• 과학기술정책
• /
• 제16권4호통권160호
• /
• pp.58-67
• /
• 2006

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.33-63
• /
• 2018

본 연구는 과학기술정책 연구의 정체성 파악과 개념 정립을 위해 과학기술정책 연구가 무엇을 연구하는 학문인가에 대한 해답을 구하고자 하였다. 따라서, 그 동안의 과학기술정책 연구가 어떻게 이루어졌는가에 대한 내용분석을 통한 연구현황과 네트워크 분석을 통한 과학기술정책 연구의 지식구조 및 지식흐름을 파악하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 1993년부터 2016년까지의 기술혁신학회지 및 기술혁신연구에 게재된 논문들의 데이터셋을 구축하고 실증분석하였다. 분석결과, 지금까지의 과학기술정책 연구는 서울 대전 지역, 대학 출연(연)에서 대부분의 연구가 수행되어, 특정 지역이나 연구수행 주체에 편중되기보다는 다양화된 형태로 수행되어야 할 것이다. 연구범위별로는 연구관리 및 기술혁신 분야에서 70% 이상을 차지하고 있어, 향후 '과학기술 공공관리' 및 '과학기술 정책과정' 등에서 더 많은 연구가 수행되어 균형 있는 학문 분야로 성장해 나아가야 할 것이다. 한편 과학기술정책 연구의 지식구조를 파악하기 위해 주제어를 활용한 네트워크 분석결과, 연구관리, 기술혁신, 과학기술 공공관리 및 정책과정 등으로 군집화되어 이찬구 김은미 오현정(2016)이 제시한 지식구조와 크게 다르지 않았음을 재확인할 수 있었다. 지식흐름을 파악하기 위해 정권별로 구분하여 시기별 분석을 수행한 결과, 초기 과학기술정책 연구는 연구자, 연구개발투자 등 일반적인 주제로부터 시작하여 최근 기술혁신체제, 연구성과 활용 등 다양화되고 세분화된 연구가 진행되고 있는 것으로 분석되었다. 따라서 향후 과학기술정책연구는 과학기술 정책과정, 과학기술 공공관리, 연구관리, 기술혁신 측면에서 더욱 확대되어야 하며 체계적인 지식구조를 형성해 나아가야 할 것으로 판단된다.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.1-32
• /
• 2018

이 논문은 2017년 현재, 우리나라에서 과학기술정책학 또는 과학기술정책 연구가 독자적인 학문 정체성을 가지고 있는가 하는 문제의식에서 수행되었다. 이를 위하여 국내에서 출판된 과학기술정책 관련 단행본 19권을 대상으로, 학문 패러다임 형성의 핵심요소인 학문적 정의와 핵심 연구범위의 논의 여부를 분석하였다. 연구결과는 현 시점에서의 우리나라 과학기술정책학은 패러다임 형성 이전의 단계에 머물러 있다는 잠정 결론을 내렸다. 이러한 결론에 근거하여 연구자들은 향후 과학기술정책학의 패러다임 완성에 필요한 학문적 정의와 연구범위를 새롭게 제안하였다. 과학기술정책학은 '과학기술 활동 및 과학기술과 관련된 정치 경제 사회 문화의 제반 현상을 연구 분석함으로써, (1) 과학기술 자체의 발전을 도모하면서 (2) 과학기술을 활용하여 국가와 공공 부문의 문제해결 능력을 높이고자 하는 정책지향적인 학문'으로 정의하였다. 과학기술 정책학의 '연구범위'는 (1) 과학기술 정책과정, (2) 과학기술 공공관리, (3) 연구관리, (4) 기술혁신의 4대 부문으로 제안하였다. 이 중에서 '과학기술 정책과정'과 '과학기술 공공관리'는 이 논문에서 제안하는 과학기술 정책학의 정의를 반영하는 새로운 내용이며, '기술혁신'과 '연구관리'는 기존 연구들도 대부분 포함하고 있는 과학기술정책학의 연구범위라고 할 수 있다.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제3권3호
• /
• pp.125-140
• /
• 2000

The paper studies on the cooperation between the humanities & social sciences and natural science & technology in 1990's. The article showed policy alternatives about the crisis of humanities & social sciences. That was science wars and we heard that was announced by Sokal affair. In this article, the author inquired into the Korean research policy's crisis and presented the policy alternatives about the crisis of humanities & social sciences and natural science & technology in various ways. In the concrete, the policy alternatives are cultural critique of technology and science and science & development of domain about interdisciplinary studies at the humanities & social science and natural science & technology. In conclusion, First, the author showed the appraisal and institutionalization of interdisciplinary studies. Second, the researcher proposed few policy alternatives and developmental area of interdisciplinary studies between the humanities & social sciences and natural science & technology.

• STI Policy Review
• /
• 제3권2호
• /
• pp.1-46
• /
• 2012

The paper assesses the innovative performance and challenges that a small innovative country like Sweden faces in an era of intense global competition. We contrast innovative performance with similar countries in Europe as well as discus the reliability and validity of indicators used to shape policy development. The conclusion from the analysis shows that available input-output indicators must be used with some caution. Even if the supply and quality of indicators has increased for policy analysis, they still lack precision and validity to make broad claims about the innovative performance of companies and nations. It is argued that understanding knowledge flows (rather than simple input-output metrics) are a key to understand innovation processes for small countries at the innovation frontier; subsequently, small countries will have to abandon failed policy orthodoxies in order to cope with future policy challenges.

• Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.87-109
• /
• 2022

The study attempts to examine the system-building activities of scientific institutions in developing the Molecular Diagnostic (MDs) Innovation System in India. Scientific Institutions are the precursor of any technological development with their capabilities in generating new ideas. MDs are advanced and accurate diagnostic technology with considerable scope to serve the diagnostic needs and requirements of the healthcare system. We adopted a System framework and analyzed the development of MDs in terms of the Technological Innovation System (TIS) functions, and the systematic challenges are assessed through the System Failure Framework (SFF). Based on the secondary and primary survey of prominent science base actors, the study finds that the role of government is crucial for facilitating technological development within a science base through the mobilization of resources. In India, the MDs technological development gained significant momentum over the last decade with the development of specialized human resources and dedicated research institutes. However, we do find that the innovative capabilities in attaining need-based TIS are sub-optimal owning to the specific diagnostic needs of highly burdened diseases in the society. The system analysis reveals that the TIS functions are underperforming because of the absence of a well-defined funding mechanism and goal-oriented targeted policy regime of the government. Since MDs have a transformative effect on the present healthcare system, we argue that the government has to address the system-based challenges and issues for developing a need-based technological innovation system for MDs in the country.

• STI Policy Review
• /
• 제1권2호
• /
• pp.69-88
• /
• 2010

This paper explores the determinants of the innovation impact of publicly funded R&D projects along three broad dimensions, namely project, firm and market-related factors. In addition to these factors we examine the attributes of the research result per se and aspects of the commercialization process. The observations from empirical and qualitative analyses are based on R&D projects funded by the Fifth and Sixth Research Framework Programmes of the European Union. Firm size, prior experience, innovation culture, the nature of the project itself, explicit intension to commercialize, consortium management and strategy are the factors with the strongest effect on project success, defined in terms of product/process innovation and/or technical knowledge creation. The paper provides important implications for the organization, objectives, and management of public programmes that fund R&D and for project and participant selection.

• 한국기술혁신학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국기술혁신학회 2006년도 추계학술대회
• /
• pp.483-494
• /
• 2006

The purpose of this study is to suggest the framework for innovation policy that the approach to popularization, diffusion, and S&T culture through the science and technology(S&T) fair. The innovation policy has a role which suggests direction to do behavior and concerns to social members. According to, this point of the diffusion of the S&T culture emerges the reasonable and adoptable innovation policy. Korean S&T fair have many problems, for example, a short historical background, lack of the fund and special human resource, so on. In this aspect, this study provides theoretical reviews and several issues for publicity of the innovation policy and S&T popularization and culture through the representative case-Future Tech Korea2006. Also, this study argues that "How to build and improve S&T fair", and "What the figure of S&T is that communicate and approach to people". Finally, the research for the S&T fair gives detailed and realized strategies for improving them.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제5권1호
• /
• pp.113-149
• /
• 1997

This paper, searching for the origin of the science and technology policy, is one of the research series on the original form of current S&T policy such as origin, evolution and changing patterns. Without understanding the origin, it is very difficult to understand the evolution and the current change of the policy. To answer this question, 2 kinds of conditions are set: 4 concepts for the origin of a policy and also 4 conditions for the S&T policy itself. As the origin of a policy, 4 concepts are set such as independence, continuance, diffusion and modern state as a policy body. Also as conditions for S&T policy, there may be 4 conditions such as policy targets, policy functions, administration body and the usage of the name of the policy. S&T can be distinguished as science, technology and S&T along it's development path. There, hence, are 2 origins of science and technology policy. French policy for modern science at the late 18th century and the establishment of the Agency of Science and Technology Policy of Japan in 1956 can be pointed out as the origin of the policy. The former can be called as the origin for natural science, and the latter as the origin for S&T. This study implies that new paradigm of S&T policy is a reflection for both the needs of new S&T and social needs. When there were big problems in a society and when there appeared new S&T, they exploited new S&T vigorously. This has been remained as a rememberable monuments in the history of the S&T policy.

• STI Policy Review
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.139-161
• /
• 2012

The United States National Innovation system has many distinctive aspects and its government research institutes (GRI's) play a variety of important roles within the overall system. This paper reviews issues pertaining to U.S. GRI's but within the broader concept of US science and technology policy. After presenting an overview of the GRI's in this broader context, the paper presents a brief historical analysis of changes in the roles and deployment of U.S. GRI's. After identifying unique features of GRI's (ones that separate the U.S. GRI's from other nations) the paper concludes by identifying the ways in which the U.S. experience may be relevant to other nations such as Korea. The lessons include the competition-cooperation with large-scale and multidisciplinary university research centers, the use of GRI's to promote sharing and efficiencies in fundamental scientific equipment and resources, and the ability of GRI's to accelerate the development of science and technology.