출하였으며, AHP기법을 활용하여 도출된 평가항목에 대한 가중치를 산정한 후 구조물의 특성에 맞는 성능평가 체계를 새롭게 제시하여, 향후 성능평가 세부지침 수정 및 보완 시 참고자료로 활용될 수 있도록 하고자 한다.

• 산업공학
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.69-78
• /
• 1989

The objective of this study is to establish a hierarchical structure for Quality of Service Management (QOSM) from subsriber's viewpoint. First, We construct the hierarchy of the QOSM items. These items are derived from the CCITT concepts and the present Korean Telecommunication Authority(KTA) system. Then QOS performance indicators which consists of the lower levels of the hierarchy and the weight value is constructed. Finally, an evaluation method of the QOS is presented. It is expected that this study offers an evaluation method of network performance and efficiency of operation and maintenance for telecommunication facilities.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제13권3호
• /
• pp.309-321
• /
• 2014

Recently, due to the advent of ubiquitous computing and the spread of intelligent portable device such as smart phone, iPad and PDA has been amplified, a variety of services and the amount of information has also increased fastly. It is becoming a part of our common life style that the demands for enjoying the wireless internet are increasing anytime or anyplace without any restriction of time and place. And also, the demands for e-commerce and many different items on e-commerce and interesting of associated items are increasing. Existing collaborative filtering (CF), explicit method, can not only reflect exact attributes of item, but also still has the problem of sparsity and scalability, though it has been practically used to improve these defects. In this paper, using a implicit method without onerous question and answer to the users, not used user's profile for rating to reduce customers' searching effort to find out the items with high purchasability, it is necessary for us to analyse the segmentation of customer and item based on customer data and purchase history data, which is able to reflect the attributes of the item in order to improve the accuracy of recommendation. We propose the method of recommendation system using association rule and weighted preference so as to consider many different items on e-commerce and to refect the profit/weight/importance of attributed of a item. To verify improved performance of proposing system, we make experiments with dataset collected in a cosmetic internet shopping mall.

• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제47권6호
• /
• pp.45-52
• /
• 2019

최근 국제기준 및 규격의 적용이 요구됨에 따라 조경분야에서도 성능기준 마련 및 평가에 대한 관심이 증가하고 있으나, 건축이나 토목분야와 비교하여 이에 대한 논의와 관련 연구가 부족한 실정이다. 이에 본 연구는 조경분야의 성능 및 친환경성을 평가할 수 있는 항목을 도출하고, 국내 실무자의 의견수렴을 통해 항목간의 중요도를 분석하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 해외 친환경 평가도구 및 선행연구 고찰, 전문가 설문을 통해 주요 평가항목을 도출하였으며, 30명의 조경분야 전문가를 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였다. 분석적 네트워크 의사결정 (ANP)기법을 통해 평가항목의 중요도 분석 결과, 평가항목 간의 중요도 분석에서 부지 선정 및 보존과 건강 및 편의가 높게 나온 반면, 재료 및 시설물의 중요도는 상대적으로 낮게 나타났다. 세부항목의 중요도는 모니터링 계획, 문화·역사적 장소 보존, 관리비용 절감방안, 자연지반 면적, 유실된 하천·습지 보존·복원 등의 순으로 높게 나왔으며 옥상/벽면 녹화, 자생식물 이용, 표토저장 및 이용, 지역재료 이용 등의 항목은 상대적으로 낮았다. 조경성능 및 친환경성 평가에 대한 객관적 지표정립 및 정량화에 대한 어려움이 있으나, 다수의 조경분야 전문가들은 기존 건축물 중심의 친환경 인증체계와 분리된 평가체계가 필요하다고 응답하였다. 그러나 해외에서 중요하게 다루어지나 국내 실정에 맞지 않는 평가항목이 존재하므로, 향후 조경성능 평가기준에 대한 활발한 논의와 함께 실무자들의 충분한 의견수렴 과정이 필요할 것으로 판단된다.