• 한국언론정보학보
• /
• 제17권
• /
• pp.7-36
• /
• 2001

로크의 자연권 이론 및 자연법 사상은 현대 언론사상에 많은 영향을 미치고 있다. 무엇보다도 자유주의적 언론입장을 이해하는 데 있어서 많은 시사점을 던져주고 있다. 본 논문은 로크의 사회계약론을 중심으로 로크가 자연권으로부터 이끌어낸 콜론자유의 본질이 무엇인지, 그리고 소유권과 언론자유간의 관계가 어떠한지, 로크의 시민사회에서 언론자유가 어떻게 실현될 수 있는지, 그리고 국가는 어느 범위까지 언론에 개입할 수 있는지를 중심으로 분석했다.

• 한국전산유체공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국전산유체공학회 2007년도 추계 학술대회논문집
• /
• pp.7-19
• /
• 2007

[ ${\Box}$ ] Biomimetics is the abstraction of good design from nature. ${\Box}$ Nature works for Maximum achievement at Minimum effort. ${\Box}$ When designing a new product, we can often find the right qualities and properties in a natural product.

• 한국시조학회지:시조학논총
• /
• 제20집
• /
• pp.5-27
• /
• 2004

이 글은 자연의 '말없음'을 상찬하는 일군의 작품들을 대상으로 하여 그 구체적인 의미를 밝히는 데 목적을 두고 있다. 이를 위해 오해와 거짓을 주요 소재로 삼고 있는 작품군들과 비교하였다. 자연의 말없음을 미덕으로 예찬하는 것은 세속의 언어가 지니는 허위성에 대한 반대 급부이다. 이는 세속과 언어를 동시에 부정함으로써 도달하게 되는 필연적인 귀결인 것이다. 세속은 인간의 이해 관계가 상충하는 삶의 공간으로서, 이런 곳에서 시비와 곡직을 따지는 것은 필연적이다. 이런 점에서 이들 시조에서는 자연이 삶의 원리로서가 아니라 현실의 반대항으로 자리하고 있다고 보는 편이 타당할 것이다 시조 시인들에 의해 자연의 말없음이 상찬된 것은 시비와 곡직의 초월이라는 현실적 욕망에 견인된 결과로 보는 것이 옳을 것이다. 따라서 적어도 시조 시인들에게 자연은 순수한 경물이 아니었다. 유교 사회에서 자연은 인간과 분리되지 않았고, 도덕의 자연화와 자연의 도덕화가 동시적으로 구조화되었기 때문이다.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• 제26권9호
• /
• pp.735-737
• /
• 1993

We have experienced a case of leiomyoma in the right upper lobe of the lung in a 56 year old female. Preoperative studies revealed the tumor nature as benign, and we chose right upper lobectomywith video-assisted thoracoscope rather than with the usual posterolateral thoracotomy. Postoperativehistological diagnosis was pulmonary leiomyoma which is a rare type of benign lung tumor.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제21권2호
• /
• pp.27-46
• /
• 2011

In the intellectual based society of the 21th century, intellectual property of nation and enterprise management has been the key element of nation's competitiveness and development. Therefore in countries like Korea, China, and many other countries, intellectual property of advancement strategy are being constructed and intellectual properties are protected at national level. Top priority task of protecting the intellectual property is to efficiently resolute intellectual property right disputes. Considering the nature of intellectual property right and arbitrage system, arbitration to solve intellectual property disputes is realistically the best method. However, not all cases of them are qualified. In order to relieve the intellectual property disputes through arbitration, qualification must be obtained. During the process, generally and globally, intellectual property right dispute is evaluated by three parts, intellectual property right contract dispute, intellectual property right violation dispute, and intellectual property right validity dispute. Based on UN's "Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards Agreement" in 1958, June 10th, in New York, both arbitrage organization and judgment can be approved in both Korea and China countries. However, as of today, there is a big gap of arbitration qualification between two countries, which can be troublesome if intellectual property right disputes arise. For instance, in Korea, intellectual property right contract disputes and intellectual property right violation disputes are both generally accepted as arbitration qualification. However for intellectual property right validity dispute, arbitration qualification is only accepted for non-registered intellectual property as in copyright entity. It does not apply to other registered intellectual property right as in patents. In China, arbitration qualification is accepted for intellectual property right contract dispute, and also accepted for intellectual property right violation dispute to copyrights but restricted to others. As for intellectual property right validity dispute, arbitration qualification is completely denied. Therefore, when there is an intellectual property right dispute between Korea and China, the biggest problem is whether China will accept arbitrage judgments made in Korea. Theoretically, arbitrage judgement made in Korea should be also accepted in China's court. However, considering the criticism of China's passive nature of arbitration qualification for its own local intellectual property right disputes, it's very unlikely they'll actively accept arbitrary judgment made in foreign countries. Korea and China must have a more open minded approach for intellectual property disputes and arbitration qualification. Base on WTO's Intellectual Property Right Agreement, it's being defined as private right. Therefore, sovereign principle should be the basic principle of solving intellectual property right disputes. Currently, arbitration qualification is expanding internationally. So both Korea and China must also follow the trend expand the arbitration qualification with a more open minded and forward looking approach, for the good of intellectual property disputes.

