• 산업공학
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.171-177
• /
• 2000

The Six-Sigma is now common word as a management innovation in every business. Many companies have practiced to the TPM in Korea. These companies have regarded the Six-Sigma as a new approach or redundant strategy for management. This paper suggests a model which contains how to unite TPM and Six-sigma to make a big synergy effect for the company which is on developing of TPM. This model based upon SAMSUNG CORNING as a process industry.

• 경영과정보연구
• /
• 제4권
• /
• pp.557-572
• /
• 2000

Nowadays, after beginning of 21 centuries, owing to simplify market, the world is in the era of an influx of new paradigm that requires infinite competition. The manufacturing industries of Korea are in need of casting off high cost and low efficiency structure. The forfeiture of competition is resulted from the lost of level in quality of product. Today, the achievement of competitive product quality is coming from the following factors, that is., quality control, quality of service, marketing, human resources, finance, etc., together with process management. While Six Sigma, a newly introduced method to achieve process qualify outcome by sector of enterprise, is now being enjoyed a high reputation as a key device for competition by superiority enterprises in the United States, it has not been introduced sufficiently in the domestic enterprises yet. In our research, we, first of all, organized systematically the materials being released up to now. Furthermore, we looked over case studies of the American enterprises that apply Six Sigma strategy very successfully. Finally, we discussed the situation of domestic enterprises which are about to importing Six Sigma strategy as well as main causation of success by adopting it. While the enterprises approach Six Sigma strategy not in the way of on time and short term but in the way of long term, consistent renovation and persistent innovation we can assure that they will produce the highest quality and globally competitive products which are second to none.

• 대한안전경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한안전경영과학회 2005년도 추계학술대회
• /
• pp.19-29
• /
• 2005

Since 1980's, many enterprises have constructed Strategy Information System and tried BPR, ISP. Also, they implemented ERP and practiced the Process Innovation and Six Sigma for Management Innovation in todays, Although most companies had provious good plans, but those are not satisfied. Because of failed to change management and continued next activity. Many Project for Process innovation are ended as disposal project in many case, if they want next project, they need a new plan which needs additional fund and re source. This paper studied Process Innovation and Six Sigma in many things and proposed new model for continued project on the master plan. Also it proposed next study subject about ERP Optimization and Harmonization after implemented ERP which is considered as next step of PI.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제11권3호
• /
• pp.121-129
• /
• 2009

Today, many companies will be isolated in competition if they do not have competitive power to overcome quick change and big crisis of market. Nowadays, globally high-grade companies have done their best for increasing their competitive power through a many kinds of methods in keen competition for making of pacesetting position. This study focuses on distribution with the domains like capacity, layout, amount of location, assignment of product, operation procedure and operation rule in order to improve these domains, we make a further application of eight analysis ways based on DMAIC method for improving operation of processes of distribution center as the third profit source. The purpose of this study is to seek an approach that can easily adopt of Lean Six Sigma in operational management of distribution center by a kind of data, analysis method and template.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제8권5호
• /
• pp.119-130
• /
• 2006

Since 1980's, many enterprises have constructed Strategy Information System and tried BPR, ISP. Also, they implemented ERP and practiced the Process Innovation and Six Sigma for Management Innovation in todays. Although most companies had previous good plans, but those are not satisfied. Because of failed to change management and continued next activity. Many Project for Process innovation are ended as disposal project in my case, if they want next project, they need a new plan which needs additional fund and resource. This paper studied Process Innovation and Six Sigma in many things and proposed new model for continued project on the master plan. Also it proposed next study subject about ERP Optimization and Harmonization after implemented ERP which is considered as next step of PI.

• 한국건설관리학회논문집
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.88-100
• /
• 2010

