• 지식경영연구
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.57-84
• /
• 2021

본 연구는 21세기형 초경쟁 환경에서 지속가능한 경쟁우위를 위해 전략적 자원인 기술자원을 보호하기 위한 기업의 시도에 영향을 미치는 요인들을 실증 연구한다. 이를 위해 본 연구는 전략경영의 자원기반관점과 거시 조직이론의 관점에서 기업들이 불확실하고 급변하는 환경에 대응하여 신속하고 강력하게 자신의 혁신적 기술을 보호하는 동시에 경쟁자들의 기술탐색을 제한할 수 있는 제도인 '우선권주장출원'이라는 기술보호전략의 실행에 영향을 미치는 시장 환경요인들을 분석한다. 본 연구에서는 기업들이 특허출원이라는 기술혁신 성과를 보호하기 위한 일반적 전략을 넘어서서, 더 강력한 경쟁전략인 우선권주장출원을 왜 선택하는지, 그리고 이 강화된 기술자원 보호전략이 어떻게 경쟁자들을 견제할 수 있는지에 대해, 대표적인 초경쟁 산업인 대한민국 하이테크 전자기업들 특허데이터와 재무데이터를 이용하여 실증 연구한다. 1994년부터 2008년까지 우리나라 하이테크 전자기업들이 출원한 특허출원 데이터와 재무데이터를 기반으로 한 실증분석의 결과, 기업들의 우선권주장출원전략을 실행하는 것은 외생적 충격과 환경불확실성에 의해 부정적인 영향을 받는 반면, 시장변동성에 의해 긍정적인 영향을 받는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 각 기업의 지위는 위 세 가지 요인들의 영향을 약화시키는 방향으로 조절효과를 가지는 것으로 나타났다.

• 기술경영경제학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 기술경영경제학회 2002년도 제20회 동계학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.183-203
• /
• 2002

The governments investment in R&D has rapidly increased so that a comprehensive and coherent approach to resource allocation has necessitated. Therefore the need for priorities in science and technology has been increased according to growing resources to science and technology. This study presents the methodology, process and results of priority-setting of national strategic technologies(IT, BT, NT, ST, ET, CT) through which 77 national key technologies are selected based on the criteria. Specifically it is intended to identify strategically necessary areas of focus for R&D, help leverage limited resources most effectively, and help coordinate government R&D activities by supplying ministries with a common set of priorities.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제35권3호
• /
• pp.24-31
• /
• 2012

Priority rules or sequencing heuristics conventionally used to determine resource allocation is to maximize the earned value on time and cost. This study provides a effective strategy-oriented approach for the program resource management problem with limited same resource, which systematically connects individual project objectives to the overall organizational goal, by introducing financial values as well as priority rules in a broader context. It deals with the resource allocation problem as the decision making problem in the strategic management paradigm to meet business objective and solves it using the analytic hierarchy process, and explains the method of application and usefulness through some simulation cases.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제37권6호
• /
• pp.709-718
• /
• 2013

In this study, AHP analysis was conducted through a survey that was organized by 9 job categories. The results show that sustainable operation risks have the highest priority level among all criteria with management interest having the highest priority level within sustainable operation risks related attributes. The most important risk attributes among stakeholder risks appeared to be asset security and cargo and conveyance security, with education and training being the most important among regulatory risks. Effective management and response to the risks from export controls on strategic trade require an understanding of supply chain security and compliance programs, effective training programs, investments for development of security systems that meet international standards. In addition, the government needs to focus on developing professionals and providing support for companies with compliance programs, working closely with businesses.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제35권3호
• /
• pp.217-224
• /
• 2012

This study is to review strategic priority for Defense Quality Management Factors of the Defense Agency for Technology and Quality. It is necessary to decide which quality factors are more important and which quality factors are relatively less important. In this study, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method was used in assigning the factors' weights. The survey of fifty one members participated in Defense R&D Programs showed that the Consistency Ratio was under 0.1 in evaluation items and factors.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제11권9호
• /
• pp.3196-3203
• /
• 2010