• 수산경영론집
• /
• 제11권1_2호
• /
• pp.115-155
• /
• 1980

Nowadays managers of fisheries enterprises and users of accounting information have a considerable interest in the fishery right. The fishery right, which is given by administrative quarters, is referred to exclusive fishing right in a certain coastal fishing ground, and it has been one of the property rights since the turn of the century. The main purpose of this study is to provide an improved accounting method of the fishery right from the side of accounting. To achieve this purpose, legal nature of the fishery right should be understood in the first place, for the fishery right, an intangible asset, is a sort of property right guaranteed by the fisheries laws, According to the basic law in the fisheries "Fisheries Law, " the fishery right is broken down largely into three categories; culture fishing right, set fishing right and common fishing right. The legal characteristics of these fishery rights are as followings: 1. The fishery right is a private right. 2. The fishery right is a property right. 3. The fishery right is a right in rem, and legal provisions pertaining to land are applied to the fishery right with necessary modifications. In addition to the above fishery rights, the Fisheries Law provides some provisions on the so-called entrance right, and those who obtained the right are authorized to access to a certain common fishing right fishing ground where they have been traditionally fishing. In the inland fisheries, the fishery right system similar to that of the coastal fisheries discussed above is adopted in conformity with the Inland Fisheries Developing and Expediting Law. Viewing from an angle of accounting, there are two kinds of additional fishing rights which are dealt as assets. These fishery rights dealt as asset include the license of entry in the so-called permitted fishing which is also called as fishery right in plain language, and tile entrance right obtained abroad. Although these two kinds of rights are not the fishery right from a viewpoint of law, they are regarded as fishing rights in accounting which intends to provide a useful economic information.formation.

• 패션비즈니스
• /
• 제18권4호
• /
• pp.66-79
• /
• 2014

Unlike other body arts, body painting illuminates the value of art using eco-friendly formative activity and natural environment and highlights the need of eco-friendly activity. However, although body painting has focused on forming right relationship between human beings and nature, there are few researches which are linked with nature art. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to argue the need to study body painting as nature art in connection with natural environment and analyze body painting according to nature art types. The study methods included both theoretical review and empirical review. The theoretical review examined the concept and characteristics of nature art through previous researches and literature and the empirical review looked into the types and works of nature art and applied them to body painting works. The results were as follows. First, an installation type was possible by arranging and attaching certain materials to the body. Second, a physical type was possible by representing body itself as the part of nature. Third, a symbolic type was possible by making body appearance as a some symbol based on artist's idea. Fourth, a sound type was possible by stimulating auditory hallucination using the nature of objects and sensing a sound. Fifth, an ecological type was possible by conveying the message of living things in nature to the body. Sixth, an interior type was possible by inducing indoor installation of works. Seventh, a poetic type was possible by making one feel a poetic inspiration expressed in nature using the mystery of the sea and a simple sequential pattern of floral leaves. Eighth, a drawing type was possible by adding artist's intentional hand with a pictorical technique. Ninth, a indigenous type was possible by reproducing South American indian's primitive style. The review of this study suggests that body painting works have been expressed in experimental and temporary arrangement like nature art in nature and can be applied according to nine types of nature art.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제71권
• /
• pp.37-58
• /
• 2016

