• 한국기술혁신학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국기술혁신학회 2004년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.98-112
• /
• 2004

Nowadays science and technology analyses appeared as standing on the basis of the scope and quantity of literature in the field of rapidly progressed science and technology. And using both of them, it is named 'bibliometric'\;or\;'scientometrics'. These analysis results answer emergence in science and technology and provide researchers, responsible persons, technological information specialists, and planners with useful value. Accordingly, the purpose of this research is to suggest schematized change aspects and new research directions hidden in bibliographical phenomenon of a paper in the science and technology field to science and technology researchers and policy planners. For this, the field this paper researche is the next generation OLED field. The reason to choose this field is due to the importance of the next generation OLED, and wide scope connected by various fields. Besides, to measure application and technological fields by using bibliographical method and technology is as important as in a basic research field.

• STI Policy Review
• /
• 제5권2호
• /
• pp.20-42
• /
• 2014

The Brazil, Russia, India China and South Africa (BRICS) group has emerged as a collection of large economies which are outside the traditional groups of industrialised "first world" economies and which have altered the global distribution of economic power. The basis of their emergence is a combination of their size and growth rates, and the fact that they lie outside the established centres of global economic power. As such, they have "diversified" the power base of the global economic order. The question which is asked in this paper is whether the phenomenon of the BRICS goes beyond this to mark the start of a possible challenge to the neoliberal orthodoxy which emerged as the globally dominant policy paradigm since the collapse of the Soviet Union. This paper develops and uses a "modes of innovation" approach to explore the potential of the BRICS to constitute a structural rupture in the current globally dominant neoliberal mode of innovation. This question is important since, in the absence of this rupture, the remarkable development trajectory of the BRICS will serve to reinforce the legitimacy of the global orthodoxy. The paper first articulates the modes of innovation concept and then proceeds to locate the BRICS systems of innovation within the current globally dominant mode. On this basis it then provides an appraisal of the possible impact of the BRICS on the evolutionary path of the global system of innovation.

• STI Policy Review
• /
• 제4권2호
• /
• pp.19-40
• /
• 2013

The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) achieved relatively rapid economic growth over the past decade. Sustainable growth among member states, however, is put into question due to macroeconomic challenges, political risk, and vulnerability to external shocks. Developed countries, in contrast, have turned into less labor-intensive technologies to further expand their economies. In this paper, we review the science, technology, and innovation (STI) policies and statuses of the scientific and technological capabilities of the ASEAN member countries. Empirical results based on STI indicators (R&D spending, publications, patents, and knowledge economy indices) reveal considerable variation between the science and technology (S&T) competence and effectiveness of STI policies of ASEAN members. We have categorized nations into clusters according their situations in their S&T productivity. Under the Korean Innovation Model, Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, and Brunei are classified as being in the institutional-building stage, while Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, the Philippines, and Vietnam in the catch up stage, and Singapore in the post-catch up stage. Finally, policy prescriptions on how to enhance the S&T capabilities of the developing ASEAN countries, based on the South Korea development experience, are presented.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제20권8호
• /
• pp.115-121
• /
• 2022

Purpose: This article aims to explore the distribution of technological innovation and environmental policy challenges to respond to COVID-19. The study also attempts to tackle a paradigm shift in science and technology policies against the pandemic and a desirable direction for environmental policies. The COVID-19 pandemic has been the one that rapidly changed global people's lifestyle. For the spread of a terrible infectious disease could not be avoided, regardless of a highly industrialized society. Research design, data and methodology: This study basically employs a qualitative approach as a methodology. This study is based on the fact that environmental pollution, various natural disasters continuously occur, and there are many unforeseeable parts, despite remarkable development of scientific technology, and that the circumstances are becoming more complex. Results: This study noted that scientific technology civilization formed due to industrial revolutions can deteriorate environment and increase environmental threat factors. As an alternative to this, this study investigates alternative discussions on how the 4th Industrial Revolution can help scientific technology and human environment to harmoniously coexist and develop. Conclusions: It implies that this study focuses on the possibility of overcoming this crisis through science and technology innovation, although mankind is in crisis of COVID-19 due to excessive human development.

• STI Policy Review
• /
• 제1권3호
• /
• pp.53-68
• /
• 2010

This paper empirically evaluates the effects of regional and industrial R&D on the performances of individual firms in two separated stages: (1) the stage of technological outcome from R&D and (2) the stage of economic outcome from technological outcome. Technological spillovers are separated from negative congestion effects through the stage-specific estimation. The firm-level Korean Innovation Survey data merit in coping with the endogeneity problem inherent in the estimation of spillovers. The estimation results show that: (1) there exist significant R&D spillovers both in regional and industrial dimensions, (2) the hypothesized technological spillovers and economic congestion effects are both in effect, and (3) firms with smaller individual R&D investments show greater spillovers.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제17권4호
• /
• pp.763-785
• /
• 2014