지역산업 지원사업은 지역환경의 여건과 제도적 변화와 더불어 지난 10년 동안 꾸준히 확대되어 왔다. 특히 정부주도의 산업정책에서 지역주도의 산업정책으로 패러다임이 변모하면서 지역 전략산업 및 특화산업 육성, 기술지원, 기업지원 사업 등 지역산업 육성을 위한 다양한 지원체계를 갖추게 되었다. 그동안 지역 내에서 다양하게 전개된 지역산업 지원사업의 성과와 효율성에 대한 필요성이 제기되면서 지역전략산업 육성정책을 중심으로 통합적 관점의 종합발전계획과 사업추진전략의 중요성이 부각되었다. 지역산업 지원사업의 총체적인 맥락에서 중복사업의 조정과 핵심역량을 집중적으로 관리하고 수요자 중심의 지원체계에 대한 프레임을 수립하는 것이 시급하다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 성과중심의 자율적 지역사업 포트폴리오를 구성하고 지역 전략산업의 특성 및 지원사업 유형에 따른 지역산업 육성 투자우선순위 도출을 위한 의사결정모형을 설정하여 검증하는데 그 목적이 있다. 본 연구는 충남전략산업 지원사업의 투자우선순위 의사결정을 위해 충남지역의 전략산업 및 지역산업 지원사업을 대상으로 AHP분석을 통해 전략산업과 지원사업유형별 투자우선순위를 도출하였다. 연구결과 전략산업 및 사업유형에 따른 중요도의 차이를 발견할 수 있었다. 즉, 사업유형의 우선순위가 전략산업에 따라 다르게 나타나는 것으로 볼 때 획일화된 기업지원 정책에서 벗어나 전략산업이나 기업규모에 따른 차별화된 기업지원 정책의 다양성이 요구된다는 것을 알 수 있다. 체계적인 정책수립 및 지원을 통해 기업의 경쟁력 강화 및 지역경제 활성화에 기여할 수 있도록 전략산업을 집중육성하고 차별화된 지원정책을 개발해야 할 것이다.

• 무역학회지
• /
• 제47권3호
• /
• pp.17-35
• /
• 2022

The Pandemic crisis caused by COVID-19 has raised awareness of the importance of supply chain risk management, such as the control of movement between countries and the simultaneous manufacturing paralysis in the world. Effective risk management within the supply chain of the company is a core competency in the global environment. Therefore, this study quantitatively analyzed the perspective of domestic large corporations and small and medium enterprises (SMEs) by using the hierarchical analysis method (AHP) to identify the factors that should be considered as the priority when establishing supply chain risk management plans for large and small business employees. In order to conduct the study, a survey was conducted on large corporations and small and medium enterprises in Gyeongnam and Busan, and AHP analysis was conducted using Microsoft 365 excel program. In addition, Mann-Whitney U test (independent sample-nonparametric test) was conducted using SPSS/18 version of statistical package program for comparative analysis between groups. As a result, the priority was highly evaluated in the order of financial ability, competitiveness, disaster in the overall priority evaluation. There were statistically significant differences in internal risk and strategic decision making of supply chain between groups. This suggests that fandemics such as COVID-19 can not be predicted, but strategic responses are needed to utilize opportunities expressed in the crisis through supply chain risk management and to increase the competitive advantage of domestic companies even in the crisis.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.25-54
• /
• 2005

In this study, priority setting model of new promising IT industries which will be the growth engines for the Korean IT industry, was established. Based on the AHP model, priority setting of IT new promising IT industries was conducted. Firstly, the selection cases of the new promising IT industries and major priority setting methodologies including the AHP methodology, were analyzed. The AHP model was selected as the most feasible methodology for priority setting of the new IT industries, among the various priority setting methodologies. Secondly, in setting up the AHP model for prioritization of the new promising If industries, a 'goal' was established to be priority setting of the new promising IT industries, and an 'alternatives' to be 18 new promising IT industries. Then a logical and a systematic assessment criteria including 5 main criteria('Technological Innovation', 'Market Ability', 'SPin-off Effect', 'Public Benefit', 'Strategic Importance') and 14 sub-criteria, were developed for priority setting of the 18 new promising industries. Finally, with the AHP model, the substantial analysis was made to set up priority of the 18 new promising IT industries. The substantial analysis showed the following priority setting results and implications for the 18 new promising IT industries.

• 한국국방경영분석학회지
• /
• 제30권2호
• /
• pp.122-132
• /
• 2004

The aim of this paper is to show the process of R&D Project-Priority Ordering in the Defense Technology field. We propose specific methods (Delphi, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Scoring) to order the R&D Project-Priority. In general, to decide the priority of R&D projects most of researches depend on questionnaires which are surveyed by experts. However, it is criticized that this process cannot reflect the limitation of experience and knowledge of experts. In this process, we separate evaluators in two parts: the first is strategic experts, the second is technical experts. Evaluators can choose and evaluate the alternatives which they are familiar with, so we can obtain reliable results. Finally, based on our process of the R&D Project-Priority Ordering we formulate policy implications for managing the defense technology.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제42권2호
• /
• pp.235-251
• /
• 2014

Purpose: To develop efficient PL response system, SMEs should decide which component of PL response system is important and implemented with priority under limited resources. To accomplish this goal, we propose strategic priority components of PL response system for SME manufacturer. Methods: We categorize the components of PL response system based on prior research results - System, Organization, Training, Technology, Cost, and Awareness. AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is applied to extract important components of PL response system, which is used in assigning the priority of component. To analyze effects of each components, performance sensitivity analysis is applied. Results: The survey analysis results show Technology is the most important components. Organization and Cost component are follows. As the importance of Technology is changed, we can find Organization, Cost is second and third important components. Conclusion: Our research shows Technology which is related to make a safe product with systematic process, is a basic enabler of PL response system. Also, building a PL team and securing a budget for PL activity should be carry out with limited resources.