CISG Article 50 contains the remedy of price reduction but limits it if the seller has a right to cure. Reduction of price presupposes that the seller delivers non-conforming goods, and that the buyer decides to accept them nevertheless. The remedy of price reduction differs from all other remedies provided in CISG with regard to it effects and to the time-limits. As to the time-limits, unlike Articles 46 and 49, Article 50 does not contain the element within a reasonable time. CISG imposes no period of time for his reducing the price. The buyer's right to declare a reduction of the price is expressly subject to the seller's right to remedy any failure to perform his obligations pursuant to Articles 37 and 48. The problem lies in determining from where to take the figures for comparing the value of the goods contracted and of those delivered. The price level in this place will usually determine his considerations as to resale or repair of the defective goods. The buyer must examine the goods, or cause them to be examined, within, as short a period as is practicable in the circumstances. The buyer loses the right to rely on a lack of conformity of the goods if he does not give notice to the seller specifying the nature of the lack of conformity within a reasonable time after he has discovered it or ought to have discovered it.

• 동양고전연구
• /
• 제35호
• /
• pp.243-274
• /
• 2009

본 연구에서는 "중용"의 내용을 중심으로 천인심성합일(天人心性合一)의 수양론(修養論)을 다루었다. 먼저 천인합일(天人合一)에 관하여 보면, "중용"에서는 천도(天道)의 의미를 중용(中庸), 성(誠), 성(性), 성(聖), 달도(達道), 도심(道心) 등으로 보고 있고, 인도(人道)의 의미를 중화(中和), 성지(誠之), 유(俗), 도(道), 교(敎), 달덕(達德), 인심(人心) 등으로 보고 있다. 천도는 우주의 생성, 운동법칙이며 이러한 천도는 사람에게 性을 부여한다. 이러한 천도를 이루기 위해서 인간이 마땅히 행해야만 하는 것이 인도이며, 사람이 인도를 수행하는 과정에서 인도와 천도는 합일된다. 다음으로, 심성합일(心性合一)에 관하여 보면, 이는 중화(中和)의 개념을 통하여 설명되는데, 사람이 마음을 바로 하여 정(情)을 올바로 발휘하는 것이 곧 성(性)과 합일이 됨을 말하는 것이다. 이와 같은 천인심성합일이 이루어지면 나타나는 그 공효는 수신이 기본이 된 구경(九經)으로 온천하가 다스려지는 것으로 설명할 수 있다. 천도와 인도의 관계 및 심과 성의 관계는 오달도 삼달덕 등 성(性)과 도(道), 교(敎)와의 관계로 설명되고, 구체적으로는 수신(修身)-사친(事親)-지인(知人)-지천(知天)의 관계로 설명되며 또한 도심(道心)과 인심(人心), 중화(中和)를 통한 심성의 합일로 설명된다. 그런데 천도와 인도의 합일, 심과 성의 합일을 이루기 위해서는 사람의 수양을 통하여 가능하다. 그 방법은 존심(存心)과 치지(致知)로 대표될 수 있고, 또한 신독(愼獨)과 계신공구(戒愼恐懼)를 통한 시중(時中), 충서(忠恕)와 택선고집(擇善固執)과, 심성합일(心性合一)의 방법으로 치중화(致中和)가 있다.

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
• /
• 제22권10호
• /
• pp.151-157
• /
• 2017

In the case of uploading privacy information of an information owner in the Internet, the information owner may want to deliver the privacy information itself or remove such information from the search list in order to prevent third parties from accessing the privacy information of the information owner. Such a right to be forgotten may collide with the freedom of expression of a third party. The right to be forgotten, which originates from the self-determination right on privacy information based on Article 10 and 17 of the Constitution and the freedom of expression, which is based on Article 21 thereof are all relative basic rights and are both limited by Item 2 under Article 37 of the same law, which is the general limitation provision for the basic rights. Therefore, when the right to be forgotten and the freedom of expression collides, it is not possible to give priority to one of the those unilaterally. It depends on the nature of the case at hand to find a natural balance for the harmonious solution for both parties. The criteria can be the sensitivity to the privacy of the information owner caused by the disclose of the privacy information, the public benefits such information may serve, the social common good that could be expected by the disclosure of the privacy information and the damages suffered in terms of the personal interest caused by the disclosure of the information, in a comprehensive manner.