• 안보군사학연구
• /
• 통권2호
• /
• pp.1-21
• /
• 2004

Clausewitz’s theory of war can be divided between the theory of conduct of war and the theory of preparations for war, and the theory of war that Clausewitz means, is the theory of conduct of war. But before Clausewitz, men regarded a theory of preparations for war as the theory of war. The theory of preparations for war concerns generally about the material side of war, but not its spiritual aspect. The activity of war is basically a human spiritual and psychological action. And because the war is dangerous, the anxiety occurs and diverse human feelings, for example courage, have been required. Also the informations in war is normally very uncertain, so an insight of the commander is in war very needed. The Theory of war has to consider this spiritual aspect. To end the war and to acquire the peace, an excellent talent of commander is necessary. And it is a genius. Men who are difficult to move but have strong feelings, these are the men who are best able to be a genius.

• 안보군사학연구
• /
• 통권8호
• /
• pp.311-350
• /
• 2010

War has been existing with human history. There seems to be two approaches of war study. One is to deter war among politicians, the other is to get victory in a war among soldiers. Many scholars and soldiers tried to find out the way of victory at war, that is, the major factors of victory at war. They found out some factors that dominate the victory of war through numerous experiences of war, and we call it 'principles of war'. The principles of war which we are using has been shaped during past three centuries. But, nowadays rapid change in the environment of war has brought the change of features of warfare and method of waging war. NCW may be the most typical example of new environment of war. The Iraque War may be the most recent modem war performed under the NCW environment. And the Iraque War brought up the need of new principles of war adaptable to the NCW environment. This article is focusing on new principles of war that comprehends future wars. I suggest that some principles of war which we are using should be supplemented to be understood its own conception, and new principles are needed such as principle of paralysis, principle of synchronization & Integration.

• 안보군사학연구
• /
• 통권7호
• /
• pp.129-154
• /
• 2009

The principles of military operations(principles of war) are the fundamental principles ruling warfighting that made based on the experiences of wars from the time of ancient Greeks to the World War II. Recent wars such as Iraq War showed us the change of environment of war and the style of waging a war. It is believed that future war will be executed with the style of Rapid Deceive Operations, Effect Based Operations, Network Centric Operations. Therefor the principles of war which we use should be reconsidered whether it is useful or not in future warfare. By considering the present principles of operation which are using in many countries and analysing the style of waging future war, we suggest new principles of operations : principle of gravity, principle of mass and dispersal, principle of disturbance, principle of speed, principle of paralysis, principle of synchronization and integration, principle of leadership, and principle of information.

• Strategy21
• /
• 통권40호
• /
• pp.37-81
• /
• 2016

This paper aims to use crossover analysis to uncover similarities and differences between the U.S-Japan relationship in the World War II era and the modern U.S-China relationship, and to forecast the possibility of the outbreak of war between U.S and China by applying the steps to war theory. The steps to war theory argues that the probability of the outbreak of war between two states within five years would approach 90 percent, if they have ongoing territorial dispute, alliance, rivalry, and arms race. The comparison exposes some similarities with the territorial dispute, alliance, rivalry, but reveals dissimilarities with arms race. U.S-Japan relationship in the World War II era had the arms race, which does not exist the modern U.S-China Relationship. The result of comparison is that the probability for the Outbreak of War between U.S and China correspond to third stage(Risk Level). it means that the probability for the Outbreak of War between U.S and China is 55%. But, There are four elements(① Perception of Leader ② Mutual dependence of economy ③ Possession of nuclear weapon ④ Ravages of war) that reduce the probability for the Outbreak of War. Considering the four elements, the probability for the Outbreak of War between U.S and China is a slim chance. But the probability for the Outbreak of War between U.S and China is excluded because of territorial dispute, alliance, rivalry. So, This paper suggests three points.(① Developing military options ② Reducing the misconception of intend, ③ Promoting navy exchanges) to prevent of Outbreak of War.

• 비교문화연구
• /
• 제34권
• /
• pp.115-146
• /
• 2014

Cyclical stories on Caucasus and Sebastopol Sketches, including War and Peace, have generally been said as masterpieces dealing with the theme of war in Leo Tolstoy's literature. Among them, it is no doubt that War and Peace is absolutely the best one describing the grand panorama of people's lives and war itself. The plot of this novel consists of the so-called Napoleonic War of 1812 and of diverse lives both from the upper class and lower class, more essentially it dramatically presents how these pictures made all literary participants experienced their destiny and lives. Throughout these texts, war, including of its cause and effects and participants, re-considers and re-evaluates all of each features. The most important themes in War and Peace is war itself as the novel's title says. Rather than a just backdrop to the novel, the war plays a significant role in providing the reader with various realistic, philosophic, moral and existentialist perspectives. Moreover, War and Peace for the writer shows contradictory two views about war; he severally criticizes the Napoleonic war of 1812 in the sense that it violets people's reason and nature. At the same time, however, Tolstoy considers that the war as liberation is justified and necessary for guarding people's nation, otechestvo in Russian. What the writer attempts to show from this novel, however, goes beyond the simple descriptions which were done above. Leo Tolstoy successfully offers and what he tries to show in the long run is that how people go through all kinds of sufferings and hardship and their spiritual resurrection, thereby leading to the vital force making history. For the writer, the essential force that makes history and people's lives is not heroic military leader like Napoleon, but those common people. And the novel serves a wonderful prelude expecting the Decembrist revolt in 1825, because all of the vital and active streams that Tolstoy emphasizes turn out true in Russian history.

