• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.252-263
• /
• 2015

우리나라는 2004년부터 지금까지 OECD 국가 가운데 자살사망률 1위이며, 지속적으로 자살자 수와 자살사망률이 증가하고 있다. 효과적인 자살정책을 확인하기 위해 AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) 기법을 이용하여 자살예방의 주요 접근방법별 세부정책들의 우선순위를 조사하였다. 설문은 2013년 8월 23일, 26일 두 차례에 걸쳐 총 30명을 대상으로 워크숍 형식으로 실시하였다. 이중 학계는 20명(사회복지사 4명, 정신보건학자 7명, 정신의학자 5명, 임상심리학자 4명), 정책결정자는 5명, 공급자는 5명이였다. 2013년 9월 9일부터 12일까지 4일간 이메일로 사회복지분야와 임상심리분야에서 각각 5명씩 추가하여 총 40명을 대상으로 조사를 하였다. 세부 정책들의 중요도는 '자살시도자 관리,' '공공자살예방서비스 인프라 구축,' '유가족 지원사업,' '위험집단의 위기관리' 등의 정책에서 높은 것으로 나타났다.

• 한국건설관리학회논문집
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.25-34
• /
• 2010

최근 건설 프로젝트는 규모의 대형화, 공정의 복잡함 등에 의한 리스크 인자의 발생이 증가하고 있다. 이로 인해 건설관리에서 리스크 관리의 중요성은 더욱 부각되고 있는 현실이다. 리스크 관리는 확인, 분석, 대응의 과정을 통해서 이루어지며, 분석과정에서 위험인자들의 중요도 및 우선순위를 객관적이고 정확하게 분석해내는 것이 리스크 관리의 성공여부를 좌우한다. 본 연구는 기존연구에서 건설 프로젝트의 공정 리스크 중요도 및 우선순위를 산출하는데 사용된 AHP 기법의 문제점을 보완하기 위하여 PROMETHEE를 활용한 정량적 분석 프로세스를 제시하였다. PROMETHEE를 사용함으로써 AHP 기법에서 분석대상 인자가 9개를 초과 할 때의 신뢰성 저하와 인자의 추가 또는 삭제 시 발생하는 복잡한 산출절차의 문제점을 보완할 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

• 한국건축시공학회지
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.147-154
• /
• 2002

In the Past, The selection of individual method of construction was done by head of construction site or an experienced person very frequently. By doing this, The wrong selection of construction method without exact adjudication of construction site situation lead to increasing of cost and extension of construction term. Finally it will effect all over the construction process. Especially, In case of underground construction in the beginning, there are a lot of a variable factor and it also effect on the entire construction process and it need very careful process. The purpose of this study is to present the best suitable methodology for selection of construction method by considering potential risk of construction method and variables together with external condition for underground construction. The purpose of this study Is to select the most suitable construction method by analysing potential conditions(construction site situation and client request in designing ) To do this, We prepared arrangement rule to arrange the conditions for construction method. And thin make checklist of the analyzing construction method. Though above process, To expect the risk of individual construction method using above risk checklist and using Analytic Hierarchy process among Multiple-Criteria Decision making, the professional opinions is to be adapted. By doing this, it can lead and select the most suitable construction method considering the data which get from risk density test.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제30권1호
• /
• pp.89-95
• /
• 2007

In general, reliability of AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) depends on pairwise comparison of evaluators. In addition, human judgment on the importance of alternatives or criteria is always imprecise and vague. To cope with these shortcomings, Fuzzy AHP is suggested and used widely recently. But in Fuzzy AHP, it cannot deal with the evaluator's various attitudes towards risk and confidence owing to evaluator's different expertise and experience. This paper proposes a method for consideration of evaluator's confidence and risk attitude in Fuzzy AHP. And suggested methods are applied various scenarios to verify the meaningfulness. The result shows that the priority of alternatives can be change through the consideration of evaluator's confidence and risk attitude.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2001년도 학술논문발표회
• /
• pp.99-117
• /
• 2001

In the past, The selection of individual method of construction was done by head of construction site or an experienced person very frequently. By doing this, The wrong selection of construction method without exact adjudication of construction site situation lead to increasing of cost and extension of construction term. Finally it will effect all over the construction process. Especially, In case of Underground construction in the beginning, there are a lot of a variable factor and it also effect on the entire construction process and it need rely careful process. The purpose of this study is to present the best suitable methodology fer selection of construction method by considering potential risk of construction method and variables together with external condition for Underground construction. The purpose of this study is to select the most suitable construction method by analysing potential conditions(Construction site situation and Client. Request in designing) To do this, We prepared arrangement rule to arrangement conditions for construction method. And then make Checklist the analyzing construction method. Though above process, To expect the risk of individual construction method using above risk checklist and using Analytic Hierarchy Process among Multiple-Criteria Decision Making, the professional opinions is to be adapted. By doing this, It can lead and select the most suitable considering method considering the data which get from risk density test.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제23권56호
• /
• pp.65-85
• /
• 2000

Industrial accidents have been consistently increased in terms of medical costs, lost work days, and incidence rates every year in Korea. Since the infrastructure of the industry changed shifts rapidly from 1980s in the developing countries such as South Korea, the nature and magnitude of the industrial accidents have also undergone a major shift. The situation is especially severe in small-to-medium sized industry(SMI). This article reports the development of a systematic evaluation system of risk factors specifically for the SMIs. The new approach introduced by this article is geared to the systematic identification and evaluation of the injuries from power press machines using the Analytic Hierarchy Process with the key evaluation data generated and evaluated by the employees on site. A total of 21 companies was studied and surveyed using the hierarchical structures of the cause-effect relationship of the mechanical injuries and their countermeasures. For the relative weighting of each risk factor, separate questionnaire survey was conducted for the selected workers from each company who had worked for more than 10 years in press work. Most participants (48 out of 62) replied that human attributes were the most significant factors for mechanical injuries fellowed by administration, machine, and work environment factors. The result also showed that the self-motivated risk assessment and safety enhancement activities would be an effective and efficient way of managing the risk factors in the SMIs.

