• 비교문화연구
• /
• 제23권
• /
• pp.33-55
• /
• 2011

In the late Japanese colonial period, from the Sino-Japanese War until the Pacific War, critical discourses on the modern were prevalent in Japan and the Joseon. Despite the absence of a consensus about the specific definition of the modern, most thinkers agreed that the modern was something to be overcome. While some regarded naturalism and capitalism of the West as the essence of the modern, some others named scientism and humanism as the nature of the western modernity. Additionally, some criticized the temporal concept of historicism and brought new meanings of 'tradition' into relief, and some others advocated overcoming 'the West inherent in us'. This study is to consider the temporality of the theory of overcoming the modern focusing on the following three notions-world history, tradition, and emergency-, and examines the antinomy of them. The first notion to consider is 'world history'. The theorists of overcoming the modern, including the Kyoto school, discarded the progressive ideology that had led the Western modern history, and instead introduced 'world history' as a new notion. Although this resulted from the imperialistic embracement of the theories of Ranke, a major positivist historian from Germany, it contained antinomy of remaining in 'history' which was the modern temporal view. The second notion is 'tradition'. While the critical mind of 'world history' brought 'time of world' into question in the context of temporal realization, the notion of 'tradition' was to understand 'time of history' itself as the modern and overcome it. The critical mind of the notion involves the attempts to criticize regarding history as a 'progressive' process and to discover tradition as 'the present past' or 'the eternal present'. However, it also contained antinomy; the 'tradition' here was a notion that was created in the modern times, not passed down from ancient times. The third notion to consider is 'emergency', which was a method to define the present time as a transition period toward a new era, relating to states of war. However, the theorists of overcoming the modern did not regard 'emergency' as a particular time that strayed from normal states, instead they thought is as 'a regularized exceptional state', namely 'a state in which exceptions have become regulations'. However, the notion also contained antinomy since the word 'emergency' connotes abnormality.

• 대한지리학회지
• /
• 제49권2호
• /
• pp.139-159
• /
• 2014

1960~70년대 한국의 산업화와 경제성장을 설명하는 대표적인 프레임은 발전국가론이었다. 그러나 발전국가론의 방법론적 국가주의는 국가의 관계론적 속성을 간과했고, 실제 국가과정에서 나타나는 다중스케일의 전략관계를 주변화했다. 우리는 발전국가를 통해 개발연대의 산업화를 사유하는 방식에 익숙해졌고, 그것을 자명하게 받아들이기도 했다. 이 글의 목적은 이러한 국가중심적 사유를 문제시하고, 그것이 주변화시킨 다중스케일의 전략관계를 복원해 우리가 자명하게 받아들인 산업화의 경로를 재구성하는 데 있다. 본 연구에서는 이를 위해 개발연대의 대표 산업공간인 울산공업단지를 분석한다. 구체적으로는 해방 이후 지속적으로 추진되었던 울산정유공장 건설 프로젝트를 초점에 두고, 15년 남짓한 시간 동안 이 사업에 연결되었던 다양한 스케일의 전략관계를 검토한다. 이를 통해 본 연구에서는 Van Fleet 같은 냉전 네트워크의 결절이나, 남궁연 등의 다중 스케일 행위자가 당대에 국가 간 관계나 글로벌 스케일의 사회관계를 울산이라는 특정 공간에 결속시키는 과정에 주목한다. 본 연구에서는 울산 정유공장이, 다중스케일의 경관들이 울산에 중첩해 만든 역사적 산물이란 점을 밝힘으로써, 방법론적 국가주의가 놓친 사회공간의 전략관계를 다중스케일의 시각에서 재구성할 것을 제안한다.