• 융합보안논문지
• /
• 제14권3_1호
• /
• pp.55-63
• /
• 2014

인류의 역사는 전쟁으로 점철되어 왔으며 지금 이 순간에도 전쟁은 벌어지고 있다. 이러한 전쟁을 대비하기 위해 전쟁사연구를 하고 있으며 그 중요성은 크게 세 가지로 요약 할 수 있다. 첫째, 전쟁을 이해하여 예측하고, 둘째, 상황변화에 맞는 교리를 개발하며, 간접 전쟁경험을 통해 전술전기를 연마하는 것이다. 현재 2년제 부사관 학과의 전쟁사교육 역시 전쟁사연구를 통해 교훈을 도출하여 대비능력을 배양해 나가는 교육과정이 무엇보다 중요하다고 할 수 있다. 교육을 통해 간접경험을 함으로써 장차 직책수행 시 그 능력을 배가 할 수 있기 때문이다. 이러한 관점에서 본고에서는 대부분의 학생들이 졸업 후 초급간부로 임관 할 2년제 부사관 학과에서 현재 시행하고 있는 전쟁사교육 내용 및 방법이 적절한가에 대하여 알아보고 향후 적용할 전쟁사교육 발전방안을 제시하고자 한다.

• 안보군사학연구
• /
• 통권2호
• /
• pp.165-200
• /
• 2004

A look back at the history of war reveals that leaders/nations which were able to recognize beforehand the change in weaponary or the concept of implementing war achieved victory in war(battle) while those that were not able to do so lost. Along with the development of civilization, so too did the characteristics of war : from the first wave of war (ancient, Napoleon's war)$\rightarrow$ the second wave of war (The first and second World War) $\rightarrow$ to the third wave of war (The Gulf War, and the War in Iraq). Especially notable was the American led victory earned in the Afghanistan and Iraq wars which applied the Rapid Decisive Operations(RDO) concept according to the Effects Based Operations(EBO) following the Gulf War and 9.11. This is the time when methods of warfare is changing through development in military science technology and military innovation and when the change of the defense paradigm including those of the Korea - U.S. alliance is required. We should therefore prepare for the future by delving into the analysis of American Modern warfare and learn from it.

• 한국언론정보학보
• /
• 제40권
• /
• pp.80-113
• /
• 2007

이 연구는 한국 언론의 전쟁취재 역사를 간략하게 살펴보고, 실제로 전쟁취재를 했던 현직 기자들을 만나 전쟁취재 활동 과정에서 제기될 수 있는 문제점과 그 개선방안을 탐구한다. 한국 언론의 전쟁취재 역사는 50년 이상 되었지만, 취재과정의 노하우가 부족하고 취재활동에 필요한 여러 가지 여건의 개선은 이루어지지 않은 실정이다. 무엇보다도 전쟁특파원들은 한국 언론들이 전쟁취재를 위한 체계적 준비과정 없이 관습적으로 기자를 파견한다는 점을 주요 문제점으로 지적하고 있다. 또한 전쟁취재 기자들은 자신이 처한 환경과 개인적 경험만을 토대로 전쟁 상황을 생색내기 식으로 보도하는 경우가 많다. 전쟁취재 경험이 적은 기자들을 갈등 지역에 파견하는 것도 전쟁취재의 문제점으로 지적됐다. 이러한 문제를 극복하기 위해서는 먼저 한국 언론들이 제한된 환경에서도 생생한 취재활동을 벌이기 위해 중동지역의 국제전문가와 분쟁 전문기자 또는 특파원을 두어 이들을 체계적으로 교육하고 관리할 필요가 있다.

• 미국학
• /
• 제44권2호
• /
• pp.131-158
• /
• 2021

This paper examines how nation-specific history of Asian war brides affects different representations of war brides in Velina Hasu Houston's Tea (1984) and Julia Cho's The Architecture of Loss (2003). While war brides had long been excluded from American history, Japanese war brides were brought to public attention in the 1980s. Korean war brides, on the other hand, were kept out of sight until the 2000s. Focusing on how this time gap is related to ethnic difference, this paper analyzes dramaturgical differences between the two plays such as the presence/absence of war bride on stage or ethnic solidarity/familial reconciliation as the main device of war bride memorialization. Such differences, the paper suggests, stem from ethnic/historical differences between Korean and Japanese war brides. Through historical interpretations of the plays, this paper argues that America's military relationships with Korea and Japan were reproduced within the Asian-American families of each drama in ways that raise questions about pan-Asian identity.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제12권11호
• /
• pp.100-109
• /
• 2012

전쟁의 역사는 국가의 정체성과 시대의 사회 상황을 제시해 준다는 측면에서 모든 집단에게 관심 있는 주제이다. 따라서 전쟁은 문화산업의 중요한 소재가 되었고, 전쟁영화는 다양한 양상으로 전장을 재현하며 우리에게 사회를 이해하는 중요한 서사를 제공하였다. 이 연구는 전쟁영화의 유형적 분석을 통해 영화 속에 나타난 전쟁의 양상과 재현을 살펴보는데 그 목적이 있다. 전쟁의 양상과 그것의 사회적 영향을 비교하기 위해서는 보다 포괄적인 재현의 개념에 접근할 필요가 있다. 따라서 전쟁을 소재로 한 국내 외 전쟁영화들 중 연구주제에 맞춰 전쟁영화의 유형을 분류하고 분석대상에 맞는 영화를 자료체로 선택하였다. 이를 바탕으로 전쟁의 재현이 영화 속에서 어떠한 모습으로 투영되고 묘사되고 있는지와 그 내용들이 전쟁의 양상을 어떻게 반영한 재현인 것인가를 살펴보았다.