Browse > Article

Interactions between Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Issues and Academic Research: A Case of the Qualitative Content Analysis on Major Newspapers and Academic Journals between 2008-2011  

Choi, Hyundo (조선대학교 경영학부)
Publication Information
Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society / v.17, no.4, 2014 , pp. 763-785 More about this Journal
Abstract
Science, technology and innovation policy (STI policy) is a result of the interactions between the social issues and academic research. Understanding the interactions of the STI policy between the social issues and academic research can throw some light on designing better policies and enhancing the social value of academic research. Thus, this paper explores the interactions of the STI policy between the social issues and academic research using the qualitative content analysis of major newspapers and journal articles in Korea. We have three major findings. First, on the one hand, academic research rose after uprising changes in the STI policy issues in the society. Second, on the other hand, social issues on STI policy were influenced by academic research reflecting the fundamental changes in the Korean innovation system and the nature of technology. Third, there are strong policy demands regarding the role of the STI policy for society and for traditional economic domains, but relevant research is scarce up to now. These findings contribute to uncovering the potential policy domains and agendas for policy makers and researchers.
Keywords
Science; Technology and Innovation Policy; Interactions; Academic Research; Newspaper; Qualitative Content Analysis;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Birkinshaw, J., Healey, M. P., Suddaby, R. and Weber, K. (2014), "Debating the Future of Management Research", Journal of Management Studies, 51(1): 38-55.   DOI
2 Borras, S. (2011), "Policy Learning and Organizational Capacities in Innovation Policies", Science and Public Policy, 38(9): 725-734.   DOI
3 Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2014), "Social Innovation: Moving the Field Forward. A Conceptual Framework", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82(0): 42-51.   DOI
4 Calero, C., Buter, R., Cabello Valdes, C. and Noyons, E. (2006), "How to Identify Research Groups Using Publication Analysis: An Example in the Field of Nanotechnology", Scientometrics, 66(2): 365-376.   DOI
5 Chaminade, C. and Edquist, C. (2006), "From Theory to Practice: The Use of the Systems of Innovation Approach in Innovation Policy", In Chaminade, C. and Edquist, C. (eds.), Innovation, Science and Institutional Change, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6 Chesbrough, H. W. (2003), Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Boston, Mass: Harvard Business Press.
7 Choung, J.-Y., Hwang, H.-R. and Song, W. (2014), "Transitions of Innovation Activities in Latecomer Countries: An Exploratory Case Study of South Korea", World Development, 54(0): 156-167.   DOI
8 Dacin, P. A., Dacin, M. T. and Matear, M. (2010), "Social Entrepreneurship: Why We Don't Need a New Theory and How We Move Forward from Here", Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3): 37-57.   DOI
9 De Bakker, F. G. A., Groenewegen, P. and Den Hond, F. (2005), "A Bibliometric Analysis of 30 Years of Research and Theory on Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Social Performance", Business & Society, 44(3): 283-317.   DOI
10 Ferrell, B., Virani, R., Grant, M. and Borneman, T. (1999), "Analysis of Content Regarding Death and Bereavement in Nursing Texts", Psycho-Oncology, 8(6): 500-510.   DOI
11 Hsieh, H.-F. and Shannon, S. E. (2005), "Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis", Qualitative Health Research, 15(9): 1277-1288.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Kim, L. (1997), Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea's Technological Learning, Boston, Mass: Harvard Business Press.
13 Kochan, T. A., Guillen, M. F., Hunter, L. W. and O'Mahony, S. (2009), "Introduction to the Special Research Forum--Public Policy and Management Research: Finding the Common Ground", Academy of Management Journal, 52(6): 1088-1100.   DOI
14 Ladi, S. (2005), Globalisation, Policy Transfer and Policy Research Institutes, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