• 해양안보
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.73-114
• /
• 2021

본 연구는 현실주의의 대표적 이론인 세력균형이론을 기초로 군사력을 국가의 핵심 힘으로 전제하여 동북아시아의 힘의 분포를 살펴본다. 이전 세력균형과 군사력 수준에 관한 연구결과를 고찰하고, 그 연구한 결과를 활용하여 2020년까지 미국, 중국, 러시아, 일본, 한국과 북한의 힘의 변화를 분석하여 2030년경 안보환경을 전망하여 본다. 세력균형이론에서 국가(nation)나 국가군(a group of power) 간에 힘의 균형이 무너지면 전쟁 가능성이 높고, 그 불확실성과 불신이 높은 국제사회에서 생존과 안전을 확보하기 위하여 국가는 힘의 증강(자조, self-help)과 더불어 협력(cooperation)과 동맹(alliance)을 더욱 강화하는 행동을 한다고 본다. 동북아시아의 국가들도 자국의 군사력을 지속 증강하고 있으며, 특히 중국의 급속한 부상으로 국제 안보환경의 급격한 변화에 주변 국가들은 촉각을 세우고 경계심을 늦추지 않고 있다. 중국은 2030년대 중국 창군 100주년과 더불어 '국방 및 군현대화'를 실현하고, 2050년대 건국 100주년에 '세계일류군대건설'을 목표로 하고 있다. 그리고 미국은 국제사회의 협력과 동맹 강화 등 중국 견제에 분주하다. 미국과 중국이 패권경쟁이 진행되고 있는 상황에서 동북아시아의 안보환경과 힘의 역학관계도 서서히 변하고 있다. 세력균형이론에 기초하여 2030년 이후 동북아시아의 힘의 분포 변화와 함의를 살펴보고자 한다.

• Strategy21
• /
• 통권32호
• /
• pp.123-159
• /
• 2013

The purpose of this research paper is to re-valuate the factors that affected the Royal Navy's rearmament and preparation for war by conducting analysis on the discussion held in the Britain on the strategic priorities and Navy's coping measures adopted during the interwar period. After the end of the WWI, each of the military arms of the Britain faced significant difficulty in securing budget and increasing their military power all throughout the interwar period, and the Navy was not an exception. The WWII that got started on September 1939 was the turning point in which this difficulty led to full-fledged crisis. Immensely many criticisms followed after the war and problems were identified when it comes to the Royal Navy's performance during the war. This type of effort to identify problem led to the attempt to analyze whether Royal Navy's preparation for war and rearmament policy during interwar period were adequate, and to identify the root causes of failure. Existing studies sought to find the root cause of failed rearmament from external factors such as the deterioration of the Britain itself or pressure from the Treasury Department to cut the budget for national defense, or sought to detect problems from the development of wrong strategies by the Navy. However, Royal Navy's failed preparation for the war during interwar period is not the result of one or two separate factors. Instead, it resulted due to the diverse factors and situations that the Britain was facing at the time, and due to intricate and complex interaction of these factors. Meanwhile, this research paper focused on the context characterized by 'strategic selection and setting up of priorities' among the various factors to conduct analysis on the Navy's rearmament by linking it with the discussion held at the time on setting up strategic priorities, and sought to demonstrate that the Navy Department's inadequate counter-measures developed during this process waned Royal Navy's position. After the end of WWI, each of the military arms continued to compete for the limited resources and budget all throughout the interwar period, and this type of competition amidst the situation in which the economic situation of Britain was still unstable, made prioritization when it comes to the allocation of resources and setting up of the priorities when it comes to the military power build-up, inevitable. Amidst this situation, the RAF was able to secure resources first and foremost, encouraged by the conviction of some politicians who were affected by the 'theory of aerial threat' and who believed that curtailing potential attack with the Air Force would be means to secure national security at comparatively lower cost. In response, Navy successfully defended the need for the existence of Navy despite the advancement of the aerial power, by emphasizing that the Britain's livelihood depends on trade and on the maintenance of maritime traffic. Despite this counter-measuring logic, however, Navy's role was still limited to the defense of overseas territory and to the fleet run-off instead of sea traffic route production when it comes to the specific power build-up plan, and did not understand the situation in which financial and economic factors gained greater importance when it comes to the setting up of strategic priorities. As a result, Navy's plan to build its powers was met with continual resistance of the Treasury Department, and lost the opportunity to re-gain the status of 'senior service' that it had enjoyed in the past during the competition for strategic prioritization. Given that the strategic and economic situation that Korea faces today is not very different from that of the Britain during the interwar period, our Navy too should leverage the lessons learned from the Royal Navy to make the effort to secure viable position when it comes to the setting of priorities in case of national defense strategy by presenting the basis on why maritime coping should be prioritized among the numerous other threats, and by developing the measures for securing the powers needed effectively amidst the limited resources.