사회에서 논의되는 과학기술혁신정책 이슈와 학술영역에서의 이론적 논의는 상호작용한다. 둘 사이의 상호작용을 이해하는 것은 보다 나은 정책을 제안하고 학술연구의 사회적 가치를 높이고자 하는 노력에 중요한 시사점을 제공해 줄 수 있다. 이런 배경아래 본 논문은 한국에서의 과학기술혁신정책 이슈와 학술연구 사이의 상호작용을 탐색하고자 주요 일간지와 학술지에 대한 질적내용분석을 수행했다. 연구를 통해 우리는 세 가지를 확인할 수 있었다. 첫째, 사회에서 단기간에 등장한 과학기술혁신정책 이슈를 대상으로 하는 연구들이 학술영역에서 뒤이어 등장했다. 둘째, 오랜 시간에 걸쳐 한국사회와 기술 하부구조에서 진행되어온 혁신시스템의 변화를 관찰하여 개념화 시킨 학술연구들이 과학기술혁신정책 이슈형성에 직간접적으로 반영됐다. 셋째, 과학기술의 사회적 역할과 전통 경제학 영역에서 다루어진 주제에 대해 현장에서의 과학기술혁신정책 연구수요가 존재하지만 아직 많은 연구가 이루어지지는 못하고 있다. 세 가지 연구결과는 정책입안자들이 한국에 필요한 정책과제를 발굴하고 연구자들이 새로운 연구대상을 확인하는 과정에 도움을 줄 수 있을 것이다.

• STI Policy Review
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.1-13
• /
• 2013

The Schumpeterian process of "creative destruction", associated with the emergence and diffusion of new radical, so-called "general purpose" technologies, has throughout history impacted wealth and income, jobs creation, jobs displacement, and the emergence and submergence of new hotspots of innovation. Emerging countries have benefited most from such a renewing of those societies' dynamics, leading them to higher levels of economic development and welfare. Doing so they have shown a remarkable capacity in moving upstream in the value chain, from outsourcing of manufacturing activities to autonomous process technology development, product development, design, and applied research. At the same time however, such Schumpeterian processes have now and then turned into exactly opposite processes of "destructive creation." Such processes seem to have become common among what could be called "submerging" economies: innovation only benefitting a few at the expense of many with as a result an opposite pattern of a long term reduction in overall welfare, productivity, and employment growth.

• 기술경영경제학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 기술경영경제학회 1997년도 제12회 동계학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.70-88
• /
• 1997

Recently, the interdisciplinary linkage between engineering and social science has received an increasing attention as an emerging education discipline. Due to intrinsic complexity of innovation process and heterogeneity of disciplinary nature, however there exists little, if not no, effort to draw a common framework in terms of educational scope and contents of the new subject. This paper presents a number of criteria and guidelines for building up new educational framework by integrating engineering subject and social science subject. Specifically, three neo-disciplines, technology policy, technology management, and economics of technology are considered since it is postulated that the forementioned disciplines have established academic identity and fundamental structure By nature, this paper is an exploratory and seminal one. It is not the purpose of this paper to provide a concrete table of contents of educational material. Instead, it merely brings up a discussion topic for the wide audience of academic arena, leaving the gradual consensus and convergence as future task.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제27권4호
• /
• pp.85-110
• /
• 2019

본 연구에서는 사회적 도전과제 해결을 임무로 설정하여 이론과 정책을 개발하고 있는 임무지향적 혁신정책론의 관점에서 사회문제 해결형 연구개발정책을 점검하고 그 시사점을 살펴본다. 이를 위해 시민사회의 참여, 정부의 동태적 능력의 확보, 선도적 투자와 후속 투자의 유도의 측면에서 '제2차 과학기술기반 사회문제 해결 종합계획'을 분석했다. 이 계획은 사회문제 해결형 혁신을 위한 시민참여의 제도화, 정부의 조정·통합능력 강화와 새로운 생태계 형성을 위한 제도들을 도입하고 있다. 그러나 기존 활동의 경로의존성이 있기 때문에 이를 넘어서기 위한 구체적인 프로그램이 요구되는 상황이다. 또 선도적인 투자를 이끌어내기 위해서는 커뮤니티 케어, 기후변화 대응과 같은 사회정책 분야의 전략 사업과 혁신정책을 통합적으로 전개하는 것이 필요하다.

• STI Policy Review
• /
• 제8권2호
• /
• pp.49-74
• /
• 2017

What are some of the explanations for cross-national diversity of foresight performance among technological followers? Why are some countries more successful than others in learning how to develop national innovation system foresight? This paper argues that the answers are linked to organizational capacities at three different levels: governmental, policy network and social learning. To corroborate this argument, the paper chose Iran and Korea as benchmarking partners, and attempts to find out what makes Iran a slow learner in building innovation system foresight. The conceptual model is an improved model of Saritas's, by integrating Borras' and Andersen's conceptions and classifications. The data are collected from comprehensive interviews in both countries and second-hand data of international indexes. The paper, finally, concludes that it is the weakness of analytical-systemic capacity that impedes and delays the emergence of systemic foresight in Iran, and that this weakness stems from the adverse impacts of the dominant institutions, surrounding the innovation system. The final point is that it is not sufficient for Iran to learn the methods and techniques of foresight from Korea. It should learn how to open its macro-policy towards the global market and design appropriate industrial strategy in a coherent policy-strategy portfolio.