15 Lengrand, L., Miles, I. and Quevreux, A. (2002), Innovation Tomorrow. Luxembourg, European Commission.
16 Leonhardt (2014), "The Quiet Movement to Make Government Fail Less Often", New York Times, (2014.7.15).
17 Martin, B. R. (2012), "The Evolution of Science Policy and Innovation Studies", Research Policy, 41(7): 1219-1239.   DOI
18 Morlacchi, P. and Martin, B. R. (2009), "Emerging Challenges for Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Research: A Reflexive Overview", Research Policy, 38(4): 571-582.   DOI
19 Mytelka, L. K. and Smith, K. (2002), "Policy Learning and Innovation Theory: An Interactive and Co-Evolving Process", Research Policy, 31(8-9): 1467-1479.   DOI
20 Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
21 OECD (2005), Governance of Innovation System, Paris, OECD.
22 Pawson, R. (2006), Evidence-Based Policy: A Realist Perspective, London: Sage.
23 Rainer, P., Cropley, B., Jarvis, S. and Griffiths, R. (2011), "From Policy to Practice: The Challenges of Providing High Quality Physical Education and School Sport Faced by Head Teachers within Primary Schools", Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 17(4): 429-446.
24 Rosengren, K. E. (1981), Advances in Scandinavia Content Analysis: An Introduction, CA: Sage.
25 Rothwell, R. and Dodgson, M. (1992), "European Technology Policy Evolution: Convergence Towards Smes and Regional Technology Transfer", Technovation, 12(4): 223-238.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Schuck, P. (2014), Why Government Fails So Often: And How It Can Do Better , Princeton: Princeton University Press.
27 Stiglitz, J. E. (1996), "Some Lessons from the East Asian Miracle", The World Bank Research Observer, 11(2): 151-177.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Stone, D. (2000), "Non-Governmental Policy Transfer: The Strategies of Independent Policy Institutes", Governance, 13(1): 45-70.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Tesch, R. (1990), Qualitative Research: Analysis Types and Software Tools, Bristol, PA: Falmer.
30 김병윤.정철우.김길선 (2011), "미국에서의 기술경영 논의의 진화: 한국에 대한 시사점을 중심으로", 기술혁신연구, 19(2): 129-152.
31 김석관 (2009), "개방형 혁신은 새로운 혁신 방법론인가?: Chesbrough 의 개방형 혁신이론에 대한 비판적 평가", 기술혁신연구, 17(3): 99-133.
32 김승혁.박용찬.최희정.박영수.고지현.엄혜진.최현도.정진주.김인혜.전민정 (2011), 산업기술정책 미래아젠다 연구, 서울: 인터젠컨설팅.
33 노풍두.조용곤.조근태 (2011), "조직의 창의성 수준 평가 모델 개발", 기술혁신학회지, 14(1): 109-138.
34 민철구.김병목.고상원.송성수.정근하.최영락.허현회.홍정임 (2006), 과학기술 정책연구 20년. 서울: 과학기술정책연구원.
35 송위진 (2002), "기술혁신정책의 진화와 기술혁신이론", 과학기술학연구, 2(1): 39-61.
36 송위진 (2012), 기술혁신정책의 진화와 과제, STEPI WORKING PAPER SERIES, 서울: 과학기술정책연구원.
37 양혜영.손석호.한민규.한종민.임현 (2011), "과학지도작성을 통한 미래기술 발굴 및정부 R&D의 동적 투자방향성 설정 연구", 기술혁신연구, 19(3): 1-29.
38 정선양.조성복.석재진 (2009), "정부출연연구기관의 창의적 인적자원 양성전략: 전주기적 인력관리의 관점에서", 기술혁신연구, 17(2): 187-206.
39 조인동.김남규.곽기영 (2012), "데이터 마이닝과 소셜 네트워크 분석을 통한 중심 학술 키워드 추천 방법론", Entrue Journal of Information Technology, 11(1): 87-99.
40 주상현 (2002), "한국 행정학 연구경향의 실증적 분석", 한국행정학보, 36(3): 39-55.
41 황혜란 (2011), "공공연구부문의 탈추격형 혁신활동특성 분석 및 과제: 대덕연구개발특구를 중심으로", 기술혁신학회지, 14(2): 157-176.
42 Bartzokas, A. and Teubal, M. (2002), "A Framework for Policy Oriented Innovation Studies in Industrialising Countries", Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 11(4-5): 477-496.   DOI
43 Beck, U. (1992), Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, London: Sage.
44 Bennett, C. and Howlett, M. (1992), "The Lessons of Learning: Reconciling Theories of Policy Learning and Policy Change", Policy Sciences, 25(3): 275-294.   DOI