• 수산경영론집
• /
• 제41권1호
• /
• pp.53-72
• /
• 2010

The objects of this study are to consider the current features and the development process of the utilizing system of aquaculture farms in Japan, and to suggest the theoretical basis for improvement of aquaculture system of Korea in the future through the analysis of background of the liberalization theory proposed recently. The aquaculture-fishery system of Japan was begun from the Meiji Era Fishery Act and New Fishery Act of the World war II. A small sum of fishery fee is paid to the fishery cooperative having fishing rights for securing fishing area newly, because the aquaculture of Japan belong to fishery cooperative not individual ownership of union membr of cooperative society, the other words, cultivation fisheries household. In case of Korea, there are several differences with Japan as follows; almost cultivation fisheries household has a individual license, the lisence of fishing rights are recognized as an article, the license of fishing lights are able to do sale. Therefore, it is needed to paid a lots of money for securing fishing area newly. On the other hand, advanced countries in the marine aquaculture such as Norway have reached the stage where the managing abilities of marine aquaculture are similar to those in the manufacturing industry. And the number of large scale aquaculture farms with developed technologies and advanced marketing strategies in those countries is increasing. Considering that the marine aquaculture in Japan under the similar fishery systems of Korea has developed the state-of-the-art management skills or lead to large scale management, it is difficult to expect the decrease in the production costs under the small scale family business in Korea and this will lead to the decreasing competitive advantage over the imported seafood. Therefore marine aquaculture in Korea needs to increase the economy of scale to acquire the competitive advantage.

• 한국사회복지학
• /
• 제59권3호
• /
• pp.229-252
• /
• 2007

최근 지역복지정책의 발달원인을 규명하기 위한 비교사회정책 연구들이 국 내외적으로 크게 증가하고 있다. 대부분 실증분석에 기초한 이 연구들은 방법론적 측면에서는 더욱 정교해지고 있지만, 이론적으로는 전통적인 거시 복지국가 발달이론의 틀을 그대로 적용하고 있는 상황이다. 그러나 초기산업사회라는 특정 상황을 바탕으로 발전한 복지국가 발달이론들로는 후기산업사회에서 이슈가 되고 있는 지역복지정책의 발달을 이해하는 데 한계가 있을 수 있다. 이러한 시각에서 본 연구는 지역복지정책 비교연구들이 무비판적으로 수용해온 대표적인 복지국가 발달이론들, 즉 산업화이론, 권력자원이론, 그리고 국가중심이론의 적용한계점을 논의한다. 그리고 그에 대한 대안으로서 신사회위험론, 신공공관리론 그리고 정부간 관계론의 이론적 유용성을 검토한다. 최종적으로, 지역복지정책 발달의 비교분석을 위한 새로운 이론적 틀을 제시한다.

• Ocean and Polar Research
• /
• 제28권3호
• /
• pp.273-285
• /
• 2006

As the political arguments on international power concept has gradually been deepened, the role of international regimes, defined as principles, norms, rules, and decision-making procedures around which nation-actors' expectations converge in a given issue-area, has also been reinforced. There are many ways of understanding about international regimes. In terms of realistic theories, international regimes are one of methods of maintaining hegemonic power order of hegemonic nation and in terms of liberalistic theories, international regimes are understood as the products of mutual inter-dependence of nations in changing international society. As a matter of fact, if we take structural causes and regime consequences into severe consideration, we can find not a few characteristics of international regimes, such as security regime, world trade and fiance regime, ocean regime, environmental regime, human right regime, etc. This paper will examine the changing concept of power after World War II in three categories of hard power (military power), meta power (regime creating power), and soft power (advanced in cultural, diplomatical, and technological power). This paper will provide the evidence of why the changing power concepts will be strongly related with the emergence of international regimes. The UN convention on the law of the sea will chosen as a standard case of the ocean regime and it's regime structure and role will also be analysed in both realistic :md liberalistic theories. Futhermore, the nations' interests involved in the UN convention on the law of the sea will be analytically classified and finally a future prospectus of the UN convention on the law of the sea as an ocean regime will be tested.