국내외적으로 기업 간 경쟁은 점점 심화되고 있으며, 경쟁에서 살아남기 위하여 경영혁신전략 방법 중 하나인 6시그마를 도입하는 기업들이 늘어나고 있다. 이런 추세에 맞추어 6시그마는 전략적인 측면과 방법론적인 측면 모두에서 끊임없는 변화를 거듭하고 있다. 그러나 6시그마의 초기 방법론의 선정부터 프로젝트 수행 과정에서 적용된 프로세스의 효과 검증 및 사후관리 체계가 미흡하며, 그 수행 절차가 복잡하고 번거로움이 있어 개선 대상 선정과 수행과정에 있어 다수 기업 내에서 부서 간 협조가 아직까지도 매우 미흡하다고 할 수 있다. 이런 문제점들을 해결하기 위해서는 6시그마가 기업 내 경영혁신의 중심에 있는 상황에서 전사 확산과 전 직원의 참여를 위하여 보다 쉽게 배우고 활용할 수 있는 방법론에 대한 연구의 가속화가 절실한 것으로 판단된다. 이에 본 연구에서는 건설실무 중 6시그마 DMAIC 방법론이 적용된 사례분석을 통해 Measure 단계에서는 잠재인자에 대한 낭비요인 규명방법의 적용을 실시하였으며, Improve단계에서는 기존의 불필요한 단계를 축소함으로써 보다 효율적인 6시그마 적용 프로세스를 개발하여 제시하고자 하였다. 이를 적용한 사례 분석 결과 Measure 단계에서는 낭비요인을 통한 잠재인자 도출이 가능했으며, Improve 단계에서는 같은 결과 값을 유지하면서 기존 프로세스보다 단축된 단계로 개선프로세스의 수행이 가능하였다. 이때 Improve 단계의 축소는 6시그마 프로젝트의 개선효과에는 별다른 영향을 주지 않기 때문에 실제로 6시그마 프로젝트 수행 속도가 매우 향상 될 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제37권3호
• /
• pp.54-64
• /
• 2009

This study conducts an empirical analysis of how the suggestion activity, most widely used in quality control activities, interacts with the dimensions of learning organizations. The study also attempts to analyze the results of Six Sigma based on sub-dimensions of learning organizations, which are infrastructure, culture and system. In order for learning and innovation to take place in implementing a Six Sigma program, the organizational infrastructure and culture are created and sustained and then, a learning organization system would become effective. In this study, a empirical model is used to demonstrate such an association. The sample consists of 134 organizations who have implemented a Six Sigma program for more than three years. Using the version 16.0 of AMOS for structural equation modeling, the study estimates the structural equation model that has a Six Sigma organization's infrastructure, culture and system as independent constructs, the suggestion system as a mediator, and the performance of Six Sigma projects as a dependent construct.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제10권8호
• /
• pp.2068-2077
• /
• 2009

6시그마 프로젝트 관리 시스템은 6시그마 추진기업의 지식경영 시스템으로 활용되어 왔지만 벨트의 프로젝트 관리 시스템 활용이 프로젝트 성과에 미치는 영향에 대한 실증적 연구는 전무한 상황이다. 따라서 본 연구는 6시그마 프로젝트 관리시스템의 활용이 프로젝트 균형 성과지표에 미치는 영향을 구조방정식 모형을 통해 실증적으로 분석하였다. 연구 자료의 결과에 의하면 프로젝트 시스템의 활용은 6시그마 프로젝트 학습과 성장관점에 영향을 미치고, 학습과 성장 관점은 내부 프로세스 관점과 고객관점에 영향을 미치는 결과로 나타났다. 내부 프로세스는 고객관점 지표에 영향을 미치고 고객관점 지표는 재무성과에 영향을 미치는 분석의 결과가 도출되었다. 내부 프로세스는 재무성과에 직접적인 인과관계가 없는 것으로 귀결되었다. 연구모형과 더불어 대안모형 분석이 추가로 이루어졌는데 연구모형이 대안모형보다 모형 적합도에서 나은 것으로 나타났다.

• 대한산업공학회지
• /
• 제32권4호
• /
• pp.298-313
• /
• 2006

Six sigma is focused on quality improvement through variation reduction, while lean is on process flow improvement and lead time reduction by waste elimination. However, lean cannot bring a process under statistical control and six sigma alone cannot dramatically improve process speed. Lean six sigma was developed to achieve faster rate of improvement in customer satisfaction, cost, quality, process speed, and invested capital. In this paper we present the importance of using value stream mapping and suggest a guideline on how to integrate lean and six sigma by is proposed.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제27권4호
• /
• pp.266-279
• /
• 1999

Today, Companies are facing the harsh realities of a competitive environment. This is no time for revolutionary change. Instead, Companies are instituting revolutionary change meant to have impact within a very short time frame. Bold steps are required to lead the industry into a future of improved efficiency and significant productivity gains. GE, as well as Intel, Motorola, and other companies adopted a program called Six Sigma, in order to make fundamental changes in the way the company operated to fulfill customers'expectations. Six sigma reduces the occurrence of defects from a 3 sigma level of 66,800 defects per million to a 6 sigma level-less than 4defects per million. The goals and metrics of the company's Six Sigma process clearly have had a positive effect on customer satisfaction and customer perception of the company.