• 감성과학
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.29-40
• /
• 2004

디자인에 있어서 율동요소는 제품디자인에 대한 소비자의 심미적 반응에 영향을 미치는 조형요소의 하나라는 점이 이론 및 실무적으로 폭 넓게 받아들여지고 있다하더라도, 다른 조형요소에 비하여 율동요소에 대한 연구는 상대적으로 많은 연구가 이루어지지 못하였다. 또한 율동요소에 대한 기존 연구들도 율동요소가 제품디자인에 있어서 심미성 요소의 하나라는 단순한 내용을 전개하고 있을 뿐 제품디자인에 어떻게 적용되어져야 하는지에 대한 통찰력을 제공해 주지 못하고 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 제품디자인에 있어서 율동감의 표현이 가격수준과 브랜드 위계수준에 따라 어떻게 소비자의 심미적 반응에 영향을 미치는지에 대하여 검토하였다. 연구결과에 의하면 율동감은 분명히 심미성에 영향을 미치고 있는 요소인 것으로 나타나고 있다. 또한 율동감의 표현은 낮은 가격수준의 제품에서는 브랜드 위계수준과 상관없이 소비자의 심미적 반응을 증가시키는 것으로 나타났다. 그러나 이와는 달리 높은 가격수준의 제품에서는 율동감의 표현이 인지적 위험으로 인해 소비자의 심미적 반응을 감소시키는 것으로 나타났다. 다만, 브랜드 위계수준이 높은 경우에는, 인지적 위험과 브랜드 명성과의 상쇄관계로 인하여 율동감의 표현이 소비자의 심미적 반응을 증가시키는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 본 연구의 결과는 디자이너들이 율동감 요소를 어떻게 이해하여야 하는지에 대한 시사점을 제공해 준다고 할 수 있다.

• Geomechanics and Engineering
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.57-81
• /
• 2015

Water inrush and mud outburst always restricts the tunnel constructions in mountain area, which becomes a major geological barrier against the development of underground engineering. In view of the complex disaster-causing mechanism and difficult quantitative predictions of water inrush and mud outburst, several theoretical methods are adopted to realize dynamic assessment of water inrush in the progressive process of tunnel construction. Concerning both the geological condition and construction situation, eleven risk factors are quantitatively described and an assessment system is developed to evaluate the water inrush risk. In the static assessment, the weights of eight risk factors about the geological condition are determined using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Each factor is scored by experts and the synthesis scores are weighted. The risk level is ultimately determined based on the scoring outcome which is derived from the sum of products of weights and comprehensive scores. In the secondary assessment, the eight risk factors in static assessment and three factors about construction situation are quantitatively analyzed using fuzzy evaluation method. Subordinate levels and weight of factors are prepared and then used to calculate the comprehensive subordinate degree and risk level. In the dynamic assessment, the classical field of the eleven risk factors is normalized by using the extension evaluation method. From the input of the matter-element, weights of risk factors are determined and correlation analysis is carried out to determine the risk level. This system has been applied to the dynamic assessment of water inrush during construction of the Yuanliangshan tunnel of Yuhuai Railway. The assessment results are consistent with the actual excavation, which verifies the rationality and feasibility of the software. The developed system is believed capable to be back-up and applied for risk assessment of water inrush in the underground engineering construction.

• Safety and Health at Work
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.180-183
• /
• 2018

Background: This research investigates the degrees of slipperiness felt by the participants who walk on contaminants applied to a floor surface to decide degrees of slipperiness for various contaminants. Methods: For the experiment, 30 participants walked on a floor to which six contaminants were applied. All participants took the analytic hierarchy process (AHP)-based slipperiness questionnaire survey for the six kinds of contaminants, and the results were compared with the coefficient of friction. Results: The results of slip risk from the AHP indicate that grease is the most slippery of the six contaminants, followed by diesel engine oil, hydraulic oil, cooking oil, water-soluble cutting oil, and water in a decreasing order of slipperiness. When the results of slip risk from the AHP are compared with the static coefficient of friction for each contaminant, the order of slip risk follows the same trend. Although the results of slip risk from the AHP coincide with the static coefficient of friction, further study would be needed to investigate this relationship. Conclusion: This study will contribute as reference material for future research on preventing industrial accidents that result in falls from high places due to slipping.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.117-130
• /
• 2008

Multi-attribute risk assessments provide a useful framework for systematic quantitative risk assessment that the security manager can use to prioritize security requirements and threats. In the first step, the security managers identify the four significant outcome attributes(lost revenue, lost productivity, lost customer, and recovery cost). Next. the security manager estimates the frequency and severity(three points estimates for outcome attribute values) for each threat and rank the outcome attributes according to AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process). Finally, we generate the threat index by using muiti-attribute function and make sensitivity analysis with simulation package(Crystal Ball). In this paper, we show how multi-attribute risk analysis techniques from the field of security risk management can be used by security managers to prioritize their organization's threats and their security requirements, eventually they can derive threat index. This threat index can help security managers to decide whether their security investment is consistent with the expected risks. In addition, sensitivity analysis allows the security manager to explore the estimates to understand how they affect the selection.