• 한국실내디자인학회논문집
• /
• 제21권3호
• /
• pp.31-39
• /
• 2012

This is the time we need differentiated strategy due to consumer's standard of purchasing is becoming more complicated and corporate marketing war is intensely competitive. For a long-term strategy, making competitive corporate image is important because companies have their own competitiveness. In addition, importance of having a relationship with customer is magnified through consumers'direct and indirect experience. "The corporate complex cultural space is designed place for experiential marketing to convey its meaning to consumers." Under above concept, this study analyzed the theory of experiential marketing and conducted a survey which is based on experiential marketing strategic module (SEMs) using the analyzed theory. This study drew expression characteristics of space through case analysis and conducted a survey to have more effective corporate complex cultural space. As a result, the experience in the space enables people to understand of the space through five senses, not consist of simply chucks of sense-date, and this result emphasizes the importance of 'Event' because people tend to escape from restriction for reality to relive stress and have emotional satisfaction. In addition, it shows expression characteristics which provide sympathy as a flexible interaction through symbolical image. The result of the expression characteristics' survey is showed up to improve effect of corporate complex cultural space. This study is analyzing the corporate complex cultural space through experience marketing for the company which wants provide differentiated experience of various space expression methods and catching current position. Also, this study places its significance to give a way to increase space preference and effect of corporate complex cultural space. Based on the result of this study, I hope the future corporate complex cultural space will develop refreshingly.

• 문화기술의 융합
• /
• 제8권6호
• /
• pp.531-536
• /
• 2022

전 세계적으로 국가경쟁력, 효용성, 중요성 등의 이유로 메가시티가 속속 등장하고 있으며, 점차 각 국가의 중심지로 자리를 잡아가고 있다. 또한, 메가시티는 현존, 잠재적, 초국가, 비군사 등 다양한 위협에 노출될 수밖에 없다. 특히, 최근 우크라이나-러시아 전쟁에서 볼 수 있듯이 국가기반체계는 적대 및 위협세력의 주요 목표가 되고 있다. 하지만 메가시티의 막대한 규모, 다양한 위협의 양상, 한정된 자원 등을 고려할 때 모든 국가기반체계를 완벽하게 방호하는 것은 현실적으로 어렵다. 따라서 여러 국가기반체계 중 핵심노드를 식별하여 중점적으로 방호하는 접근이 필요하다. 핵심노드는 다양한 국가기반시설이 연결된 국가기반체계의 중요도가 매우 높면서도 동시에 급소에 해당한다. 이를 위해 본 연구에서는 핵심노드를 논리적·체계적으로 식별하기 위해 네트워크 이론인 노드 중심성(Centrality) 분석방법과 군사이론인 중심(Center of Gravity) 분석방법을 제시하였다.

• 한국시뮬레이션학회논문지
• /
• 제17권3호
• /
• pp.45-51
• /
• 2008

개전 초,적군은 다양한 화력지원수단을 이용하여 아군의 핵심시설 파괴를 기도할 것이다. 이러한 화력지원수단 중 포병은 가장 큰 비중을 차지하고 있다. 갱도포병은 생존성 측면에서 아군에 비해 월등한 우세를 점하고 있어 아군에게 큰 위협요소로 판단된다. 갱도포병을 타격하는 연구는 지금까지 군 내부의 연구를 통해서 발전해 왔다. 그러나 이러한 연구의 대부분이 정성적인 분석방법으로 이루어져 객관적이지 못하고 다양하지 못한 방법이라는 한계를 지니고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 아군이 생존성의 약점을 극복하기 위하여 갱도포병이 갱도 출구를 개방하고 사격을 개시하기 전에 타격하는데 초점을 맞추고 갱도 포병을 타격하기 위한 정량적인 분석 방법으로 DEVS를 이용한 시뮬레이션 연구를 수행하고자 한다.